RE: Audi TT quattro Sport | PH Private Area

RE: Audi TT quattro Sport | PH Private Area

Thursday 19th June

Audi TT quattro Sport | PH Private Area

The run-out Mk1 is slowly inching toward unicorn status. This one munched some serious miles on the way


The last time we shone a light on a TT quattro Sport - in January of 2024 - it was a lovely one in customary Misano Red that had, in nearly two decades of life on British roads, covered, on average, less than 2,000 miles a year. That is shockingly little for a car that is generally considered the most appealing Mk1 TT to drive - and it resulted (somewhat inevitably) in an asking price of £21,995. Bold, when you consider that the model’s price when new was only £29,335. Perhaps unsurprisingly, that car is still for sale

This one is different in three key regards. Firstly, it is Mauritius Blue, which is much less common and a much nicer colour. Secondly, it is valued by its owner at £5,300, which is a much more reasonable-sounding amount. And thirdly, it has amassed a more appropriate amount of miles - 230,000 of them, in fact. The equivalent of nine times around the Earth. Which, we think you’ll agree, is much more like it. 

Even better: the chap selling it reckons the chap he bought it from had owned the car almost from new - and accrued said miles in supposedly everyone’s favourite way, by romping repeatedly up and down a motorway with the kind of diligence that would make a homing pigeon blush. Not only did the TT get a very regular workout, its servicing was said to be no less metronomic, with sufficient stamps for it to now be on its second book. 

The current keeper (a chip off the old block in mileage terms, having added 20k of his own) cannot be accused of standing idly by either. The comprehensive mechanical refresh undertaken early in their ownership reads like a suspension engineer's Christmas list: complete front and rear suspension overhaul with new bushes, bearings, and top mounts; a 3cm drop on mid-tier coilovers; four-wheel alignment; and new Goodyear rubber at all corners.

No less importantly, the 1.8-litre turbocharged four-pot - tickled up to 240hp in the QS, lest we forget - hasn't been neglected either, with a new clutch, DMF, cambelt, water pump, and cam cover gasket all fitted. Inside, the cabin mostly defies its astronomical mileage. The Recaro seats – half leather, half Alcantara in the QS – show minimal wear, and even the notoriously failure-prone pixel display has been professionally repaired, ensuring all instruments function as they should.

The appeal of all this, of course, beyond affordability, is that the limited edition model’s place in the TT annals has long been recognised, and with Audi’s iconic sports car finally gone the way of the Dodo, well-kept examples of the QS have become to ascend in value - as the aforementioned Misano Red shows. But because they require significant outlay, financial anxiety tends to take the edge off later enjoyment. Not so today’s hero, which ought to be catnip for anyone who values provenance and attentive TLC over garage-stored perfection. Which is most of us, right? 


See the full ad

Author
Discussion

corcoran

Original Poster:

618 posts

288 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
ugh, where are the seats.

The Pistonsdead

5,196 posts

221 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
Undocumented engine rebuild would worry me, nevertheless it is testament to its original owners care and attention to service schedules that this car looks way better than the miles it's travelled.

DaveyBoyWonder

3,129 posts

188 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
corcoran said:
ugh, where are the seats.
I think "comfort seats" (or a name to that effect) was an option that some people weirldy went for over the proper Recaros.

I've been half looking at these for a bit as mechanically they're a bit of a known quantity for me vs things like slightly more expensive Caymans etc and I think they've aged really well. Would I buy this one? Absolutely no. Suspension looks shagged too...

EDIT - just seen "mid range coilovers" mentioned in relation to the suspension drop. At least set them up so theres equal arch gap...

Edited by DaveyBoyWonder on Thursday 19th June 08:52

RSstuff

742 posts

29 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
No Pole Position seats, no thanks.

troc

3,983 posts

189 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
I’ll take my dad’s MK1 TT over this one. It’s the 225hp Quattro with very low miles and has always been garaged and meticulously serviced. Even had all the well know dashboard issues (the display can start to lose pixels and replacements are almost impossible to find) fixed. Looks almost showroom new.

Plus it’s dark green.

thehardman07

257 posts

195 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
troc said:
I ll take my dad s MK1 TT over this one. It s the 225hp Quattro with very low miles and has always been garaged and meticulously serviced. Even had all the well know dashboard issues (the display can start to lose pixels and replacements are almost impossible to find) fixed. Looks almost showroom new.

Plus it s dark green.
A picture is worth a thousand words (or however many you wrote there). ;-)

GeniusOfLove

3,539 posts

26 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
Funnily enough one has just turned up on BCA, with the usual dreadful photos, on 99,713 miles with 3 owners and a CAP of £5950. It'll be interesting to see what YC55 FND ends up going for and then how many multiples of that some dealer asks.




Really does seem like one for TT fanboys and the "future classic, sure fire investment" idiots, for the rest of us you can tart it up all you like but ultimately it drives like what it is; a nicely trimmed 90s Golf and taking out the rear seats to pretend it's some sort of focussed sports car is just silly.

I'd rather a 225bhp one and £3k change for fixing the inevitable old car issues, it's a nice brisk shed car then.

Edited by GeniusOfLove on Thursday 19th June 11:09

smilo996

3,339 posts

184 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
nice colour and wheel choice but that estate agent really got about.

blue_haddock

4,424 posts

81 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
I've always liked these and i think in a few years they will be proper classic material.

GeniusOfLove

3,539 posts

26 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
blue_haddock said:
I've always liked these and i think in a few years they will be proper classic material.
Not this 230k mile turd though!

fantheman80

1,967 posts

63 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
no pole positions no party

andy97

4,756 posts

236 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
This one went for £8650 at auction at the weekend. Pole position seats and just 76000 miles.
https://angliacarauctions.co.uk/auctions/2706-14-J...
I suggest that the car in the PH article is probably a couple of K over priced judging by that comparison.

blue_haddock

4,424 posts

81 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
GeniusOfLove said:
blue_haddock said:
I've always liked these and i think in a few years they will be proper classic material.
Not this 230k mile turd though!
To be fair i wouldnt be scared of the mileage if it had decent history to back it up but the lack of the recaros is what kills this one for me.

Kosy

124 posts

175 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
Pistonheads united…. you had us until the 3rd pic

NGK210

3,881 posts

159 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
andy97 said:
This one went for £8650 at auction at the weekend. Pole position seats and just 76000 miles.
https://angliacarauctions.co.uk/auctions/2706-14-J...
I suggest that the car in the PH article is probably a couple of K over priced judging by that comparison.
^£8650 for that??!!
Did you checkout its history, I guess not?
Its past is so toxic it reads like a Sniff Petrol parody.

Instead of the 18 services it should’ve had – VAG’s interval was 12 months or 10k miles, whichever occurred first – it’s had only 4.
The last of which was 5 years ago.
Previously, it hadn’t been serviced for 8 years.

Its last cambelt refresh was 13 years ago; ideally should be changed every 4 years, 5 at a push.

I guess its 6(!) charming former keepers had to skip maintenance so they could afford their selection of oikish mods, which includes a remap.

But hey, it has some boy-racer seats beloved by forum nerds and osteopaths in need of extra work.

The PH car with 2 enthusiast owners, a perfect FSH plus recent suspension refresh, is a complete bargain imho. Worth every penny.
And it’s blue, not grey.

Chapeau to its owners. Deserves to sell soon.

Leins

9,879 posts

162 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
I have a bit of a thing for cars that have ditched their rear seats, and always quite fancied the QS. About 10 years ago I was contemplating one of these, a MINI GP1, or alternatively a Mk4 Golf R32, all of which were similar enough value wise at the time

Mr Tidy

26,707 posts

141 months

Thursday 19th June
quotequote all
blue_haddock said:
I've always liked these and i think in a few years they will be proper classic material.
I'm not sure they are different enough to a TT 225 for that to happen.

This one certainly isn't worth the ask!

Resolutionary

1,396 posts

185 months

Friday 20th June
quotequote all
GeniusOfLove said:
..and taking out the rear seats to pretend it's some sort of focussed sports car is just silly.
The rear bench in the non-QS ones is all but pointless, I whipped that nonsense out shortly after purchase for some additional storage - would feel bad putting even my enemies in the back seats.



Had a 225 for a couple of years now, its pretty basic all things considered, and they do have their fair share of problems as age takes its toll, but they're a design classic and pretty good bang for buck if sourced diligently. A solid, low mile QS with the proper seats would be a fine thing to stash away.

Maybe the comfort spec actually allowed this 200k+ miler to circumnavigate many globes biglaugh

Mashley

53 posts

110 months

Friday 20th June
quotequote all
I’ve never owned one of these, never owned any TT, but I do understand how different the QS was to any other TT. They were built in a different factory, specifically the Quattro GmbH factory which was where they used to build the RS cars such as the RS2. This is a small, specialist factory which could only produce 1 type of Audi high performance vehicle at the same time. Think of it as their AMG facility.
The rear seats, parcel shelf, spare wheel, harmonic damper and air conditioning were all removed to reduce weight. The battery was relocated to the back of the car to aid weight distribution. Recaro Pole positions were offered as a no cost option for further weight saving. Additional bracing was added, the power was increased, and the suspension was upgraded and lowered.
So again, I’ve never owned a TT, never driven a Quattro Sport 240, never owned a VW, and once owned an Audi S3 Sportback for a year, so I have no allegiance to this brand at all, but these cars still sound like pretty special things imo.

PRO5T

5,590 posts

39 months

Friday 20th June
quotequote all
The wheel choice on these really missed the mark of the original bauhaus design.