RE: 2025 Mercedes G 580 Edition One | UK Review
RE: 2025 Mercedes G 580 Edition One | UK Review
Tuesday 11th February 2025

2025 Mercedes G 580 Edition One | UK Review

The first electric G-wagen rocks up with 587hp and a big asking price - more of the same?


On the face of it, electrifying the latest generation of G-Class might seem cruel and unusual for a car with the environmental credentials of a Saudi oil rig - yet to Mercedes it makes total sense. Its off-road heritage notwithstanding, the modern G-wagen is chiefly bought by well-heeled people who live in global cities - the same global cities that will be among the first to enact the most stringent emission regulations, including an outright ban on combustion engines. The G-Class is also famously expensive, heavy, large and fast - character traits that lend themselves to battery power. It requires some additional effort to make EVs work credibly well when away from asphalt, but there are benefits to electric power here, too. And while you cannot reproduce the unique sensory pleasure of a V8, you can easily duplicate its showy output. The new G 580 develops 587hp and costs £180,860 in First Edition format pictured. 

Not an oil rig then, but reading about the electric G-wagen certainly brings to mind one of those futuristic cities being built in a desert somewhere at mind-blowing cost. With a jumbo, torsion-resistant 116kWh battery squeezed into a modified, reinforced ladder frame chassis and four e-motors driving a wheel each via half shafts - capable of summoning up 858lb ft of torque between them in the right conditions - the G 580 suggests a level of money-no-object development that would make a sovereign wealth fund blush. On one hand, this seems appropriate: grafting new technology onto the G-Class without forfeiting its stronger-than-time reputation has been one of Mercedes’ more prominent success stories in the last ten years, and has required no little expense or technical ingenuity. On the other, there is inevitably a price to be paid for electrification. 

Firstly, there is the current model’s aforementioned and long-standing association with the V8. Even allowing for the popularity of big-capacity petrol engines among luxury SUVs generally, few rival the G-Class when it comes to the proportion of buyers choosing the most bombastic version possible. Future legislation notwithstanding, it seems unlikely (based on current trends) that a substantial number of Mercedes-AMG fans will be inclined to trade in their side exit exhausts for the prospect of none at all. At 4.7 seconds to 62mph, the G 580 is adequately fast in that neck-craning way that EVs specialise in, but the G63 is faster still and (more importantly) endows its raw speed with moreish depth and proper mechanical heft. Despite the audible presence of ‘G-Roar’, a synthesised approximation of a V8, the G 580 never really threatens to overcome this charisma deficit. 

Nevertheless, the quality of its performance is not nearly as limiting as the quantity of tech required to produce it. Weight has always been an underlying issue for the Geländewagen - the G63 we tested last summer weighed 2,753kg, and it came with hydraulically interlinked adaptive dampers - the G 580 does without these and tips the scale at 3,209kg (both with EU-weighted driver). Unsurprisingly, this leaves its mark on the driving experience. While there is no variant of the G-Class that seems light on its contact patches, the battery-powered model pushes down on them as forcibly as a fully-loaded Transit might, and though there is no sluggishness associated with the added burden of its two-tiered battery and 26mm-thick underbody shield, it weighs down on almost everything the chassis is asked to do dynamically.

Admittedly - and encouragingly for markets like California - the effects are less noticeable around town and on flowing, runway-wide A roads, where the G 580 is adequately comfortable on its standard-fit 20-inch rims and, wind noise aside, certainly refined enough; but on uneven Scottish B roads the occasionally laboured wheel control and palpable sense of mass when cornering are hard to miss. And even if you’re inclined to think either respectable enough for such a heavy, high-sided car, the effect under braking, where you're inclined to factor in the sort of slowing distances usually associated with a bulk carrier, is unavoidable. Again, being quick to get going and slow to stop are hardly new traits for the G-Class, but the cleverly constructed, surface-modulating fluency of the combustion models is in much shorter supply. 

A back-to-back go in the current G500 - the six-cylinder derivative we identified as the G-wagen best suited to Britain just last month - confirms as much. It shares the G 580’s front double wishbones and De Dion-style rigid rear axle, but at 2,665kg, it is more than half a tonne lighter than the EV and feels it. Probably Mercedes should be commended for delivering a battery-powered G-Class that manages to hold any kind of candle to its siblings when at so obvious a disadvantage - and it is certainly no less luxurious or likeable to sit in - but that thought does precious little to dilute the fact that the G500 changes direction quicker, rides more deftly and doesn't need so much braking. It isn’t limited to 112mph either, nor a range of 283 miles. In other words, you would need a particularly compelling use case to choose plugging in over fuelling up. 

Intriguingly, and somewhat counter-intuitively, one of them might conceivably involve off-roading. Not of the run-of-the-mill sort, of course (any G-Class is vastly overqualified for that) but when Mercedes talked about using the G 580’s quad-motor configuration to set a new standard away from the road, it evidently meant it. As is so often the case, this proved to be less about outright power than control: the system’s ability to very precisely meter the amount of torque it delivers to each wheel via four individual two-speed transmissions - the effect amplified by a ‘low range’ gear reduction ratio - conveying an astonishing amount of slow-speed traction. Granted, this works best if you let the intelligent off-road crawl function do its thing (which essentially automates progress, leaving you with just the steering to worry about) but the result, admittedly with the standard tyres swapped for an all-terrains, seemed virtually invincible in the face of a heavily flooded quagmire. 

Exciting, it must be said, it isn’t. The silence and the sheer unstoppability of the G 580’s tank-like crawl is almost eerie, not least for the extent to which it is doing better than any human could - although probably it is for this reason that Mercedes has also installed novelty features like G-Steering and G-Turn. The former allows the car to turn very abruptly around a locked inside rear wheel, the latter (which is much more precious about when it can be activated) causes the wheels on either side to turn in opposite directions, meaning the 3.2-tonne SUV can almost turn on the spot. This is undeniably impressive, although in its ground-churning ability to dig holes while going nowhere, it arguably functions better as a metaphor for the car than as an actual thing you’d ever use. 

Ultimately though, while it’s tempting to make light of the G 580’s apparent redundancy given the other (superior) G-Class derivatives available, the fact remains that it isn’t. For one thing, short of something like a Rivian, there is precious little to rival the G-wagen when it comes to battery-powered off-road alternatives - and until the Range Rover Electric arrives later this year, there isn’t likely to be for some time. Moreover, for all the ways it can be found wanting, there is nothing about the G 580 that doesn’t seem expensively or expertly assembled - and its identity as a bona fide G-Class, with all the bandwidth and build quality that conveys, is never in question. Mercedes might have chosen to build a less able and therefore more profitable EV, but laudably, did not. And with the First Edition out of the way, making the follow-on version £30k cheaper than a G63 ought to convince some city-dwellers to make the switch. Just no one reading this. 


SPECIFICATION | 2025 MERCEDES G 580 with EQ Technology Edition One 

Engine: Four electric motors, one per wheel; 116kWh battery
Transmission: Two-speed, one per motor, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 587
Torque (lb ft): 858
0-62mph: 4.7 seconds
Top speed: 112mph
Weight: 3,209kg (EU)
MPG: na
CO2: 0g/km
Price: £180,860 (as tested; G 580 from £154,810) 

Author
Discussion

GTRene

Original Poster:

22,416 posts

253 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
wait, what?

Weight: 3,209kg (EU)

wow

J4CKO

46,823 posts

229 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
I normally sort of ignore some of the weight related comments, as whether an SUV is 2.2 or 2.4 tons, doesnt really make that much difference, but over 3.2 tons is ridiculously heavy, and it still manages to dip below five seconds 0-60, thats a lot of mass being slung about.


WPA

14,654 posts

143 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
3.2 tons, holy crap that is a lot

SuperPav

1,336 posts

154 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
Can somebody confirm if this is actually a 4 seater then? If so that's quite a limitation for a G wagon!

As you need to allow 75+5kg payload per occupant from my understanding, and at 3,209kg with driver, that doesn't leave enough headroom for 4 passengers if you want to stay <3.5t GVW.

bennytheball

255 posts

56 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
It looks like it's sagging at the rear - not something I'd noticed on the ICE versions.

Also, the squared-off spare wheel cover on the tailgate looks too small. Is it actually just an extra external storage pod?

Sulphur Man

300 posts

162 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
GTRene said:
wait, what?

Weight: 3,209kg (EU)

wow
Weight, Watt?

NJJ

525 posts

109 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
Answering a question that nobody asked. The G-Class is known for embracing the old fashioned in a clunky, boxy feel-good kind of way and somehow this feels like one of those classic car EV conversions that takes away the soul of what makes it unique in the first place.

benjidog

121 posts

90 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
Sulphur Man said:
GTRene said:
wait, what?

Weight: 3,209kg (EU)

wow
Weight, Watt?
A sphincter says what?

EV8

620 posts

32 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
If I would ever have one, it would be electric. Wafting around City centre, perfect.
Dropping kids at school? Green.
Heavy? Who cares.
Sound? Better than diesel.

Like it.

The Pistonsdead

7,000 posts

236 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
benjidog said:
Sulphur Man said:
GTRene said:
wait, what?

Weight: 3,209kg (EU)

wow
Weight, Watt?
A sphincter says what?
biglaugh

ChrisCh86

1,126 posts

73 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
bennytheball said:
It looks like it's sagging at the rear - not something I'd noticed on the ICE versions.

Also, the squared-off spare wheel cover on the tailgate looks too small. Is it actually just an extra external storage pod?
Yep, it's for storing electrical cables (or anything else) - it's not supposed to hold a spare wheel. I assume the spare wheel has been deleted to save weight.

Angelo1985

796 posts

55 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
I think it’s a good idea. Mercedes did it before someone else would come with an electric restomod.

Wills2

29,583 posts

204 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all

I like it, but at that weight wow, I recall driving an Escalade with 6 passengers on board in LA, my current car back home was an F80 M3, my first attempt to stop at a junction was well, interesting! I let out the words Oh shiiiite!




Gruntled

193 posts

108 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
GTRene said:
wait, what?

Weight: 3,209kg (EU)

wow
F*** me … if you lose traction expect to slide for a loooooong time. And the tire wear when you don’t … just wow.

Harry H

3,758 posts

185 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
Is Nic to scared to add his name to articles these days ?

Simon12c

21 posts

232 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
OK - boring post here. But I don't reckon this is a good thing. A 3.2t tank with such a turn of speed - completely unregulated in terms of who can buy / drive one.
The momentum and forces involved are scary.
When one of the Harrod's import mobs slams this into a Mum and her kid driving an old Fiat Panda.

Can this continue indefinitely? I'm certainly not in favour of the nanny state, but selling this kind of thing doesn't afford other people the kind of protection from it that should be their right.

cayman-black

13,265 posts

245 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
£180k is just ridiculous money.

Master Bean

5,203 posts

149 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
Harry H said:
Is Nic to scared to add his name to articles these days ?
It's at the top. Never shows the name on the forum layout.

pti

1,856 posts

173 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
SuperPav said:
Can somebody confirm if this is actually a 4 seater then? If so that's quite a limitation for a G wagon!

As you need to allow 75+5kg payload per occupant from my understanding, and at 3,209kg with driver, that doesn't leave enough headroom for 4 passengers if you want to stay <3.5t GVW.
My thoughts exactly. It must be.

Tayne

65 posts

166 months

Monday 10th February 2025
quotequote all
Angelo1985 said:
I think it’s a good idea. Mercedes did it before someone else would come with an electric restomod.
Kreisel have been building electric G-wagens for 7 or 8 years. Arnold Schwarzenegger has one.

Edited by Tayne on Monday 10th February 13:32