RE: Alfa Romeo Montreal | Spotted
RE: Alfa Romeo Montreal | Spotted
Yesterday

Alfa Romeo Montreal | Spotted

Name a better looking car from the 1970s - we'll wait...


What a time for Grand Tourers the late '60s and early '70s were. Think Lamborghini Espada, Maserati Ghibli, Ferrari 365 and so on. It’s almost impossible not to fall into cliche describing the cars and the time, so perfectly does it all encapsulate what we imagine classic continental motoring to be. 

Alfa Romeo had its own take on the front-engined 2+2 as well but, being Alfa Romeo, it did things slightly differently to even its Italian contemporaries. See, when the Montreal was first shown as a concept in 1967, without a name but at the Montreal expo, it was powered by a humble 1.6-litre engine. It’s hard to think of many production cars with more exotic powertrains than their motor show previews, but that’s exactly what the Montreal delivered: it used a very racy 2.6-litre V8, producing its 200hp maximum at 6,500rpm. 

Plus, if anything, the real Montreal was an even finer piece of automotive design than what was first seen in Canada. Gandini didn’t really do duds, though even by his standards the Montreal - both concept and production - was something very special. Clearly inspired by his work at the time with Lamborghini and Maserati, but with that unmistakable front end, the Montreal has endured 50 years as some of Gandini’s best work. 

Nevertheless, that wasn’t enough for the Montreal to succeed. While some of that was Alfa Romeo’s problem - the car's fairly unsophisticated underpinnings didn’t really do the design or the engine justice - it was also a timing issue. Launching a car powered by a motorsport-inspired V8 at the start of the '70s was ultimately doomed to fail, however pretty to look at or exciting to listen to. 

Add that to the fact that, over here, a Montreal cost more than an E-Type V12 (it was only £500 less than a Ferrari Dino, actually), and it’s easy to see why it struggled. Comfortably more than half of the near-4,000 units sold were spoken for ahead of the 1973 fuel crisis; from then on the Montreal really struggled, with Bertone building bodies that Alfa couldn’t sell. It was withdrawn from sale in 1977. 

And that was kind of that for Alfa’s foray into V8 2+2s. The 8C that came in the '00s was more of an out-and-out supercar, and this sort of GT was consigned to the history books. With very few right-hand drive cars made, it’s definitely been one of the lesser-spotted Italian icons in recent years. 

This one is a European market, left-hand drive Montreal, but get this for provenance: until it came to the UK, it was in the care of just one owner from new. The ad suggests they were ‘an academic based in Imst, Austria’, diligent in their approach to maintenance throughout their decades of ownership. Additional recommissioning work has also taken place in this country.

All of which means it presents as a wonderful slice of '70s V8 glamour at rather less than some of the equivalents might cost. This Montreal, in a fabulous shade of Arancio Miura and having barely covered a thousand miles a year for half a century, is £84,995; that’s the sort of money that can still be asked for a V12 E-Type, let alone some of the Italian or German alternatives. Certainly none are going to draw any more eyeballs than the sensational Montreal. And what’s an Italian V8 if not a few admiring glances?   


SPECIFICATION | ALFA ROMEO MONTREAL

Engine: 2,594cc V8
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 200@6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 173@4,750rpm
MPG: N/A
CO2: N/A
First registered: 1975
Recorded mileage: 54,300
Price new: £5,077 (1972)
Yours for: £84,995

See the original advert

Author
Discussion

Motormouth88

Original Poster:

714 posts

85 months

Yesterday (06:50)
quotequote all
That is a stunner of a thing, especially in that colour

Alistair BCC

15 posts

51 months

Yesterday (06:52)
quotequote all
I name the Citroen SM....

Chubbyross

4,909 posts

110 months

Yesterday (07:00)
quotequote all
Alistair BCC said:
I name the Citroen SM....
Good shout. The Montreal is one of my all time favourite but the SM is certainly up there.

Bencolem

1,157 posts

264 months

Yesterday (07:09)
quotequote all
Always found the Montreal a bit tall and narrow looking personally.

So many fantastic designs in the ‘70s (Stratus, M1 Pro Car, 930 Turbo, CSL, Bora, Pantera, 308, 2.7RS, Vantage etc) but I’d have to pick Countach and Range Rover.

Dombilano

1,381 posts

80 months

Yesterday (07:22)
quotequote all
De Tomaso Pantera, Lotus Esprit, BMW M1, all better looking

Frankychops

1,909 posts

34 months

Yesterday (07:54)
quotequote all
240z is prettier. This Alfa is pretty though

Billy_Whizzzz

2,572 posts

168 months

Yesterday (07:59)
quotequote all
Nice but a bit pigeon toed for me. I’ll go with:




Mark_Blanchard

1,032 posts

280 months

Yesterday (08:13)
quotequote all
Lotus Esprit S2 JPS

Ferrari 512 BB

Pantera GTS

Countach LP400





OPC100

273 posts

213 months

Yesterday (08:42)
quotequote all
As others have said, not the best looking car from the 70's, but it is a very distinctive design. I loved the 70's for some amazing cars and it felt growing up back then that cars where so different from each other. I also remember these being a bit unloved in the 90's and costing about £10k. It was on my 'list' back then, but the engine scared me too much.

How times have changed with prices. It's interesting how their values have gone up compared to some other classics like the TR6 though. Comparable back in the 90's, but I guess showing a true reflection of the engine used and the specialness of the design now.

Firebobby

963 posts

64 months

Yesterday (08:52)
quotequote all


I actually prefer thisbiggrin

NGK210

4,673 posts

170 months

Yesterday (09:17)
quotequote all
Perfect history. Nice vibe.
Very pretty and striking cars, apart from the ‘multi-deck’ rear.
But even in period they were a bit of a sheep in wolf’s clothing, with a state of the ark rear axle.

nismo48

6,485 posts

232 months

Yesterday (09:25)
quotequote all
Lovely old car and Gandini penned a few beauties back then.

Caterhamfan

355 posts

195 months

Yesterday (09:37)
quotequote all
Wasn't there a rumour that it was originally intended to have a mid-mounted engine, hence the vents on the rear quarters?

Julian Thompson

2,672 posts

263 months

Yesterday (09:40)
quotequote all
They look great but the concept looked better - done as an unnamed design study by Gandini and launched at the 67 Canada expo in Montreal.

They never intended to build it and so there was no room under the bonnet for a powerful engine.

After the show got such interest they decided to do it but the bonnet line got jacked up to fit the motor and it lost some of the sleekness. The name was adopted from the location of launch.



Edited by Julian Thompson on Sunday 10th May 10:02

StescoG66

2,392 posts

168 months

Yesterday (09:52)
quotequote all
It’s actually a design from the late 60s, not 70’s. It’s stunning to my eyes anyway

cerb4.5lee

42,302 posts

205 months

Yesterday (10:16)
quotequote all
Firebobby said:


I actually prefer thisbiggrin
I loved the one my Dad had when I was a nipper as well. This is still a lovely old thing though I reckon.

runnerbean 14

303 posts

159 months

Yesterday (10:20)
quotequote all
Had a mate with one of these AND a Stratos in 1978 - both gifts from an Arab sheik. Neither was a paragon of reliability.

blistacompact

152 posts

28 months

Yesterday (10:23)
quotequote all
[quote=Billy_Whizzzz]Nice but a bit pigeon toed for me. I ll go with:



Wow what a profile!
The title is a bit sensationalist. I doubt the Montreal is the first car that comes to mind when thinking of a beautiful car from the 70s. It looks a little like an americanized italian sports car.

Edited by blistacompact on Sunday 10th May 10:25

wolfracesonic

8,986 posts

152 months

Yesterday (10:50)
quotequote all
The gear shifter reminds of the drummer from Angine de Poitrine…

WPA

14,055 posts

139 months

Yesterday (11:45)
quotequote all
Motormouth88 said:
That is a stunner of a thing, especially in that colour
Agreed