Rear facing seats?
Author
Discussion

J4CKO

Original Poster:

46,437 posts

226 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
Mentioned on the Montego thread, rear facing seats in the boot of estate cars are a “death trap” apparently and I can certainly see why that would be the consensus.

However, like Swans breaking your arms, I have never heard of any accidents where the rear facing seats have been a factor ?

Now I am sure it has happened but personally never heard of it, anyone else got any opinions or examples of them being dangerous ?

Jordie Barretts sock

6,018 posts

45 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
If they were dangerous, then they a) would never have been permitted in the first place and you can bet b) Volvo would never have fitted them.

Silvanus

6,908 posts

49 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
Do any manufacturers still offer rear facing seats in the boot?

Muddle238

4,408 posts

139 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
I suppose the issue is that without proper head restraints, rear-facing seats would have been dangerous in any forward-orientated collision. Not sure if any cars with rear facing seats didn't have head restraints though.

The other issue would be sitting in the perceived crumple zone, but this is no different to sitting in the back of an Aygo etc today.

No ideas for a name

3,064 posts

112 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
It was a design feature for Captain Scarlet.

Silvanus

6,908 posts

49 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
Muddle238 said:
I suppose the issue is that without proper head restraints, rear-facing seats would have been dangerous in any forward-orientated collision. Not sure if any cars with rear facing seats didn't have head restraints though.

The other issue would be sitting in the perceived crumple zone, but this is no different to sitting in the back of an Aygo etc today.
I'd imagine the back of a current Aygo is much safer than the boot of a Montego.

ajprice

32,721 posts

222 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
Silvanus said:
Do any manufacturers still offer rear facing seats in the boot?
Tesla Model S had/has a rear facing kids seats option.



I'm not sure whether it was available to buyers but rear facing seats were shown by Tesla for the Model Y too.

Silvanus

6,908 posts

49 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
ajprice said:
Silvanus said:
Do any manufacturers still offer rear facing seats in the boot?
Tesla Model S had/has a rear facing kids seats option.



I'm not sure whether it was available to buyers but rear facing seats were shown by Tesla for the Model Y too.
I wonder what the crash stats are like in the back. Can't find anything on-line

TheDoggingFather

17,374 posts

232 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
ajprice said:
Tesla Model S had/has a rear facing kids seats option.



I'm not sure whether it was available to buyers but rear facing seats were shown by Tesla for the Model Y too.
When the Model S was a relatively new phenomenon, a friend was one of the first used Tesla specialists in the area, probably the UK, had an open day. One of them was fitted with those seats. We were laughing about who on earth could fit in there, somehow I ended up volunteering to have a go. So, all 6' 2" of me attempted to clamber in the back of this Model S.

Yes, I got in.

No, you couldn't close the tailgate.

Like duhhh, what were you expecting? It's for kids! But what got me was the difficulty of getting into those seats, by the time the kids were big enough to do so, they would probably be too big to sit in them. A very weird addition, Just another attempt at being quirky by Tesla?

I'm sure my Dad had a Volvo 240 Estate company car many moons ago and the rear-facing seats were a realistic proposition.

Davie

6,080 posts

241 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
Jordie Barretts sock said:
If they were dangerous, then they a) would never have been permitted in the first place and you can bet b) Volvo would never have fitted them.
That was then, this is now.

I wouldn’t put my kids in them. Forget all this ‘it’s a tank’ garbage, you seen how easily an old Volvo estate folds up in a hefty rear impact.

Volvo stopped offering them as an option many many years ago… makes you wonder why.

Jimbo.

4,197 posts

215 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
Wasn’t there a belief that rear-facing seats were safer? In the event of a sudden stop/impact, you’ll be held in place by the seat back, rather than relying on the seatbelt?

ferret50

2,802 posts

35 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
Seem to remember that the RAF VC10 fleet had rear facing seats....

biggrin

And that train seats are often the 'wrong' way around...

biggrin

So why not car seats?

Afterall, judging by current GB driving standards it would not make much difference if drivers faced the rear!

biglaugh

OverSteery

3,794 posts

257 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
There seems 2 aspects to this.
Clearly modern cars are very much safer than older ones. I don't believe rear facing seats are inherently dangerous, but they do seem rare today, so perhaps I'm wrong.

Personally, I put my kids on the back of my bike, but never rear facing - that wouldn't be safe.

Jordie Barretts sock

6,018 posts

45 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
Davie said:
Jordie Barretts sock said:
If they were dangerous, then they a) would never have been permitted in the first place and you can bet b) Volvo would never have fitted them.
That was then, this is now.

I wouldn’t put my kids in them. Forget all this ‘it’s a tank’ garbage, you seen how easily an old Volvo estate folds up in a hefty rear impact.

Volvo stopped offering them as an option many many years ago… makes you wonder why.
It doesn't.

I agree with you. But then I put my child in a car seat in a TVR Cerbera.

markymarkthree

3,505 posts

197 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
Middle seats in my Caravelle swivel so it becomes the on tour party bus sometimes. Cant see a problem, kids love it with their mates pilled in there.


Silvanus

6,908 posts

49 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
markymarkthree said:
Middle seats in my Caravelle swivel so it becomes the on tour party bus sometimes. Cant see a problem, kids love it with their mates pilled in there.

Thats very different to some afterthought rear facing seats in the boot of a car.

unsprung

6,054 posts

150 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all

Nowadays I wouldn't allow anybody to use such a seat, even if OEM supplied. Just my opinion based on perceived crumple zone. And not based on test data.

If you google around, you'll find abundant data to support the use of rear-facing child seats for however many years the child fits the manufacturer's parameters.

This is not directly comparable to a rear seat in the boot of an estate. But it does remind us of a) the most likely crashes (ie: front and side, not rear) and b) the greater safety of a human body that decelerates into a seat back (and not into a seat belt strap).

Also: There were seats in the boot that were not rear facing. At least over here. From the post-War years into the 1990s. The following from a 1990 Ford Country Squire station wagon.

https://barnfinds.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/P...

I don't like the physics implied by those side facing seats, and I wouldn't have allowed their use in my such car.









markymarkthree

3,505 posts

197 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
Silvanus said:
markymarkthree said:
Middle seats in my Caravelle swivel so it becomes the on tour party bus sometimes. Cant see a problem, kids love it with their mates pilled in there.

Thats very different to some afterthought rear facing seats in the boot of a car.
Well we also never had a problem with either of the 7 seater Montego countrymans i had. Kids used to fight over who's turn to go in the back. I had to put mirror tint on the rear screen, as i knew the boys used to flick the Vs to those behind us.

Glosphil

4,831 posts

260 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
ferret50 said:
Seem to remember that the RAF VC10 fleet had rear facing seats....

biggrin

And that train seats are often the 'wrong' way around...

biggrin

So why not car seats?

Afterall, judging by current GB driving standards it would not make much difference if drivers faced the rear!

biglaugh
Didn't all RAF Transport Command aircraft have rear facing seats?
In 1954 I flew home from Iraq in a Hastings that had rear facing seats as did the RAF Brits I worked on in the mid-1960s.

Glosphil

4,831 posts

260 months

Sunday 29th October 2023
quotequote all
unsprung said:
Nowadays I wouldn't allow anybody to use such a seat, even if OEM supplied. Just my opinion based on perceived crumple zone. And not based on test data.

If you google around, you'll find abundant data to support the use of rear-facing child seats for however many years the child fits the manufacturer's parameters.

This is not directly comparable to a rear seat in the boot of an estate. But it does remind us of a) the most likely crashes (ie: front and side, not rear) and b) the greater safety of a human body that decelerates into a seat back (and not into a seat belt strap).

Also: There were seats in the boot that were not rear facing. At least over here. From the post-War years into the 1990s. The following from a 1990 Ford Country Squire station wagon.

https://barnfinds.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/P...

I don't like the physics implied by those side facing seats, and I wouldn't have allowed their use in my such car.
Don't some Landrovers & Rangerovers have sideways seats in the rear?