Do I need glasses?
Discussion
I just stumbled across this on another thread and for the life of me I just can't see the attraction. Yes the performance is on another level and it's (probably) one of the best cars most people could hope to drive (so mega points for that, obviously) but... but... but... it's feckin' hideous! Seriously that is one ugly car - one that really is the automotive equivalent of a double paper-bag job


DodgyGeezer said:
I just stumbled across this on another thread and for the life of me I just can't see the attraction. Yes the performance is on another level and it's (probably) one of the best cars most people could hope to drive (so mega points for that, obviously) but... but... but... it's feckin' hideous! Seriously that is one ugly car - one that really is the automotive equivalent of a double paper-bag job

Point entirely missed, I think. This was created to get around the GT1 rules of the 1990s that required a roadgoing version of the racing car to be created - Porsche really pushed the limits of the GT1 rules before others followed suit.
The spirit of the rules was to make a racing car from your roadgoing supercar. Porsche designed a car that was basically a prototype and then worked out how to make it road legal. This is the result, and the point is that it (and the roadgoing CLK GTR) is pretty much the closest thing you can buy to a Le Mans prototype with a numberplate.
spikyone said:
The spirit of the rules was to make a racing car from your roadgoing supercar. Porsche designed a car that was basically a prototype and then worked out how to make it road legal. This is the result, and the point is that it (and the roadgoing CLK GTR) is pretty much the closest thing you can buy to a Le Mans prototype with a numberplate.
Quite a few examples of that kind of rule-bending, Ford's new GT springs to mind.Probably terrible road cars, but brilliantly mad and interesting things anyway.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





