RE: Saab 9-3 V6 Cerulean Aero | Shed of the Week
RE: Saab 9-3 V6 Cerulean Aero | Shed of the Week
Yesterday

Saab 9-3 V6 Cerulean Aero | Shed of the Week

Sun's out, sheds out - 250hp convertible for the weekend, sir?


When trawling through the automotive compactor that is PH Classifieds’s selection of sub-£2k snotters Shed often comes across some interesting curios. Sadly most of them are not suitable for publication here, usually because their MOTs have run out but sometimes because they represent some kind of affront to humanity. Not so the car that Shed has been allowed to talk about here, namely this 247hp Saab 9-3 Cerulean Aero Convertible. 

Cerulean refers to the blue Saab applied to the bodywork and to the leather seat inserts on those editions. That’s a bit weird in this case, because according to HM Govt this car is black. Whatever, Ceruleans were a celebration of the convertible sales success that this once-Swedish outfit had enjoyed over the years. As a harbinger of bleaker times ahead the Cerulean was the first Saab droptop to be offered with a diesel engine, the 150hp 1.9 TiD. 

Unfortunately you had to electrically drop the top on that version to escape the ghastly mechanical din that would otherwise be trapped inside the cabin by the fabric roof. Assuming you didn’t have Mrs Shed yakking at you from the passenger seat it was quieter to drive your diesel 9-3 convertible with the roof down, not ideal in northern Sweden in winter - or Aberdeen in summer come to that.

Today’s 9-3 is a different kettle of fermented herring. For a start, it’s got the Aero badge on the boot, or most of it anyway. The Aero was the only 9-3 that was allowed to have GM’s B284 2.8-litre intercooled turbo V6 motor. Running an unstressed 8.7psi of boost it lobbed out 250hp at 5,500rpm and a lazy but useful 258lb ft of thrunge from 1,900 to 4,500rpm. 

With a six-speed manual gearbox fitted the 1,600kg 9-3 Aero estate did the 0-62 sprint in 6.7 seconds. With the six-speed auto box, as here, the strengthened and therefore weightier convertible needed an extra second to hit that mark. However, unless you found yourself in the unusual situation of racing a 9-3 Aero manual estate on the public highway you probably won’t find yourself criticising the performance. If you did find yourself doing that on a regular basis, light remaps would easily take your Aero beyond 300hp and 330lb ft. 

The B284 was strong enough to take a tune. Coil packs occasionally fritzed out and batteries didn’t last that long partly because they were located in a hot spot close to the turbo. Coolant expansion tanks were similarly afflicted. Fuel level sender units sometimes played up and fuel pumps weren’t immortal either so owners were usually advised to change both at the same time. Expect fuel consumption figures in the low to mid-20s. 

The ad for this Aero starts off by saying what most of us can see for ourselves, i.e. that it’s neat and clean. It also talks about stuff that we can’t see, like the lack of any issues or faults and its 100 per cent drive. We can dig past the current, minty fresh and advisory-free MOT to discover a 90 per cent MOT pass rate over the years, with only two tests failed out of 21. The worst fail point was a fractured offside front coil spring back in 2012, not entirely surprising when you remember the meatiness of the engine and the suspension-shattering state of British roads. Previous 2.8s Shed’s featured here have had the same issue. 

There are two main problems with this particular car. One is that the VED is £760 a year. The other is that it’s in Shafford, which to many PHers will sound too much like Bradford. For the benefit of puzzled overseas readers, Bradford is a place where, according to many PHers, there are no honest car dealers whatsoever. Only you can decide whether the 145 miles that separate Bradford and Shafford is enough distance for you to experience full peace of mind when purchasing a vehicle from Shafford. 


See the original advert

Author
Discussion

tomsugden

Original Poster:

2,431 posts

253 months

Yesterday (06:05)
quotequote all
Very cool, love it!

Billy_Whizzzz

2,576 posts

168 months

Yesterday (06:06)
quotequote all
Nice enough but no manual no thanks

FrankandLynn

69 posts

18 months

Yesterday (06:12)
quotequote all
Solidly built, relatively low miles, and the most comfortable car seats I have ever sat in. Many reasons to like this but, with so many convertible options out there, (as well as the ruinous mpg and horrendous RFL cost), it’s got to be a no. Nice trinket for someone with deep pockets, though.

RotorRambler

1,033 posts

15 months

Yesterday (06:23)
quotequote all
It will creak like an old ship, also the worst sound system known to man (those crazy Swedes had their own system with fibre optics & muppetry during that era).
But it’s £1500! (due to the tax issue..)

Ignoring the above, still have a soft spot for the same, which my wife had 10 years ago.

Long trip, roof down, the Saab night panel (only speedo illuminated) it was a nice place to be, Especially weirdly on a crisp winters night.

hammo19

7,303 posts

221 months

Yesterday (06:54)
quotequote all
Just lovely. It’s fun watching the symbols on the dashboard buttons slowly disintegrate into white space.

drgoatboy

2,013 posts

232 months

Yesterday (06:55)
quotequote all
Always thought these looked lovely. The tax is off putting for sure but for a few summer months that could be a real treat.

For those wondering this is at Shafford motors which is actually (and confusingly) in Shefford just south of Bedford....

Andy86GT

945 posts

90 months

Yesterday (07:07)
quotequote all
Had a drive of one of these round the Millbrook Alpine course, very nice to waft in.
On the subject of the coil springs, at the time I think GM were buying them from Cadburys as I had a couple of them fail on my Vectra which I believe was the same platform.

el romeral

1,981 posts

162 months

Yesterday (07:24)
quotequote all
Perfect summer shed, apart from the elephant in the room VED, bit crippling that.

yme402

619 posts

127 months

Yesterday (07:32)
quotequote all
Shafford is not an issue. Bradford is a different kettle of fish however and a SOTW from that part of the world is likely to be an Audi A3 with black wheels and vape vents.

POIDH

3,230 posts

90 months

Yesterday (07:37)
quotequote all
Yeah, why not?

AndySheff

6,873 posts

232 months

Yesterday (07:50)
quotequote all
Yep, great shed. It's a 'yes' from me.

1994TomcatTurbo

34 posts

75 months

Yesterday (07:52)
quotequote all
I had the 2.0T version of this, and as someone has already said, the most comfortable seats I’ve ever known in a car. Had the remap done by well known Saab remap guy and it was a lovely thing for wafting around in.

As someone who has to tax 5 different vehicles I’m always amused by people turning their noses up at something that costs about £70 a month to tax, it’s a lot less than the cost of a full tank of E5 and if you SORN it for 6 months during the winter, it’s really not a deal breaker for a nice comfy old thing to run around in with the top down.

If I had space, and a suicidal approach to my marriage, this would be a strong yes from me.

cerb4.5lee

42,482 posts

205 months

Yesterday (07:53)
quotequote all
POIDH said:
Yeah, why not?
Same. I'd want a manual rather than the auto though I think.

Piston-slapper

73 posts

115 months

Yesterday (07:54)
quotequote all
Shafford or Shefford???

griffsomething

379 posts

186 months

Yesterday (07:54)
quotequote all
A big comfy V6 convertible for the summer months for not a lot of money Looks in pretty good shape too. Good shed.

DKS

1,857 posts

209 months

Yesterday (07:56)
quotequote all
I'm a true Saab fanboy, but I'd never buy an auto or one without heated seats.
My partner has a 2.0 Aero convertible with most of the options boxes ticked and it's such a lovely, smooth car to drive. It's started to show it's age (2004) and it was never! ever serviced from new, but we both love it.
Apart from the silly fibreoptic stereo (luckily this one will at least have an AUX input), I prefer the pre-facelift versions.
Rear sub frame corrosion and suspension bushes are a weak point, at the age these all are now.

Dog Biscuit

2,012 posts

22 months

Yesterday (07:58)
quotequote all
Nicely. I do like a SAAB

Shame its a GM era but still cool

georgeyboy12345

4,422 posts

60 months

Yesterday (08:02)
quotequote all
Ah, Saab number 685885 to feature on shed of the week.

The £760 tax is too much of a pisser at this price point imo.

cookie1600

2,617 posts

186 months

Yesterday (08:07)
quotequote all
I don't believe that's a Cerulean as it's the wrong shade of blue (i.e. not Cerulean!) and it doesn't have the correct wheels.

Watcher of the skies

1,178 posts

62 months

Yesterday (08:11)
quotequote all
1994TomcatTurbo said:
I had the 2.0T version of this, and as someone has already said, the most comfortable seats I ve ever known in a car. Had the remap done by well known Saab remap guy and it was a lovely thing for wafting around in.

As someone who has to tax 5 different vehicles I m always amused by people turning their noses up at something that costs about £70 a month to tax, it s a lot less than the cost of a full tank of E5 and if you SORN it for 6 months during the winter, it s really not a deal breaker for a nice comfy old thing to run around in with the top down.

If I had space, and a suicidal approach to my marriage, this would be a strong yes from me.
Good shed, I love a Saab.
Saab aside, has your 218VVC coupe replaced a turbo coupe?