RE: 2025 Porsche Taycan GTS Sport Turismo | UK Review
RE: 2025 Porsche Taycan GTS Sport Turismo | UK Review
Tuesday 4th February 2025

2025 Porsche Taycan GTS Sport Turismo | UK Review

The latest Taycan GTS promises to be one of the very best performance EVs now on sale - is it?


It would be easy to spend a lot of time in the old Porsche Taycan GTS and find it beyond much meaningful improvement. After all, it was the best model in the range, usefully faster than the variants beneath it while probably being the most enjoyable to drive and still reasonably efficient. And not £150,000. There’s never been such a thing as a bad Taycan, though the GTS always felt like the version that was showing off its talents most prominently. 

Yet despite all that, the J1.2 (there’s another one for your Porsche product code database) GTS promises a significant improvement to the sportiest Taycan. ‘The electric sports car surpasses its predecessor in almost every discipline’ was the line that stood out from the press release, because ‘surpass’ certainly doesn’t imply incremental improvement. And it was hardly kicking off from a dud. Still, on paper, you can see where they’re coming from: base power is now 605hp, which is more than the launch overboost delivered the first time around (598hp), and a huge gain from 517hp, as it used to be. Launch is now 700hp, meaning this grey family estate can go from 0-100mph in seven seconds. The race from the autoroute toll will never be the same again. 

Yet this GTS can also claim comparable efficiency to its predecessor on paper, despite being so much faster; the WLTP combined efficiency rating is between 3.27 and 2.88 miles per kilowatt hour, where the figure was 3.04 previously. A bigger battery (97kWh against 83.7kWh) means another 74 miles of range - and 390 feels like a usefully chunky amount - which can be charged at up to 320kW, where 270kW was the peak before. And it’s only 15kg heavier. For, er, 2,310kg DIN, yes, but you can’t have everything. The point being that beneath a modest visual update, there’s plenty to suggest the GTS might have really moved things on quite a bit for Porsche’s exec EV. 

The first thing you’ll notice, in a car with Active Ride at least, is the comfort entry feature that lifts the car up 5.5cm in an instant to make getting in easier. This comes as quite a shock if you aren’t prepared for it, as a brand-new Porsche bounds up a couple of inches like a show car on air ride. It’s not the only trick the £6,291 suspension has, either, but we’ll come back to that - safe to say it’s another very persuasive Porsche option. 

Beyond climbing in at what felt like Cayenne height, the first few miles in a Taycan GTS felt much as they always did: stable, secure, comfortable, accurate and confidence-inspiring. Not every large, heavy, fast EV puts the driver at ease so immediately, and it’s to the credit of the Porsche’s calibration and control weights that the Taycan always gives that impression. The brake pedal is still too spongey and light, unfortunately, though you get used to it. 

This is handy, because the driver will have to get very familiar with the left-hand pedal, the GTS accelerating violently and seemingly relentlessly given even half a chance. The intensity doesn’t feel far off early Turbo S wallop, and with the extra power this model probably now shapes up as a slightly more affordable alternative to the Turbo-badged cars than an upgrade from a 4S. The GTS is one of those cars where full throttle at any speed takes your breath away. So with that, and with a less-than-stellar brake pedal, it’d be nice to have more regenerative braking options, because the standard setting doesn’t do a great deal. And while Porsche has dismissed EV gimmicks like sound and shifts, we’d still maintain that a configurable backing track for such wild acceleration would make the experience even more memorable. Porsche’s Electric Sport Sound is maybe a little more prominent than before, if still pretty restrained. And 0-124mph in less than 11 Mississippis doesn’t feel restrained at all. In a derivative some rungs from the top, it feels insane.

What really marks this GTS out over the old car, however, is Active Ride. Yes, another Porsche that requires optioning up to make the best of it. And sure, it was hardly like the first Taycan struggled when it came to ride and handling. But the way the new electro-hydraulic system can retain such unerring composure and comfort, under considerable load or duress, is genuinely remarkable. On the crummy Berkshire B roads we often drive cars, tarmac that can make even the very best flounder and fidget, the GTS honestly glides like it’s on a bowling green. Unperturbed, unflustered, unrelenting. 

It can actually be driven everywhere in Sport Plus, ramping up the agility and purchase to unbelievable levels because of how low the Taycan sits while also appearing to offer up boundless wheel travel and excellent suppression. It’s honestly a tad spooky, because your brain prepares for disturbances that never arrive. Put most simply, here’s a GTS that now cruises with greater isolation and corners even more keenly than before, thanks to a cost option tick. Of course, it won’t be sub-par with the standard adaptive setup, though more than most extras it feels like a must-have. Maybe we just have to view a GTS Sport Turismo as a £125k prospect with Active Ride rather than the standard £118,300 offering. 

If there’s a gripe, it’s perhaps that one that always existed around 911s, that this latest Taycan update ebbs away a little at the character. Active Ride is so good that you have to think even less about going obscenely fast: drive mode doesn’t matter, entry speed apparently doesn’t either, the throttle floored at almost every opportunity. Naturally, the GTS felt pretty damn brilliant on the very odd squiggles that it did, but more notable was just how seldom they occurred given the low ambient temperatures and commitment involved. 

Probably that’s not a real issue: that a crushingly capable Porsche now feels even more omnipotent thanks to advanced suspension sounds very sellable, really. The steering remains as good a point of contact as ever, so the experience isn’t completely magic carpet-esque. It just felt worth pointing out that if a Taycan seemed too easy to go too quickly in beforehand, that feeling is even more prominent this time around. 

Which will probably be a reason to buy for many, and alongside its astonishing ride and handling GTS customers will still find a well-built, handsome and practical EV wagon. Now with a useful chunk more range (albeit the ability still to hack efficiency down to two miles per kilowatt hour.) There are more rivals and alternatives than ever, from Audi S6 e-tron to BMW M5 Touring, though as meaningful updates of electric vehicles go, the Taycan J1.2 continues to impress in all its guises. Probably it’ll be a hard one for existing customers to justify, given what the trade in is likely to be against new prices, but for those who find that a Taycan GTS fits their use case (and finances), it’s an even more emphatic display of Porsche EV excellence than ever. 


SPECIFICATION | PORSCHE TAYCAN GTS SPORT TURISMO

Engine: Two Permanent Magnet Synchronous motors, 105.0kWh (gross, 97.0kWh usable) battery
Transmission: Front (Single-speed auto); rear (two-speed auto); four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 700 (acceleration overboost; 605 otherwise)
Torque (lb ft): 581 (overboost)
0-62mph: 3.3 secs
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 2,310kg (unladen)
MPG: 2.88-3.27mi/kWh, 320kW peak charging
WLTP range (combined): 390 miles
Price: £118,300 (price as standard; price as tested £156,985*, comprising - deep breath - Slate Grey Neeo paint for £2,732, 21-inch Taycan Exclusive Design Wheels fully painted in Satin Black with Aeroblades for £1,121, Wheels painted in Satin Black for £926, GTS Interior package in Slate Grey neo for £2,981, 4+1 seats for £371, Front and rear seat heating for £338, ‘PORSCHE’ logo LED door courtesy lights for £222, Roof railes in Black Aluminium for £453, Preparation for rear bike carrier for £380, Model Designation painted in black (high gloss) for £185, Rear axle steering for £1,593, Porsche Active Ride for £6,291, Porsche Design Sport Chrono Clock for £783, Light Strip with illuminated ‘PORSCHE’ logo black for £353, Panoramic Roof with Variable Light Control for £3,926, Thermally and noise insulated glass including privacy glass for £1,361, Carbon matt interior package for £639, Roof lining grab handles in Race-Tex with coloured decorative stitching for £648, Interior mirror panel in Race-Tex for £269, Night Vision Assist for £1,751, Remote ParkAssist for £1,458, Porsche Innodrive with Active Lane Keeping for £2,042, Lane change Assist (blind spot monitoring) for £639, Comfort Access for £648, Soft-close doors for £546, Advanced Climate Control for £657, Air Quality system for £329, Smokers Package for £42, Side Airbags in rear compartment for £371, Passenger Display for £1,061, Burmester 3D High-End Surround Sound System for £3,569. *German test car with these options fitted.)

Author
Discussion

gruppeb86

Original Poster:

611 posts

39 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
Now I wonder; Is that value for money...

...or will it depreciate like a stone lol

Red_Kite

22 posts

115 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
Looks like a fantastic machine to drive and now with better range. My issue with the Taycan is nothing to do with it being an EV. I think why it initially sold well but sales have now fallen off a cliff is that it is a massive car with poor packaging. Even in Sport / Cross Turismo spec, boot space is poor and it's quite cramped in the back. I tried a Taycan when I last changed car and that was my overriding issue - too cramped to be a family car, too big to be a sports GT

Cobnapint

9,757 posts

177 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
I've driven the previous version of this. The acceleration off the line was ridiculous, my neck hurt for two days.
God knows what this is like, but what a vehicle. Stunning.

M138

1,155 posts

17 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
I think the Taycan sold well initially because there was quite a few people who wanted to be first in the all new electric Porsche bandwagon but it’s looking like no one cares what badge is on the front of an ev, people are more bothered about the range.
Plus the Taycan looks cumbersome.

chrisironside

923 posts

188 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
Expect there will be a lot of complaints about EVs, and depreciation, but to me at least that looks like a great car doing everything well. Great job!

Twoshoe

990 posts

210 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
How come it's £1121 for '21-inch Taycan Exclusive Design Wheels fully painted in Satin Black with Aeroblades' + £926 for 'Wheels painted in Satin Black'?

Nomme de Plum

7,050 posts

42 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
I've been driving the newer model 4S Cross Turismo without this upgraded active ride. It's an already a noticeable improvement over the first iteration.

For those that think it's too big it doesn't feel like it whilst driving or even manoeuvring.

IMO this will be the sweet spot of the Taycan range.

FamousPheasant

765 posts

142 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
Red_Kite said:
Looks like a fantastic machine to drive and now with better range. My issue with the Taycan is nothing to do with it being an EV. I think why it initially sold well but sales have now fallen off a cliff is that it is a massive car with poor packaging. Even in Sport / Cross Turismo spec, boot space is poor and it's quite cramped in the back. I tried a Taycan when I last changed car and that was my overriding issue - too cramped to be a family car, too big to be a sports GT
Agreed it looks a great car. But a boot space of only 450l isn't great for a large family car.

griffsomething

383 posts

187 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
Nearly £3k each for grey paint and grey interior.

Blimey. I thought that would be the generic free option.

Ray_Aber

823 posts

302 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
for me, this highlights the problem with the BMW M5. This car, despite being an EV, is over 150kg lighter than an M5. That's incredible.

Ignore most of the optional extras. Carbon tat in a car does nothing to improve it (IMO), and a sensibly specced Porsche would probably come in at £130k, which is clearly in M5 territory. So these cars are, at one level, competitors (yes, I know one is an ICE, one an EV, but bear with me...)

There are other factors at play. The Taycan is a decent looking thing; the M5 looks like the automotive equivalent of Kryten from Red Dwarf. The Taycan is actually 100mm shorter than the M5, with broadly the same width. If badges are your thing, then would you rather have a MBW 5 series or a Porschar?

Lastly, the cost of ownership is going to benefit the Taycan hugely over the M5, especially if it's a company car. I get the fact tthat Taycans depreciate hard, but (a) this is a rather better performing iteration (decent range) and the M5 is hardly likely to hold its value that well if previous models are anything to go by.

In summary, I think that while this car is far from perfect, it does cast some harsh light on the M5 in ways one would never have expected. Who would have thought that an EV Porsche would be lighter, more elegant and more restrained than a BMW 5 series?

I'd take this over an M5 in a heartbeat.

Edited by Ray_Aber on Tuesday 4th February 09:56

SDK

3,198 posts

279 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
Ray_Aber said:
for me, this highlights the problem with the BMW M5. This car, despite being an EV, is over 300kg lighter than an M5. That's incredible.

Ignore most of the optional extras. Carbon tat in a car does nothing to improve it (IMO), and a sensibly specced Porsche would probably come in at £130k, which is clearly in M5 territory. So these cars are, at one level, competitors (yes, I know one is an ICE, one an EV, but bear with me...)

There are other factors at play. The Taycan is a decent looking thing; the M5 looks like the automotive equivalent of Kryten from Red Dwarf. The Taycan is actually 100mm shorter than the M5, with broadly the same width. If badges are your thing, then would you rather have a MBW 5 series or a Porschar?

Lastly, the cost of ownership is going to benefit the Taycan hugely over the M5, especially if it's a company car. I get the fact tthat Taycans depreciate hard, but (a) this is a rather better performing iteration (decent range) and the M5 is hardly likely to hold its value that well if previous models are anything to go by.

In summary, I think that while this car is far from perfect, it does cast some harsh light on the M5 in ways one would never have expected. Who would have thought that an EV Porsche would be lighter, more elegant and more restrained than a BMW 5 series?

I'd take this over an M5 in a heartbeat.
The M5 is a hybrid - so both electric & engine, hence the additional weight.

Ray_Aber

823 posts

302 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
True, and I note that the difference is 150kg, not 300kg (not sure where I got that from), but the prevailing wisdom is that EVs are heavier than their ICE or PHEV counterparts. The M5 is still bloated.

fflump

3,226 posts

64 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
FamousPheasant said:
Red_Kite said:
Looks like a fantastic machine to drive and now with better range. My issue with the Taycan is nothing to do with it being an EV. I think why it initially sold well but sales have now fallen off a cliff is that it is a massive car with poor packaging. Even in Sport / Cross Turismo spec, boot space is poor and it's quite cramped in the back. I tried a Taycan when I last changed car and that was my overriding issue - too cramped to be a family car, too big to be a sports GT
Agreed it looks a great car. But a boot space of only 450l isn't great for a large family car.
It might be large but the rear room is also very poor - considerably worse even than a Panamera Sport Turismo. Makes it less than attractive for a family car.

JonnyVTEC

3,239 posts

201 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
Awesome cars, i think i prefer the original headlamps thought, these are much more like the Macan-e lamps and pretty much a generic light.

jhayward1980

156 posts

240 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
Love it.

Only thing that bothers me is still the ignorant EV journalism. 14kwh of extra battery capacity with an optimistic 3mi/kWh does not result in over 70miles of extra range.

SDK

3,198 posts

279 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
jhayward1980 said:
Love it.

Only thing that bothers me is still the ignorant EV journalism. 14kwh of extra battery capacity with an optimistic 3mi/kWh does not result in over 70miles of extra range.
Extra range over the previous Taycan, comes from more than just a larger battery

Nomme de Plum

7,050 posts

42 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
Ditchmonkey said:
Bland, soul-less, expensive, generally driven by complete throbbers, depreciate like an anvil chucked from a bridge, and sounds like a washing machine on spin cycle. I'll pass thank you.
You very first post and straight with ignorant insults. Well done.



Nomme de Plum

7,050 posts

42 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
Ditchmonkey said:
Nomme de Plum said:
You very first post and straight with ignorant insults. Well done.
I'm sorry if it struck a nerve.
Nah. I'm pretty thick skinned. Posters like you do give us some amusement though.



Magikarp

1,646 posts

74 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
I don't know how we have managed without the enormous benefit of a car that raises itself 55mm,

What an utterly pointless feature, If it was 200mm I'd get it - some of these cars are very, very low but that seems a derisory amount.

Nomme de Plum

7,050 posts

42 months

Tuesday 4th February 2025
quotequote all
Magikarp said:
I don't know how we have managed without the enormous benefit of a car that raises itself 55mm,

What an utterly pointless feature, If it was 200mm I'd get it - some of these cars are very, very low but that seems a derisory amount.
As driver of one i disagree. The car is not particularly low anyway unless comparing to an SuV some of which are, IMO unnecessarily high.