RE: Renault and Geely saddle up for Horse Powertrain
RE: Renault and Geely saddle up for Horse Powertrain
Friday 31st May 2024

Renault and Geely saddle up for Horse Powertrain

Worried about the future of engines? Announcements from Japan - and now Europe and China - suggest you needn't be


It’s been a significant week for internal combustion. It has seemed for a while like its fate had been sealed, only for legislation to be variously rolled back amid discontented murmurings about the timescales and a proportional lack of EV demand. In addition to news that some firms were delaying progress on additional electric advancements, some have gone even further: in just the past few days, five global manufacturers have underlined their commitment to the future of suck-squeeze-bang-blow in one form or another. 

Earlier in the week Toyota, Subaru and Mazda came together to state that as part of a combined decarbonisation push - and driven ‘by a deep understanding of their customers’ diverse lifestyles’ - all three will continue to develop ‘signature engines’. Which essentially guarantees the development of a new generation of the Mazda rotary, the Subaru boxer and Toyota's inline-four. The newcomers will be much more efficient and smaller than we’re used to, boosted by the integration of electric drive units. But reduced cubic capacity means a lower bonnet, opening up new design possibilities as well as better aero performance. 

Moreover, all the new units will be designed to run on e-fuel, biofuel and hydrogen. Toyota in particular has been keen to push the latter in motorsport of late, even if its adoption into the mainstream seems no closer to fruition. CEO Koji Sato noted: "In order to provide our customers with diverse options to achieve carbon neutrality, it is necessary to take on the challenge of evolving engines that are in tune with the energy environment of the future.”

For some, however, the future is too far away and statements like that too conservative. As of today, Horse Powertrain is to produce a ‘complete portfolio of state-of-the-art powertrain technologies for global partners including hybrid systems, internal combustion engines, transmissions, and battery solutions.’ Horse Powertrain (it’s meant to be written HORSE, but there’s no way we’ll be trotting that one out) is a joint venture between Renault Group and Geely, with each holding a 50 per cent share. The HQ will be in London, but more broadly (and because it assimilates existing resources) there are going to be in the region of 19,000 employees with the logic mirroring that of the Japanese trio: ‘Renault Group and Geely believe that a combination of various powertrain technologies is necessary, including highly efficient internal combustion engines (ICE), lower carbon e-fuels, and hydrogen, to achieve a successful decarbonization in a world where more than half of vehicles produced are expected to still rely on combustion engines by 2040.’

Horse Powertrain is galloping into the challenge at full tilt, with agreements already in place to supply Volvo, Nissan, Proton and Mitsubishi. To assert its position as a ‘worldwide leader in hybrid and combustion powertrain solutions from Day One’, the Horse Powertrain stable will include 17 global plants, five R&D centres plus nine customers from the get-go. Its expected €15bn of yearly revenues and five million or so powertrains will include engines that can be powered on ethanol, methanol, hydrogen, LPG, compressed natural gas and hydrogen, plus hybrids and PHEVs. Comprehensive, then.

At the reins will be Matias Gianni as CEO, who brings powertrain experience from Vitesco Technologies. The six-person board features senior bods from both Renault and Geely, including the former’s Chief Technology Officer Gilles Le Borgne, CEO of Geely Auto Group Jerry Gan and Dacia CEO Denis Le Vot. A huge undertaking? Yes. 

We can expect the results to be similar: smaller and more efficient engines that reduce emissions still further while retaining the convenience (and perhaps enjoyment - you never know) of internal combustion. Anyone else wishing to join the party better move fast, because Horse Powertrain has big ambitions straight out of the gate; Renault Group CEO Luca de Meo says HP can help its parent company “achieve worldwide leadership and scale in a sector representing more than 80 per cent of its [Renault’s] business.” Geely Holding Chairman Eric Li suggested that it’s “crucial” for expertise to be shared and multiple technologies explored for the industry to reach net zero. He added: Horse Powertrain Limited will have the portfolio, scale and capacity to offer the low-emission solutions the automotive industry of tomorrow demands. Today’s launch marks a new chapter in sustainable mobility, and we at Geely are proud to play a part.”

For the moment, an exact date hasn’t been given for when the first Horse Powertrain engine will be complete and in a car. But the project has been racing along at quite a canter - an agreement was signed by Renault and Geely last July, and already Horse has the stamp of approval from authorities - so it seems unlikely we’ll be waiting furlong.


Author
Discussion

SydneyBridge

Original Poster:

11,741 posts

187 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
I do think some manufacturers, looking at you Jaguar, are going to be in big trouble relying on electric only

bobo79

315 posts

178 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
SydneyBridge said:
I do think some manufacturers, looking at you Jaguar, are going to be in big trouble relying on electric only
I think Jaguar are in big trouble irrespective of drive trains. Sales are now 1/3 what they were 7-8 years ago, and no new models (due to constant dithering) in what, 7 years?

ChrisCh86

1,127 posts

73 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
I appreciate all the horse puns in this article biglaugh

foxhounduk

703 posts

209 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
This couldn’t make me happier. I’m seeing a shift in human consciousness of late; not just with the nonsense that is EV but other woke issues.

Long may this continue.

Xenoous

2,411 posts

87 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
foxhounduk said:
This couldn’t make me happier. I’m seeing a shift in human consciousness of late; not just with the nonsense that is EV but other woke issues.

Long may this continue.
Agree with you on this. We as a culture appear to be getting fed up of the current state of affairs. Let's hope it continues and we get back to some form of normality!

In terms of this news, I think it's fantastic. I cannot see a world where 90%+ of people have EV's, it just doesn't work for everyone. Hybrid drivetrains with smaller more efficient engines is obviously the way forward. Surprised it's taken so long to get to this decision. Huzzah for common sense.

Skaben

365 posts

170 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
so it's just the american and german big car companies who are left out of this delay full EV party. be interesting to see if there are any further announcements from them any time soon

JJJ.

5,547 posts

44 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
foxhounduk said:
This couldn’t make me happier. I’m seeing a shift in human consciousness of late; not just with the nonsense that is EV but other woke issues.

Long may this continue.
biggrin

chickensoup

57 posts

41 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
brave time to be coming up with a all new ICE idea, and geely are an odd investor, considering the skin they have in the EV game

borat52

585 posts

237 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
Xenoous said:
Agree with you on this. We as a culture appear to be getting fed up of the current state of affairs. Let's hope it continues and we get back to some form of normality!

In terms of this news, I think it's fantastic. I cannot see a world where 90%+ of people have EV's, it just doesn't work for everyone. Hybrid drivetrains with smaller more efficient engines is obviously the way forward. Surprised it's taken so long to get to this decision. Huzzah for common sense.
Electric motors are without question the best technical solution to powering a wheel, the issue remains how to store the energy required for the motor.

Small batteries with some sort of supplementary combustion engine appears to be a really good solution and it's quite annoying that previous tax legislation pushed us very quickly down a path of large battery EV vehicles which were always questionable with respect to affordability and scarce resource allocation.

The average UK car does around 30 miles per day, if you sized a battery around a 50 mile range then had a range extender combustion engine you're looking at a daily charge and on the occasions you need more range you go on petrol

Piston Ted

299 posts

89 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
Agree with all of the comments above. Has common sense finally prevailed?!

samoht

7,225 posts

175 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
Horse was born about a year ago

Renault said:
ON 1 JULY 2023, HORSE HAS OFFICIALLY STARTED ITS ACTIVITIES IN THE AUTOMOTIVE MARKET
https://media.renaultgroup.com/horse-new-leading-powertrain-technology-company-is-now-fully-operational-and-ready-to-reinvent-combustion/

I saw it as basically a 'bad bank' to hive off legacy factories, employees etc into so that when the world goes fully electric and Renault has no need of them, they don't have to pay out redundancies, brownfield site clean-up etc wink

However the 'interim' state looks likely to continue for longer than expected 12 months ago, deferring Horse's appointment at the glue factory.

kambites

71,474 posts

250 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
chickensoup said:
brave time to be coming up with a all new ICE idea, and geely are an odd investor, considering the skin they have in the EV game
I guess it's an insurance policy for Geely. If they're 80% sure the future everywhere is electric and hence they don't want to develop another ICE themselves, having a stake in someone else's project is a way to mitigate the 20% risk.

TV200

241 posts

99 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
I agree that its nice to have things other than EVs = it need not be one horse race - efuels, hydrogen, EV etc can all be the future. However I don't understand how trying to reduce tailpipe emissions is seen as 'woke'. I have an EV, a diesel car, a petrol motorbike and a 2-stroke. The EV just works - its the nicest thing for any distance travel, it costs peanuts (to charge and service).
It seems to me to just demonstrate ignorance to label a propulsion system as 'woke' (and anything you haven't taken up/tried/understood).

whp1983

1,374 posts

168 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
I think EV will be the political path wealthy western nations take on the whole, however, for places like South Africa, India and many others where electric infrastructure is miles behind and finances won’t allow for EV take up it is wise to make combustion more efficient.

Also wise to keep research going never know what the next big thing will be…

malaccamax

1,654 posts

260 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
samoht said:
I saw it as basically a 'bad bank' to hive off legacy factories, employees etc into so that when the world goes fully electric and Renault has no need of them, they don't have to pay out redundancies, brownfield site clean-up etc wink.
'Bad bank' is a good way of looking at it. Whereas before they were brand differentiators, engines are becoming commodities. Strap a hybrid drivetrain on and it doesn't really matter what's banging away under your bonnet so long as its reliable. So you combine operations to go for scale and then get them off your books

So it's hard to understand the fella above getting all excited about this announcement.

cookie1600

2,718 posts

190 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
ChrisCh86 said:
I appreciate all the horse puns in this article biglaugh
But someone neglected to get the Mitsubishi Colt one in there somewhere

wisbech

4,226 posts

150 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
whp1983 said:
I think EV will be the political path wealthy western nations take on the whole, however, for places like South Africa, India and many others where electric infrastructure is miles behind and finances won’t allow for EV take up it is wise to make combustion more efficient.

Also wise to keep research going never know what the next big thing will be…
Having spent last year working in India - not true. Especially for delivery vehicles (motorbikes and auto rickshaw) many are already electric because the economics are just better. If a bike/ auto is being used hours a day for delivery, then the much cheaper operating cost of EV soon makes up for the higher purchase cost.

Plus anyone who can afford a car has electricity at their house, not sure why you think electric infrastructure is miles behind?

Intercity trucks and coaches sure - but even there it’s mostly train and flights for passengers. Distances are long, and roads poor, so most people don’t drive cross country. Most cars are urban use - suits electric.

Edited by wisbech on Friday 31st May 15:17

Water Fairy

6,596 posts

184 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
TV200 said:
I agree that its nice to have things other than EVs = it need not be one horse race - efuels, hydrogen, EV etc can all be the future. However I don't understand how trying to reduce tailpipe emissions is seen as 'woke'. I have an EV, a diesel car, a petrol motorbike and a 2-stroke. The EV just works - its the nicest thing for any distance travel, it costs peanuts (to charge and service).
It seems to me to just demonstrate ignorance to label a propulsion system as 'woke' (and anything you haven't taken up/tried/understood).
I agree. Although I am not an EVist in the slightest you can't call them woke.

Having driven various EVs I personally find them tediously boring and soulless regardless of performance levels but there is no way anyone can refute the fact that, on paper at least, they are objectively better and make far more sense as a means of propulsion than ICE.



EdIsNotDead

4,217 posts

244 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
TV200 said:
I agree that its nice to have things other than EVs = it need not be one horse race - efuels, hydrogen, EV etc can all be the future. However I don't understand how trying to reduce tailpipe emissions is seen as 'woke'. I have an EV, a diesel car, a petrol motorbike and a 2-stroke. The EV just works - its the nicest thing for any distance travel, it costs peanuts (to charge and service).
It seems to me to just demonstrate ignorance to label a propulsion system as 'woke' (and anything you haven't taken up/tried/understood).
Bob on!

Our stable has:
- A Seat Alhambra diesel for carrying 3 kids and 2 dogs to holidays
- A Tesla Y standard for everyday and weekend expeditions. It does the most miles, and my wife will have a hard time getting back to an i/c car for her everyday use.
- A Golf mk5 Edition 30 which is my airport car / short distances when wife uses her Tesla.
- A Street Triple 765RS for blowing the cobwebs, trackdays and taking 14 y.o daughter on a sunday morning brunch when weather allows it.

They all work great in their own way for their own purpose.

daveco

4,402 posts

236 months

Friday 31st May 2024
quotequote all
SydneyBridge said:
I do think some manufacturers, looking at you Jaguar, are going to be in big trouble relying on electric only
It's huge tell when Toyota are saying the ICE engine is nowhere close to obsolescence.

EVs essentially make cars white goods with no USP - why spend £100k on an EV Porsche when a £40k BYD offers similar performance?