RE: Subaru Forester XT | Spotted
RE: Subaru Forester XT | Spotted
Today

Subaru Forester XT | Spotted

Now this is what you call a sports utility vehicle


It’s probably fair to say that the entire SUV class has become a bit silly now. You might argue that the idea was always a bit daft, that a 4x4 was always compromised as a performance car, but that would be to deny some very impressive machines from the past quarter of a century or so. The problem we have now is that there are huge off-roaders capable of lapping at sports car speed, but which are so massive they barely fit on the public highway. 

Or we have those fast and family-focused 4x4s that have become so large the car parks have no chance - let alone the green lanes. Even those somewhere between Waitrose Express and ‘ring record breaker are larger, heavier, and more expensive than ever. So they don’t ride properly, there’s more to go wrong, and you’re less likely to test their abilities anyway, because they’re worth so much. 

Phew, it feels good to get things off your chest sometimes. The continued bloating of everything about family 4x4s doesn’t half make something like a Subaru Forester look appealing. It too can seat five people, tackle a muddy car park and take the dog in the boot, which is all most SUVs seem to be used for. But this one is sensibly sized, rides on fairly modest 17-inch wheels, and costs just £5k. 

The Forester was always an anti-SUV sort of SUV. Even at a time of the Toyota RAV4 with its jazzy seat fabrics and fun-loving adverts, the Subaru was there just to get the job done. Part estate, part 4x4 and part Impreza, it wasn’t ever like anything else, though that didn’t stop it from winning a dedicated legion of fans. Even now, the Forester is ploughing its own furrow, with an electrified 2.0-litre petrol flat four. 

This second-generation XT looks just the ticket. With Foresters of all shapes and sizes having been around for 30 years now, and been jolly handy throughout, good ones are hard to find. If the rust didn’t get them, simply being run into the ground would. And this is PH, of course - we’re not that interested in autos and non-turbos. So this is a manual Forester, with 211hp from the EJ25 boxer turbo. It’s had just three previous owners and, for a car with 150k and 21 years to its name, looks remarkably good. A subtler take on blue with gold scrubs up nicely, the super shiny leather is unmarked, and there looks to be some sturdy (Subaru-branded!) boot protection in place. This is the sort of condition you expect to see old Impreza Turbos in; Foresters, not so much. 

There’s said to be a huge history file with it, which seems believable; as a niche SUV choice, the Forester has surely always been picked up by those committed to the cause. Subframe rust has just been addressed for a fault-free MOT into ‘27, and pre-’06 will make it less punishing to tax. For £5,495. Think of all the spare cash that could go to the holiday fund or doing up the spare room, while you get a cool flat-four Scoob. The whole family’s happy with a Forester…


SPECIFICATION | SUBARU FORESTER XT

Engine: 2,457cc, flat-four turbo
Transmission: 5-speed manual, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 211@5,600rpm
Torque (lb ft): 236@3,600rpm
MPG: 25.7
CO2: 261g/km
Year registered: 2005
Recorded mileage: 148,423
Price new: £24,695
Yours for: £5,495

See the original advert

Author
Discussion

Oliver Quartly

Original Poster:

5 posts

105 months

Great car. Mine only lasted 10 days. I was 21, watched a Ken Block video, and somehow convinced myself I could go rallying. I'm still sure that tree came out of nowhere on the forest track!

Drivebyabuser

36 posts

231 months

I loved my Turbo S, Previous shape - had amazing ~armchairs~ seats, a moon roof. Not super quick but was a very credible steer, brilliant in the snow. And a button to make the clock display brighter. Very thirsty and not cheap to fix, but didn't go wrong much. Once I have a reshuffle of vehicles i can see one coming back into the garage at some point. Perfect tip/camping car

rossub

5,750 posts

216 months

Time very much against it now.

At 20+ years old, I’d be wary of relying on it as daily transport in absence of a back up plan.

Iamnotkloot

1,887 posts

173 months

I’ve had two. Loved them though they’re not that quick and can be thirsty. Ideal car for when you get a family but still want a good drive.

craig9367

72 posts

168 months

Surely you are not suggesting that this is good value for money?! Should be at shed money IMO.

GreatScott2016

2,390 posts

114 months

Excellent doggy mobile smile

Orangutangerine

824 posts

206 months

rossub said:
Time very much against it now.

At 20+ years old, I d be wary of relying on it as daily transport in absence of a back up plan.
How so? I don't see how Foresters are drastically less reliable than anything else of the era. Should be a dependable bus and a half.

foxhounduk

690 posts

206 months

Love these. Alloys are a bit naff. It s a got a manual. Horsepower in these things don t matter too much, it s the ride feel, burble and grip that makes them fun.

I bought a brand new Forrester about 5 years ago, it looked the business and had everything I wanted, but I just couldn t tolerate that rubbish CVT gearbox (that Subaru put in everything nowadays); it felt anaemic and zapped all the enjoyment. If they had a manual like this Forrester I would have taken it to my grave.

Edited by foxhounduk on Monday 15th June 15:11

Shooter McGavin

8,803 posts

170 months

I really like this apart from the wheels but those could be easily changed.


Oberheim

677 posts

17 months

Durable, practical and comfortable vehicles these. My wife's Aunt and Uncle, who live in Albuquerque, have a 2004 Forester that's still going strong at 350,000 miles. Went on a big road trip around New Mexico, Arizona and Utah in it about 20 years ago, and was very impressed with how capable and comfortable it was. The fact that they've held onto it all this time says a lot, as they're not short of a dollar or two.

rossub

5,750 posts

216 months

Orangutangerine said:
rossub said:
Time very much against it now.

At 20+ years old, I d be wary of relying on it as daily transport in absence of a back up plan.
How so? I don't see how Foresters are drastically less reliable than anything else of the era. Should be a dependable bus and a half.
I didn’t say they were, but everything under that bonnet is potentially over 20 years old. Hoses, seals and engine ancillaries are all possible issues.

Says it has great history, so you’d want to see that a lot of that stuff has been replaced.

Not to mention the inevitable HGF. Original engine? Matter of when, not if.



spreadsheet monkey

4,703 posts

253 months

Oberheim said:
Durable, practical and comfortable vehicles these. My wife's Aunt and Uncle, who live in Albuquerque, have a 2004 Forester that's still going strong at 350,000 miles. Went on a big road trip around New Mexico, Arizona and Utah in it about 20 years ago, and was very impressed with how capable and comfortable it was. The fact that they've held onto it all this time says a lot, as they're not short of a dollar or two.
Old Foresters and Legacy Outbacks are the official car of "old money" folks in the American West. New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming... they all love an old Subaru.

The American equivalent to rich British people driving around in old Land Rovers and old Volvo estates smile

https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/a33393/th...

Square Leg

15,965 posts

215 months

Had a 2003 MY for a couple of years - had 120k on the clock and never went wrong.
Brilliant all rounder, if a little thirsty.

Oberheim

677 posts

17 months

spreadsheet monkey said:
Old Foresters and Legacy Outbacks are the official car of "old money" folks in the American West. New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming... they all love an old Subaru.

The American equivalent to rich British people driving around in old Land Rovers and old Volvo estates smile

https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/a33393/th...
That's interesting to know. My wife's aunt and uncle are certainly well off. Despite now being in their seventies, they still use their Forester for trips up to their lake house in Minnesota (something like 1300 miles). It's never let them down in 22 years AFAIK but I'm sure they keep it well-maintained.

Cold

16,511 posts

116 months

spreadsheet monkey said:
Oberheim said:
Durable, practical and comfortable vehicles these. My wife's Aunt and Uncle, who live in Albuquerque, have a 2004 Forester that's still going strong at 350,000 miles. Went on a big road trip around New Mexico, Arizona and Utah in it about 20 years ago, and was very impressed with how capable and comfortable it was. The fact that they've held onto it all this time says a lot, as they're not short of a dollar or two.
Old Foresters and Legacy Outbacks are the official car of "old money" folks in the American West. New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming... they all love an old Subaru.

The American equivalent to rich British people driving around in old Land Rovers and old Volvo estates smile

https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/a33393/th...
There it is. Took longer than I expected.

Spidermoor

118 posts

33 months

rossub said:
I didn t say they were, but everything under that bonnet is potentially over 20 years old. Hoses, seals and engine ancillaries are all possible issues.

Says it has great history, so you d want to see that a lot of that stuff has been replaced.

Not to mention the inevitable HGF. Original engine? Matter of when, not if.
I guess that's why you never ever see an 04/05/06 plate car on the road these days...
confused