RE: Skoda Superb Sleeper | PH Review
RE: Skoda Superb Sleeper | PH Review
Sunday 6th October 2024

Skoda Superb Sleeper | PH Review

There's under-the-radar performance, then there's a 477hp Superb wagon...


PistonHeads loves a sleeper. There’s something very Clark Kent/Superman about hiding lots of horsepower under a very unassuming body. It is the automotive version of walking softly with a big stick. When we feature Q-cars in Six of the Best, it always gets a great response; fast Volvo wagons remain the most popular Sheds; it’ll be no surprise to learn that the subtler, more modest old BMWs - shout out to my old 335i touring - are typically better received than the flashier ones. Light-under-a-bushel ‘bahnstormers are most definitely our bag. 

So no surprise this Skoda Superb 280 went down very, very well when announced earlier in the year. Commissioned to celebrate how popular the unassuming yet fast flagship has been since 2015, Skoda UK took that idea and ran with it much further than the factory ever deemed acceptable (in cahoots with RE Performance, who built the Bonneville car): think big Garrett turbo, better injectors, naughtier map and custom exhaust for 477hp and 486lb ft. Plus some expensive chassis and brake hardware to fully take advantage. While leaving the exterior totally untouched. 

It’s a very convincing facade. Normally builds like this will give the game away with aftermarket wheels or a silly exhaust, but this Superb keeps the same 19s as standard (albeit now properly stuffed into the arches thanks to the coilovers) and the standard pipes (the 2.0-litre turbo helped along with racier downpipes). The Laurin & Klement badges remain, as does the chrome trim and the Royal Green paint. Nobody will know. Even the delivery guy who dropped it off was surprised to hear the spec; he thought ‘sleeper’ on the job sheet meant it was going to have a tent on the roof and camping supplies…

It says a lot about what can be achieved with modern turbo engines (and some 99RON) that this 240hp-per-litre Superb can be driven like any other 2.0 TSI. It starts with a more purposeful burble, and those around will hear a bit of menace, but there’s no reluctance, cold running issues or excessive lag. It can dawdle along at a couple of thousand revs feeling a-ok. Better than that, in fact, because of the improvements to the brake and suspension - but we’ll get to that later. Rest assured this is no obstinate, awkward tuner car. 

But you’re not here to hear about how it goes slow. This is a Skoda Superb that’s probably as fast as an Audi RS3 - you know, less than 10 seconds to 100mph plus the best part of 180mph - and that’s as exciting to experience as it is to write down. The EA888 remains a pretty linear engine, torque building from 2,500rpm and the shove sustained - rather than ramping up - to the limiter, but the flip side of that undramatic delivery is that it feels fast all the time. There’s no huge lag to overcome, or rev threshold to reach; the speed just builds and builds and builds for as long as you dare. Overtakes become extended for the sake of it, slip roads seem a whole lot shorter, and quick squirts off roundabouts soon get a bit inappropriate. Hot hatches don’t know what to make of it. All in a car that looks like a retirement gift - brilliant. 

Perhaps a more rousing soundtrack would be nice, the combination of angry turbo blare and the augmented additions not really raising the pulse, though it’s probably a price worth paying to keep the unaltered aesthetic. The Skoda wouldn’t be the same car with big exhausts. The seven-speed DSG is a more glaring weak spot, some of the shifts thumping through unsettlingly and the initial step off sluggish. It’s a shame the kick down switch remains programmed in and the auto change up retained; if ever there was a car to feel haul at full throttle in a high gear, this is it. The box was never the best bit of the package, and all the extra power has only highlighted that fact. 

Still, the sleeper has plenty else to distract you from a less-than-stellar dual-clutch. Every person responsible for making performance cars in the VW universe should have a go in this for an idea of how brakes and suspension should feel. The former in particular are monstrous, the stopping power immense and the feel a world away from a grabby, overly light stock setup. The powers of deceleration are just as shocking as the accelerative ones, and only furthers your incredulity from behind the wheel. It stops like a touring car, and means the point to point pace of the Skoda is phenomenal.

The suspension is very nicely sorted, too, further proof that money is surely better invested in a well-judged coilover solution than 15 adaptive settings. It’s a bit tougher at low speed, though always fantastically absorbent and compliant. The very worst of any imperfection is always smothered, which actually makes for a more relaxing car despite the tighter control because any vagueness or crashiness is eradicated. Strict and well marshalled puts you at ease more than lax and overly easygoing.

Such are the improvements, in fact, that you soon start to wish for a slightly better foundation to have been built from. While nothing else does the Q car vibe like a green Superb, it isn’t hard to imagine what a keener turn in and tauter front end might do with the benefit of a VAQ diff between the wheels as well. Or the torque vectoring rear axle from the Golf R. Ultimately this still feels like a front-biased all-wheel drive application (because it is), and so there’s not really anything more to unlock once the considerable purchase of the sticky Yokohamas has been breached.

Which is to take nothing from the standard 280, of course - given the remit and price, it was always eminently recommendable. Perhaps never more so, in fact, than now, with plentiful secondhand cars around, starting at less than £15k. This sleeper is a fine achievement, too; what it demonstrates, in quite charming fashion, is the scope for improvement that exists in the platform. This’ll still do 30mpg while you’re gapping A35s on the A34, if not more so given an easier time. It doesn’t squeak or rattle or bump or grind; there’s a nadge more noise from the brakes and engine, though nothing untoward given the towering performance of each. 

So when you want this to be a Superb estate, it’s more than capable; its sports car humbling performance and ability always remain accessible rather than overbearing. The compromise for a car of such extended abilities really isn’t very much at all - it’s been built to a very high standard. Anybody who’s been tempted to do similar shouldn’t hesitate to contact someone like RE Performance; a faster, sharper, ruder Skoda Superb that looks like any other is even better than we’d hoped. 


SPECIFICATION | SKODA SUPERB 2.0 TSI 4X4 DSG

Engine: 1,984cc four-cyl turbo
Transmission: 7-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 280@4,500-6,200rpm (standard, now 477)
Torque (lb ft): 258@1,500-4,400rpm (standard, now 486)
0-62mph: 5.8 secs (standard, now c. 4.5 seconds)
Top speed: 155mph
Weight (kg): 1,615
MPG: 39.8 (standard)
CO2: 159 (standard)
Price: N/A

Author
Discussion

el romeral

Original Poster:

2,155 posts

166 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
Love it, great colour, fairly traditional dash, gorgeous seats, sensible tints and silver wheels. Can actually see the engine too, I guess it is maybe just missing the cover?

Edited by el romeral on Saturday 5th October 06:26

vladcjelli

3,370 posts

187 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
Showing my age when the photo I actually went “Ooh, look at that” was of the large boot…

The 280 would be plenty enough for me, but this seems like a belter.

Turini

474 posts

195 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
Looking forward to the video review on a certain late braking channel, limited run please even if the concept of a Q car is probably long gone given such extremes of performance in EVs

Fore Left

1,611 posts

211 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all

newbie101

53 posts

139 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
Needs a v6 in my humble opinion. I feel the same way about this as the new 4 pot c63. Technically impressive but no interest in owning one.

wistec1

794 posts

70 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
Almost like Skoda's attempt at their Alpina going on here but with very little to give it away. Even with Vag's money and assistance it's great to see how Skoda have elevated themselves from the badge snobbery doldrums to this very desirable creation albeit with the help of RE. Wonderfully Q.


Edited by wistec1 on Saturday 5th October 07:55

wistec1

794 posts

70 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
Will R.E actually modify one for you or is this still a one off only?

Scoobysaurus

360 posts

126 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
Fore Left said:
Short memories over at PH Towers...

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Bizarre

ChrisCh86

1,127 posts

73 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
Such a great family car, our 2016 280 (albeit standard) is a great daily. Comfortable, plenty of space for the kids, good infotainment (ours is upgraded to the newer 2017+ MIB2.5 system and fast(ish).

The kids haven't managed to ruin it yet too!

mooseracer

2,783 posts

199 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
Scoobysaurus said:
Fore Left said:
Short memories over at PH Towers...

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Bizarre
Yes, I mean why would you have 2 articles - 1 about the car when announced and another later on when you get to drive it?

Black S2K

1,899 posts

278 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
mooseracer said:
Scoobysaurus said:
Fore Left said:
Short memories over at PH Towers...

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Bizarre
Yes, I mean why would you have 2 articles - 1 about the car when announced and another later on when you get to drive it?
It's a slow news time of year - nothing unusual about an announcement followed by a test drive report, anyway.

It's more the regular thing of a prick-teaser image about a decade before the car actually arrives followed by meaningless drip-feeds, that mean I'm utterly bored of it by the time of the publication of the UK drive report.

Scoobysaurus

360 posts

126 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
mooseracer said:
Scoobysaurus said:
Fore Left said:
Short memories over at PH Towers...

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Bizarre
Yes, I mean why would you have 2 articles - 1 about the car when announced and another later on when you get to drive it?
Yeah sure, look at all the photos

charltjr

474 posts

38 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
wistec1 said:
Will R.E actually modify one for you or is this still a one off only?
It’s mostly a bunch of bolt-on bits, plenty of VAG tuners will be able to do something similar. Not to take anything away from RE, who are very highly regarded indeed, but AFAIK Skoda gave them a standard car and a brief as to what they wanted the outcome to be like.

Baldchap

9,624 posts

121 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
On the DSG front, I'd love to know whether the writer has ever owned one. Reason I ask is they aren't like a TC automatic gearbox and they do require a level of knowledge and ability to use properly.

I've always got on very well with them, but I took the time to understand them. A friend of mine was convinced his was broken until VW sent a tech out in the car with him who got him using it properly.

You wouldn't expect to know how to drive a manual without training but people continue to use DSGs badly and then blame the product.

Not a rant, just an observation.

Phil300plus

32 posts

151 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
Or for what I guess would be similar cost, assuming a 22/23 plate Superb as the starting point, buy a 2021-22 E53 estate and have the same performance but with the factory warranty, inline six and a far nicer interior. Not quite as 'stealth' as the Skoda but fairly understated.

Dr G

15,964 posts

271 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
Fore Left said:
Short memories over at PH Towers...

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
You know this is in the article, right? Paragraph 2, line 1.

Bobupndown

2,951 posts

72 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
Absolutely love this!

Still Mulling

16,592 posts

206 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
Splendid. If only there was a synonym for that…

CG2020UK

2,954 posts

69 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
Big fan of the Superb and that colour looks brilliant.


Mercdriver

3,000 posts

62 months

Saturday 5th October 2024
quotequote all
Baldchap said:
On the DSG front, I'd love to know whether the writer has ever owned one. Reason I ask is they aren't like a TC automatic gearbox and they do require a level of knowledge and ability to use properly.

I've always got on very well with them, but I took the time to understand them. A friend of mine was convinced his was broken until VW sent a tech out in the car with him who got him using it properly.

You wouldn't expect to know how to drive a manual without training but people continue to use DSGs badly and then blame the product.

Not a rant, just an observation.
What training is required to drive the auto box, not a criticism I have one on a 2L 4x4?

Been driving autos since the 80’s, working in Glasgow and got fed up changing gear all the time, now I would not have anything else