RE: Hyundai Kona N | Spotted
RE: Hyundai Kona N | Spotted
Monday 30th March

Hyundai Kona N | Spotted

How strange was the start of this decade, really? Remember the small Hyundai crossover with 280hp... 


Rumours continue to circulate regarding a return to petrol power for Hyundai's flagship N models, despite it having recently committed to an all-electric future. It’s easy to understand the logic: having proven so popular at £35,000 and under, the brand could certainly do with enthusiast-focused models at less than the £65k asked for the Ioniq 5 and Ioniq 6 N. Moreover, Hyundai’s combustion engines were never the most efficient; a new generation - or else some hybrid assistance - would really help address one of the main N car gripes. 

There would most certainly be interest in a new era of combustion-powered Ns. The first star shone briefly if very brightly, introducing two brilliant hot hatches in the shape of the i20 and i30. From a standing start, Hyundai created two of the best cars in their respective classes, which is now reflected in strong residual values. Moreover, like all good performance sub divisions, it created a mad little curio as well: remember the Kona N?

Ostensibly this was Hyundai’s Puma, the N model rivalling the ST version like the i20 did the Fiesta. But to address those moans that are usually along the lines of ‘why wouldn’t you just buy the hatch?’ - or maybe just because they could - Hyundai gave its small SUV more power than the hatch. A lot more: while the i20 got a 1.6 turbo for 204hp, the Kona was actually motored along by the i30’s 2.0-litre, meaning 280hp. With an eight-speed dual-clutch standard (though still front-drive), a Kona N could scrabble to 62mph in 5.5 seconds. Honest. 

A Kona was a little longer and about 300kg heavier than an i20 N, but the message was clear: this was a small SUV unlike any other in terms of performance. It would do 150mph, while all a Puma ST could offer was a Mountune upgrade to 235hp. The Hyundai handled like a proper N, too, the PH review praising it for decent traction, minimal torque steer and useful throttle adjustability. Oh sure, the ride was super firm and the economy couldn’t even officially hit 35, but the Kona N was a giggle alright. We needed that in 2021; we definitely need it now. 

With the i30 available at the same time, you’d really have to buy into the Kona’s wackiness. Because if the i20 couldn’t compete on power, the larger hatch absolutely could. For about the same money as the small SUV as well. But as the hot hatch has become rationalised into extinction, so the slightly left-field options look more appealing than ever. Some Konas will still have years of warranty remaining…

Like its more traditional hot hatch siblings, the Kona N has clung onto its value as eagerly as it does the tarmac. What were £35k cars new are still more than £25,000 in most instances now, even with production having finished three years ago. There are actually 11 for sale on PH, which is more than expected, all weirdly nestled in the Kona rather than our dedicated ‘Kona N’ section. They take some finding! This two-owner example has just been through its first MOT, which it failed for - you guessed it - a very worn front tyre. And it’s hard to place too much faith in a Sailfish. But otherwise it looks as weird and wonderful as ever. A return to that from Hyundai at an accessible price would surely be welcomed. 


SPECIFICATION | HYUNDAI KONA N

Engine: 1998cc, four-cyl turbo
Transmission: 8-speed auto, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 280@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 289@2,100rpm
MPG: 33.2 (WLTP combined)
CO2: 194g/km (WLTP)
Year registered: 2023
Recorded mileage: 21,500
Price new: £35,395
Yours for: £25,995

See the original advert

Author
Discussion

Augustus Windsock

Original Poster:

3,757 posts

181 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
Tell you what, cover all those red trinkets on the exterior with faux-carbon wrap or similar, and it would make quite the Q-car… er Q-suv… whatever.
Stick a plaid trilby on the back shelf and Bobs your uncle, nobody will suspect what’s under the bonnet until you understeer off into the scenery in a cloud of blue smoke, swearing that Sailfish Ditchfinders really were the best option to buy…

solopb

92 posts

166 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
LOOKS GOOD, GOES GOOD, Nasty interior plastics, AND CERTAINLY Underneath metal parts are waiting to rust.

CountyLines

5,258 posts

29 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
Had a quick go in one of these quote some time ago (it was being repossessed). Was really good fun. Only seen a couple since but always struck me as deserving a wider audience.

finlo

4,403 posts

229 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
solopb said:
LOOKS GOOD, GOES GOOD, Nasty interior plastics, AND CERTAINLY Underneath metal parts are waiting to rust.
We have had an ioniq for nine years and 100k and there is not a spot of rust underneath or anywhere else for that matter, same can't be said for some so called 'premium' brands we've had over the years.

fantheman80

2,485 posts

75 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
I think these are really cool but why they gave it two sets of headlights and rear lights is beyond me

Yahonza

3,814 posts

56 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
Why not, smallish and fast and reliable. But very rare and an auto.

Konan

2,607 posts

172 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
Why do these things have a set of lights on the back from a saloon and then a set from an SUV? It looks like a vertical cut and shut.


Mikebentley

8,499 posts

166 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
I saw one of these this week as it drove past my house. It looked ok but not drastically different to an N line Kona. Cool that it was made though.

CronxDriveBy

52 posts

139 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
Was seriously considering these as a family car at one point. Hilariously over-engined, inefficient, and borderline offensive to the touch inside.

I'm so glad they exist. More of this please.

SE2

469 posts

162 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
As my only exposure to it has been In Forza Horizon 5, I didn't actually realise they'd been available in the UK.

Compared to the electric version being a bit Voldemort (as in, it's got a weird, flat nose) this one actually looks alright.

JJJ.

5,111 posts

41 months

Tuesday 31st March
quotequote all
That would tick a lot of boxes for someone, understandably too.

nismo48

6,666 posts

233 months

Tuesday 31st March
quotequote all
Konan said:
Why do these things have a set of lights on the back from a saloon and then a set from an SUV? It looks like a vertical cut and shut.

It does look odd

DaveyBoyWonder

3,722 posts

200 months

Tuesday 31st March
quotequote all
"Remember the small Hyundai crossover with 280hp..."

No. No I don't. And looking at the pics I can see why - its just another amorphous blob shaped thing on 4 wheels.

WPA

14,341 posts

140 months

Tuesday 31st March
quotequote all
Nearly £26k for that, not a chance when you can get a Puma ST and keep the change

Steve-9gcjy

4 posts

43 months

Tuesday 31st March
quotequote all
That was my one, great car, hilarious to drive a proper hooligan car with the looks to match! Plastics and interior were a bit cheap but the engine and gearbox made up for it (I think the best duel clutch on the market), swapped for a Volvo EX30, 428hp I must be maturing in my retirement!

CMTMB

1,462 posts

21 months

Tuesday 31st March
quotequote all
Opened the thread, saw the pics and thought "ooh, that's looks quite interesting for a small used nippy hatchback. Probably around £10-12k?.."

26 thousand pounds. For a 3 year old Kona.

Yes, I'm out of touch with car prices but no thanks.


fflump

3,253 posts

64 months

Tuesday 31st March
quotequote all
WPA said:
Nearly £26k for that, not a chance when you can get a Puma ST and keep the change
I suppose it depends if you value the straight line extra performance, but I imagine the ST is a much better drive.

The Countryman JCW is also in the mix at this price point I guess.

Leftfootwonder

1,754 posts

84 months

Tuesday 31st March
quotequote all
CMTMB said:
Opened the thread, saw the pics and thought "ooh, that's looks quite interesting for a small used nippy hatchback. Probably around £10-12k?.."

26 thousand pounds. For a 3 year old Kona.

Yes, I'm out of touch with car prices but no thanks.
My thoughts exactly.

biggbn

31,458 posts

246 months

Tuesday 31st March
quotequote all
fflump said:
WPA said:
Nearly £26k for that, not a chance when you can get a Puma ST and keep the change
I suppose it depends if you value the straight line extra performance, but I imagine the ST is a much better drive.

The Countryman JCW is also in the mix at this price point I guess.
I really like all of the cars you mention but the Kona has a very strong attraction, maybe because its so rare.

Sheepshanks

40,171 posts

145 months

Tuesday 31st March
quotequote all
biggbn said:
I really like all of the cars you mention but the Kona has a very strong attraction, maybe because its so rare.
Wonder how many were imported? I can't recall ever seeing one, and we looked at used Gen1 Kona as an EV (but ended up with a new Gen2) so it's a car I'm very aware of.

Apparently some of the Gen1 EV's "escaped" from the factory with the performance turned up to max and were mental to drive!