RE: Line finally drawn under Gerry McGovern era
RE: Line finally drawn under Gerry McGovern era
Friday 20th March

Line finally drawn under Gerry McGovern era

Closure for JLR after the confusion; former Chief Creative Officer will now establish his own consultancy


Following much speculation in the aftermath of an exit rumoured to be so abrupt it required an escort, today Gerry McGovern’s exit from JLR has finally been made official. A company-wide release, shared with PH, confirmed he will leave the business at the end of March. Hardly unexpected given the nature of the fallout, but that does at least draw a line under the saga: Gerry McGovern, a man who’s headed up a hugely successful design revolution for his employer, is no longer part of the company after 22 years. 

Much like Ian Callum, albeit in rather different circumstances, McGovern will now form his own creative consultancy. Given all that was achieved, from Evoque to Defender to Discovery, it’s easy to imagine McGovern’s expertise will be in demand - especially given the world’s love affair with the SUV doesn’t show too many signs of abating. 

In the staff memo, his quote reads: “It has been a great privilege to work at JLR across two extraordinary decades, and I would like to thank the Tata family in particular, for the opportunities they gave me.” The statement continues: “The dedication and passion of thousands of people across the business have made these brands what they are today, and I am enormously proud of what we have built together.”

While the ‘why’ of his departure remains unanswered, there is no less intrigue involved in the identity of his replacement; McGovern’s will be colossally big shoes to fill, that’s for sure, and his influence on JLR will certainly not disappear overnight. He was central to the 2021 Reimagine strategy, and was a leading figure in the creation of the Type 00 concept that will underpin Jaguar’s electric rebirth. Moreover, any and all upcoming facelifts in the Land Rover lineup will likely be recognisably McGovern-era designs. 

JLR CEO PB Balaji, a man said to have played a leading role in the drama, added: “Gerry’s creative leadership, vision, drive and passion have left an indelible stamp on our brands. I would like to thank Gerry for the significant contribution he has made to JLR and wish him every success in his next creative chapter.”

Of course, it is merely speculation to suggest that a new advertising campaign (posted above), one that credits Jaguar’s previous design triumphs in a way that it was not inclined to previously - and flagrantly lacking in controversy - might have been timed to appear in the same week as confirmation of McGovern’s departure. Ditto the thought that no video featuring the happy chug of a combustion engine would've been signed off by JLR’s former Chief Creative Officer in a month of Sundays. Nevertheless, as hard evidence of a change in direction, we can probably call it Exhibit A


Author
Discussion

newbie101

Original Poster:

51 posts

135 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
That last paragraph is virtually unreadable.

Geoffcapes

1,172 posts

189 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
newbie101 said:
That last paragraph is virtually unreadable.
Indeed, I think I can surmise though:

Blah blah blah, he left with the hump and won't be getting any credit for what he did, or didn't do.

GTEYE

2,415 posts

235 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
Interesting that they show the badges of some of the historics in that new advert - as of they’re still trying to appeal to buyers who don’t know what an XJ-S or some of it’s predecessors actually were…

wfarrell

240 posts

245 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
Poorly written article - bloated verbose copy and no clear point of view. Pistonheads, you could, and should do much better.

eein

1,558 posts

290 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
Recent PH could be much improved if you replaced it with a well prompted AI that grabs stories elsewhere and rewords.

86wasagoodyear

910 posts

121 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
So, to summarise :
- jaGUar (or whatever it is now) officially accepts that generating loads of negative press is actually negative
- they don't know anyone who's going to buy their new toy
- they're desperately fishing for a customer base with this inoffensive & unoriginal new ad.

Maybe they'll find some previous Jag board members who are still alive & have mahoosive pensions to burn ?

Big trouble down at t' mill.

smilo996

3,635 posts

195 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
well, at least Jaguar have made it as clear as possible for all the fossils and chesterfield sofa crowd that Jaguar has always been about reinvention, except a hick up when Fawd was in charge and tried the hideous nostalgia cliches that were the S and X type.
The XJS was as revolutionary as the new car, as was the E Type, XJ220, the C-75, XE and XF.

pacdes

754 posts

186 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
newbie101 said:
That last paragraph is virtually unreadable.
I honestly - don't - know what - you mean.

yme402

617 posts

127 months

Saturday 21st March
quotequote all
A badly written article and like said previously, the final paragraph is nonsense.
However, that image of the early XJ-S in gold is just sublime.

Kawasaki2000

182 posts

16 months

Saturday 21st March
quotequote all
Thank goodness, I had missed the Jaguar Outrage Machine and this news and advert provide the full opportunity to crank it up again. I just hope people take it, I mean it was a pink car for gods sake.

The ad is interesting, its the first time I've seen an attempt to link the new car with the past and the XJS is certainly an influence viewed side on. The XJS was a car i loved as a kid but time has not been kind although that gold looks really well.

As for direction, their main problem as I see it is the main market for this is the US and the current government is making EV very unattractive there, lots of planned or ready to launch product is being scrapped. While that will cheer the culture warriors its hurting real businesses who are writing off investment.

Wills2

28,464 posts

200 months

Saturday 21st March
quotequote all

So they fired him marched the guy out of the building then realised they had messed up big time from a contractual POV, and he's now setting up a design consultancy with the £££££ JLR had to give him after the CEO's fit of pique.




nismo48

6,488 posts

232 months

Saturday 21st March
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
So they fired him marched the guy out of the building then realised they had messed up big time from a contractual POV, and he's now setting up a design consultancy with the £££££ JLR had to give him after the CEO's fit of pique.



Madness

Geertsen

1,711 posts

84 months

Saturday 21st March
quotequote all
“...rumoured to be so abrupt it required an escort”

“...will leave the business at the end of March”


Which one is it? Because it can’t be both. Sounds like the original ‘forcefully removed’ story is a complete fabrication.

themule

162 posts

100 months

Saturday 21st March
quotequote all
Geertsen said:
...rumoured to be so abrupt it required an escort

...will leave the business at the end of March


Which one is it? Because it can t be both. Sounds like the original forcefully removed story is a complete fabrication.
Well, he could either walk very slowly or the building could be massive.

Lester H

4,106 posts

130 months

Saturday 21st March
quotequote all
It’s difficult for outsiders to learn just who did what but under McGovern the massively successful Defender finally emerged. Mustn’t descend to rambling, but there must be ways for JLR to use historic design cues which are more than a veneer of walnut.

Wills2

28,464 posts

200 months

Saturday 21st March
quotequote all
nismo48 said:
Wills2 said:
So they fired him marched the guy out of the building then realised they had messed up big time from a contractual POV, and he's now setting up a design consultancy with the £££££ JLR had to give him after the CEO's fit of pique.



Madness
Great work if you can get it.



Kawasaki2000

182 posts

16 months

Saturday 21st March
quotequote all
Geertsen said:
...rumoured to be so abrupt it required an escort

...will leave the business at the end of March


Which one is it? Because it can t be both. Sounds like the original forcefully removed story is a complete fabrication.
Employment law. He can be marched off the premises and still be under contract. Lawyers will undoubtedly have been consulted, settlement negotiated and departure agreed. Assuming there was an agreement. I'd suspect a compromise agreement and possible nda. All the phrasing leans lawyer led.

Its amazing how little people understand employment law when work is a huge part of life and its why employers get away with murder and come gloriously unstuck whe dismissing people. The broken UK system is focused on process and following it.

Paracetamol

4,265 posts

269 months

Saturday 21st March
quotequote all
The only saving grace for my crappy 2023 Range Rover was absolutely its styling and brand strength. Weak on virtually every other measure . But these two dimensions make it so desirable it’s not funny …it will be fascinating to see just how much of this was down to Gerry.

Newey and Aston provides a first hand demonstration of how these things are not always down to one man.


Kawasaki2000

182 posts

16 months

Saturday 21st March
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
So they fired him marched the guy out of the building then realised they had messed up big time from a contractual POV, and he's now setting up a design consultancy with the £££££ JLR had to give him after the CEO's fit of pique.



Thats unclear. There's been no tribunal but even if a business fires someone for cause its rare that they leave with nothing, unless they are badly advised. Holiday pay, back pay, even notice in some circumstances. He was never leaving with 'nothing', how good the agreement is for either party is completely unknown. But saying that they messed up is daft, if they wanted him gone its a financial calculation. Ending up in an expensive tribunal with huge negative publicity is messing up. Something employers and employees forget and it costs them.

Wills2

28,464 posts

200 months

Saturday 21st March
quotequote all
Kawasaki2000 said:
Wills2 said:
So they fired him marched the guy out of the building then realised they had messed up big time from a contractual POV, and he's now setting up a design consultancy with the £££££ JLR had to give him after the CEO's fit of pique.



Thats unclear. There's been no tribunal but even if a business fires someone for cause its rare that they leave with nothing, unless they are badly advised. Holiday pay, back pay, even notice in some circumstances. He was never leaving with 'nothing', how good the agreement is for either party is completely unknown. But saying that they messed up is daft, if they wanted him gone its a financial calculation. Ending up in an expensive tribunal with huge negative publicity is messing up. Something employers and employees forget and it costs them.
Getting rid of him might have the right thing to do the way they did it was a mess...talking about tribunals like he's some sort of middle manager, hilarious.