RE: 2026 Mercedes-AMG GLC 53 4Matic | PH Review
RE: 2026 Mercedes-AMG GLC 53 4Matic | PH Review
Wednesday 27th May

2026 Mercedes-AMG GLC 53 4Matic+ | PH Review

Out with four play, in with six appeal for the AMG GLC - has it worked?


If you can’t beat them, join them. Whatever the German equivalent, that feels like exactly the approach employed by AMG for this latest GLC 53. Having taken a punt on a two-tier, 2.0-litre lineup - 421hp ‘43, 680hp ‘63 PHEV - last time around with limited success, there’s now a more conventional alternative to the SQ5s and M50 X3s of the world. Audi and BMW were apparently already aware that those spending £80k (and more) on a performance SUV with an engine want a generous cylinder count, delivering six-cylinder swag with some useful fuel-saving tech. Now Mercedes has accepted that four cylinders isn’t the way forward it anticipated, and installed the latest M256 3.0-litre under the bonnet of the GLC for the first time. According to them, it offers ‘an AMG-typical driving experience with even more driving pleasure on winding country roads.’ Third time lucky, eh? 

On pure stats, there’s a clear advantage for the Mercedes over the other two. 449hp is comfortably ahead of the 367hp Audi and 392hp BMW, and the kerbweight of 2,137kg is absolutely in the same ballpark. 4.2 seconds to 62mph (with braked towing capacity up hundreds of kilos to 2,400kg) ought to be enough for most bank holiday breaks. The GLC is certainly the most expensive proposition, though, starting from £79,250 where the Audi is £72,905 and the BMW £73,795. Plump for an Edition 53 and a GLC is beyond £90k before any further options. Is it good enough to warrant the extra spend?

At a launch event that also featured the new GT 4-door, the GLC looks pretty smart. Confident and assured on its chunky wheels, yet quite restrained by modern AMG standards and all the more likeable for it. The SUV variant tested could definitely pass for a much less potent model, as was the AMG tradition for a while and it's nice to see continued. Four exhaust pipes are reasonably well hidden by a black diffuser, and only the slightly naff rear spoiler gives the game away. But for those uninspired by the Audi or unimpressed by the BMW, this looks like a smart compromise; sometimes the best styling update is the most minor one. The Coupe is more overt, because they all are - even before the optional Golden Accents package… 

As the car interior seems to be reinvented most months at the moment, the GLC’s cabin is caught slightly between pillar and post. It can’t offer the full IMAX of something like the new CLA, though neither is there a surfeit of buttons for the traditionalists (apart from on the steering wheels). It continues with the old portrait-oriented screen, which is far from bad - vivid, logical, responsive - though does look a tad old hat when so many alternatives now link driver’s display with dash in one panorama. Like the outside, it’s familiar and easy to grasp - if not immediately likeable. 

But we aren’t here for interior ambience, we’re here for a 3.0-litre turbo straight-six with a ‘high-revving character’ and ‘sonorous sound.’ Credit where it’s due to AMG as well, the GLC 53 wears its beefed-up status with unabashed pride: a cold start prompts a lovely metallic rasp from those four pipes, absolutely akin to an old BMW or Japanese tuner special. It’s smooth but potent, cultured but menacing and - obvious though it will sound - a whole lot more aurally appealing than a four-cylinder of any power output. The exterior treatment may leave the GLC’s AMG credentials in some doubt; the sound certainly doesn’t. 

Furthermore, while there’s inevitably going to be some augmentation of the sound coming into the cabin, it feels like an authentically straight six symphony regardless of drive mode. And heck, if BMW has to make IconicSounds standard fit on a X3 with the B58 engine (it’s near enough silent onboard without), then anything’s fair game. You always know what’s under the bonnet, put it that way, and are always happy about the fact, without ever being totally overawed (unless you choose to be by Race mode ).

It’s definitely fast, too, surging through its intermediate ratios and reaching 140mph on the autobahn with no drama whatsoever. Perhaps the problem, if indeed it can be called that, is the claims of an ‘even more agile and sporty’ drive thanks to the changes made to the straight six: proper stuff, too, like tweaking the ports and changing cam. While the resulting engine is very eager, easily as keen as the BMW to chase 7,000rpm, it isn’t transformed from previous applications. Though a comparison with the CLE 53 unit isn’t exactly a perfect versus, this M256 Evo only felt as willing and as urgent as that M256 did. So it’s great, just don’t expect a night-and-day difference. Peak power is unchanged, and the revs it is produced at adjusted only ever so slightly. 

Torque is up, though, from non-Evo to Evo, and that does make a difference (especially as a CLE cabrio weighs about as much as this). What was a 443lb ft overboost is now always available, with 473lb on offer for temporary bursts. It makes the 53 feel usefully muscular when overtaking, complete with a great straight-six growl under load, and that tiny bit quicker than the aforementioned rivals for the extra 10 seconds. The pops and bangs are a bit overdone, though. 

And away from straight lines? It’s hard to be definitive for the moment, for the simple fact that in a packed schedule on Germany’s Labour Day bank holiday, there wasn’t very much time behind the wheel that wasn’t urban or motorway driving. Certainly the GLE’s ride is firm, as we’ve become accustomed to with contemporary AMGs, not really permitting much lateral leeway at all (though happy to rear up and hunker down when accelerating, which is fun). Around town, where these cars will surely spend a chunk of their time, it can be a little bit annoying. Hopefully the damping experience over here will be like the CLE (i.e. purposeful without seeming punishing) rather than the restlessness of models like old (V8) GLC 63. Its gait definitely didn’t seem quite as accommodating as something like the X3, for what it’s worth, even when wound down to the tamest drive modes. 

On the flipside, the GLC continues that AMG tradition of pleasingly meaty control weights, brake pedal and steering ensuring that pretty much every input is a satisfying one. As a modern Mercedes on supercar-spec tyres, there’s abundant grip and traction, with just the occasional suggestion that the rear axle is getting the lion’s share of the engine’s potential. Drift Mode went unexplored; as did, in truth, quite a lot of the dynamic potential. 

That being said, the 53 demonstrated sufficient quality on smooth German roads to make another drive something to anticipate - rather than merely an obligation when the time comes. As might have been expected, the combination of a relatively subtle Mercedes SUV with a powerful, likeable straight six is a persuasive one in a way that a four-pot one couldn’t possibly be; the fact that AMG really seems to have sweated the details makes the 53 feel like a proper performance derivative. And not just the six-cylinder swap so urgently needed. Don’t buy any similarly configured SUV, basically, without trying this first...


SPECIFICATION | 2026 MERCEDES-AMG GLC 53 4MATIC+

Engine: 2,999cc turbo straight six, mild hybrid
Transmission: 9-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 449@5,500rpm-6,100rpm
Torque (lb ft): 443@2,200rpm-5,000rpm (473 with overboost)
0-62mph: 4.2
Top speed: 155mph (168mph optional)
Weight: 2,137kg
MPG: 28.9-29.5
CO2: 220-225g/km
Price: £79,250 (AMG Premium spec; AMG Premium Plus for £89,250, Edition 53 for £92,250)

See every GLC 53 for sale

Author
Discussion

Motormouth88

Original Poster:

727 posts

85 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
I know it’s just another bloater but there’s a lot of appeal there, for me at least, smart looking too

pSyCoSiS

4,237 posts

230 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Probably one of the better looking cars Mercedes have made recently. I like this.

The all-electric GLC also seems a nice car from the reviews I have seen.

cerb4.5lee

42,531 posts

205 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
I enjoyed your write up thanks Matt. thumbup

Plus I'll always get onboard with a 3.0 6 cylinder SUV(or a V8 if funds allow) as well. smile

iphonedyou

10,200 posts

182 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Quite like this. It's a pretty refined looking thing, externally. Internally continues to be a mess, per all modern Mercedes.

LRDefender

588 posts

33 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Have I logged onto the wrong forum? What’s with all the positive comments?

No “it’s gopping”… No “that’s a munter”… No “that looks like Stevie Wonder designed it”….

Anyway, my eyes…!!! That iPad stuck to the dash..!! That leviathan of a thing has no place on our roads…!!!

However back in the real world I think that looks quite nice and looks to have all the power and gadgets I’d ever need. Hopefully it can tow my jet skis to the beach without breaking into a sweat.

nismo48

6,546 posts

232 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Smart looking thing

BikeSausage

686 posts

93 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
LRDefender said:
Have I logged onto the wrong forum? What s with all the positive comments?

No it s gopping No that s a munter No that looks like Stevie Wonder designed it .

Anyway, my eyes !!! That iPad stuck to the dash..!! That leviathan of a thing has no place on our roads !!!

However back in the real world I think that looks quite nice and looks to have all the power and gadgets I d ever need. Hopefully it can tow my jet skis to the beach without breaking into a sweat.
Matt paint, black wheels say a lot about the target punters here.

That any good?

Its Just Adz

18,234 posts

234 months

Thursday
quotequote all
That's really smart.

How can they get the SUVs so right and the saloons so wrong?

LRDefender

588 posts

33 months

Thursday
quotequote all
BikeSausage said:
LRDefender said:
Have I logged onto the wrong forum? What s with all the positive comments?

No it s gopping No that s a munter No that looks like Stevie Wonder designed it .

Anyway, my eyes !!! That iPad stuck to the dash..!! That leviathan of a thing has no place on our roads !!!

However back in the real world I think that looks quite nice and looks to have all the power and gadgets I d ever need. Hopefully it can tow my jet skis to the beach without breaking into a sweat.
Matt paint, black wheels say a lot about the target punters here.

That any good?
Mr Sausage, that's more like it..!!

But you do know that when you buy a car you do have a choice on what colour that car is and what the specification will be.

driving

Mods - can we have a Victor Meldrew smilie please?

epom

14,425 posts

186 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Have to say I like that. Approx £85k over my budget but alas.

CMTMB

1,324 posts

20 months

Thursday
quotequote all
I know price gets moaned about on every new car thread but £90k with a bit of spec for a mid-size SUV isn't something I can get my head around.

TwigtheWonderkid

48,358 posts

175 months

Thursday
quotequote all
I have a GLC (just a 220 diesel) and whilst I'm a GLC fan, not convinced I see the point of this.

The GLC43 offers more performance than realistically you'd even need in the real world, for people who want a high performance SUV. The GLC 63 offers the ultimate completely mental performance for people who want the craziest model in the range. A model stuck between those 2 is going to draw its buyers from where exactly?

I'd love a high performance model, and the wife and I have been mulling over upgrading to the GLC43. The GLC63 just isn't something I need, and I wouldn't get one even if I won the lotto. The GLC53 doesn't tempt me either. The GLC 43 has the same electronically limited 155 mph top speed (that I'm never going to get even close to), and a 0-60 time of a smidgen over 4 seconds (that the wife is never going to use whilst popping to the supermarket).


Terminator X

20,027 posts

229 months

Thursday
quotequote all
At lease they're sensible enough to admit the 4cyl was madness on their part. Strange Kool Aid when they decided that!

TX.

Ed.Neumann

1,219 posts

33 months

Thursday
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
I have a GLC (just a 220 diesel) and whilst I'm a GLC fan, not convinced I see the point of this.

The GLC43 offers more performance than realistically you'd even need in the real world, for people who want a high performance SUV. The GLC 63 offers the ultimate completely mental performance for people who want the craziest model in the range. A model stuck between those 2 is going to draw its buyers from where exactly?

I'd love a high performance model, and the wife and I have been mulling over upgrading to the GLC43. The GLC63 just isn't something I need, and I wouldn't get one even if I won the lotto. The GLC53 doesn't tempt me either. The GLC 43 has the same electronically limited 155 mph top speed (that I'm never going to get even close to), and a 0-60 time of a smidgen over 4 seconds (that the wife is never going to use whilst popping to the supermarket).

Isn't this the replacement for the GLC43 rather than a model that sits between the 43 and 63?

I have an E43, and only bought that as the E400 was not available in the UK.

I have just borrowed a GLC250 I think it was, and the ride compared to my E43 was so nice. The 43 is just too overdamped, the guy at Mercedes said the GLC43 suffered in the same way, dampers too firm, especially on the rear, for UK roads anyway.

Borrowing the GLC made me think about swapping to something more comfy.