RE: Latest Mercedes-AMG GLC gets C63 four-pot
RE: Latest Mercedes-AMG GLC gets C63 four-pot
Wednesday 19th July 2023

Latest Mercedes-AMG GLC gets C63 four-pot

Latest '43 and '63 revealed with up to 680hp - but with 2.0-litre engines only


With such a plethora of options now out there, it can be easy to forget that AMG pretty much pioneered the uber SUV thing back in the late 1990s with the ML55 AMG. Back then the idea of a 4x4 with a 5.4-litre V8 and almost 350hp seemed like lunacy, and now look where we are - that car is kind of a gamechanger. Perhaps the same fate will also befall the latest AMG GLCs, complete with their 2.0-litre, four-cylinder engines…

That’s right, just as with the C-Class saloon with which it shares so much, the GLC SUV has switched from 3.0-litre V6 (for the ’43) and 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 (in the ’63 S E Performance) to a four-cylinder turbo for both, one with hybrid assistance for the flagship model. If not quite such a seismic shift as for the saloon and estate (because people don’t care about the SUV so much), it’s a pretty momentous change for the GLC.

Specs will be familiar to anyone who’s closely followed the C-Class’s reinvention. The GLC 43 is powered by a 421hp, mild hybrid version of the M139 engine found in the A45, driving through a nine-speed MCT (it’s an eight-speed DCT in the hatch) to a rear-biased all-wheel drive system. With 369lb ft as well, AMG reckons the new GLC 43 is good for 62mph in 4.8 seconds and 155mph. The 48-volt mild hybrid system improves efficiency by helping out with stop-start and coasting.

It's the ’63 that’s undergone the most dramatic reinvention, however, adopting wholesale the new C63 powertrain. That means the M139 is boosted further to 476hp and 402lb ft, then joined by a 204hp, permanently excited synchronous electric motor and 6.1kWh battery - for 680hp in total, plus 752lb ft of ‘system torque’. The numbers are, of course, absurd: 3.5 seconds to 62mph, a 170mph limited top speed, 2,310kg and 7.5 miles of electric range. The nine-speed automatic gearbox is also fitted to the ’63, its parameters adjusted - along with much of the rest of the dynamic make-up - through eight AMG Dynamic Select drive modes (it’s five in the ’43).

Containing all that horsepower is a familiar suite of AMG chassis technology. While the ’43 gets rear-biased (31:69) 4Matic all-wheel drive, the ’63 is fitted with the fully variable 4Matic+ that allows everything up to 100 per cent rear-wheel drive. Ride Control suspension with the Adaptive Damping System is standard on both, as is rear-wheel steering, with the additional benefit of AMG-specific axles (including bespoke steering knuckles and suspension joints).

The ’63 builds on this with AMG Active Ride Control, which should keep it comfy on the straights and controlled in the corners. Both are slowed down by some burly old brakes, too: for the GLC 63 S E Performance, that means a 390mm front disc with a six-piston caliper, with 370mm rotors on the rear. AMG promises ‘very short braking distances as well as maximum stability and fade resistance under heavy use’.

As is AMG tradition, there will be an Edition 1 for the 680hp model available for the first year of sales. The GLC 63 will be offered in graphite grey magno or high-tech silver magno, with 21-inch black wheels, a standard AMG Aerodynamics Package, both AMG Exterior Night Packages and an interior dominated by black and yellow. There’s even an Edition 1 car cover thrown in. Standard models will have 19- or 20-inch wheels, plus AMG-specific grilles, front apron and diffuser, with the ’63 made to look the more aggressive of the two. The interiors get the latest MBUX infotainment and AMG trinkets, including Track Pace datalogging app for the North Circular GP.

Michael Schiebe, Mercedes-AMG CEO, added of the new models: "The Mercedes-AMG GLC SUV is an absolute success with our customers… With the E Performance drive in the GLC 63 S, we are also launching the first performance hybrid SUV. The all-wheel-drive system, the active rear-axle steering and the quick-shifting transmission enhance the emotionally appealing hallmark AMG driving experience". We’ll have to take his word for it for now, and hope the switch to an electrified powertrain is more successful here than in the other ’63. If not, you know where to find a V8 one…


Author
Discussion

mibman2004

Original Poster:

43 posts

128 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
This car is a very nice car. I like it because it is a fast car.

Honeywell

1,669 posts

128 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
I would t have one if they paid me.

Xenoous

2,465 posts

88 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
I'm sure they'll sell... However I don't know if it's just me, but AMG are no longer appealing in the slightest. Such a shame to go from a brute of a NA 6.2 v8, to a 2.0T within 10 years.

No, I don't care if its just as fast, or faster, I care about the event!

Boo Mercedes, boooooooo.

kambites

71,551 posts

251 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
Doesn't seem as sacrilegious as the C-class somehow, perhaps because I never really saw the appeal of the SUVs in the first place.

Leins

10,470 posts

178 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
I shouldn’t like these, but I really do. I’d gladly use one as the family bus, other than they’re going to be a bit pricey

I used to own an ML55, awful car in so many respects but that engine made it great fun. I’m not quite sure that Mercedes/AMG invented this type of car though, given the sorts of performance SUVs that the likes of Overfinch and Lamborghini were producing in the 80s

Mouse Rat

2,103 posts

122 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
There is so much to dislike about this if you look at it as an AMG

But from the other angle it's a practical 4x4 plug in hybrid with reasonable running costs that's probably one of the fastest things on the road.

it a CLC350e on steroids, I like.



andyA700

3,452 posts

67 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
Is there a concerted effort to make cars as ugly as possible?

el romeral

2,212 posts

167 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
I have had an ML55 as my daily for the last 7 years. I love it and as said “that engine”. The newer models with so much more power and technology are making my car increasingly seem like a dinosaur from a bygone age. Not planning on trading it in anytime soon though!

cerb4.5lee

44,867 posts

210 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
Xenoous said:
I'm sure they'll sell...
I don't know if it is because of the general uplift in price of new cars, but I haven't seen a second generation of GLC of any description out on the roads or out and about yet where I live. However I see absolutely loads of the previous generation of GLC though in comparison.

Folk just don't seem to be buying this generation of GLC around me, but I presume that they must be selling down south(Hertfordshire/London etc) and in places like Alderley Edge Cheshire where the money is though.

GreatScott2016

2,538 posts

118 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
andyA700 said:
Is there a concerted effort to make cars as ugly as possible?
Personally, I wouldn't tag this one as "ugly", but I do get what you're saying! smile

cerb4.5lee

44,867 posts

210 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
Leins said:
I shouldn’t like these, but I really do. I’d gladly use one as the family bus, other than they’re going to be a bit pricey
Although it wasn't the fast version, we really liked the GLC350d that we had for 4.5 years/108k miles as well. It was a great all round family car I thought. I keep looking out for this current generation of GLC when I'm out and about, but I can't believe that I haven't seen one yet though(I have looked around one(300d model) in my local Merc showroom though).

Gruntled

193 posts

109 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
2,300 kgs… can’t wait to drive it up (or down) the Stelvio pass.

Nicolas Lazar

214 posts

57 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
Exterior over the top but ok. Interior design lazy with stuck-on iPads, and the materials do look cheapish. But the philosophy of that power unit is just a woke disaster. There is a video out on youtube by the two guys from throttlesomething, testing a C63. And they have no nice things to say at all. I wonder what happens when one drives that thing at high speed over extended period of time. At some point the battery will be empty and you have a super heavy overpriced four-pot. Well, there is a reason cars from the noughties and early tens are increasingly popular ...

cerb4.5lee

44,867 posts

210 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
Gruntled said:
2,300 kgs… can’t wait to drive it up (or down) the Stelvio pass.
It is heavy isn't it? Especially when I consider that the GLC350d I had was "only" 1800kg, and the current GLE400d that I have is 2300kg which is obviously quite a bit bigger in comparison. You always feel the weight of the GLE when you're driving it as well for me. I have read that these proper AMG versions do drive a lot better than the standard models though, so I presume that they hide the weight as best as they can perhaps?

Darnoc95

516 posts

60 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
I know it will get some brake re-gen & obviously charge pretty quick given the puny battery but can anybody be really bothered to charge it every day for a mere 7.5 miles ( 5 miles real world) range. Purely a tax break car imo.

WPA

14,731 posts

144 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
Ugly and too heavy

Turbobanana

8,465 posts

231 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
I don't dislike it, but I'd want both sides the same colour please.


TheMuu

107 posts

221 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
I think at this point just gives me full electric

Taycan & upcoming Macan more appealing

Numeric

1,499 posts

181 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
I think what I don't get is once you have removed the 'event' of the engine why not just get an electric vehicle of similar type and performance assuming you are in a market and have a type of driving that supports such a vehicle.

I could well understand someone getting the previous generation as the engine was a terrific part of the experience and the car was practical, but not now.

Water Fairy

6,619 posts

185 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
Don't mind the exterior at all tbh, the interior not so much. I get why Merc are doing this but I would want my donkey with at least 6 cyl in a car like this.