RE: 2025 Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 Hybrid | UK Review
RE: 2025 Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 Hybrid | UK Review
Friday 31st January 2025

2025 Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 Hybrid | UK Review

You can now get Mercedes-AMG's persuasive 449hp straight-six as a plug-in hybrid - why wouldn't that work?


The plug-in hybrid version of the GLE 53 has endured what seems like a bumpy ride before finally arriving in the UK. Revealed back in 2023 - and fundamentally sharing its powertrain with the E53 we drove last summer - it was suggested at the time that the model might not make it to the UK at all, presumably on the basis that it would be redundant what with everyone buying electric SUVs like they were enormous loaves of subsidised sliced white. Fifteen months later, with that forecast in tatters and plug-in hybrids propping up new car sales across the board, the Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 HYBRID has suddenly materialised. Little wonder its maker has felt the need to spell out its distinguishing feature in capital letters. 

In fairness, this is also to distinguish it from the other Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 you can apparently still buy, which shares the 449hp six-cylinder petrol engine, but is limited to mild-hybrid status by its familiar 20hp starter generator. The HYBRID, thanks to the presence of a transmission-mounted 136hp e-motor and an underfloor 31kWh battery in the boot, claims a 536hp total output and is claimed to offer around 55 miles of electric range alongside 31g/km combined CO2 emissions. It’ll also do 0-62mph in 4.7 seconds (three-tenths quicker than its sibling, despite being a startling half a tonne heavier on paper) and make it to 90mph on battery power alone. Or 155mph with the straight-six running. In other words, it is Mercedes-AMG’s idea of a plug-in HYBRID should be. So what’s not to like? 

Well, to start with, not a whole lot. Despite a recent facelift and some shouty AMG trim addenda (and despite this pre-production car taking its Night Edition status a mite too seriously), the GLE has a curiously anonymous aura when parked up - probably because the W167 model has been around since 2018 and its lineage stretches all the way back to the positively ancient ML. So while it doesn’t want for new tech inside or a general feeling of modernity, the ambience and architecture - heavy on air vents and (for 2025) physical switchgear - is curiously old-fashioned. Which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. A G-Class it manifestly isn’t, yet with shortcuts for deactivating the lane assist and speed limit warning present and correct on a nicely integrated infotainment screen, there is precious little about the GLE cabin that will exasperate you. That’s a win. 

As you’d expect from a plug-in hybrid with meaningful battery range, it doesn’t do much to rile you up when ghosting about the place either. As ever, there’s a limit to the electric motor’s performance relative to the petrol engine, but with 324lb ft of torque to call upon, you’re unlikely to locate it just pottering about town. Which, if you’re happy to set aside the question of what an AMG badge (and its premium) is supposed to confer in these moments, is fine - the GLE mimics a luxury EV well enough for as long as it is able, and Mercedes suggests that a 60kW charger will have it back to 80 per cent of capacity in as little as 20 minutes. Confined exclusively to school-run duties, your child would never know what the engine sounded like. 

As it happens, this would probably be the ideal state of affairs. This is not the sort of HYBRID that lends itself to the seamless interaction of power sources once the battery is drained - or not in Comfort anyway, which is the default mode once you’ve reached the limit of silent running. The main problem (if we can call it that) is that the battery is never truly exhausted, and instead continues to function like a beefed-up version of the mild-hybrid on partial throttle openings. This ought to be fine, but because it has access to more power, the GLE insists on dutifully shutting down the engine when it assumes it isn’t needed - which, by Mercedes reckoning, is virtually all the time you’re not accelerating very purposefully. 

Now, if the baton-passing between e-motor and awakening straight-six were as smooth as a Jamaican 4x100m team in mid-flight, this arrangement would be acceptable - and around town, it’s generally okay - but when you’re moving between mundane A road speeds, the transition from battery energy to petrol power is not just tediously obvious, there is also a sufficient half-second lull between the two to make the pace of your progress seem momentarily disconnected from the accelerator pedal. Which is not just irksome in a ‘why can’t things be perfect’ kind of way, but also about as appropriate to a 536hp Mercedes-AMG as it would be if you replaced the Jamaican team’s baton with a half-empty plastic cider bottle. 

Admittedly, this is less of a concern at higher speeds (where the engine isn’t quite so adamant about switching off) and you can squelch the problem entirely by driving everywhere in Sport mode, where the always-on engine and e-motor combine from the get-go. The presence of the latter at low revs means the M256 unit does without its lag-reducing electric compressor, although with up to 553lb ft of torque available, the six-pot doesn’t take very long relocate its likably punchy delivery and a good deal more of its raspy soundtrack. The only downside here is that the nine-speed MCT, usually so adept at selecting the appropriate cog, is inclined to hang onto intermediary ratios like you were Colin McRae on the RAC. Fine if you really are flat out; less good if you just want to push on a bit. 

You could change gears for yourself, of course - but the HYBRID never seems particularly suited to spirited paddling in the manner of, say, a Jaguar F-Pace SVR or a high-spec Porsche Cayenne. Which is a shame, because it turns out Mercedes-AMG has done a good job of nailing the car’s air-suspended chassis settings. To appropriately contain its eye-popping 2.8-tonne kerbweight, the manufacturer has added passive stabilisers to both axles, installed new stop buffers in the front struts and upgraded the dampers at the back. Assuming you appreciate a well-judged compromise between plush ride comfort and positive body control, the updated hardware pays real dividends: the plug-in GLE never seems less than heavy and nor does it convincingly shrink around you, but it is easily assured enough for you to go very quickly indeed without sacrificing the sort of long-wave absorbency that makes a large SUV vaguely appealing in the first place. 

Dial it up to Sport+ - eminently usable on UK roads - and you’ll locate sufficient go-faster wallop to finally justify the AMG label, even if fuel consumption at this point inevitably descends to the 20-something-MPG that makes you question the advantage of the unavoidably hefty HYBRID bit. Ultimately, you’ll need to be convinced of its real-world benefits for two reasons: one, because the model is priced from £94,360 (fractionally more than a similarly powerful Cayenne S E-Hybrid) which is no small amount of money in a crowded premium SUV market. And two, the presence of its mild-hybrid sibling with the same gutsy petrol engine but spared the cumbersome, boot-pilfering battery (630 litres versus 490 litres), means the thought of a much lighter, more practical and dynamically straightforward GLE is probably going to fester - especially if you've not got a compelling use case for going HYBRID. 


SPECIFICATION | MERCEDES-AMG GLE 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ NIGHT EDITION PREMIUM PLUS

Engine: 2,999cc, turbo straight-six, 31kWh battery, e-motor
Transmission: 9-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 536 (system output; engine 449hp, motor 136hp)
Torque (lb ft): 553 (system output; engine 413lb ft, motor 324lb ft)
0-62mph: 4.7 seconds
Top speed: 155mph (limited; 90mph in EV)
Weight: 2,800kg (EU)
MPG: 201.8-217.3
CO2: 31g/km
Price: £101,360 (as tested)

Author
Discussion

GianiCakes

Original Poster:

567 posts

95 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
Doesn’t sound like the hybrid weight penalty is worth it in this case but that looks like a much better, dechintzified, cabin from Mercedes. That will make a big difference if they roll it out across the range including the SL and GT.

Motormouth88

690 posts

82 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
Actually don’t mind the look of these, minus the fake exhaust tips, a mainstay on any semi skimmed AMG.

Enjoyed the article too, Nic. Though…”smooth as a Jamaican 4x100m team in mid-flight” I’m sorry what?

cerb4.5lee

40,976 posts

202 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
I do really like the idea of this, and funnily enough I have a test drive booked this morning in a BMW X5 50e, so I'm very close to dipping my toe into this world of PHEV's as well. The X5 50e is a bit lighter than this too, but that won't make much difference in this market of car though in fairness, because they're all heavy so and so's anyway.

Gruntled

176 posts

101 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
2,800 kgs 😱

Tyre manufacturers must be minting it….

cerb4.5lee

40,976 posts

202 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
Motormouth88 said:
Enjoyed the article too, Nic. Though…”smooth as a Jamaican 4x100m team in mid-flight” I’m sorry what?
I presume that you've never dropped the baton while trying to pass it on when doing a relay race then? biggrin

cerb4.5lee

40,976 posts

202 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
Gruntled said:
2,800 kgs ??

Tyre manufacturers must be minting it….
Our current GLE400d is on it's 7th set of rear tyres now for reference, and that "only" weighs 2300kg in comparison. The rear tyres are 325/35/22's, so they don't come cheap either(well if you don't go for a ditchfinder anyway and you stick to Pirelli/Michelin etc).

andy43

12,446 posts

276 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
Why wouldn’t that work?
The chance of a 16 grand battery replacement perhaps?

Wills2

27,890 posts

197 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all

I was driving a GLE 300D last night it was OK unless you wanted to overtake (didn't have the grunt for that) but the economy was shockingly bad at 22mpg, felt a bit tippy toed at speed though as all big wheeled SUVs do compared to the hunkered down feeling you get from the saloon or estate alternatives, no matter the brand they always feel like your driving a bus as they lollop along.




cerb4.5lee

40,976 posts

202 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
I was driving a GLE 300D last night it was OK unless you wanted to overtake (didn't have the grunt for that) but the economy was shockingly bad at 22mpg, felt a bit tippy toed at speed though as all big wheeled SUVs do compared to the hunkered down feeling you get from the saloon or estate alternatives, no matter the brand they always feel like your driving a bus as they lollop along.
I never liked my old 2004 X5 4.8iS that I had back in 2010 for that either. That was only 2200kg in weight, but it wasn't very reassuring in the corners or under braking for me. Whereas every review you read about the X5 was that it drove just like a normal car, but of course they don't though, because they're tall and shaped like a brick, and they're loads heavier than most normal cars too.

Economy wise for the GLE, I think you're best leaving the GLE300d well alone, and just go for the GLE400d instead. 4 cylinder 2.0 engines don't have a place in a heavy SUV for me, because you don't get either the performance or the economy from them for me.

BlueJ

400 posts

67 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
I despair at this trend for ever bigger, ever heavier cars and SUVs. I must be turning into Victor Meldrew!

In my early 50's and as the market moves towards heavier, more complex vehicles I find my tastes going in the opposite direction - smaller, lighter, more analogue please!

Am I the only one with these sentiments?


pb8g09

2,970 posts

91 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
Nah I’d take the GLE63. Lose the hybrid gubbins, whack a hefty V8 in there.

DaveyBoyWonder

3,479 posts

196 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
100 grand, pushing 3 tonnes... Nah.

To be fair, in the blob shaped SUV world I do think this looks decent.

GianiCakes

Original Poster:

567 posts

95 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
BlueJ said:
I despair at this trend for ever bigger, ever heavier cars and SUVs. I must be turning into Victor Meldrew!

In my early 50's and as the market moves towards heavier, more complex vehicles I find my tastes going in the opposite direction - smaller, lighter, more analogue please!

Am I the only one with these sentiments?
I’ve got a few years on you but I’m also enjoying bigger cars these days including SUVs. I know I’ve let everyone down, especially myself, but these days spirited driving where you enjoy agile handling is a very small part of my daily needs. I also think it’s become an automatic criticism of modern cars ignoring many of the benefits, particularly safety, that have come with it. People are outraged at the 2 tonne weight of the new SL yet they’ve been that weight for decades at this point.
Small, light and agile are wonderful in a car but generally more suitable for a 2nd (3rd 4th etc) car than the DD. Other opinions are available.

theicemario

1,489 posts

97 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
Very imaginative spec that. Hideous thing

Wills2

27,890 posts

197 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
Wills2 said:
I was driving a GLE 300D last night it was OK unless you wanted to overtake (didn't have the grunt for that) but the economy was shockingly bad at 22mpg, felt a bit tippy toed at speed though as all big wheeled SUVs do compared to the hunkered down feeling you get from the saloon or estate alternatives, no matter the brand they always feel like your driving a bus as they lollop along.
I never liked my old 2004 X5 4.8iS that I had back in 2010 for that either. That was only 2200kg in weight, but it wasn't very reassuring in the corners or under braking for me. Whereas every review you read about the X5 was that it drove just like a normal car, but of course they don't though, because they're tall and shaped like a brick, and they're loads heavier than most normal cars too.

Economy wise for the GLE, I think you're best leaving the GLE300d well alone, and just go for the GLE400d instead. 4 cylinder 2.0 engines don't have a place in a heavy SUV for me, because you don't get either the performance or the economy from them for me.
I wasn't looking to buy it Lee it was a dealers car (a friend) I have an e 350d on the drive and that's poor as well so I won't be be replacing it with another merc of any flavour, back to BMW in summer for me. (I never realised just how much better they are than mercs)

Just checked the weight of that GLE53 2800kg! so 4 up it's 3 tonnes...wow.


fantheman80

2,353 posts

71 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
Motormouth88 said:
Nic. Though…”smooth as a Jamaican 4x100m team in mid-flight” I’m sorry what?
Do you really not get that?

I dont mind this at all....and I think maybe...just maybe OEMs are realising putting buttons back on the dash is what consumers actually want. They do read these pages after all.... wink

GreatScott2016

2,197 posts

110 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
I do really like the idea of this, and funnily enough I have a test drive booked this morning in a BMW X5 50e, so I'm very close to dipping my toe into this world of PHEV's as well. The X5 50e is a bit lighter than this too, but that won't make much difference in this market of car though in fairness, because they're all heavy so and so's anyway.
A sad day indeed smile. Do share your thoughts though, I have a sneaky feeling that you might just like it! hehe

andy43

12,446 posts

276 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
pb8g09 said:
Nah I’d take the GLE63. Lose the hybrid gubbins, whack a hefty V8 in there.
There’s a bit of a sweet spot on the older frumpier GLE63 where you can get the 5.5 twin turbo but still only pay £190 car tax. Holding their value well too.

cerb4.5lee

40,976 posts

202 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
BlueJ said:
I despair at this trend for ever bigger, ever heavier cars and SUVs. I must be turning into Victor Meldrew!

In my early 50's and as the market moves towards heavier, more complex vehicles I find my tastes going in the opposite direction - smaller, lighter, more analogue please!

Am I the only one with these sentiments?
I'm the same age as you, but why not have both? I've got a Caterham Seven as well to offset the GLE for example.

Motormouth88

690 posts

82 months

Friday 31st January 2025
quotequote all
fantheman80 said:
Motormouth88 said:
Nic. Though…”smooth as a Jamaican 4x100m team in mid-flight” I’m sorry what?
Do you really not get that?

I dont mind this at all....and I think maybe...just maybe OEMs are realising putting buttons back on the dash is what consumers actually want. They do read these pages after all.... wink
No I get it…it’s just too random for my liking