Do I need glasses?
Author
Discussion

DodgyGeezer

Original Poster:

49,043 posts

220 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
I just stumbled across this on another thread and for the life of me I just can't see the attraction. Yes the performance is on another level and it's (probably) one of the best cars most people could hope to drive (so mega points for that, obviously) but... but... but... it's feckin' hideous! Seriously that is one ugly car - one that really is the automotive equivalent of a double paper-bag job


SlimJim16v

8,168 posts

173 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
OK, it looks like duck duck wasn't showing the photo. I like it, looks purposeful, but then I always preferred function over form.

Edited by SlimJim16v on Wednesday 22 February 23:52

Leins

10,485 posts

178 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
I quite like them actually, but prefer the look of the CLK GTR

Is this the only instance of a mid-engined 911?

ajprice

33,487 posts

226 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
Leins said:
I quite like them actually, but prefer the look of the CLK GTR

Is this the only instance of a mid-engined 911?
Depends, if you count racing cars, the RSR. If you count other versions of the 911 not built by Porsche, the Ruf CTR3.

911Spanker

3,711 posts

46 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
Yes you need glasses.

DodgyGeezer

Original Poster:

49,043 posts

220 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
Leins said:
I quite like them actually, but prefer the look of the CLK GTR
weirdly(?) I really like the SLK GTR

off_again

13,917 posts

264 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
One of the best examples of function over form? Maybe....

Yes, you need glasses, its awesome.

But equally, it was never designed to be 'attractive' but to solve a specific requirement.

spikyone

1,915 posts

130 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
DodgyGeezer said:
I just stumbled across this on another thread and for the life of me I just can't see the attraction. Yes the performance is on another level and it's (probably) one of the best cars most people could hope to drive (so mega points for that, obviously) but... but... but... it's feckin' hideous! Seriously that is one ugly car - one that really is the automotive equivalent of a double paper-bag job

Point entirely missed, I think. This was created to get around the GT1 rules of the 1990s that required a roadgoing version of the racing car to be created - Porsche really pushed the limits of the GT1 rules before others followed suit.

The spirit of the rules was to make a racing car from your roadgoing supercar. Porsche designed a car that was basically a prototype and then worked out how to make it road legal. This is the result, and the point is that it (and the roadgoing CLK GTR) is pretty much the closest thing you can buy to a Le Mans prototype with a numberplate.

Krikkit

27,938 posts

211 months

Thursday 23rd February 2023
quotequote all
spikyone said:
The spirit of the rules was to make a racing car from your roadgoing supercar. Porsche designed a car that was basically a prototype and then worked out how to make it road legal. This is the result, and the point is that it (and the roadgoing CLK GTR) is pretty much the closest thing you can buy to a Le Mans prototype with a numberplate.
Quite a few examples of that kind of rule-bending, Ford's new GT springs to mind.

Probably terrible road cars, but brilliantly mad and interesting things anyway.

Randy Winkman

22,619 posts

219 months

Thursday 23rd February 2023
quotequote all
For me it's probably only good looking because of what it is. If it was home made I'd probably think it looks a right mess.

Den Den

515 posts

49 months

Thursday 23rd February 2023
quotequote all
Wonder if they used drip trays in the pits? Cracking car though, not pretty but purposeful .

havoc

33,474 posts

265 months

Thursday 23rd February 2023
quotequote all
It's a damn sight less ugly than most of the new hypercars.

I mean, put that next to any of the following:-
- Mclaren Senna
- AMG One-whatever
- AM/RBR Valkyrie
- Pagani Huayra (exterior, at least)

...and there's no contest.

What The Deuces

2,780 posts

54 months

Thursday 23rd February 2023
quotequote all
havoc said:
It's a damn sight less ugly than most of the new hypercars.

I mean, put that next to any of the following:-
- Mclaren Senna
- AMG One-whatever
- AM/RBR Valkyrie
- Pagani Huayra (exterior, at least)

...and there's no contest.
Maybe agree, except Huayra.



s94wht

2,217 posts

89 months

Thursday 23rd February 2023
quotequote all
I've not really seen the GT1 before but the other day when reading about the GT2 I wondered if there had every been a GT1.

I just googled it and found this render. I think this looks incredible!


brillomaster

1,885 posts

200 months

Thursday 23rd February 2023
quotequote all
I wouldnt worry about it. you'll never even see one on the road let alone get behind the wheel of it or own it.

this, however... what on earth were they thinking?






M11rph

1,175 posts

51 months

Thursday 23rd February 2023
quotequote all
I like the GT-1.

When the GT-1 Touring spec is available (no rear wing) I shall be straight on to the Configurator. type