RE: Mercedes-AMG GT63 S 4Matic | Spotted
RE: Mercedes-AMG GT63 S 4Matic | Spotted
Friday 13th October 2023

Mercedes-AMG GT63 S 4Matic+ | Spotted

The only GT now on sale has 843hp - but it was pretty damn good with 200hp less...


It seems especially crazy in 2023 that those with the wherewithal can walk into a Mercedes-Benz showroom (or whatever name dealer spaces go by at the moment) and order a four-door uber grand tourer with 843hp. And the ability to plug it in and travel a few miles on purely electric power. Sure, it’ll cost a lot of money - £180,000, before adding a funky paint colour - and there probably isn’t a queue around the block for V8 PHEVs with a single-digit EV range, but the AMG GT 63 S E Performance is a reality. Whether it’s the kind of reality buyers are clamouring for remains to be seen, of course; some might simply covet a V8 without the additional complexity of a hybrid, while others may already have had their heads turned by the performance of an EV. 

We’ve been here before with the AMG GT 4-door, of course, back when the standard, non-hybrid, 63 models were launched. As the plug-in looks now, it seemed to be answering a question that nobody had asked; patently it wasn’t much like the two-door GT, and didn’t really seem to offer much beyond the fabulous E63 AMG saloon beyond the bragging rights of a few extra horsepower. Only there was much more to it than that. 

The inclusion of equipment like four-wheel steer denied to the E-Class, plus an uplift in torque to 664lb ft, made for an almighty AMG experience. The GT wasn’t a traditional flagship in the luxobarge sense; it was a fast, focused, quite incredibly exciting AMG coupe. It just happened to cost a lot of money, look spectacular, and boast a sumptuous interior as well. As an unashamed fan of the model having not yet tried the hybrid, the GT 4-door always felt like the ultimate representation of what AMG could do: spectacularly quick thanks to a superb engine, properly exhilarating to drive, and a joy to travel in. Once over a fairly unapologetic ride, that is. But it’s meant to be a GT 4-door, don’t forget - i.e. a sports car - so that does make some sense. 

The sneaking suspicion remains, however, that those in the market for a £150k continent-crushing missile might covet something less intense, as it’s not often you see a GT on the road. Or perhaps something with a more premium badge. Whatever, the benefit of that rarity is, very much not in keeping with V8 AMG tradition, the 63 hasn’t plummeted in value. The least expensive one we’ve seen is £75k, and that’s for the non-S with 585hp and less technology. Typically it’s the 639hp flagship that’s offered, and that’s from £90k and up. Still a useful saving off list, if not the slashing of value that is often associated with big Benzes. 

This 2020 car appealed with its low mileage (13k) and slightly-more-interesting-than-usual spec. Sombre exterior colours are par for the GT course (it’s only with the facelift that some special paints like yellow, orange and green have been introduced), but this car’s Graphite Grey Magno is at least paired with red and black leather, which really lifts the interior. With the gold calipers of the ceramic brakes peeking out behind the black wheels, it’s a properly moody spec - and brilliant with it. 

This one is offered at £110k, at which point we’ll all go looking for what an equivalent E63 AMG might cost instead. Less, for sure, because they weren’t that much to start with; but there really is something special about the GT, and if the current trajectory continues then it stands to retain its money a tad better than a humbler E-Class. Don’t be surprised, too, if you get along just fine without the 843hp…


SPECIFICATION | MERCEDES-AMG GT 63 S 4-DOOR COUPE

Engine: 3,982cc, V8, twin-turbo
Transmission: 9-speed 'multi-clutch' transmission, 4Matic+ 4WD
Power (hp): 639@5,500-6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 664@2,500-4,500rpm
0-62mph: 3.2sec
Top speed: 196mph
Weight: 2,045kg (without driver)
MPG: 22.1
CO2: 257g/km
Year registered: 2020
Recorded mileage: 13,000
Price new: £145,495 (as standard, 2020)
Yours for: £109,990

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

sidesauce

Original Poster:

2,967 posts

241 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
A friend ran one of these for a few months - what a beast...

cerb4.5lee

41,674 posts

203 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
I've always really liked the idea of these big time. smokin

pSyCoSiS

4,168 posts

228 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
Proper machine. The one with 840+ bhp would just be insane.

Andy83n

592 posts

85 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
The only true successor to the 500E, or more likely the E60AMG from the early 90's.

I'm semi-retiring next year and want a forever car and the non-hybrid GT63S is in my final three to choose from.

numtumfutunch

5,102 posts

161 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all

Thats a crazy price for a 3y old car with a limited market






evojam

754 posts

183 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
Andy83n said:
The only true successor to the 500E, or more likely the E60AMG from the early 90's.

I'm semi-retiring next year and want a forever car and the non-hybrid GT63S is in my final three to choose from.
Over 2 tonnes,lardy looks and a questionable front grill,I'd put your money into a W124 500E or an E60 if you can find one,way cooler and unlike this you won't lose a penny on either.

howardhughes

1,321 posts

227 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
Right up there with the Audi RS6 C8. Vile.

samoht

6,989 posts

169 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all

I like it, but at this level I'd probably look to stretch to an M5 CS given the extent of praise that car has won up against actual sports cars as a drivers' car.

Andy83n

592 posts

85 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
evojam said:
Andy83n said:
The only true successor to the 500E, or more likely the E60AMG from the early 90's.

I'm semi-retiring next year and want a forever car and the non-hybrid GT63S is in my final three to choose from.
Over 2 tonnes,lardy looks and a questionable front grill,I'd put your money into a W124 500E or an E60 if you can find one,way cooler and unlike this you won't lose a penny on either.
E60 too expensive (£175k-200k) and 500e simply too old now, neither suitable for the drive to core d'azur and beyond.

In 20yrs time these will be the equivalent of both

..and impossible to lose money on a forever car.

Edited by Andy83n on Friday 13th October 08:44

Marcus-7tcc2

212 posts

120 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
One of my very strong possibles for ‘next car’ and I’m in a 2019 E63s. Brilliant brilliant cars but not very comfortable frankly and the GT63s seems to cover both bases very well. It’s heavier of course but I read (such as on here) great things about the handling plus of course how much of an exciting car it is. The E63 also does the exciting part big time. Currently selling my estate to get into something like this (got a short list including Panamera Turbo etc). The newer version is a LOT heavier (pushing 2.5 tons I think) which is a lot and will blunt that power-see ‘Remove Before Race’s’ review on it. They look the nuts whereas the E63 is a bit of a Q car especially from the rear (also not a terrible thing as its a nasty surprise for most).

911Spanker

3,040 posts

39 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
I find these look truly terrible. Chintzy and poorly.rsolved to my eyes.

I would save £70k and get a 212.

theicemario

1,507 posts

98 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
Surprised the interior isn’t black, looks all the better for it.

Don’t know how these and the E compare but I just wish they’d made an E63 Coupé.

J4CKO

45,912 posts

223 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
theicemario said:
Surprised the interior isn’t black, looks all the better for it.

Don’t know how these and the E compare but I just wish they’d made an E63 Coupé.
They did didnt they, the CLS 63 ? Or do you mean a 2 door ?

Never really got where this fitted in with the CLS actually, is it basically a posher, more powerful CLS 63 ?

evojam

754 posts

183 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
Andy83n said:
evojam said:
Andy83n said:
The only true successor to the 500E, or more likely the E60AMG from the early 90's.

I'm semi-retiring next year and want a forever car and the non-hybrid GT63S is in my final three to choose from.
Over 2 tonnes,lardy looks and a questionable front grill,I'd put your money into a W124 500E or an E60 if you can find one,way cooler and unlike this you won't lose a penny on either.
E60 too expensive (£175k-200k) and 500e simply too old now, neither suitable for the drive to core d'azur and beyond.

In 20yrs time these will be the equivalent of both

..and impossible to lose money on a forever car.

Edited by Andy83n on Friday 13th October 08:44
Well I drove my 500e down to Lake Garda via the Mercedes-Benz museum in Stuttgart and it was an absolute pleasure,built for that kind of trip,caught a few folk out to on the autobahn who were not expecting an old boxy Merc to be as fast as it was!

smilo996

3,585 posts

193 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
Scorpions jacket interior aside, definitely one of the better looking Mercs of the era. Continent eating beast.

J4CKO

45,912 posts

223 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
smilo996 said:
Scorpions jacket interior aside, definitely one of the better looking Mercs of the era. Continent eating beast.
I was thinking more,






British Beef

2,566 posts

188 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
numtumfutunch said:
Thats a crazy price for a 3y old car with a limited market
Yes agree, I was imagining £70k for this, given that they were very expensive new, and 4 doors so depreciate like a bomb.

anonymous-user

77 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
I'm not sure I understand the huge asking price. An E63s of the same vintage offers something very similar for about 40 grand less.

andy43

12,572 posts

277 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
Not a looker. Sensible it’s a hatchback but a really high lip to lift those posh suitcases over.
E63 estate or Panamera Turismo thingy every day of the week. They look better, they’re more practical and they’re cheaper - no idea why the GT63s haven’t got below 50k yet.
And the options list on stuff like this pees me off - surely cooled seats, HUD, lane keep and adaptive cruise should be standard at this level of continent crusher? My Kia has more spec.

AmyRichardson

1,888 posts

65 months

Friday 13th October 2023
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
They did didnt they, the CLS 63 ? Or do you mean a 2 door ?

Never really got where this fitted in with the CLS actually, is it basically a posher, more powerful CLS 63 ?
No CLS63 in this generation, only a 53.

I get the feeling that the GT was an AMG pet exercise and because it exists there can be no CLS; the GT's (notionally) somewhat superior dynamics would have to placed on a high pedestal if you weren't to walk past the "hunchback of Stuttgart" and get into a cheaper, prettier and equally potent CLS.