RE: Mazda CX-7 | Shed of the Week
RE: Mazda CX-7 | Shed of the Week
Yesterday

Mazda CX-7 | Shed of the Week

The 260hp MPS Mazdas were quirky, rare Q cars; the SUV that shared their turbo engine even more so...


Don't judge him, but back in the '80s when things were so very different in so many ways, Shed was contractually obliged to attend photo shoots involving scantily-clad models and motorbikes. Actually, scantily clad is an exaggeration. Completely unclad would be more accurate. Charming girls to a fault, these professional models were so at ease in their natural state that they didn't bother to robe up when the shutter wasn't clicking.  This was an issue for Shed at one particular London studio that had a snooker table for models and hangers-on like him to enjoy in the downtime between setups. You try sinking an important pink when a naked starlet is casually chalking her cue at the other end of the table. 

One of the most uninhibited models, a Swedish lass, bumped into Shed once in Croydon's Whitgift Centre. She had to introduce herself to him as he simply didn't recognise her, what with it being the first time he'd seen her with any clothes on. Why is Shed revealing all this now? Only because today's Shed of the Week, a Mazda CX-7, is a bit like one of those moggles. One of the two European-spec CX-7s had a 2.2 four-pot turbodiesel (170hp/295lb ft), the Mrs Shed spec if you will, but the one we've got here is the substantially more titillating Postmistress-spec 2.3 DISI turbo four petrol promising 260hp and 290lb ft. 

The numbers were big but accessing them wasn't always easy. Although maximum torque came in at a reasonable 2,750rpm, max power didn't arrive until 5,000rpm, an area you weren't aurally rewarded for exploring. Financially it would be a challenge too, because even the average fuel consumption was only 27mpg. By hanging all the consequences and hand-shandying the six-speed manual box we got in the UK (markets like the US had a more fragile auto), you could hustle this 1,700kg car through the 0-60mph run in 7.7 seconds or so. The idea of conventional clothing concealing a high-powered platform puts Shed in mind of the Postmistress. She might not look that special to the casual observer but performance-wise Shed knows she is very much a CX-7 in a sea of 1.6 Corollas. 

Also like the Postmistress, the CX-7's body still looks quite sleek. It was a Callum design, but by Moray, the lesser-known elder brother of lan. Living in his sibling's shadow didn't do Moray any harm. He gave the Mazda range a sorely needed juice-up in the first decade of the 21st century before moving over to Ford US to head up passenger car design there. There's no getting away from the fact that the CX-7 is an SUV from a time when there was less emphasis on Sport than on Utility, manufacturers' PR departments trying to get around the shortfall of SUV sportlichness by coining the phrase 'soft roaders'.

Initially at least the hot CX-7 looked more promising, with a robust chassis package including fully independent suspension, vented disc brakes, stability and traction control, and a MATS torque-splitting all-wheel drive system feeding up to 50 per cent of torque to the back wheels. The MPS (Mazda Performance Series) 3 and 6 models that used the same engine were actually a very decent steer. In rare moments of lucidity Shed seems to remember a batch of MPS 2.3s being used as track tuition vehicles by the instructors at Thruxton, but of course he might have got that completely wrong.

Unfortunately the CX-7 bombed in the UK, commercially and physically. It was introduced here in 2007, just before the big global crash, with very little forethought as to who might buy it. As it turned out hardly anybody did, and the ones who did take the plunge soon found themselves facing a few reliability issues. VT actuators stopped actuating and timing chains stretched. A degree of play in that department was acceptable, but if you ignored it for too long top end carnage would ensue. Piston rings could stick in wonky liners, conrod bearings could turn and turbochargers could fail. If you weren't driving it hard enough, which few did, soot and sludge would bedevil the spark plugs and engine. Cooling could be an issue too, busted thermostats or clogged/leaking radiators ultimately killing the head if your approach to this sort of thing was to ignore it. Air-con, heating and lights were all susceptible to fritzery.

It all sounded out of character for a company responsible for the hyper-reliable MX-5. On the other hand, you might think it was entirely in character for a company responsible for the early RX rotaries. Whatever, for reasons that may or may not be connected to its reliability record, Mazda discontinued the high-powered CX-7 in 2012. The MPS line was closed down a year later. Hopefully CX-7s like our 98,000-miler that have somehow made it through to today will have been fettled with longer-lasting parts. 

September's MOT test of our Shed picked up on a corroded but not seriously weakened rear subframe. If you're into preventative maintenance, new replacements aren't exactly jumping off the shelves in the UK. Mazda might be able to sell you an OE item for fierce amounts of cash, Shed doesn't know, but if you look hard enough you should be able to find pre-loved subframes. Shed spotted one in Lithuania at just over £100. Adding postage to the UK unfortunately triples that outlay, but at least it shows you that some solutions are available. Our car looks like it was photographed and chucked online three minutes after it came in. Nobody bothered to remove the two takeaway drinks, the abandoned water bottle or the remnants of what looks like a Gregg's pasty in the driver's footwell. On one level, that's a shame, but on another level (Shed's one) it's an opportunity to stroke your beard, if you have one, and then try to chip something off the £1,999 asking price. You might need to when you see the annual VED bill of £700+...


See the original advert

Author
Discussion

tomsugden

Original Poster:

2,407 posts

249 months

Yesterday (06:08)
quotequote all
Dull, not for me thanks.

Luke.

11,668 posts

271 months

Yesterday (06:26)
quotequote all
Great cars. And quite a unique proposition. Almost bought one when my son was born back in 2011. Ended up going with a gold 2005 Subaru Outback. Which was brilliant, if a bit thirsty.

86wasagoodyear

823 posts

117 months

Yesterday (06:37)
quotequote all
Amusingly bonkers - well spotted Shed haha

Wren-went

1,031 posts

59 months

Yesterday (06:45)
quotequote all
I'm sorry but I'm not paying over £700 a year Road Tax .
Don't remember the last time I've seen a CX-7.

Presumably Mazda 3 MPS owners will also pay the same, now I do like them but still wouldn't pay that.

apm142001

288 posts

110 months

Yesterday (06:51)
quotequote all
This engine has been known to experience conrod failure in the 3/6 MPS, so I’m sure giving it some extra weight/inertia to work with will increase the chances of creating fail content.

Suppose at this price it’s a risk you’d take though, and just weigh the car in if it occurred. Despite the above, I like it as an oddity…there’s always some appeal in a car that a) I didn’t know existed and b) has an engine that doesn’t match the appearance

Quhet

2,769 posts

167 months

Yesterday (07:00)
quotequote all
Interesting curio but I can't imagine a scenario when owning makes sense. Rare for a reason.

humphra

574 posts

113 months

Yesterday (07:04)
quotequote all
I like the concept of a punchy engine in a plain looking car, but it's not punchy enough for my liking. Plus that list of potential issues from Shed includes plenty with some serious spendage.

Also, isn't that picture background the one used by an auction house? If so, could it already have some serious issues and just been off-loaded through an auction?

FrankandLynn

50 posts

14 months

Yesterday (07:06)
quotequote all
A proper unicorn I didn’t even know this model existed ! Not sure if the pictures were taken before or after Shed’s commentary but the handbrake is dutifully standing to attention, presumably at the thought of the disrobed ladies.

Edited by FrankandLynn on Friday 9th January 07:10

Rob 131 Sport

4,238 posts

73 months

Yesterday (07:35)
quotequote all
Why would anyone buy a SUV over a saloon, hatch, or estate. This doesn’t look like a sharp drive in the slightest.

PSB1967

400 posts

177 months

Yesterday (07:51)
quotequote all
Unreliable, thirsty, highest VED. A shame really because it seems to have survived remarkably well and it's AWD. A curio, but a Nope! for me.


WPA

13,159 posts

135 months

Yesterday (08:10)
quotequote all
Dumpy looking thing with high RFL, nope not for me

Also auction photos, dread to think what horrors it is hiding

el romeral

1,862 posts

158 months

Yesterday (08:23)
quotequote all
I should be quite excited by this due to decent power, plenty of space and low purchase price. It's not quite doing it though.

Cryssys

750 posts

59 months

Yesterday (08:35)
quotequote all
Interesting shed and a nice way to start the shedding year. It just doesn't do anything for me one way or the other.

I'll pass on this one.


AC43

13,154 posts

229 months

Yesterday (08:41)
quotequote all
Rob 131 Sport said:
Why would anyone buy a SUV over a saloon, hatch, or estate. This doesn t look like a sharp drive in the slightest.
Mumsnet on wheels.



spookly

4,357 posts

116 months

Yesterday (08:45)
quotequote all
Never buy from a dealer that sells with auction photos.

J4CKO

45,420 posts

221 months

Yesterday (08:54)
quotequote all
Meh,

But it’s 260 bhp !

Still meh, but a little faster.

mart4856

169 posts

45 months

Yesterday (09:04)
quotequote all
If you must have a fast MPV spend more on something that you might actually want to own and keep. Off the top of my head maybe a Ford S-max 2.5 turbo or Zafira VXR. Anything would be better than this thirsty, max VED ugly munter.

Just checked and there are 3 x 2.5 S-maxes on AT for sub £2K.

Edited by mart4856 on Friday 9th January 09:07

Richard-390a0

3,186 posts

112 months

Yesterday (09:09)
quotequote all
WPA said:
Also auction photos, dread to think what horrors it is hiding
Always my first thought - If they can't even be bothered to take their own pics what else haven't they done?

Fastchas

2,771 posts

142 months

Yesterday (09:12)
quotequote all
Weren't these years for Mazda quite bad for reliability? I seem to remember them being high up in dissatisfaction stakes.

Antj

1,118 posts

221 months

Yesterday (09:13)
quotequote all
Wren-went said:
I'm sorry but I'm not paying over £700 a year Road Tax .
.
You won't be driving for many years with that attitude then mate ....... give it a couple of years and we'll be calling that a bargain, "remember when tax was less than a grand a year"