RE: 2025 VW California Coast | UK Review

RE: 2025 VW California Coast | UK Review

Friday 4th July

2025 VW California Coast | UK Review

Going away this summer? Volkswagen has just the thing...


It is tempting to say the VW California is enjoying a moment, based on what seems like an explosion of online interest in the travel opportunities afforded by the humble campervan. Fortunately, PH isn’t (entirely) staffed by millennials, and a working knowledge of events before 2003 - the year VW launched its first Transporter-based California - means that some of us can recall a time when all manner of commercial vehicles were cheerfully converted to accommodate what could approximately be called a bunk bed. We need not dip into the fabled history of the Westfalia Camper to know that if there is an opportunity to park overnight in very close proximity to a destination (typically a far-flung race track), blokes will find a way to sleep there.

The difference, of course, between then and now, is the extent to which this has become a ‘lifestyle’ experience. In days gone by, you were lucky to emerge from a converted van with only inch-long splinters and third-degree burns— now the vibe is sufficiently soft-touch that the latest California isn’t even based on a van platform anymore. Peel the skin back and you’d discover yet another variant of the MQB Evo architecture underneath, the same one used by the V-Class-rivalling Multivan. Which means the T7 is more closely related to an MPV than any van VW currently sells. 

Instinctively, this is another reason to look skyward and ardently wish for a time when the only awning you’d ever encountered was the one attached to your grandad’s bungalow. But it doesn’t take long for the newest California, in high-spec Coast format, to worm its way under your skin - even accounting for the fact that the T7 isn’t nearly as sharp-looking as its predecessors. It is nice inside though. Not surprisingly, the dash layout is very much like the Multivan’s, although obviously the California doesn’t get the elaborate centre console, which does wonders for the sense of available space, and how you can position your legs to take advantage of it. The temptation on long journeys to drive somewhat sprawled out, like an octopus on a bean bag, is hard to resist. 

At any rate, you’ll be comfy. Probably the California was fortunate to arrive during a heatwave and with yours truly suffering from recurring bouts of lower back torment, but the standard fit captain’s chair, with ample space on both sides for propping elbows on and an exceptional view ahead, seemed instantly preferable to any sofa. And so it proved during a 12-hour round trip to Yorkshire. Any concern you might have had about the latest model losing its van-like driver’s position along with the platform can be immediately put to bed: you’re propped up in familiar style, with pedals underfoot and the steering wheel aimed roughly at your sternum. Sporty it is not. Relaxing it very definitely is. 

The chassis settings are cut from the same cloth. Though it may have exchanged its underpinnings, VW has not distanced the California from its van-like handling; you simply gain a bit more finesse. Most notably from the primary ride and the steering, both of which are impressively well configured for the job at hand. Driving an upmarket campervan ought to be as stress-free as possible; accurate control surfaces and a go-with-the-flow attitude to damping are just what the (back) doctor ordered. Granted, the way the California hits potholes could hardly be called subtle - let’s not forget it weighs 2.5 tonnes and there’s all manner of stuff waiting to rattle discontentedly in the back - but as demerits go, it’s easily forgiven. Or it was on a long stint up the M1, anyway. 

Admittedly, some of this contentment had much to do with the 2.0-litre TDI unit doing all the heavy lifting. VW’s venerable oil burner hardly requires a fresh appraisal - but when you’ve been away from its various strengths for so long, they reacquire the power to amaze. Installed in a car the size, shape, and weight of a fairly substantial shed, the engine is still claimed to return 41.5mpg - and did so, despite being driven with outside-lane gusto, taking full advantage of the 265lb ft of torque and the seven-speed DSG’s attentiveness. You could buy a California as a petrol-electric hybrid with considerably more power - but I wouldn’t. The four-cylinder TDI, mountain goat-like in its springy step and sinewy durability, could hardly be better suited to the task of big, monotonous distances. 

Of course, it’s when you get to where you’re going that the Cali really comes into its own. Precisely how long it takes to go from ‘drive’ mode to ‘camp’ depends on how many of its extensive features you plan to use. The Coast comes with the fold-out ‘mini kitchen’ (essentially a 1-burner gas cooker), running cold water (with fresh and waste tanks), an auxiliary heater, a 230-volt inlet for hooking up, a fold-out bed in the rear, two folding chairs in the tailgate, and the manually extendable awning to put them under. You can even have a shower if you’re feeling particularly brave/desperate. Alternatively, if you’re feeling lazy and/or plan to do nothing more complicated than sleeping in the California, it is merely a question of pushing a button and waiting for the roof-top bed to unfurl. Throw a sleeping bag and some pillows through the hatch above the front seats, followed by yourself, and Bob is very much your uncle. 

For anyone who has ever eyed a patch of grass suspiciously or wrestled with a tent or begrudged sleeping on the ground or shuddered at the sound and smell of canvas, the feeling of settling down in your private loft (which didn’t exist 90 seconds earlier) is little short of revelatory. Granted, it helped that the weather was as close to perfect as Yorkshire ever gets: warm but with sufficient breeze to take advantage of the zippable, bug-resistant openings. And yet it’s hard to imagine ever begrudging climbing into your tiny padded bedroom, one seemingly constructed from the same high-grade materials as the rest of the interior, and sleeping very, very close to nature - yet simultaneously cocooned from it. I slept like a fat baby. 

Admittedly, I was on my own. Had the Mrs been with me, I suspect she would have decreed that I ‘eff off ‘downstairs’ to assemble the other bed, which is a process as manual as erecting an Amish barn. And she would have also insisted we have the awning up and the chairs out, which requires less faff, although the former does not instil much confidence in its ability to survive anything more serious than a breath of wind. Moreover, with her famous inability to pack light (a failing I cautiously extend to the rest of her gender), I suspect the amount of space available generally would have been at a premium. The thought of travelling somewhere to stay four up, even with two small children, is the point where my enjoyment of the California would likely turn to claustrophobic dread. 

A chance but timely meeting with some previous owners (everyone loves to chat about the California) confirms that scale has a tendency to be both attraction and sticking point. The world is well-adapted to accommodating vans of this size, and the appeal of being able to drive virtually anywhere without a second thought for your vehicle’s dimensions is not to be underestimated. The California is as wieldy as a well-oiled shopping trolley; people like that. But, much like a shopping trolley, once it has a full chunky load of items aboard, it doesn’t seem half as big - and for lengthier vacations this is a problem. Ditto the idea of staying somewhere that isn’t equipped with free food and drinks and showers and toilets (thanks again, Jeep UK). 

The counter-argument to these obvious limitations, naturally, is that the California is only really meant for short-ish trips or else the full convenience of a proper campsite. But that fact must be set against its substantial asking price: the Coast is £70,681, on-the-road. The one we drove, with a smattering of options that include the upgraded infotainment (£900) and the retractable tow bar (£948), was £74,089. So the question, ultimately, is less about whether the California is any good - I loved it, and were I planning on spending umpteen weekends away mountain biking or track day-ing or hill climbing, I can honestly think of nothing better - but whether or not a) it fits your particular requirements and b) if you can afford it. 

After all, most people, if they are especially lucky, only have enough space in their lives for one very expensive toy. Plenty, it seems, choose a California without looking back - and I envy their certainty. Based on this experience, admittedly in an ideal setting, I would enjoy it not one iota less. But I would also regard the space that it takes up as one that could not simultaneously be filled by an old Porsche 911 or new Caterham Seven or any number of other exciting alternatives. That’s just me, of course. What’s important for Volkswagen and the T7 is that the California’s position as a serious, ponderable alternative to a rear-drive sports car (or whatever else you can imagine blowing £70k on) is assured for another generation. 


Specification | Volkswagen California Coast 2.0 TDI

Engine: 1,968cc, four-cylinder, turbocharged, diesel
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch automatic, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 150 @ 3,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 265 @ 1,600-2,750rpm
0-62mph: 12.6 seconds
Top speed: 117mph
Weight: 2,417kg (unladen)
MPG: 41.5 (WLTP)
CO2: 180g/km (WLTP)
Price: £70,681 incl. VAT (£74,089 as tested)

Author
Discussion

Baddie

Original Poster:

718 posts

232 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
Thanks, great review. Chuckled in places and a useful sense of what it’s like to live with, limitations and strengths. Expensive, but clearly still desirable.

samurasta

18 posts

112 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
£70k.... let that sink in...

valiant

12,310 posts

175 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
samurasta said:
£70k.... let that sink in...
Whilst there are cheaper competitors out there, there are few manufacturer made versions unless you go down the conversion route which will end you up with a similar bill for a brand new van.

Yep, they're expensive but motorhomes and camper vans always are but they do tend to hold onto their money and stuff like the California have a following and so can be easily shifted on once you tire of it.

I know we're going to get comments on that being a lot of hotel rooms but people are different and some like this sort of thing and are prepared to pay for it.

Billy_Whizzzz

2,362 posts

158 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
samurasta said:
£70k.... let that sink in...
Seems pretty good value.

Downward

4,618 posts

118 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
samurasta said:
£70k.... let that sink in...
It’s an optional extra at £3k !

Gruntled

160 posts

94 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
I’m holding out for a Tesla Mein Kampferwagen

CH80

149 posts

12 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
Downward said:
samurasta said:
£70k.... let that sink in...
It s an optional extra at £3k !
LOL

Lotobear

7,979 posts

143 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
Billy_Whizzzz said:
samurasta said:
£70k.... let that sink in...
Seems pretty good value.
I agree, 70k seems very little these days - the price of a 'premium' battery car but without the crippling depreciation.

When considering the utility offered by this vehicle and the likelihood of excellent residuals I can see the appeal

Harry Flashman

20,602 posts

257 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
Exactly. I am not a van life person, but a friend is and his older all wheel drive California goes everywhere, not just as a place to sleep in, bit also as comfortable long distance transport - Alps in ski season, festivals in summer, bike and surf trips, etc.

The value they get out of that van is stupendous - far more value than I get out of one of my V8 toys.

And £70k plus is not as much as people think it is, comparatively. Cars are expensive, today. Sure, that just about gets you into a well-specced 991 generation 911 GTS 3.8. Maybe. But you can't drive that to the mountains with all your kit in it and then sleep in it for a week whilst you cycle around the Alps.

I mean, I'd rather have the Porsche, personally, but that's not the point.

86wasagoodyear

739 posts

111 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
Plenty of online reviews saying these are nowhere near as practical as the van-based previous ones. Much less storage space in particular. 'Get a previous version' is a popular opinion it seems.

bigmowley

2,293 posts

191 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
They certainly are a brilliant fit for a certain demographic. My chums wife has just spunked her retirement lump sum on one. She is a fell runner and her husband is big into fishing. They potter about all over the UK usually to far flung places and live life to the full. She absolutely loves it to bits. I don’t think £70K is that bad in the current economy. It’s well specified, nice to drive, and well screwed together.
I’ve just had to build them an extension onto their garage so she has got somewhere to keep it nice and cosy! First world problems and all that laugh

ex-devonpaul

1,455 posts

152 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
samurasta said:
£70k.... let that sink in...
A friend bought one a couple of months ago - paid £67k with a couple of options . They love it. It really is very nice and drives extremely well and is really good on fuel. They replaced their 20 year old one which was rusting out in places, (yeah, not great) but she uses it as her only vehicle. Hubby is doing a lot of overtime to pay for it, which means he needs to earn an extra £120k+ to pay for it. I didn't point this out smile

She goes away for a night with the kids pretty much every week. Obviously on her own as hubby is at work.

The Pistonsdead

5,302 posts

222 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
Nice write up and interesting read.

ballans

867 posts

120 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
Got a couple of friends who have these and they love them. It is cheaper to get an ex builder van and get it converted but according to my friends experience they say having everything fitted “just right” is a big positive. The big upfront cost is a bit shocking but when the total cost of ownership is taken into consideration and the lack depreciation they offer tremendous value for money.
Ive had all kinds of vans over the years including full conversions and day vans and my preference is a basic van. The ability to chuck people, dogs and equipment into the back without worrying about muck and detritus wrecking the interior is great.
I like VWs but I’m currently in a Vito which I would highly recommend.

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,384 posts

113 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
Never really understood these. Why not get a proper camper van with a shower and loo, or an estate car and stay at a hotel.

I can't think of many occasions I would choose this £70k vehicle over either of the other options. Still, they hold their values so clearly others do...

ballans

867 posts

120 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
BigChiefmuffinAgain said:
Never really understood these. Why not get a proper camper van with a shower and loo, or an estate car and stay at a hotel.

I can't think of many occasions I would choose this £70k vehicle over either of the other options. Still, they hold their values so clearly others do...
I think it’s a case of you either get it or you don’t.
If you like your luxuries then it will make no sense whatsoever. But, if you are an active type with plenty of equipment to cart about they are hugely attractive. Even better if you have your own mobile kitchen, bed, changing room etc.
it’s not a replacement for hotels but a very nice addition to an outdoor lifestyle.

Ps , I’m not having a dig at your opinion, just offering an explanation.

Hothouse

115 posts

105 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
Interesting move for VW. More towards the MPV size than the previous T6 and I definitely think that triggers a slightly different market.
We ran an old Espace for years and it was nearly the perfect day van/car/workhorse for family duties. If it had had a pop top, sink and fridge it would have been perfect. Couldn't find like for like replacement so got a T6 camper. This is noticeably bigger and more van like. It's a very useful vehicle and we've done loads of short and long camping trips, but, it's not quite as versatile as an MPV on the daily stuff.
I think this Coast is more likely to find a slightly different market to the traditional camper, perhaps taking people away from big SUV's which we all know are very limited on the 'Utility' part.
Can't help but think Renault, or perhaps more relevant Matra who built the first gen Espaces, really missed a trick in not developing the Espace platform in this direction. An Espace equipped like a Matra Rancho for adventures. That would surely have been a success ?

Griffith4ever

5,590 posts

50 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
BigChiefmuffinAgain said:
Never really understood these. Why not get a proper camper van with a shower and loo, or an estate car and stay at a hotel.

I can't think of many occasions I would choose this £70k vehicle over either of the other options. Still, they hold their values so clearly others do...
A HUGE amount of people do understand them. They get a camper van for holidays, festivals, weekends away, plus its also their daily driver / school run / family taxi / bike carrier. And they park in regular car spaces, are under 2m tall (so can use multistories / don't pay higher paeage tolls / can get into height restricted open car parks (usually tourist localtions/seaside). - That's a load of reasons over an RV/"proper camper" right there.....

£70k is the starting price. People often spec over £95k on the Cali 6 and 6.1 (prev models).

I don't have one but I deal with their owners, a lot.

V41LEY

2,981 posts

253 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
Each to their own.
I don’t get the lifestyle but the world would be a boring place if we were all the same (albeit Cornwall would be a lot easier to navigate).
I had hoped Airbnb would do for these but apparently not.

POIDH

1,818 posts

80 months

Saturday 5th July
quotequote all
BigChiefmuffinAgain said:
Never really understood these. Why not get a proper camper van with a shower and loo, or an estate car and stay at a hotel.

I can't think of many occasions I would choose this £70k vehicle over either of the other options. Still, they hold their values so clearly others do...
It's amazing how many people with proper big campervans with shower and loo use the facilities on a campsite. I mean, who wants to drop a James III while trapped an a little vented tupperware box while your OH sits 2m away... Then you have to wrestle the tank of sh*t over to the drop off and try not to get splashback...or just use the campsite facilities.

I struggle with the lack of storage on the VW California's, and they sit halfway between luxury and functional. I've a Bilbos Komba LWB T5 High Top. It's properly functional build, with amazing storage, quieter and warmer than a pop top, and a bigger and more comfy bed.

And yes, £70k is a metric shed load of money, but mine was a one owner, 20k miles, 10 year old, full VWSH factory converted van and it cost me £30k two years ago. I've used it for heading on 120 nights, and when I popped into a local dealer to get some gas a couple of months ago they offered me £35k as they had waiting customers...so they do hold value.