RE: BMW 550i Gran Turismo (F07) | The Brave Pill
RE: BMW 550i Gran Turismo (F07) | The Brave Pill
Saturday 22nd April 2023

BMW 550i Gran Turismo (F07) | The Brave Pill

BMW tried to reinvent the 5-Series. It failed.


So have you ever had a late-night idea, possibly after a bit of alcoholic encouragement, that you reckoned would make your fortune and transform the world? And then realised, in the grey light of a hungover morning, that the market for a tuxedo onesie is likely limited, or that you are a bit short of the funds required to bring that dog-walking drone to market? The BMW 5 Series Gran Turismo has always struck me as likely being the result of a similar flight of fancy, the difference being that BMW actually built it.

For all the excellence of the 5 Series dynasty, it has never been a radical car. The first two versions were only saloons, with a lifestylish Touring estate joining the clan from the E34 onwards. But even now, more than thirty years later the choice of bodystyle for the current 5er remains the same coin toss: boot or box.

The Gran Turismo is the exception to that rule. Also a conspicuous failure. Those two things are almost certainly linked: it turned out that the world hadn’t been waiting for a lumpily styled 5 Series hatchback with serious rear legroom. Yet while potential buyers might have struggled to see much point when the Gran Turismo was new – being sold between 2009 and 2017 – the lack of love has turned it into something of a used bargain. Witness this week’s Brave Pill: a gleaming 2012 GT barely into its second decade, powered by the excellent 4.4-litre twin-turbo V8 engine and potentially yours for just £11,695 without haggling. These are great times we’re living in.

The logic that led to the Gran Turismo was understandable, even if the finished result felt like a bit of a lash-up. When it was launched in 2009, as the first of what we normally think of as the F10 generation of 5 Series to reach the market, the company said it was aimed primarily at the Far East. In markets like China buyers were resisting switching to the SUVs becoming increasingly fashionable in the west, still preferring big saloons – with generous rear legroom indicating the most personal success. The Gran Turismo’s fastback body and XL wheelbase – identical to the 7 Series - gave it stretch-out space in the back but with an overall length barely longer than the 3 Series. It also meant it could be positioned between the regular 5 and the 7 on price. 

There were some other novelties. The Gran Turismo got frameless doors and what was effectively a split-opening tailgate. Its seating position was higher than the saloon’s, but still lower than that of an X5. It could also be specced with twin sunroofs which, although some way short of delivering a true upwards panorama, brought plenty of light to the spacious cabin. The idea was that it would be seen as upmarket when compared to the reppy three-box.

That was reflected in the pricing, BMW launching the GT in the UK with a supplement intended to reflect this greater desirability. It was also spared the regular car’s lesser engines, with the choice of petrol powerplants in the UK being a straight choice between two turbocharged options: the six-cylinder 535i and the V8 550i, this making an impressively potent 402hp.

In short, lots of interesting ingredients had gone into the pot, but the result that came out felt a bit bland and sloppy. The Gran Turismo’s tall body and raised roofline made it look slightly SUV-ish, but not in a good way. The rear-three quarters has something of the Toyota Prius about it, which is doubtless not what design boss Adrian van Hooydonk’s team were aiming for. But from the front it just looked like a slightly taller 5-Series; hardly the sort of thing to clear the fast lane. 

The GT’s spacious cabin had also come at the expense of luggage space, which felt a little stingy considering how well passengers were catered for, something the novelty of the tailgate’s twin opening modes couldn’t improve. In this, it pretty much copied the design-led compromises of the Vauxhall Signum which had previewed much the same bodyshape five years earlier.

The car-buying public’s reaction to what BMW assured us was a paradigm-shifting segment buster could be summarized as ‘meh’. The GranTurismo had never been intended to be a big seller, but it soon became apparent the risk was that it actually be closer to a non-seller. BMW was soon offering generous incentives to try and shift them, and it was possible to buy a GT for less money than the equivalent saloon version – rendering the whole exercise a bit pointless. When the F10 generation 5-Series was replaced by the G30 in 2017, the next-gen GranTurismo was promoted to become a 6 Series.

But if you are in the market for an early GranTurismo, our Pill makes an excellent case for itself. It has covered just 90,000 miles and the dealer selling it promises a full service history. Life is slightly too short to try and sift standard from optional features in the word salad of the features box, but as a 550i GT M Sport this one would have been well equipped as standard, with the presence on the list of such luxuries as adaptive headlights and soft-close doors suggesting this one is probably close to being fully laden. The database hamsters suggest it would have had an unoptioned list price of £57,710, so it has fallen a long way.

The MOT history shows it had covered just 89,000 miles by the time of the last test in October last year, this coming five days after a fail for an excessively worn balljoint in the anti-roll bar. There have been a few other tyre and suspension advisories over the year, and a fail for excessively worn rubber back in 2018, but there is certainly nothing in the record to put a stout-hearted Pillsman or Pillswoman to flight. 

While middle-aged BMWs are generally good at creating bills, and this one features plenty of borkable-tech, the good news is that the N63 V8 is widely regarded to be a sensible choice by the standards of BMW’s sometimes troublesome powerplants from this era. It could certainly be an interesting way to get a final dose of V8 noise and performance, even if you’ll have to be stretched out in the back to experience the GT at its best.


See the original ad

Author
Discussion

aston addict

Original Poster:

475 posts

188 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
It looks like an early predecessor of one of those sh*tbox Teslas - not sure which model - Y maybe? Or the even more idiotic one with rear gullwing doors?

At least it probably wasn't built to the budget of a ham sandwich with the quality to match.

Andy86GT

1,185 posts

95 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
I could never understand why they called it a Grand Turismo, it certainly doesn't look very GT'ish. In this case it seems a waste of a V8.

KPB1973

938 posts

129 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
Horrible looking car, but likely hilarious after a remap.

One for the old Q Car thread(s).

cerb4.5lee

44,916 posts

210 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
I've always had a weird soft spot for these, and a V8 engine always seems to lure me in as well. A nice(looks aside) rare car I reckon.

HM-2

12,467 posts

199 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
Got to be one of the cheapest ways to get yourself behind the wheel of a 400+ bhp twin turbo V8. Shame it's a bit "challenging" to look at.

Macron

13,411 posts

196 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
It's funny because it was such a poor seller they now sell everything with a GT variant, including the 6 series, which ia about the same size.

It's like BMW just sit there telling the buying public they're wrong, not BMW, until we are battered into submission and buy the propeller of middle management dreams.

cramorra

1,689 posts

265 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
remains meh

andy43

13,245 posts

284 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
aston addict said:
It looks like an early predecessor of one of those sh*tbox Teslas - not sure which model - Y maybe? Or the even more idiotic one with rear gullwing doors?

At least it probably wasn't built to the budget of a ham sandwich with the quality to match.
I actually looked at a couple of these GTs a few years ago but bought a Tesla Model S instead.
They’re quite nice inside with bits from the 7 series iirc but the exterior is more regurgitated pasta salad than ham sandwich.

Court_S

14,750 posts

207 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
Always hated the look of these. It’s a very awkward car to look at, the interior is nice enough though. It’s not quite X6 ugly, but it’s not exactly a design high point for BMW.

Rich Boy Spanner

1,891 posts

160 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
I have always liked the look of them, better than the boring saloons. I wasn't surprised that BMW built these, I was, still am surprised people still buy impractical saloons like it is the 1970's.

Baldchap

9,629 posts

122 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
You don't see how it looks from the inside.

That engine is fitted to the B5 with 621bhp and 800NM so plenty of tuning potential I reckon.

wolfie28

1,144 posts

174 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
Court_S said:
Always hated the look of these. It’s a very awkward car to look at, the interior is nice enough though. It’s not quite X6 ugly, but it’s not exactly a design high point for BMW.
Totally agree. God awful things to look at externally in my opinion.

HM-2

12,467 posts

199 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
I did wonder if some select modifications would improve the aesthetic...



Well, not those select modifications hehe

Chubbyross

5,002 posts

115 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
HM-2 said:
I did wonder if some select modifications would improve the aesthetic...



Well, not those select modifications hehe
And I think we know what the answer is.

MikeM6

6,064 posts

132 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
I quite like these, as they make far more sense to me than any of the X ranges. The looks are neither here nor there really, but as a practical and useable car it resists the SUV trend nicely.

But is comprehensively bettered by a regular 5 series. Cheap V8 though.

wpa1975

14,750 posts

144 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
Court_S said:
Always hated the look of these. It’s a very awkward car to look at, the interior is nice enough though. It’s not quite X6 ugly, but it’s not exactly a design high point for BMW.
Agreed also I seem to remember these were very heavy

Mark_Blanchard

1,044 posts

285 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
Dreadful looking thing. Scrap heap at the double.

samoht

7,287 posts

176 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all

At 5m long, 1.9m wide and the best part of 2 tonnes in weight, it's obviously a big car (wider than the regular 5 series thanks to the 7 platform I guess).

Feels like the Touring version would be smaller and wieldier, and more practical load-wise. An off-beat way to get a roughly 7 series size interior on the cheap I guess, if carrying four adults is a big part of your motoring.

apx7

249 posts

140 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
Do the authors here ever do even basic research on the vehicles they are writing about?

While middle-aged BMWs are generally good at creating bills, and this one features plenty of borkable-tech, the good news is that the N63 V8 is widely regarded to be a sensible choice by the standards of BMW’s sometimes troublesome powerplants from this era.

This is one of the least reliable engines they made. Would definitely avoid especially anything with an N63 pre 2014, although later "revised" versions still have some issues.

samoht

7,287 posts

176 months

Saturday 22nd April 2023
quotequote all
apx7 said:
While middle-aged BMWs are generally good at creating bills, and this one features plenty of borkable-tech, the good news is that the N63 V8 is widely regarded to be a sensible choice by the standards of BMW’s sometimes troublesome powerplants from this era.

This is one of the least reliable engines they made. Would definitely avoid especially anything with an N63 pre 2014, although later "revised" versions still have some issues.
Good to hear that correction. I tend to believe that BMWs should be straight sixes while Mercs should have V8s, sounds like that still holds true.