RE: 2026 BMW M240i xDrive vs. Ford Mustang GT
RE: 2026 BMW M240i xDrive vs. Ford Mustang GT
Today

2026 BMW M240i xDrive vs. Ford Mustang GT

BMW's junior muscle car meets the real thing - is it any contest?


We all know that true coupes are conspicuous by their absence from today’s new car market. You’ll search in vain for a properly driver-centric two-door, while being bombarded by SUVs missing a rear wiper claiming coupe kudos. It’s a pity, for sure, made worse by the fact that the situation doesn’t look like changing anytime soon. Because niche sellers on bespoke (or at least heavily modified) platforms aren’t exactly dish of the day in these straitened times. Fingers crossed the Celica rumours come good...

Hope does exist, though, for those who want two doors, four seats, a big engine up front and a healthy dollop of attitude. Ever since its introduction to the UK more than a decade ago, the Ford Mustang - first as the S550 generation, now as the S650 for the past few years - has proven an absolute tonic. As the industry generally and Ford specifically abstained from fun, so the Mustang has both reminded us of the old-school charm that’s innate to 5.0-litre coupes - and evolved with the times as well.

Cars like the Bullitt and Mach 1 usefully improved the previous version, and the latest began from an even better starting point to become the superb Dark Horse. This GT plonks two iPads in front of the driver, offers all sorts of telemetry options and will even let you look at digital dials akin to the '60s original - yet the gimmicks aren’t at the expense of actual development. This is a better Mustang GT than before, it requires no special favours to acquire, and can be bought with a manual gearbox and just 26 miles on the clock in the classifieds from £47k. So maybe things aren’t quite so bad - the coupe choice is limited, though not without talent. 

The BMW M240i xDrive further validates the narrow argument, despite being a pretty different prospect to the first M Performance 2 Series that arrived a year or so before the Mustang. That car was old-school BMW for the mid-2010s, a two-door saloon with a rasping straight-six up front, a standard six-speed 'box and drive unapologetically sent to the rear wheels. It never really had a direct rival, while offering up a compelling alternative to some more conventional sports cars. Used values reflect its cult status. And while the Mustang’s evolution deferred to the heritage, time waits for no M car in the inexorable BMW product churn.

So in 2021 it was out with the rear-drive, the manual option and even the convertible (won’t anybody think of the recruiters?), in with the chunkier 3 Series CLAR architecture, xDrive and the eight-speed auto. Though it appeared another nail in the Ultimate Driving Machine coffin (as well as a much weirder 2 Series), the reality was undeniably impressive: fast, sophisticated, capable, engaging and efficient. 

Not obviously a foil for a Mustang, then, which has always traded on a certain warts-and-all swagger, but more links these two than just being the final pair at the last chance saloon for coupes (if that’s not mixing metaphors too far). Look at the stats: just six (!) kilos separate them at the kerb, torque of the turbo straight six is equal to more than 300 cubic inches of Detroit V8, and the as-tested price of the BMW - so one indicative of how many will be specced - is barely £1,000 less than the Mustang’s RRP. Patently two very different takes on the coupe, but it’s hard not to be intrigued by the match-up. 

Well, that’s the idea at least, right up until spending more than five minutes in the company of a Ford Mustang. That’s all that’s needed to fall almost completely under its spell, totally beguiled by the unliveried stock car look and the cold start holler. It’s easier to turn off the traction control in a Ford Mustang than it is the lane keep, and only too easy to embrace a sweetly judged partnership of throttle pedal and rear axle. The gurgles, rumbles and burps of that iconic V8 have always been a USP, yet there’s undoubtedly depth to the Mustang package also.

Certainly its charm offensive remains undimmed in the presence of a white-over-cream M240i. Despite not being very much different to the pre-LCI G42 (or the previous 2 Series, for those that don’t speak BMW), it’s somehow still worse. Why are there even more M badges? Why have the nice Cerium Grey accents gone? Who thought those wheels were acceptable? And so on. Disappointingly, as is so often the case with a modern M car, the M240 is a car you’ll learn to like despite how it looks. Or the very opposite of the Mustang’s kerb appeal, basically. 

The BMW’s interior is much more impressive, at least. It too melds a pair of screens to make one panorama of the dash and infotainment display, but with a much more sophisticated appearance, crisper displays and better responsiveness. With the iDrive controller for added functionality, a feature the Mustang sorely misses. Every touchpoint is nicer, every button more satisfying to press and every feature better integrated in the BMW. Which will probably come as a surprise to no one, of course. A new BMW looks a bit weird and has a swisher interior than a Mustang - who’d have thought…

The virtues of both the BMW B58 and Ford Coyote have been extolled at length for more than a decade now, though it’s seldom that the two are driven together at the same time. So the praise can begin all over again. What were impressive engines a few years back are now standout powertrains; freshly hybridised for the 2 Series, the 3.0-litre turbo six now has virtually no lag to speak of, while also singing for 7,000rpm like a naturally aspirated engine. It has the mid-range welly of a much larger, atmospheric unit and, though enhanced, a smooth, cultured sound to remind you why an inline six was always so special. 

Just not as special as a V8. Granted, the reality of more than 15 mpg (and 100g/km!) difference is extremely hard to ignore for comparable performance - the BMW often feels sprightlier in give and take driving - but the theatre of a 5.0-litre engine in 2026 is totally captivating. Maybe you’d walk more and drive less to offset the cost; maybe that gym membership isn’t being used enough, so could be cancelled. Whatever, once you’ve experienced this Mustang V8 snarl and bellow through its 7,500 revs, power building and building all the time to a rollicking crescendo, it’s hard to countenance an existence without it. Every aspect that’s so cherished about a V8 - the torque, the feel, the sound - is here in droves.

But please, unless there’s a physical or legal impediment to getting the manual, don’t buy the automatic. It just isn’t good enough, and ruthlessly exposed by the slick, swift, silky BMW transmission. There are 10 ratios, for one thing, which is too many; as with dwarves, deadly sins and Fast and Furious films, somewhere around seven feels like a good count for a modern torque converter. It’s hard to keep track beyond that. You’ll get RSI flapping through the paddles to get the desired ratio, or the gearbox mimics a CVT, slurring and whirring through a middle order that falls like an England batting lineup.

There are too many ratios too close together, which makes kickdown indecisive; neither the gearknob nor the paddles are nice to use, and it’s actually worse on CO2 than the manual. All for a car that could make do with five speeds, not twice that. The BMW, on the other hand, delivers total smoothness around town and manual changes as fast as you’re ever going to need. Honestly, in this package, you miss a BMW manual about as much as getting cash out for a takeaway; the extra effort just wouldn’t be worth it.

The whole package is so cohesive and complete that interrupting its flow with your imperfect gearchanging - to say nothing of spoiling the interior layout - would feel like an aberration more than anything else. And that’s from someone who likes BMW manuals enough to buy the ugliest one ever made. Much has been made of the new generation of BMW coupes, how they’ve managed to be so much heavier yet so much better controlled, and nothing demonstrates that fact quite like a back-to-back with a Mustang. Even on optional Magneride dampers (and with those comparable kerbweights, remember), the Ford can’t match the BMW when it comes to tackling a challenging road. 

Where one white car is level, flat and composed, the other white car is heaving, lurching and flustered; not to an unreasonable degree, sure, but sufficiently so for driver confidence (and enjoyment) to be tangibly higher in the M240i. You can have faith that inputs will manifest as the desired action that never quite materialises in the vaguer Mustang; because it’s always more approximate, there’s never the same desire to push on. Steering, never a strong suit of Mustangs, remains as arcade in feel as the animations on screen. The BMW, on the other hand, soon has the driver revelling in a crisp front end, an xDrive that perfectly (yet imperceptibly) shoves power around, and damping quality that would make the first F22 era M240is of a decade ago weep. BMW most certainly still knows how to make a straight-six coupe that’s great to drive; just a shame that neither the size nor the price is very junior anymore. 

Will a Mustang driver, trailing behind in a less comfortable, less capable coupe, care very much? Probably not. Perhaps it isn’t the last word in driver engagement, though it’s sorted enough not to feel overawed by that mighty V8. And, truth be told, a car that can worm its way into your affections at whole lot less than ten tenths feels ideal for Britain in 2026. There isn’t a journey that the Mustang vibe won’t improve, and that should count for a lot. 

Probably the biggest issue for it is the existence (and experience of) the Dark Horse. That too can do muscle car moodiness and ain’t–no-replacement vigour, but with real reward on offer as well. Whereas the M240 is sufficiently adept to make you question the need for an M2, especially as that now has its own xDrive option (and look at the M3 for proof of where that ends up). As an everyday performance car that isn’t at the track every weekend, its array of talents might be more persuasive.

Which means it’s undoubtedly the objectively superior coupe of this duo, and will probably continue as something of an overlooked gem in the BMW range; not as affordable as B58-engined 2 Series used to be, not as lairy as an M2 and so on. But if you know, you know. The Mustang is far from disgraced, though, being more capable than needed and even more likeable than expected. Or even remembered, for that matter. The coupe market might be severely depleted, but that certainly doesn’t mean great cars no longer exist. 


SPECIFICATION | FORD MUSTANG GT

Engine: 5,038cc, V8
Transmission: 10-speed auto, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 446@7,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 398@4,600rpm
0-62mph: 4.9sec
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1,836kg
MPG: 23.5
CO2: 274g/km
Price: £58,470 (price as standard; price as tested £64,820, comprising MagneRide damping with Pothole Mitigation for £1,750, Recaro Seats for £2,000, Red Calipers for £400)

SPECIFICATION| BMW M240i xDRIVE (LCI) 

Engine: 2,998cc, straight-six, turbocharged, mild-hybrid
Transmission: 8-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 392
Torque (lb ft): 398
0-62mph: 4.3secs
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1,830kg
MPG: 38.7 (WLTP)
CO2: 167g/km
Price: £50,215 (as tested £57,307)

Author
Discussion

CH3NO2

Original Poster:

57 posts

107 months

In a nutshell, if your head is in charge, you buy the BMW, if your heart is in charge you'll buy the Mustang.

Davy Jones

80 posts

75 months

Mustang all day thanks.

Kawasicki

14,306 posts

261 months

It’s a real pity that they can’t get a decent chassis and steering tune in the Mustang, because it looks good and the powertrain really deserves it. That engine is awesome.

GTEYE

2,434 posts

236 months

Sadly the Mustang doesn’t really make any sense for the European market, unless you own your own filling station.

Objectively, although most on PH will say they’ll take the Mustang, they won’t actually buy one. The link in the article to the 2 year old on on delivery miles tells a bit of a tale too.

The BMW is a cracking car, it would be just nice if it was not quite so gawky.

edoverheels

580 posts

131 months

I’ll take a manual Mustang please.

NigelCayless

229 posts

181 months

I had a mustang for 3 years. I found the mpg to be similar to the 997s that came before it and the M4 that came afterwards.

stuart100

1,127 posts

83 months

GTEYE said:
Sadly the Mustang doesn t really make any sense for the European market, unless you own your own filling station.

Objectively, although most on PH will say they ll take the Mustang, they won t actually buy one. The link in the article to the 2 year old on on delivery miles tells a bit of a tale too.

The BMW is a cracking car, it would be just nice if it was not quite so gawky.
Who cares about mpg if you are not doing lots of city driving or lots of miles? The efficiency is now far better on this than the big V8 US cars of over 20 years ago.

Its Just Adz

18,364 posts

235 months

Those wheels on the BMW really are terrible.

stevemcs

10,078 posts

119 months

CH3NO2 said:
In a nutshell, if your head is in charge, you buy the BMW, if your heart is in charge you'll buy the Mustang.
Pretty much, I’ll take the mustang.

Squirrelofwoe

3,265 posts

202 months

stuart100 said:
GTEYE said:
Sadly the Mustang doesn t really make any sense for the European market, unless you own your own filling station.

Objectively, although most on PH will say they ll take the Mustang, they won t actually buy one. The link in the article to the 2 year old on on delivery miles tells a bit of a tale too.

The BMW is a cracking car, it would be just nice if it was not quite so gawky.
Who cares about mpg if you are not doing lots of city driving or lots of miles? The efficiency is now far better on this than the big V8 US cars of over 20 years ago.
I bought a new Mustang GT nearly 4 years ago and it has been my daily driver since. When sitting in traffic on the work commute it is doing 24mpg, but once on the dual carriageway / motorway it does over 30 no problem. Granted its still poor compared to other modern stuff with smaller engines, but for a 5.0 n/a V8 i think it's pretty remarkable. I struggled to get 28mpg out of my 2004 Honda Accord tourer petrol. Plus i get to listen to that glorious V8 burble which makes the drive to work all the better. cloud9

My issue with this new generation is the interior and the screens- at least on the S550 the digital dash and centre display were both properly integrated into the dash/console.

QuattroDave

1,800 posts

154 months

GTEYE said:
Sadly the Mustang doesn t really make any sense for the European market, unless you own your own filling station.
This is a bit of an outdated trope I'm afraid. There was a time when American cars in the UK were too big, too heavy, too thirsty. But the first two don't ring true any more, the size and weight are comparable. For a V8 they're incredibly efficient, I can easily get 35mpg on a run and lifetime consumption is 24mpg but that's with a lot of car shows and arsing about.

GTEYE said:
Objectively, although most on PH will say they ll take the Mustang, they won t actually buy one.
I effectively went from one to the other. I bought an M140i new and kept it three years, loved it. Then the opportunity to get a brand new mustang arose and I didn't even think twice, chopped the BMW in and picked up the mustang.

The driving driving difference between the two. The BMW feels good driving at 8/10ths and up, the mustang feels good at 1/10ths to 8/10ths (though mine now has KW coilovers so actually gets above 8/10ths without trying to kill you!)

Recent mustangs are starting to struggle to sell now as the price has increased ridiculously. In 2016 they were 35k new, mine was 47k in 2019 and the dark horse is 75k now.

Firebobby

973 posts

65 months

Beemer for me. I wouldn't give the Ford a 2nd look. On butter tubs pass, or any decent windy 'b' road the mustang wouldn't know which county the bmw had gone into! VED, fuel, insurance will all be cheaper in the BM. Why would you choose the lesser vehicle?

Escort3500

13,323 posts

171 months

On looks alone it would be the Mustang for me against the bland design of the BMW (and those awful rims). In every other respect the BMW wins

Digga

47,288 posts

309 months

Mmmmmmustang!

Love a V8. The new Ford V8 is a very clever bit of engineering too.

Perhaps it’s because I’ve also always loved the Ford vs Holden Aussie V8 super cars, which more recently are Ford Mustangs vs the Chevrolet Camaros (another car I like the look of).

I’d agree the new electric dash binnacles in most modern stuff is more than a little meh.

tallpaul26

694 posts

245 months

Did BMW UK press team really give a white car with ste wheels out for these reviews?

As the article alludes to, the original G42 press car was Thundernight with the grey wheels /mirrors and looked so striking. It 100% sold the car to me right there on the screen before I’d ever seen one on the road. There are so many actual colours available on the BMW, why send it out in lease spec? Same for Ford. Kinda makes you think the manufacturers don’t really care about this segment.

Water Fairy

6,511 posts

181 months

Firebobby said:
Beemer for me. I wouldn't give the Ford a 2nd look. On butter tubs pass, or any decent windy 'b' road the mustang wouldn't know which county the bmw had gone into! VED, fuel, insurance will all be cheaper in the BM. Why would you choose the lesser vehicle?
Cars are very subjective that's why


Legacywr

15,240 posts

214 months

Mustang for me.

This is my 4th, measured over a tank full many times, it did 18-20 mpg. Not sure how (if) people are getting the mpg they claim?

The new interior/dash is great.


AndySheff

6,885 posts

233 months

Legacywr said:
Mustang for me.

This is my 4th, measured over a tank full many times, it did 18-20 mpg. Not sure how (if) people are getting the mpg they claim?

The new interior/dash is great.

I get 35mpg on a run with my 21 GT Cab. It has the 10 speed auto. Mixed driving obviously isn't as good but that's not the point of owning a 5l V8.

My pair smile

cerb4.5lee

42,948 posts

206 months

I like them both, but I'd be going for a manual Mustang though I think. I'm just put off the Mustang with it's weight though, and I worry that it wouldn't "feel" punchy enough, with me being used to a Cerbera and a twin turbo M4.

Clad-Hach

486 posts

14 months

I like those Mustangs, there is just something about them that appeals to me, its really just a big Capri which isn't a bad thing because I liked them too.

And having a V8 of course.