RE: Aston CEO on new specials, PHEVs and less 'frenzy'
RE: Aston CEO on new specials, PHEVs and less 'frenzy'
Tuesday 4th February 2025

Aston CEO on new specials, PHEVs and less 'frenzy'

Adrian Hallmark has a lot to discuss - not least the idea that Aston Martin might not go fully electric until 2040


Adrian Hallmark has been the boss of Aston Martin for about five months now. There are likely many good reasons why he chose to leave Bentley, the brand he’d very successfully led since 2018, but for the purposes of this meeting with the press - his first roundtable since starting his tenure - he has it boiled down to one: “To be the first guy in 112 years to make it sustainably profitable.” This, as anyone even vaguely familiar with Aston Martin’s long history will tell you, is much easier said than done. 

The firm’s more recent predicaments notwithstanding (its latest financial results are imminent following a profit warning late last year), Hallmark suggests that his new employer is in a much better place than when he walked in the door at Crewe. Even if he’s minded to describe Aston’s output over the past year and a half as a ‘frenzy’ of product development: “I’ve never seen as much ambition as four cars in 18 months; no one ever tried that.” This hyperactive launch programme has evidently taken its toll internally, and Hallmark concedes that not every new model was necessarily perfect on day one - but it has resulted in the kind of portfolio that most luxury carmakers can only dream about. 

Though he doesn’t say it, the impression that those inside Aston, fuelled by the ambition of current ownership and suddenly with the resources to do something about it, went a tiny bit mad, is palpable. The Valiant, for example, a V12-powered special based on another special edition, the Valour, went from concept to delivery in less than a year. “Phenomenal,” says Hallmark, but not necessarily good in a way you'd choose to repeat. Certainly not when Aston was already straining to finish Valhalla (a PHEV it first revealed back in 2019) and bring the Valkyrie’s decade-long development to a close - a mind-boggling challenge that causes even the seen-it-all-before exec’s head to shake in reverential disbelief. 

Accordingly, at the root of Hallmark’s plan for the immediate future is some careful stock-taking and perhaps a more thoughtful consideration of data than Aston has attempted before. “We’re going to slow it down a bit and get boring,” he says optimistically. Of course, when he means ‘boring’ he means making money in a more efficient and cost-effective way than launching an all-new car every three months. This includes the number of cost options currently available to buyers (Aston has already identified up to 90 items that its rivals offer that it doesn’t) and the introduction of more and better-defined derivatives of its existing models. 

This facet of the modern luxury market hardly needs explaining, although Hallmark has the most obvious example already teed up: “Vantage, great car - but a 911 has 15 derivatives in a five-year period,” said with the quizzical look of a man stating a fact he believes to be obvious. “In two years there’s got to be a reason to buy a better Vantage - and in two years after that another better Vantage. [Aston] never had that intensity of life cycle innovation that we need.” The DB12 and DBX - the SUV singled out as a perennial underachiever in the current lineup - are identified by name as suffering from the same issue. So expect that to change in the short term. 

Modest-sounding stuff perhaps, but readily achievable, repeatedly proven to work and much less strenuous on the production front. Moreover, in case the significance had passed everyone by, Hallmark has a gem of a soundbite to flesh out the wider meaning: “If you had Bentley’s core business (i.e. its margin per vehicles) and Aston’s specials, that company would be as profitable as Ferrari.” You’d imagine this is precisely the sort of thing that Lawrence Stroll likes hearing, and it explains the second part of the incremental game plan that his new CEO has been working on. 

“We’re going to use Vanquish and Valhalla as the basis to do a couple of specials - and only those - and do them in the right time according to a credible development period and pre-marketing, and get them sold before we’ve even declared them.” Not just the inevitable open-top Volante derivatives either, but a “completely different concept” albeit built on the core technologies of arguably Aston’s most interesting cars. Vanquish Zagato anyone? Or Valhalla Newey-002? Aston certainly has considerable form when it comes to dreaming up niche crowd-pleasers, a knack that Hallmark confessed he’d been ‘jealous’ of when viewed from Crewe. 

Bentley, of course, made its own inroads into the seven-figure niche market with GT-based cars like the Batur and Bacalar - but the VW-owned brand does not rival the diversity of Aston’s lineup, which (let’s not forget) now encompasses platforms as dissimilar as a V8-powered SUV and a petrol-electric V12 hypercar. The 1079hp Valhalla, finally due for launch later this year - which Hallmark called the ‘most affordable’ mid-engine car in its class based on its output and hybrid configuration - offers yet another chance to ‘reposition’ Aston for buyers who’ve not previously found something to their liking. 

The emphasis on trying to gauge what future customers might want informs a significant part of Aston’s longer-term strategy for electrification. Having already delayed revealing an incoming EV, Hallmark confirmed that we will see a fully electric model before the end of the decade - quite what form it will take is apparently still not decided - but suggested that switchover to exclusively battery-powered cars might not now occur till after 2035, reflecting a school of thought (one previously alluded to by Lawrence Stroll and familiar to PHers) that exceptionally wealthy people were unlikely to start favouring luxury EVs simply because there was societal pressure to do so. 

“Up until 2030, combustion engines with some form of electrification will still be the majority of our business,” Hallmark explained, addressing what he calls the first phase of Aston’s blueprint for the next decade. “And beyond 2030, it will at whatever rate become more and more electric up to the point of being full electric sometime - maybe not even in 2035, you never know - but ’35 to ’40 is the new expectation of when the full switch would occur.” If that sounds very much like the can being kicked down the road again, Hallmark is quick to point to the broader legislative wavering that has occurred globally: “We’re fully committed to BEVs but the uncertainty is disruptive,” he noted. “There is no way we can go fully BEV overnight and sustain the company.” 

As you might expect, the immediate priority is to introduce the kind of crowd-pleasing plug-in hybrid options for Aston’s front-engined cars that have just started appearing in Bentley’s showrooms. When asked whether he missed access to a modular parts bin as well-stocked as the VW Group’s, Hallmark reckoned, “it is no different dealing with Mercedes-Benz than dealing with Porsche” - which is handy, because Aston will continue to rely on Stuttgart for a ready supply of engines. Not necessarily transmissions, though, a distinction that suggests the manufacturer is considering a wider role for the in-house-developed eight-speed DCT it introduced on Valhalla, not least because it already features a built-in e-motor. At any rate, with 2030 looming large in the window, those developmental cogs are clearly being made to turn as quickly as possible. 

That said, there is an acceptance - emphatically reiterated by its CEO - that Aston cannot do everything and must choose its bets carefully. Interestingly, these are unlikely to include many more reinvigorated classics in the style of the DB5 continuation cars. Hallmark identified the brand’s Works department as crucial to retaining know-how and delivering historical product support (one of the key reasons Bentley instigated the Blower programme was to teach itself lost skills and reanimate a supplier base) but “constantly doing recreations is not a good thing”. Aston’s valuable time, we can surmise, is better spent looking forward. And knuckling down to the profit-making basics. “In here I want it to be quiet, calm, boring and successful,” Hallmark emphasised. “And that’s the mission.”


Author
Discussion

JakeS77

Original Poster:

40 posts

175 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
Hallmark's strategy for Aston Martin seems far more sensible than Jaguar's. I hope they succeed.

big_rob_sydney

3,671 posts

223 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
AM don't even make their own engines. And they aren't going to do an EV for that long? How much money will it cost them in credits? And will they even be a going concern by then?

wistec1

794 posts

70 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
Great strategy and they will succeed because there are lots of very wealthy buyers who will pay to ensure EV doesn't blight them. Let's hope they go way beyond 2040

JAMSXR

1,845 posts

76 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
AM don't even make their own engines. And they aren't going to do an EV for that long? How much money will it cost them in credits? And will they even be a going concern by then?
I think ZEV mandate threshold is currently 2,500 per year, so I guess their European numbers stay within that range or they buy credits.

MOOSECORTINA

253 posts

108 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
No need to go full electric. That will have gone away by then - again.

mrclav

1,645 posts

252 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
MOOSECORTINA said:
No need to go full electric. That will have gone away by then - again.
What evidence do you have to support that load of hot air opinion? Or is that you just bullstting again?

Nicolas Lazar

210 posts

56 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
Wonder how he sees the difference between modern-day Bentley and modern-day Aston. Aside from that Aston should focus on one luxury sporty GT and one luxury sporty SUV, both with wide individualization / personalization options and not forget its British roots. Building a multitude of different cars is a no-go for a niche brand. Instead they might want to focus on making their Merceded-powered V8 turbo GT better than the Mercedes organ donor AMG GT, which seems to be the better car than both the smaller and larger Aston.

Edited by Nicolas Lazar on Monday 3rd February 08:03

Stick Legs

8,924 posts

194 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
I don’t know why they don’t just stick the DBX body on the Mercedes EQC platform?

But everything else sounds sensible. A good appointment.


ducnick

2,255 posts

272 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
Presumably they if we are legislated to only have BEV in the uk after 2030 then Aston will plonk the Merc battery into a car just before 2030 for the uk market. I suspect most Aston sales are to markets where ice will continue longer. I very much doubt Norwegian legislation for bev only will be of any concern at all to Aston.

Lotusgav

168 posts

188 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
Their current line up is super impressive (to me) I hope they can stay alive!

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
mrclav said:
What evidence do you have to support that load of hot air opinion? Or is that you just bullstting again?
To be fair AM is not looking like somewhere I would put my money.
£1.5 billion of debt
Haemorrhaging cash (although losses reduced to £10 million last quarter)
And share price around 15% of what it was a few years ago.
Lovely cars though.

smilo996

3,821 posts

199 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
It just does not make enough cars, amazing considering it does not even make drivetrains or interior tech. Bentley & Ferrari sold about 13,000 cars last year. If they don't it will be sold to zee Germans who will. A baby (not signet baby) & more distinct variants, as the man says perhaps.

The comparison with the 911 is invalid. The 911 has been made for decades, is a volume sports car and a new version is mostly characterised by changing slat direction and a parts bin raid.
A baby (not signet baby), more distinct variants, as the man says.

"Exceptionally wealthy people were unlikely to start favouring luxury EVs simply because there was societal pressure to do so".
Well, perhaps someone should and start forcing them to act responsibly then.
Changes in government EV tone & focus seem more important. This just means China will move further ahead.


smilo996

3,821 posts

199 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
JakeS77 said:
Hallmark's strategy for Aston Martin seems far more sensible than Jaguar's. I hope they succeed.
What an odd comment. Perhaps more related to annoyance at the type of buyer, young people with disposable income, rather than Jaag drivers. A bit like they did when it introduced the XF, XE, F-Type etc, after the Pasttichefest X and S types.

martin12345

1,007 posts

118 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
Discombobulate said:
mrclav said:
What evidence do you have to support that load of hot air opinion? Or is that you just bullstting again?
To be fair AM is not looking like somewhere I would put my money.
£1.5 billion of debt
Haemorrhaging cash (although losses reduced to £10 million last quarter)
And share price around 15% of what it was a few years ago.
Lovely cars though.
Share price approx 1% of the price the company was floated at in 2017 !!

It must be a valuable tax write off for Lawerance for some other part of his business empire, but that can only last so long
It seems he thinks it is now time to try to make some money - good luck to them - tough business to succeed in !

TWPC

904 posts

190 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all


Autocar published a render of a future Aston EV. I know it's vapourware but wouldn't something like that be utterly awesome? Love the small wheels/fat tyres...

Regardless of the performance of other parts of the company, hopefully we can always have faith in the styling department.

Bimmer800

6 posts

75 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
I popped into an Aston showroom on Saturday, without appointment - maybe considering a DB11 or 2020 Vantage.
Was met by some very nice people who were super helpful and knowledgable about the brand and the cars, gladly encouraging test drives when I had more time.
BUT, the showroom/setup, general environment is just not representative of this level of luxury in my view. Also the cars, whilst cleaned, not to the standard of competing brands in terms of even visual prep.
Certainly didnt feel like a luxury / premium experience in my view.
I do think they need to rectify this.

Just my observations.

pycraft

1,431 posts

213 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
smilo996 said:
It just does not make enough cars, amazing considering it does not even make drivetrains or interior tech. Bentley & Ferrari sold about 13,000 cars last year. If they don't it will be sold to zee Germans who will. A baby (not signet baby) & more distinct variants, as the man says perhaps.

The comparison with the 911 is invalid. The 911 has been made for decades, is a volume sports car and a new version is mostly characterised by changing slat direction and a parts bin raid. A baby (not signet baby), more distinct variants, as the man says.
Agreed. The 911 is almost a loss leader - it's there to help shift bucketloads of Macans. Also agree with you about the "baby" - what Aston needs if they're going to increase sales is a junior DBX. But also they're never going to sell as many cars as Porsche, because then they'd not be the exclusive manufacturer that they trade on. As the man said, they need to be following Bentley's example, where half the sales are Bentaygas. Given the current car market, the DBX should not be "underachieving" compared to e.g. the Urus.

smilo996 said:
"Exceptionally wealthy people were unlikely to start favouring luxury EVs simply because there was societal pressure to do so".
Well, perhaps someone should and start forcing them to act responsibly then.
If exceptionally wealthy people acted in a socially responsible manner, they'd never have become exceptionally wealthy people in the first place. Except for all you millionaires on the PH boards, of course.

HighwayStar

4,865 posts

173 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
pycraft said:
smilo996 said:
It just does not make enough cars, amazing considering it does not even make drivetrains or interior tech. Bentley & Ferrari sold about 13,000 cars last year. If they don't it will be sold to zee Germans who will. A baby (not signet baby) & more distinct variants, as the man says perhaps.

The comparison with the 911 is invalid. The 911 has been made for decades, is a volume sports car and a new version is mostly characterised by changing slat direction and a parts bin raid. A baby (not signet baby), more distinct variants, as the man says.
Agreed. The 911 is almost a loss leader - it's there to help shift bucketloads of Macans. Also agree with you about the "baby" - what Aston needs if they're going to increase sales is a junior DBX. But also they're never going to sell as many cars as Porsche, because then they'd not be the exclusive manufacturer that they trade on. As the man said, they need to be following Bentley's example, where half the sales are Bentaygas. Given the current car market, the DBX should not be "underachieving" compared to e.g. the Urus.

smilo996 said:
"Exceptionally wealthy people were unlikely to start favouring luxury EVs simply because there was societal pressure to do so".
Well, perhaps someone should and start forcing them to act responsibly then.
If exceptionally wealthy people acted in a socially responsible manner, they'd never have become exceptionally wealthy people in the first place. Except for all you millionaires on the PH boards, of course.
The 911 isn’t remotely close to being a loss leader. In 2019 Porsche it had a profit margin of 47%
https://www.motoringresearch.com/car-news/porsche-...
Even across the range Porsche produce, the average margin was 15-17%

If anything it’s the GT cars that are the lost leaders… maybe it’s those you were alluding to.


CG2020UK

2,953 posts

69 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
Lotusgav said:
Their current line up is super impressive (to me) I hope they can stay alive!
+1

Some great looking cars at the moment!

Firebobby

988 posts

68 months

Monday 3rd February 2025
quotequote all
2040 for full EV production? I wonder if the UK will have reached 1% of global emissions by then? When countries like China, India, USA, Brazil contribute over 70% of world CO2 emissions start to do something realistic about them that's when I'll take notice. Until then this government along with all the EU and many more besides are in it simply for the massive tax increases they can impose on us all in the name of " net zero" which will never be achievable in this life or the next. If you don't believe it then I suggest you pull your head out of your arse, read it and weep! IMHO of course biggrin