RE: New Mercedes-AMG A45 S starts at £63k
RE: New Mercedes-AMG A45 S starts at £63k
Friday 28th October 2022

New Mercedes-AMG A45 S starts at £63k

Latest version of flagship hot hatch now 15k pricer than an entry-level Porsche Cayman


The Mercedes-AMG A45 has never been cheap, that’s for certain. Its maker had never attempted a proper hot hatch prior to the A45, which led to a swing-for-the-fences effort. The result was an all-wheel-drive super-hatch with an unprecedentedly powerful 2.0-litre turbo. It was not perfect, perhaps - but it was hugely better than the A-Class it was based on and eyeball-squashingly fast. The general public ate it up, regardless of the high price tag. In that regard, the latest version simply builds on what has gone before. 

Still, £63,140 is a substantial figure - especially for a car which has not accumulated any additional horsepower since last we saw it. You still get 421hp and a similarly preposterous amount of torque, which means you still get a 3.9-second-to-62mph sprint time. Plenty quick enough, perhaps, but let’s not forget that for just £5k more, you could buy a Porsche 718 Cayman GTS with a 4.0-litre flat six and solid claim to being the best sports car available for any money. Alternatively, while we await a final price in the UK, the new Honda Civic Type R will probably save you £20k. Both offer food for thought. 

Of course, the Mercedes-AMG faithful wouldn’t be wrong to stoutly reject either alternative. With the Audi RS3 very near the end, and BMW focusing its attention on coupe-shaped alternatives, the latest A45 could justly claim to sit atop its niche - especially with its styling refreshed and the new data-spewing AMG Track Pace app added to the latest infotainment system as standard. Not to mention a Mercedes-AMG performance steering wheel that adds rotating drive setting dials. Minor alterations, sure - but the car's customers haven’t been griping much about the fundamentals. 

And if the asking price still seems inexcusably large to you, the manufacturer will happily show you to the more cost-effective alternative. You’ll likely recall the A35 has been updated, too, earning a new 48-volt auxiliary power supply and associated belt-driven starter generator that ought to make pull aways even more effortless. Granted, with ‘just’ 306hp from its own 2.0-litre petrol motor, it can’t claim to be the heavy-hitter the A45 is - but that’s why Mercedes-AMG charges £17k less for the pleasure of owning one. The hatchback starts at £45,930, or you can have the saloon from £46,050. All are available to order now.


Author
Discussion

KD2020

Original Poster:

23 posts

118 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
I used to be a big A45 fan, but it's going slightly wrong.

Koyaanisqatsi

2,561 posts

60 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
It could cost £163,000 and it still wouldn't matter. These are almost always paid for on a monthly basis.

Wab1974uk

1,418 posts

57 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
They look far better without the Aero kit on.

Wonder how cars like these will last with ever increasing interest rates pushing up the monthlies.

Maybe what the world need at times like these (no doubt a hell of a lot worse next year) is a small affordable light hot hatch that's fun to drive? Oh no, Ford just canned it.

Edited by Wab1974uk on Thursday 27th October 16:37

whp1983

1,401 posts

169 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
I’ll take the Cayman, for the drive, looks, feeling and finally residuals and cost.

Whole idea of the hot or hyper hatch was to have something excellent, practical and critically much less expensive than a sports car….. just isn’t that anymore

ITP

2,764 posts

227 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
Who’s buying these? 63k for a A class!? How do the salesmen even keep a straight face when trying to sell one.

It’s like trying to sell a mars bar for £5. I suppose that could be 20p deposit and 10p/month for 4 years.

smithyithy

7,931 posts

148 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
Is it only the non-S version that can be bought without all the crap stuck on?

I do like the A-class but would prefer the AMG variant as more of a sleeper rather than being all shouty.

The early models seem to be really popular in my area recently, maybe moreso than Golf Rs and Audi S3s, the Merc's now the car of choice to race around 30mph roads at 60...

Alpenus

224 posts

60 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
Koyaanisqatsi said:
It could cost £163,000 and it still wouldn't matter. These are almost always paid for on a monthly basis.
is that a bad thing?

TyrannosauRoss Lex

36,729 posts

242 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
I may be wrong but I'm pretty sure that the A class has back seats and a half decent boot? Seems a bit odd to compare it to a Cayman? What's next, comparing a Mercedes S Class with a Caterham?

ChrisCh86

1,133 posts

74 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
Can anyone tell the difference between this and the pre-facelift?

Bonkers performance, but bonkers money too. No wonder 99% of "proper" AMG A-Classes are the A35.

MrGeoff

780 posts

202 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
ITP said:
Who’s buying these? 63k for a A class!? How do the salesmen even keep a straight face when trying to sell one.

It’s like trying to sell a mars bar for £5. I suppose that could be 20p deposit and 10p/month for 4 years.
Shouldn't be a problem with the incoming agency model, take your pick, pay your monthly fee.

jcdti

10 posts

76 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
On one hand: 63k for an A-Class is bum-clenching

On the other: 63k for a sub-four second 0-60 sprint isn't bad

Choose your angle, I guess!

Leon R

3,920 posts

126 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
whp1983 said:
I’ll take the Cayman, for the drive, looks, feeling and finally residuals and cost.

Whole idea of the hot or hyper hatch was to have something excellent, practical and critically much less expensive than a sports car….. just isn’t that anymore
When was that accurate?

Must have been prior to the MX5….

Dombilano

1,463 posts

85 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
My A45 was noisy, rode too hard, and attracted every sub 2 litre car driven by youths into trying to race me.

Plus it was too boosty, and just wasn't worth the aggro. Think it lasted about 5 months.

Of all the many cars I've owned, it would be below a R reg Fiat Bravo in terms of wanting it back. And for 60 odd grand, god no.

whp1983

1,401 posts

169 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
Leon R said:
When was that accurate?

Must have been prior to the MX5….
Yeah….Depends on definition of sports car too I guess

Silvanus

6,917 posts

53 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
Koyaanisqatsi said:
It could cost £163,000 and it still wouldn't matter. These are almost always paid for on a monthly basis.
Yep, very few cars are bought cash, most things are bought on some kind of rental scheme. I wouldn't have one if it was half the price.

Harrison Bergeron

5,444 posts

252 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
ChrisCh86 said:
Can anyone tell the difference between this and the pre-facelift?

Bonkers performance, but bonkers money too. No wonder 99% of "proper" AMG A-Classes are the A35.
It’s got 37% more imagine and 58.3% more pops and bangs.

Kid B

35 posts

68 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
Disgusting car. Ugly, laden with boy-racer vibe and with a chintzy blingy interior. I wouldn't buy it at any price and certainly not at Boxster/Cayman pricing.

I think Mercedes has disappeared so far up their own arses it's not funny.

VR6 Eug

832 posts

229 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
The Cayman is a far superior car, why would you buy a hot hatch over a proper sports car.

Draxindustries1

1,657 posts

53 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
So much you can buy with £63k , the depreciation on this will be massive . Even with a twin scroll turbo 400+ hp from just 2litres can't be a nice drive at low rpm.
A 4litre n/a flat six though picks itself up from any revs...

iphonedyou

10,422 posts

187 months

Thursday 27th October 2022
quotequote all
Koyaanisqatsi said:
It could cost £163,000 and it still wouldn't matter. These are almost always paid for on a monthly basis.
In most cases, monthly payments on a £163k car will be significantly higher than on a £63k car. So it does matter.