RE: World's most powerful manual road car due at FOS
RE: World's most powerful manual road car due at FOS
Yesterday

World's most powerful manual road car due at FOS

Move over Ferrari: Hennessey Venom F5-M enters production with over 2,000hp in Evolution spec


First Ferrari, now Hennessey. The manual is truly back in fashion, it would seem, however curious its route to production ends up being. But where the 12Cilindri Manuale calls upon the inventive makeover of its base car’s existing dual-clutch transmission, this Venom F5-M proudly possesses a good ‘ol fashioned open-gate manual with three, traditional pedals.

Making its Goodwood Festival of Speed debut later in the week, this appears to be the existing, 12-off, $2.65m F5-M Roadster welcoming in the new aero and active suspension of the latest Venom F5 Evolution upgrades. Something that isn’t immediately earth-shattering on the surface should prove the opposite in reality, of course; volunteering for sole responsibility of shifting gears in a 6.6-litre twin-turbo hypercar with 2,031hp is not a task anyone takes on lightly. The car you see here also signifies the F5-M replacing, um, itself as the world’s most powerful manual road car.

“It’s the most all-consuming driving experience we’ve created,” says founder and CEO John Hennessey. “A gated six-speed manual puts the driver completely in control, while the open-top design brings the Fury V8 sound directly into the cockpit. The noise, the feel, and the power delivery are raw and unfiltered.”

This first production example belongs to a UK customer, too, so there’s a chance its Fury will one day need nursing through the Dartford Crossing tailbacks. Its public debut will see it slither up the Goodwood hill at the hands of racer Alex Brundle. He’ll be among the first to experience snicking a “precisely weighted” short-throw lever through a “billet aluminium gate with a crisp, machined-metal clink,” according to the highly evocative bumf. We’re promised “sophisticated traction control and engine management systems” to ensure rowing your own gears with so much power isn’t a total leap of faith.

Driver-focused it may be, but the owner of car #1 has also carefully raided the cupboards of Hennessey’s customisation department – called ‘Maverick’, of course – specifying exposed purple carbon bodywork and anodised gold accents in the process, most notably inside, while the badge on this Venom’s nose is 24-carat. 

Gold is also deployed for the complementary US and UK flags on either side of the 1,400mm-long dorsal fin. The special relationship looks alive and well on here, at the very least.

While the Venom F5-M Roadster is limited to 12 units, those with bulky enough wallets can rest assured they’ve not missed out. 'The introduction of the Venom F5-M represents a significant evolution for the Hennessey hypercar range,' we’re told. 'Following its launch, both the manual transmission and the updated chassis architecture will be made available across other F5 models, enabling customers to specify Coupe and Roadster variants – as well as track-focused Revolution models – with the six-speed manual configuration.'

Whether it’ll still hold its crown of the world’s gnarliest manual by then is another matter entirely…


Author
Discussion

GreatScott2016

Original Poster:

2,429 posts

115 months

Yesterday (10:44)
quotequote all
I wouldn’t say no to a quick spin smile

TinpotTintop

115 posts

58 months

Yesterday (10:44)
quotequote all
I like the way this outfit has just gone for it, ignored everyone else and followed a singular path. Feel like they don't give a sh^t whether you like it or not.

Turbobanana

8,189 posts

228 months

Yesterday (10:45)
quotequote all
Does removing the roof mean you get excess scuttle sheikh?

sinbaddio

2,810 posts

203 months

Yesterday (10:57)
quotequote all
Crazy, love it!

HoneyBadgerUK

35 posts

31 months

Yesterday (10:59)
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
Does removing the roof mean you get excess scuttle sheikh?
Get out.

Stu R

21,580 posts

242 months

Yesterday (11:05)
quotequote all
He's done hell of a job of reinventing his reputation I'll give him that.

GTRene

21,766 posts

251 months

Yesterday (11:27)
quotequote all
that is a lot of power with a manual box, wonder what such will do when misshift.

crazy car, go nuts wobble

personally I rather have something with 500-850max hp and say around 1.000kg with a manual.

hungry_hog

2,853 posts

215 months

Yesterday (11:28)
quotequote all
nice car to learn cutch control in then!

Ray_Aber

852 posts

303 months

Yesterday (11:45)
quotequote all
GreatScott2016 said:
I wouldn t say no to a quick spin smile
First gear should do that nicely.

Actually, most of the gears....

mac96

6,170 posts

170 months

Yesterday (12:12)
quotequote all
How does that steering work? Full lock with only 1/4 rotation? So undriveably direct and twitchy? Or a turning circle of 50metres?

Or more like a normal car but very awkward to use because it is U shaped?

I am curious, not criticising. It obviously doesn't really matter as they are not being sold for their practicality!

jet_noise

6,039 posts

209 months

Yesterday (12:21)
quotequote all
HoneyBadgerUK said:
Turbobanana said:
Does removing the roof mean you get excess scuttle sheikh?
Get out.
hehe

J4CKO

46,497 posts

227 months

Yesterday (12:34)
quotequote all
Be interesting to see a road test, that must be utterly, terrifyingly rapid.

Wonder where you could actually ever let it rip in the UK ? Even if just for a few seconds of full throttle.

RB Will

10,752 posts

267 months

Yesterday (12:40)
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
Wonder where you could actually ever let it rip in the UK ? Even if just for a few seconds of full throttle.
Could say the same for anything with north of 300bhp really. Just have to do what everyone else is doing and accidentally forget what speed you are going.

Or get it on some trackdays.

ex-devonpaul

1,699 posts

164 months

Yesterday (12:45)
quotequote all
Awesome car.

The new owner b=must be a big fan of Cadbury's Eclairs.


dukeboy749r

3,506 posts

237 months

Yesterday (14:12)
quotequote all
I'm not sure what that 'dorsal fin' achieves, other than to make it look odd in some of the photographs.

SchillingTwo

173 posts

1 month

Yesterday (14:17)
quotequote all
One issue I have with fast manuals is the frequency and speed that you need to be changing gears at to keep up with the performance, especially if they have six (or more) forward gears with relatively close ratios.

I think in a car with this much torque and power I’d want a four or five speed ‘box with widely spaced gears.

And yes, I know you can miss gears out when shifting but I’d still not want six+.

dukebox9reg

1,714 posts

175 months

Yesterday (14:35)
quotequote all
SchillingTwo said:
One issue I have with fast manuals is the frequency and speed that you need to be changing gears at to keep up with the performance, especially if they have six (or more) forward gears with relatively close ratios.

I think in a car with this much torque and power I d want a four or five speed box with widely spaced gears.

And yes, I know you can miss gears out when shifting but I d still not want six+.
Quick google *take with as much salt as you want'

Car does over 60 in 1st and 150 in 3rd. You wont need to row gears that much

RB Will

10,752 posts

267 months

Yesterday (15:20)
quotequote all
Was going to say with a 6 speed set up for doing 300mph you will pretty much just be able to leave it in 3rd and drive anywhere.

The new Donkervoort takes this sort of thing into account, sticking with a 5 speed to make the drive a bit less frantic

SchillingTwo

173 posts

1 month

Yesterday (15:44)
quotequote all
I frequently think about this when using all of the performance of my (significantly slower than this one) fast car.

It has a good dual-clutch gearbox, and even that suffers a little in semi-automatic relative to full auto when using all of the performance.

I think that for me my GR Yaris is about as high performance as I prefer a manual gearbox in. Anything faster and I’m happier now with an automatic.

el romeral

2,051 posts

164 months

Yesterday (18:08)
quotequote all
Wouldn’t mind giving this a quick sheikh down. Zero to 60 time must be up in zero point something seconds.