RE: Jaguar F-Type Coupe | High Mile Club
RE: Jaguar F-Type Coupe | High Mile Club
Today

Jaguar F-Type Coupe | High Mile Club

The first coupe we've seen at more than 150,000 miles - the first at a lot less than £15k, too...


The appeal of a cheap old Jaguar shouldn’t take very much explaining, especially when it’s a fast one. They look great, they drive really nicely, they make a tremendous sound and there are a decent amount to choose from. With no new Jaguars like the old ones going to happen, so the temptation increases. Especially when just £10k buys a lovely, long-wheelbase V8 XJ, supercharged and naturally aspirated XKs, S-Type Rs, XFs, XEs - you get the idea. Of course, they’re going to cost a lot to run as well, but name a cool old classic that doesn’t in one form or another. Hopefully it all be deemed worthwhile investment given the experience on offer. 

And now look at what little more than £10k buys: an F-Type V6 Coupe. The C-X16 concept made real, the F-Type with the proper boot, the Jaguar sports GT that was even better to drive than the soft-top. For £13,000, before any negotiating. F-Types may not yet be the bargain two-door that the XK became, though it seems hard to argue with the value for money on offer here. It’s only just about to turn 11 years old, and even in a sombre spec, the hard-top F-Type is glamorous and exciting like little else at the money. Check out one of the last XKs from 2014 or so has evidence of how far the replacement brought Jag design on - this is going to look brilliant for a long time yet. 

As you’ve probably guessed, it’s mileage that puts this F-Type at so much less than the rest, with 155,723 showing on the dash. Impressive for a sports car that was probably designed (and is often seen) with more modest use in mind. The advert suggests that it’s mostly motorway mileage, and an MOT wrap sheet that shows about another 20k added each year in the seven years the last owner had it would back that up. It’s a cool thing to arrive at meetings in, that’s for sure. There are also said to be stacks of invoices for maintenance over the years, which is encouraging. 

No doubt it would benefit from a little bit of TLC (though probably just some favourable light would help as well). The leather is shiny, the wheels are missing centre caps and the paint has lost some of its lustre. Crucially though, everything is intact and actual wear doesn’t look bad at all; a nick in the bumper above the exhaust is the worst blemish we can see. A few hundred quid spent on a detail and wheel refurb will surely work wonders.  

The dealer says all their cars come with at least eight months' MOT; given the current ticket is up in May, another test with the sale should throw up any potential problems. Or, as we like to look on these things as old car enthusiasts, 'areas for improvement'. And negotiation. You’ll want to know when the last service was in that stack of history, and whether the eight-speed auto has received any attention, as it was another unit suggested to be sealed for life that was anything but. There is, of course, a PH F-Type Buying Guide for more info. 

Even with some bits and bobs to sort, this F-Type is certainly an intriguing prospect, especially as the V6: it sounds better than the 2.0-litre, and isn’t quite so wild as the V8. With these miles you needn’t worry about how often it’s used, and as what’s surely going to remain the cheapest you’ll easily find another curious enthusiast to sell it onto. There are always plenty on the hunt for great cheap Jags, after all…


SPECIFICATION | JAGUAR F-TYPE V6 COUPE

Engine: 2,995cc, V6, supercharged
Transmission: 8-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 340@6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 332@3,500rpm
0-62mph: 5.3sec
Top speed: 161mph (limited)
MPG: 31.4 (NEDC)
Year registered: 2015
Recorded mileage: 155,728
Price new: from £58,500
Yours for: £13,450

See the original advert

Author
Discussion

liamthedude

Original Poster:

56 posts

155 months

Great to see something intended to be driven, actually driven.

wistec1

730 posts

64 months

50 Shades of sh*te that will probably show themselves as the miles increase.

Robertb

3,365 posts

261 months

I love the F Type but they always seem poor value vs the XK

Same money buys a 5.0XK… slightly older but under half the miles.

MikeM6

5,815 posts

125 months

I nearly bought a V8 R and really liked the F Type, so at this money it does seem like incredible value, provided it has been maintained properly.

A decent wheel refurb so it has silver wheels would make quite a difference too.

SweptVolume

1,169 posts

116 months

Robertb said:
I love the F Type but they always seem poor value vs the XK

Same money buys a 5.0XK slightly older but under half the miles.
Tend to agree. The other factor is that the XK was positioned as a flagship, so it was very well appointed as standard. I had the Portfolio spec, which was a common upgrade, and that had almost everything you could hope for at the time, including soft leather everywhere. It felt really premium.

The F-Type could also be specced similarly, but it was all optional extras and it makes buying one second hand a lot more complicated.

cerb4.5lee

41,409 posts

203 months

I'd prefer a different exterior colour and silver wheels, but it is great to see a 2 seater car actually get used though for sure. These sound nice I've always thought as well.

PSB1967

423 posts

179 months

To my eyes these are really good looking, well resolved design. Better than a lot of Astons.

Cryssys

799 posts

61 months

A bit of a brave pill to my mind but if luck is on your side it might be worth rolling the dice.

Give it a bit of TLC, stick a private plate on it and impress the neighbours.

NigelCayless

228 posts

178 months

Doesn’t seem worth the risk when you consider the one that sold on PH auctions for £19k with 37k miles

defonsecca

134 posts

108 months

My 2007 XK 4.2 V8 Coupe has now done 126k miles. I've put 45K on in 3-years mainly motorway - and it's been incredibly reliable. hasn't missed a beat. It'll hit 150k without major issues easy. Very high quality car.

But it's now only worth about £6k which is incredible value for what you get.

Although I've looked at F-Types as replacement I'm definitely going for a late model 5.0 XK when time comes to replace - fewer potential issues, generally very well cared for, fantastic value and they just look much classier in my opinion.

varsas

4,072 posts

225 months

Another vote for the XK (especially the 2012-on ones) looking even nicer than the F-type, they have better proportions.

pSyCoSiS

4,135 posts

228 months

Great value. I saw a high mileage one for sale last year at £11k.

The V6 makes nice sound and is a good general all-rounder.

J4CKO

45,798 posts

223 months

varsas said:
Another vote for the XK (especially the 2012-on ones) looking even nicer than the F-type, they have better proportions.
Yeah, I prefer the XK, did think about getting one but the wife has a TT, my Fiesta ST has nothing in the rear as its a track car, so three cars with only two seats wouldn't work.

I have a friend who has had various Jags and a V12 Aston, he went from an XK to the Aston, never liked it, struggled to get rid of it at anything like a reasonable price and is now back in an XK 5.0 convertible. He tried an XKR but says he prefers the N/A engine, finds it plenty fast enough and the supercharged one "a bit much".


JJJ.

4,414 posts

38 months

NigelCayless said:
Doesn t seem worth the risk when you consider the one that sold on PH auctions for £19k with 37k miles
Worth it the extra purchase price.



scz4

2,749 posts

264 months

NigelCayless said:
Doesn t seem worth the risk when you consider the one that sold on PH auctions for £19k with 37k miles
That had a very dubious history (accident damage) and very poor service history.

As a previous V6S owner, mine started becoming a financial burden and constant worry of what next at 45k miles. How someone has deep enough pockets and patience to take one to 150k miles is quite staggering. Early cars were a bit s**t.

Benny Saltstein

773 posts

236 months

varsas said:
Another vote for the XK (especially the 2012-on ones) looking even nicer than the F-type, they have better proportions.
I still think the X150 is a gorgeous car offering mega value. I had an interim 2009 car which had the 5l engine but pre the final face (side?) lift. Really should get another.

mooseracer

2,628 posts

193 months

varsas said:
Another vote for the XK (especially the 2012-on ones) looking even nicer than the F-type, they have better proportions.
Funny isn't it as I'm put off by the proportions of the XK!

No doubting they are fantastic value though.

nismo48

6,250 posts

230 months

Cryssys said:
A bit of a brave pill to my mind but if luck is on your side it might be worth rolling the dice.

Give it a bit of TLC, stick a private plate on it and impress the neighbours.
+1

pSyCoSiS

4,135 posts

228 months

defonsecca said:
My 2007 XK 4.2 V8 Coupe has now done 126k miles. I've put 45K on in 3-years mainly motorway - and it's been incredibly reliable. hasn't missed a beat. It'll hit 150k without major issues easy. Very high quality car.

But it's now only worth about £6k which is incredible value for what you get.

Although I've looked at F-Types as replacement I'm definitely going for a late model 5.0 XK when time comes to replace - fewer potential issues, generally very well cared for, fantastic value and they just look much classier in my opinion.
Agreed, the final run-out XK are great cars and most of the engineering issues resolved by this age.

georgeyboy12345

4,211 posts

58 months

A bit too rough for my liking this one. Hate the black wheels. If I were to get one, then I’d go for a manual. I thought the 3.0 supercharged V6 wasn’t too bad in terms of reliability? Also, didn’t these have issues with rain getting in the bonnet vents and causing issues?