RE: Subaru Forester STI | PH Auction Block
RE: Subaru Forester STI | PH Auction Block
Friday 24th January 2025

Subaru Forester STI | PH Auction Block

Need an SUV in your life? Here's a rare, Litchfield-tuned family wagon that won't sap the joy out of driving


Like it or not, sporty crossovers and SUVs are immensely popular and will form a core part of the performance car market for many years to come. Good thing that several manufacturers have stepped up to the plate and invested blood, sweat and tears into turning inherently un-sporty family wagons into bonafide performance cars. Ford did a stellar job with the Puma ST, BMW (usually) injects some M magic into its family mobiles with relative success and there’ll be a decent number of PHers who’ll rank the AMG G63 among their guiltiest of pleasures.

Fast SUVs aren’t a new phenomenon, of course. Porsche has been chucking out sporty versions of the Cayenne for over two decades and once upon a time Volvo offered the XC90 with a 4.4-litre V8. But the first properly cool performance SUV (if you can call it that) arguably came from Japan, specifically Mitsubishi’s Pajero Evolution built to homologate the firm’s off-roader for the Paris-Dakar. And a few years later, Subaru came along with its own rally-inspired crossover with the Forester STI, much like the one that’s about to go under the PH hammer.

Actually, the first Forester STI came out in 2004, whereas the one here is a facelifted model from 2007, but the two are largely identical underneath. Which is to say, the same underpinnings as the Impreza with lots of STI goodies bolted to it. Sportier springs and reworked suspension struts were fitted all round, while the anti-roll bars were beefed up to help keep that Forester’s cupboardy frame in check. A faster steering rack was thrown in for a greater sense of agility, and the brakes were of course upgraded with four-pot Brembo calipers on the front axle.

Power-wise, the Forester STI used an uprated version of Subaru’s 2.5-litre four-cylinder boxer engine, which sounds a lot like the motor found in UK-spec ‘Hawkeye’ WRX STIs but it was a little different in design. Nevertheless, it featured the same manifold and six-speed gearbox as the WRX STI, and came with a bigger intercooler and freer-flowing exhaust, bringing power up to 265hp and 279lb ft of torque. Not quite on par with the saloon, but not far off at all, and with the added benefit of a giant boot and a bit more ground clearance.

Best of all, it looked like a proper STI. Both bumpers were given sporty reworks, a spoiler was plonked on the rear and pink STI badges and stickers were slapped all over the body. The bonnet scoop appeared a little larger, too, likely to feed more air into the uprated, top-mounted intercooler. And no, metallic purple wasn’t offered from the factory and is a wrap on this particular car. It doesn’t look too bad, either, and goes nicely with the gold-painted brake callipers and black stickers. However, if you’d rather rip it off you’ll find a more muted Obsidian Black underneath. 

Also, notice the Litchfield badge at the back? The tuning firm imported the car from Japan (it was never officially sold here) and treated it to some choice upgrades before handing it over to its first buyer. Said upgrades have lifted power up to a dyno-recorded 333hp, which sounds a lot more like it. These are proper cult cars these days, and are a great way to mix family requirements with a love for noughties rallying and turbo whistles. And you won’t have long to wait until the auction gets underway, with bids being accepted from January 29th. But if you really, really want it, you could always beat bidders to the punch by submitting an offer the seller can’t refuse… 


See the original advert

Author
Discussion

fantheman80

Original Poster:

2,596 posts

78 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Purple works on some cars. Not this one - more quality street than quality

DaveCWK

2,400 posts

203 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
fantheman80 said:
Purple works on some cars. Not this one - more quality street than quality
Not sure it works on any car TBH yuck

StoutBench

1,509 posts

57 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Terrible color but the absolute perfect car if you are outdoorsy and want to get a wriggle on. Most competent car I've ever owned really was a do anything machine.

fantheman80

Original Poster:

2,596 posts

78 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
DaveCWK said:
fantheman80 said:
Purple works on some cars. Not this one - more quality street than quality
Not sure it works on any car TBH yuck
I think Lambo looks good, GT3RS with silver wheels- er...the jokers daily

Scrooloose

888 posts

245 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
DaveCWK said:
fantheman80 said:
Purple works on some cars. Not this one - more quality street than quality
Not sure it works on any car TBH yuck
I respectfully disagree! Love a purple motor!




supacool1

738 posts

208 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Having been a previous owner of a pre facelift FSTI in WR Blue. This wrap looks utter wk. The Facelift isn't a looker in my eyes, but the original colour was a good one as can be seen in the door shuts. It's a rough looking car and quite dirty in the pics....surprised it wasn't properly cleaned.

Just noticed the oily turbo outlet into the bottom of the intercooler, indicating a borked turbo oil bearing or heavy oil misting... And there's a mistake in the article. It should have more than the 186 torques....should be 286 lbs/ft...

Edited by supacool1 on Thursday 23 January 13:47

Bispal

1,989 posts

180 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
I just sold my standard pre face lift Forester (non STi) and it was an amazing car. Small, light, nimble & comfortable. I considered an STi but the bonnet bulge, huge exhausts & blacked out widows aren't for me. You can't get a sunroof with an STi either.

The car to get (IMHO) is a pre face lift (around 2003-2005) 2.5XT (or 2.0 XT allegedly stronger engine). These you can get sans sat nav and with a pano roof and cloth seats. Perfect spec. Looks a lot less yobbo too and just as quick. A real Q car.


CKY

2,268 posts

44 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Scrooloose said:
DaveCWK said:
fantheman80 said:
Purple works on some cars. Not this one - more quality street than quality
Not sure it works on any car TBH yuck
I respectfully disagree! Love a purple motor!



Indeed, and that's without posting a picture of an E34 M5/E36 M3 in Daytona Violet. Oh well, their loss biglaugh

MDMA .

10,682 posts

130 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Not a big fan of the face-lift version. My old one below.


StoutBench

1,509 posts

57 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Bispal said:
I just sold my standard pre face lift Forester (non STi) and it was an amazing car. Small, light, nimble & comfortable. I considered an STi but the bonnet bulge, huge exhausts & blacked out widows aren't for me. You can't get a sunroof with an STi either.

The car to get (IMHO) is a pre face lift (around 2003-2005) 2.5XT (or 2.0 XT allegedly stronger engine). These you can get sans sat nav and with a pano roof and cloth seats. Perfect spec. Looks a lot less yobbo too and just as quick. A real Q car.
Just as quick on what planet? Not really comparable especially on cost.

GreatScott2016

2,507 posts

117 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
MDMA . said:
Not a big fan of the face-lift version. My old one below.

Not a fan of the purple wrap, hopefully it’s white underneath just like yours as white really looks lovely beer

MDMA .

10,682 posts

130 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
GreatScott2016 said:
MDMA . said:
Not a big fan of the face-lift version. My old one below.

Not a fan of the purple wrap, hopefully it’s white underneath just like yours as white really looks lovely beer
Perfect spec for me would be the earlier version but with the late colour option of dark grey metallic. You just have to watch for HG issues around 90-100k miles, so if looking for one, get a low mileage one or one that has had a rebuild.

si_xsi

1,319 posts

224 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
I'm sure that will make a good workhorse for someone but the wrap looks naff, someone's spent £2k on it but neglected to run a cloth over the engine bay. Think i'd of saved the cash or used it elsewhere on the car.

BUG4LIFE

2,518 posts

247 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
MDMA . said:
Not a big fan of the face-lift version. My old one below.

Always got to follow up your post smile I wonder where she is now?!


MDMA .

10,682 posts

130 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
BUG4LIFE said:
MDMA . said:
Not a big fan of the face-lift version. My old one below.

Always got to follow up your post smile I wonder where she is now?!

Looks like it is now on a different registration.

911Spanker

3,640 posts

45 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
A massively overrated car - I didn't gel with mine at all.

A lower spec Forester or an Impreza would be far better.

mmcd87

632 posts

232 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Bispal said:
I just sold my standard pre face lift Forester (non STi) and it was an amazing car. Small, light, nimble & comfortable. I considered an STi but the bonnet bulge, huge exhausts & blacked out widows aren't for me. You can't get a sunroof with an STi either.

The car to get (IMHO) is a pre face lift (around 2003-2005) 2.5XT (or 2.0 XT allegedly stronger engine). These you can get sans sat nav and with a pano roof and cloth seats. Perfect spec. Looks a lot less yobbo too and just as quick. A real Q car.
In my opinion the Subaru XT and WRX cars were quite dull as standard but really came alive with a remap or factory Prodrive Performance Pack.

The STI is a fair bit quicker than the XT. I found my standard facelift Forester XT ‘ok’ but never really loved it. I suspect I would have better liked one of the Litchfield Foresters or similar but the cost difference seemed too much at the time to justify.

Sat Nav was absolutely terrible, though I agree the sunroof is worth looking out for!

Edited by mmcd87 on Thursday 23 January 16:34

P-Jay

11,403 posts

220 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Yeah... Nah.

I don't want to drive Prince's Herse, whatever it drives like.

911Spanker

3,640 posts

45 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
P-Jay said:
Yeah... Nah.

I don't want to drive Prince's Herse, whatever it drives like.
They don't drive that well...

el romeral

2,154 posts

166 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Impressive power output but I could not live with how they look.