Poll:
Total Members Polled: 82
Discussion
Sensors are bleedin' annoying and bleep as I pass things like a bush as I back out of my drive. I know there are different tones, front and rear but I can never recall which is which. The proximity "map" is better.
I have a rear camera which is reasonably good but I still don't trust it and it's still hard to gauge how quickly that gap closes and how small it actually is. That said, it's better than my own sense of when I need to stop, I end up leaving a large gap. It is useful in reversing, however and using the lines to keep it on course.
I have a rear camera which is reasonably good but I still don't trust it and it's still hard to gauge how quickly that gap closes and how small it actually is. That said, it's better than my own sense of when I need to stop, I end up leaving a large gap. It is useful in reversing, however and using the lines to keep it on course.
CarCrazyDad said:
paradigital said:
essayer said:
Both, like normal cars have
This.ETA it also has a roof and bonnet made from tinfoil; perfectly nice car drive but it’s built to a very low budget as can be told by feeling the roof skin ripple as you run the wash sponge over it; doors are also as light as a sheet of paper. Very quiet inside at speed though.

ajprice said:
Sensors, camera, and those reflective things sticking out of the sides
.
My car has a rear camera and rear sensors. How well do the 360 cameras and top down view stitched together from the 4 cameras work for parking in real use?

Worked extremely well on my V60.
.My car has a rear camera and rear sensors. How well do the 360 cameras and top down view stitched together from the 4 cameras work for parking in real use?

Edited by parabolica on Tuesday 29th November 23:37
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





