RE: One-of-a-kind 400hp Porsche '914-8' for sale
RE: One-of-a-kind 400hp Porsche '914-8' for sale
Today

One-of-a-kind 400hp Porsche '914-8' for sale

Mid-engined Porsches can be very special with four or six cylinders - this 914 is powered by a Chevy small block...


We all love an engine swap, don’t we? Doesn’t matter if the transplant is complementary to the base car’s characteristics or it totally transforms them, the process is endlessly fascinating - as so many Readers’ Cars threads will attest to. Whether it’s creating something the factory should have made or a unique car, it’s hard not to be intrigued by engine swaps. 

The trend has become so popular that there are several well-established powertrain transfers these days. Think mid-engined Lotuses with the other K Series engine in, the Toyota MR2 getting the Celica’s 2ZZ, BMW’s S85 V10 in plenty of places that aren’t an M5 and so on. But we’ll bet you’ve never seen anything like this before. It’s a Porsche 914, originally launched back in 1969 as the VW-Porsche and with power provided by a modest 1.7-litre flat four. Max power was just 80hp, so it was launched alongside a 914/6, with a 911-spec six upping that figure to 110hp. This car, however, is neither of those. Well, it was a standard 914 once, and has the wider /6 arches on it - but under the bonnet is a V8. 

You read that right, eight cylinders in the middle of a Porsche 914. Not just any V8, either, but a 5.7-litre Chevy small block. Said to be brand new when the project was undertaken by Renegade Customs in Las Vegas, it has covered 10,000 miles since the conversion. And, thanks to spicy cams, develops 400hp. In a car that weighs as much as a stamp, the 914-8 promises to be a huge amount of fun. 

Unsurprisingly given the size of the engine and the size of the car, plenty about the Porsche is bespoke. Not that you’d really be able to tell; it’s lower and wider and meaner than a 914, complete with the Fuchs that are mandatory on a modified Porsche, though it doesn’t scream crazy project car. Presumably, the exhaust will do a very good job of that. 

Neither does this look like some kind of cobbled-together sports car. Both interior and exterior look fantastic, without rust for the former or dash cracks for the latter, and there’s still some boot space behind the engine. To all intents and purposes, it’s a much-loved Porsche 914, only one that’s hiding a 350 cubic inch secret. 

It’s impossible not to be curious, like all the best engine swaps. Furthermore, as a US-market, left-hand-drive car - plus being some way from standard - this isn’t as expensive as some other 914s. There are UK cars above £30k, yet this is £26,500. Given the nature of the build, you’d have to imagine offers anywhere adjacent to that ballpark would be entertained. And what a hoot it’d surely be; people know the Porsche 914, and people know Chevy V8s. We’ve just never known them together. Imagine the looks on the faces of the Porsche Owners Club...


See the original advert

Author
Discussion

m62tu

Original Poster:

105 posts

57 months

BHP is excessive at 400. 914 weights nothing, don't get the LS swap philosophy. I would have went with a low capacity V8 such as BMWs M60 3.0 or Jaguar AJ V8. Abundant and cheap motors, more rev happy will suit the character of the car far better. *Porsche did make a working prototype Boxer-8. If entered into production, would have been the only horizontal eight motor in existence. Missed opportunity in an era with no emissions constrains.

biggbn

28,138 posts

238 months

This is utterly brilliant, what a hoot it must be

v8notbrave

94 posts

31 months

Epic, what a build, weight transfer must be interesting with that centre of gravity!!

Earthdweller

16,404 posts

144 months

A bit of a curiosity but no more I'd say

Putting a stonking big heavy V8 in the back of a very small lightweight car kind of destroys the purpose of it

Probably great on us drag strips but I'd doubt it'd be much fun to blast on the moors up in the Pennines

edoverheels

492 posts

123 months

I love that and seems ‘cheap’.
I don’t know enough about engines but weren’t some of the later small blocks alloy?
It says that it was a new engine when it went in and that would help with the weight.
Hard to imagine how they squeezed it in and so working on it will be tricky.
However I would happily have that. Would swap one of my cars for it and I am sure it will be snapped up.
V8 instead of a 4pot. Brilliant

fatsams

36 posts

191 months

Love it and the price looks good but, think about the servicing, probably have to drop the engine to change the spark plugs…….expensive to run then?

Pablo_Picasso

42 posts

178 months

I think the people questioning the reasoning for a Chevy V8 need to remember the conversion was carried out in the US. V8 availability and knowledge is second to none out here. So the most popular engine swap choice.
It’s also worth noting that the Chevy small block is indeed very small and light. All aluminium and with only a single cam push rod design means no big multi valve over head cam heads which utilmately means a compact lightweight design.

Pablo

WPA

12,415 posts

132 months

Would have been so much better with a flat 6 from a 911

Dr G

15,638 posts

260 months

m62tu said:
BHP is excessive at 400. 914 weights nothing, don't get the LS swap philosophy. I would have went with a low capacity V8 such as BMWs M60 3.0 or Jaguar AJ V8. Abundant and cheap motors, more rev happy will suit the character of the car far better. *Porsche did make a working prototype Boxer-8. If entered into production, would have been the only horizontal eight motor in existence. Missed opportunity in an era with no emissions constrains.
Whilst I fear you're slightly missing the point (and a hot-rod doesn't need a point), here are some points:

It's not an LS.

LS swapping is immensely popular as (particularly so in domestic market) the engine is cheap, widely available, massively tunable at sensible cost, and supported by the aftermarket in a way no other engine on the planet is. You want an off-the-shelf bracket to install an LS7 on ITBs in the door pocket of a 78 Bronco? Summit have them in 3 colours and will deliver tomorrow.

BMW and Jaguar units are DOHC engines, making them relatively tall and wide. Neither have the aftermarket support SBC does or availability of parts. Neither are $3k brand new either.

I like it for what it is, just plain silly. Unpredictable alternative to the played out Cobra? Rumble around and light the tyres off whenever you feel like it!

Turbobanana

7,445 posts

219 months

I was trying to work out why the nose looks weird. It seems they've done away with the indicator / sidelight units in favour of something emulating a 911 Flachbau. Article states it has 914/6 arches, but this is a 914/6:



and this is a 911 Flachbau:


DodgyGeezer

45,039 posts

208 months

Dr G said:
Whilst I fear you're slightly missing the point (and a hot-rod doesn't need a point), here are some points:

It's not an LS.

LS swapping is immensely popular as (particularly so in domestic market) the engine is cheap, widely available, massively tunable at sensible cost, and supported by the aftermarket in a way no other engine on the planet is. You want an off-the-shelf bracket to install an LS7 on ITBs in the door pocket of a 78 Bronco? Summit have them in 3 colours and will deliver tomorrow.

BMW and Jaguar units are DOHC engines, making them relatively tall and wide. Neither have the aftermarket support SBC does or availability of parts. Neither are $3k brand new either.

I like it for what it is, just plain silly. Unpredictable alternative to the played out Cobra? Rumble around and light the tyres off whenever you feel like it!
exactly this ^^^

As an aside, iIt is interesting that 3/400 horses in a Cobra and everyone is drooling, the same output in this 914 and there are comments about how scary it must be (TBF my initial thought was it could be bloody terrifying - but then I suspect the Cobra would be too!)

bristolracer

5,815 posts

167 months

Not a fan of the arches, which I guess are done to accommodate the much larger wheels needed for the power.

To me beauty of the 60’s and 70’s Porsches was their delicacy and petite size.

LarJammer

2,360 posts

228 months

WPA said:
Would have been so much better with a flat 6 from a 911
Agree. It's such a good idea that even Porsche did it. They also did a 914/8.

bangerhoarder

680 posts

86 months

L31 5.7L crate engine? From what I can see they're cast iron block and heads - so heavy, but maybe that'd settle the car a little.

thegreenhell

20,335 posts

237 months

Turbobanana said:
I was trying to work out why the nose looks weird. It seems they've done away with the indicator / sidelight units in favour of something emulating a 911 Flachbau. Article states it has 914/6 arches, but this is a 914/6:



and this is a 911 Flachbau:

It's just a US impact bumper, isn't it? Early US cars just had massive rubber overriders on the standard bumper, but later ones had this bigger rubber bumper.


Studio263

84 posts

22 months

'Ugly little sports car designed for VW that they ultimately didn't want, meet pickup truck engine'

That's horrible, no thanks.

I drove a 914 a few years ago (one of the later 2.0L 4 cyl ones), I used to want one but this cured me. The driving position was dreadful and the view towards the rear quarters verged on dangerous as those stupid buttresses get in the way. I should have bought a 356 when 1.6L T5 bodied coupes were around £20k - ***sigh***.