RE: Ford Racing Puma | Spotted
RE: Ford Racing Puma | Spotted
Tuesday 3rd October 2023

Ford Racing Puma | Spotted

Rally looks and a chassis set up by Stig Blomqvist. The Racing Puma is fast Ford royalty...


We’ve no idea what the future of the mighty fast Ford looks like. RS as we know it is all but dead, and with the Fiesta soon to be resigned to the history books, who would bet their mortgage on the ST badge? Of course, the new Mustang will still be sold over here and who knows whether Ford will continue its performance models as we currently know them into the electric age - but for now the closest you’ll get to a hot hatch from the Blue Oval is the Puma ST.

At least Ford is leaving us with something, rather than packing in its sporty combustion models altogether and calling it a day. But while the Puma ST stands on its own two feet as a proper performance model, it isn’t the playful little rascal that the Fiesta it’s based on is. And though you might be fed up with people saying: ‘but it’s not a proper Puma’ when said ‘proper Puma’ is presented in Racing guise, you wonder why the Puma couldn’t have been revived as a Fiesta-based sports coupe like the original.

Then you remember that the regular Puma coupe was far from a qualified sales success (133,000 cars is small fry by Ford standards), while only half of the initial 1,000-strong Racing Puma production run would see the light of day. Even then, Ford had a hard time shifting them because, at £23,000 a pop, the Racing Puma was some £2,000 more expensive than the more powerful and much more practical Subaru Impreza WRX. Remember this was 1999, a year where Colin McRae and Richard Burns were battling at the front of the field in the WRC with blue Imprezas, while the Racing Puma played second fiddle to the Escort and Focus in the lower Super 1600 category.

However, the Racing Puma didn’t receive nearly the same attention from Ford as the Focus RS and Fiesta ST would. Instead, it was a proper skunkworks project, with each of the 500 UK-bound cars starting life as a boggo Pumas before being shipped off to Tickford for conversion. Once there, a substantially wider body kit was fitted that increased the width up front by nearly 100mm. The brakes, meanwhile, featured four-piston racing callipers developed by Alcon, while Ford’s motorsport division in Boreham was left to handle the suspension. And if that wasn’t enough, 1984 WRC champion Stig Blomqvist was tasked with setting up the car - mainly for track use.

So the Racing Puma was less of a heated-up version of the coupe, and closer to a road-legal version of the rally car. The Sparco sports seats that mimic the look of the latter and flashes of blue suede meant the Racing Puma looked the part both inside and out, while a Janspeed sports exhaust ensured it sounded the part, too. All versions were finished in Imperial Blue with 17-inch Speedline alloys, again linking back to the rally machine it’s closely related to.

No surprise then that values are very much on the way up. The good news is this example is on the cheaper side at £17,995 and, judging by the condition of the bodywork and interior, it’s looking mighty fresh for a car that’s covered 141,000 miles. The less good news is that, as of the time of writing, it doesn’t have an MOT and looks as though it may need a few loose ends tied up before hitting the road. The perfect winter project car? You bet. 


SPECIFICATION | FORD RACING PUMA

Engine: 1,679cc four-cylinder
Transmission: five-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 155@7,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 119@4,500rpm
MPG: 34.7
CO2: N/A
Year registered: 2000
Recorded mileage: 141,000
Price new: £23,000
Yours for: £17,995

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

richinlondon

Original Poster:

893 posts

152 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
another 'ow much???' article. Looks really lovely though.

paradigital

1,104 posts

182 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
richinlondon said:
another 'ow much???' article.
Not sure I agree. These have never really dropped much below their RRP. I’m quite surprised that the asking is relatively low.

Not my cup of tea for the money, but I don’t think it’s “OMG” high.

anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
One of the few Fords I covet.

WPA

14,710 posts

144 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
richinlondon said:
another 'ow much???' article
Not really, I expected more to be honest as these have always fetched strong money.

Luther Blissett

401 posts

162 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
Wish I'd got in when these were £5k. Another boat missed frown

Turn7

25,732 posts

251 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
biggbn said:
One of the few Fords I covet.
Indeed. Always had a soft spot for these.

Jon_S_Rally

4,462 posts

118 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
Adore these. Such a good looking car, and make a regular Puma look quite narrow and awkward.

The rally car comparisons are a bit of a stretch though. A Racing Puma is most certainly not more like the Puma S1600 than a road car. The Puma S1600 shares basically nothing with the road car. The body panels are much wider on the S1600. You could argue that it shares some lineage with the 1400 Kit Car Puma, which was more closely related to a road car, but even that's a stretch in reality.

Still, the FRP is brilliant, and stands on its own two feet, so no silly comparisons required.

Luther Blissett said:
Wish I'd got in when these were £5k. Another boat missed frown
Same. At the time, it felt like there almost expensive given the cost of a regular Puma, but it seems like a bargain looking back now!

0ddball

916 posts

169 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
Another car with a silly price tag because of its rarity, rather than it being anything special. Not even a low mileage one at that.

As said, even when these were going for much less (I seem to remember £6-7k for a nice one) nobody really got excited about them because they weren't special enough compared to the standard 1.7.

Andy86GT

1,172 posts

95 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
That's quite a high mileage for a car that's probably been driven 'enthusiastically'.
With no MOT I wonder if it's because of the dreaded tin worm?

Twinair

1,038 posts

172 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
Never driven or been in one as I can remember.

If it’s your thing, seems a tad pricey - given the miles & condition, could be ok as a project, except if it’s rusty…

I’d rather the TZR 250 in the background though!

Back in period I had the 125 & the 250, albeit they were in blue…

Stink wheels are great :-)) a LOT of ICE fun… I have one now, ppl stop you in the street just to reminisce about: ‘When I had my xxx 2-stroke…. etc’….

thepritch

1,564 posts

195 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
Andy86GT said:
That's quite a high mileage for a car that's probably been driven 'enthusiastically'.
With no MOT I wonder if it's because of the dreaded tin worm?
Yup, corrosion appears a few times in the last two MOTs (both failures) alongside a number of other issues. Been unused for last 18 months.

mike150

497 posts

230 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
It looks great until you see the pictures of the underside.............

Why would anyone restore a car and then cover it in thick chassis paint to hide / protect everything? I wouldn't be surprised if it fails not because of this. In N.I. the MOT is very thorough and I don't think that would pass.

trails

7,238 posts

179 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
0ddball said:
Another car with a silly price tag because of its rarity, rather than it being anything special. Not even a low mileage one at that.

As said, even when these were going for much less (I seem to remember £6-7k for a nice one) nobody really got excited about them because they weren't special enough compared to the standard 1.7.
Not special enough...u wot m8?

Everyone was essentially hand built by Tickford...what more do you want confused

cerb4.5lee

44,797 posts

210 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
As the article mentioned, these were expensive for the performance they offered I've always thought, and I would've spent my money at the time on the Impreza Turbo instead. In saying that I do love the standard 1.7 Puma though, plus I've also always liked the colour of these as well.

I used to see loads of these all together at shows like Ford Fair etc over the years, and that was always a treat to be fair.

Kingofthelea

131 posts

240 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
There are some really nice ones going for really good money, this isn’t one of them!

The previous owner sold it very honestly recently as it had lots of issues, rust being one of them. It’s been given a tart up for sale. To do these cars properly takes a lot of time and money. Trust me, I’ve done it.

Seeing the ‘before’ pictures of this car a few months ago it’s definitely a number 2 rolled in glitter…..

mooseracer

2,794 posts

200 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
trails said:
0ddball said:
Another car with a silly price tag because of its rarity, rather than it being anything special. Not even a low mileage one at that.

As said, even when these were going for much less (I seem to remember £6-7k for a nice one) nobody really got excited about them because they weren't special enough compared to the standard 1.7.
Not special enough...u wot m8?

Everyone was essentially hand built by Tickford...what more do you want confused
People couldn't - and still can't it seems - see past the fact it only had 30 or so bhp more than the normal 1.7

GreatScott2016

2,533 posts

118 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
Kingofthelea said:
There are some really nice ones going for really good money, this isn’t one of them!

The previous owner sold it very honestly recently as it had lots of issues, rust being one of them. It’s been given a tart up for sale. To do these cars properly takes a lot of time and money. Trust me, I’ve done it.

Seeing the ‘before’ pictures of this car a few months ago it’s definitely a number 2 rolled in glitter…..
Agreed, too many red flags for me too. Looks wise, I also thought that the rear end appeared to sit too high, particularly in profile pics.


0ddball

916 posts

169 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
trails said:
0ddball said:
Another car with a silly price tag because of its rarity, rather than it being anything special. Not even a low mileage one at that.

As said, even when these were going for much less (I seem to remember £6-7k for a nice one) nobody really got excited about them because they weren't special enough compared to the standard 1.7.
Not special enough...u wot m8?

Everyone was essentially hand built by Tickford...what more do you want confused
What did it do that the much cheaper 1.7 didn't? Nicer seats and a tiny bit faster. I guess it depends how you define special, in terms of hype or engineering prowess. It's a fiesta in a dress.

Like all of these old rot boxes, if they were that special in the first place, everyone would have been after them and there would be a lot more mint ones still out there. Back then, nobody wanted them.

mooseracer

2,794 posts

200 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
"full restoration in 2023, one of the best in the country"

Yet it is up for sale having failed an MOT at the end of July for, amongst other things, rust. Excellent.

TheMilkyBarKid

880 posts

59 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
I’ve always really liked these. I’ve only driven a standard 1.7 Puma but that was light on its toes and had that zingy Yamaha co-developed engine, so I’d imagine the FRP’s are really good fun - and at sane speeds on the road - too.

This wouldn’t be the right car for me though, I’d rather spend an extra £2K on this one- less than half the mileage, no mention of structural rust at any point in its entire MOT history (remarkable in itself for one of these) and also the correct colour wheels!

https://www.carandclassic.com/l/C1631151