RE: New Volvo EX60 gets up to 680hp, 500-miles range
RE: New Volvo EX60 gets up to 680hp, 500-miles range
Today

New Volvo EX60 gets up to 680hp, 500-miles range

EX30 too small? EX90 too massive? Time for an EX60 to split the difference


2026 looks like being a very good year for those after a family-friendly EV SUV from a premium carmaker. The BMW iX3 is imminent, as is the Alpine A390, to go alongside the Audi Q6 and Porsche Macan siblings and the others we’ve probably forgotten. It’s a sector that would seem tailor-made for Volvo as it continues its electrified push upmarket, and here we have its mid-size SUV offering - the EX60. 

In sensible, logical Volvo fashion, it’s exactly what you might expect from a car called EX60. It’s electric, it’s (mostly) all-wheel drive, and it’s a similar sort of size to the existing, combustion-engined XC60 SUV. This is an electric take on the current bestseller, not a reinvention of the brand. Styling cues are borrowed from both the smaller EX30 and larger EX90, battery and motor specs are familiar from the ES90 saloon, and the third generation of the SPA (Scalable Platform Architecture), though new for this ‘60, is an evolution of the SPA2 used for cars like the EX90 and Polestar 3. 

In an automotive world seemingly so determined to shock and surprise at every turn, it’s quite nice to see a car that - by and large - is exactly as expected. Modern and sophisticated and crammed full of tech, of course, but the kind of SUV you would expect Volvo to build. Because people like buying the other Volvo SUVs. Leave the triple motor torque vectoring shenanigans to Alpine - this is going to be the big Volvo bus, reinvented for the mid-2020s. There’s even a Cross Country version.

Beneath ‘the best of progressive Scandinavian design for the electric era’, the EX60 will be offered as a single-motor, rear-drive P6 with 374hp, a 510hp, dual-motor P10, or a P12, which has 680hp from its pair of motors. The top-of-the-range car gets a whopper of a battery, too; while the rear-drive model gets just 80kWh usable, enough for 385 miles on the WLTP test, and the P10 91kWh for 410, the P12 is packing an XXL 112kWh battery. That means a WLTP range of up to 503 miles, with 370kW DC charging as well. 

With efficiency a priority, the EX60 uses cell-to-body tech to better energy density in the battery, new and improved e-motors plus megacasting - replacing lots of small parts with big casts - to reduce weight. It still weighs anything from 2,115kg to 2,330kg, but by today’s chubby standards that’s hardly egregious; efficiency is rated at 4.27mi/kWh for the P6, 3.96 for the P10 and 3.88 for the P12, aided by a drag co-efficient of 0.26. Bi-directional charging is included on all models. 

Anyone who’s attempted to maintain a semblance of calm while having to lug everything a baby and a pet requires on a long trip will know how important an interior is. Volvo claims the inside of an EX60 is designed ‘for stress-free, convenient and safe journeys’, taking a lot of familiar XC60 cues ‘but with even more efficiency and refinement, and still elegant and confident.’ So the driver’s view is dominated by a large, landscape screen in the middle, though it appears less drastically pared back than the EX30, and lots of light materials keep it airy. Boot space (this is still a Volvo, after all), is rated at 634 litres with the seats up (and including underfloor storage) or 1,647 litres with them down. 

With the entire EX60 built on Volvo’s Superset tech stack, some of the features will sound familiar from the other EVs. So this gets the NVIDIA DRIVE AGX Orin core computer that’s recently made it to the Polestar 3, which means 254 trillion operations per second (!) and the ability to upgrade safety features and performance over time. The Qualcomm 8255 CPU processor should mean Google Gemini can provide an AI-enhanced interior experience, which the kids will probably be thrilled about. And we’ll promise to keep the chat about engines in future, wherever possible. 

As always when it comes to Volvos, if there’s a Cross Country variant available, it’s the Cross Country that you want. While not drastically different to a standard EX60 - 20mm taller, wider track, the arch cladding - the CC is ever so slightly more rugged. And that’s better - look at those people wearing Patagonia to walk the cockapoo around the park. We like to look like our lifestyle is more active than it is, which the Cross Country looks perfectly suited for. There’s a skid plate and everything.

Volvo says that all variants of the EX60 will be available to pre-order from launch, with first deliveries of the P6 and P10 models due in the summer. That P12 range monster will arrive later in the year. Hopefully just in time for the new school year - imagine being the first parents to arrive at the gates with one of these…  


Author
Discussion

SDK

Original Poster:

2,530 posts

274 months

I've been watching the Volvo EX60 product launch live stream.
I'm liking the 'Cross Country' version.

Another good option alongside the BMW iX3


Maccmike8

1,491 posts

75 months

The wife has a xc40 petrol. It's a pretty good car.
I would give this an easy miss though.

Nickp82

3,772 posts

114 months

It’s boxy… but good (possibly)

baronbennyt

964 posts

117 months

Nickp82 said:
It s boxy but good (possibly)
Loving the Crazy People reference

Yahonza

3,239 posts

51 months

It looks like a bigger version of the EX30, which I wasn't impressed with.
The EX30 isn't very Volvo-like, uncomfortable seats and poor ergonomics. Good drivetrain though, quick and quiet.
I take it the XC60 petrol hybrid is being phased out?


fantheman80

2,309 posts

70 months

I am not sure why polestar and volvo are separate brands - they seem design wise (apart from blocked rear window) to be very similar now

Performance is big as well on Volvo side, so not sure what polestar brings apart from some gold callipers, but it might just be me to be fair.

SDK

Original Poster:

2,530 posts

274 months

Prices are fairly good too

-> P6 : £57k
-> P10 : £60k
-> P12 : £65k

Ultra Spec is another £5.5k extra on the above

Fully designed and built in Sweden


Will be tricky choosing a replacement for my iX this year. This Volvo is more grown up, with the BMW iX3 having the sport edge design.


Edited by SDK on Wednesday 21st January 18:08

Luke.

11,710 posts

271 months

Want.

Spot on for me and my lot. Well this or the new iX3.


Water Fairy

6,369 posts

176 months

Another dreadfully cold, uninviting and characterless interior I see.

It's a shame because Volvo are a brand I considered still did things their own way as much as they could.


GreatScott2016

2,170 posts

109 months

Water Fairy said:
Another dreadfully cold, uninviting and characterless interior I see.

It's a shame because Volvo are a brand I considered still did things their own way as much as they could.
That was my first impression, what a dreary interior and to finish it off, a bland boxy exterior too, Volvo style. Sad.

BobToc

1,925 posts

138 months

Any sense for how the driving position will differ from the iX3? Especially the cross country version.

Clivey

5,514 posts

225 months

It's less ugly than the new IX3 but very much the "generic transportation box", even compared to recent Volvos - I think the S / V 60s and 90s of the last few years are good looking, well proportioned cars, even if Volvo stopped putting decent engines in them.

I really struggle to see how some people get excited for this kind of thing though.

uktrailmonster

9,262 posts

221 months

fantheman80 said:
I am not sure why polestar and volvo are separate brands - they seem design wise (apart from blocked rear window) to be very similar now

Performance is big as well on Volvo side, so not sure what polestar brings apart from some gold callipers, but it might just be me to be fair.
Polestar has more of a dynamic appeal. More focus on driving dynamics, especially their Performance models, while Volvo is a bit more traditional and conservative. Plenty of Scandi overlap though.

uktrailmonster

9,262 posts

221 months

I see Volvo have finally given up with portrait infotainment screens! I wonder if the software is functional yet? I read that it was a disaster on the EX90 launch. It’s really been putting me off recent Volvos and Polestars. Which is a shame because I like the understated Scandi style.

GTEYE

2,346 posts

231 months

Alfred obviously liked it so much he bought two of them!

uktrailmonster

9,262 posts

221 months

Clivey said:
It's less ugly than the new IX3 but very much the "generic transportation box", even compared to recent Volvos - I think the S / V 60s and 90s of the last few years are good looking, well proportioned cars, even if Volvo stopped putting decent engines in them.

I really struggle to see how some people get excited for this kind of thing though.
680 hp @ 2p per mile fuelling. What’s not to like?

cerb4.5lee

40,649 posts

201 months

I presume this will be limited to a 112mph like the EX90? So it won't be much use on the autobahn really. It will shoot off like a rocket, and then get passed by a 3 cylinder Ford Fiesta for example! hehe

Clivey

5,514 posts

225 months

uktrailmonster said:
680 hp @ 2p per mile fuelling. What s not to like?
How much per month for the 680 hp version + the options the average buyer would want + 15k miles per year? I suspect the answer to that question will give you quite a sizeable reason.

Kawasaki2000

132 posts

12 months

XC60 was Volvos most successful car, more so than even the 240. This looks like it will continue that story.

Not my thing but if you're in the market for that size of car it's probably a no brainer.

SDK

Original Poster:

2,530 posts

274 months

Clivey said:
I really struggle to see how some people get excited for this kind of thing though.
Researching and selecting a new car every 3 years- of course it's exciting !

Yes, it would be even more exciting if it was Ferrari, Lamborghini or McLaren shopping, but we all have to be realistic smile