RE: Dacia Duster 1.6 | Shed of the Week
RE: Dacia Duster 1.6 | Shed of the Week
Yesterday

Dacia Duster 1.6 | Shed of the Week

The older it gets, the more sophisticated Dacia becomes - but it didn't start out that way...


Bargain basement motoring for all this week in the blobby shape of the Dacia Duster. This was the car that, for some unbelievers at least, put the dust into dustbin. Others loved its no-nonsense no-frills design, and its pricing. Today, a new one will cost you nearly £22,000, but they were just under £12k new in 2013 when this one was first registered. They were even less than that in 2017 when Dacia was practically giving away the last gen-one cars at £9,400 a pop. 

Now they’re down to not much more than £1k, or in the specific case of this October 2013, pre-facelift, two-wheel drive, petrol-powered, entry-level Access in Appliance White, £95 more than £1k. The ad says it’s got climate control, a leather steering wheel and electric windows, features not usually associated with the Access. If that wheel did have leather on it, all Shed can say is that it’s worn off in a remarkably uniform way. The AC button must have fallen off at some point too, and although Shed can’t be certain with his eyesight it does look like the rear windows might be ‘keep fit’ ones. At least the Access’s famous radio hole has been filled, albeit with a head unit you’d probably sneer at in a £1 boot sale bucket. 

We’re told that the timing belt on our shed was replaced at 91,000 miles when it was 10 years old. That was presumably during one of the three services it’s been grudgingly given in its 135,000 mile donkey life. Without specifying an engine, Dacia UK’s website says that their timing belts should be changed if a vehicle is more than 5 years old or it has done more than 70,000 miles. Assuming this car was still running OK when the belt was changed, you should have at least another 25,000 miles to go before the next one falls due, or a lot more than that if you’re a gambling skinflint keen on pursuing the scanty maintenance schedule followed so far. 

In this day and age you can kind of understand folk turning a blind eye to maintenance requirements, but it can be a false economy. When a car that you’ve bought on the cheap decides it’s had enough of being ignored, the costs involved in putting issues right can seem disproportionately high. That’s despite most of the Duster’s bits being sourced from cobwebby old Renault parts bins. It’s labour charges that are the killer and they wait for no man.

Early 1.6 4x2 petrols like this had 103hp and 109lb ft, which should line you up for nearly 40mpg, a 0-62mph time of 11.5 seconds, a tax bill of £275pa and a top speed you don’t want to think about. No need to worry about the 4x2’s perceived lack of off-roading abillty though. If a car is light enough, and this one is at 1,160kg, it will get you around most manors just fine. Plus the gearing on 2WD Dusters is more relaxing on motorways than the low-ratioed AWD cars which didn’t have the benefit of a second set of gears. 

The next MOT on our shed is due in September. Every advisory noted on every previous test has been a consumable and the last ticket was clean, but this time around there’s something Bisto-like in the region of the driver’s door bottom that will attract the tester’s attention. In the best of all worlds it will actually be gravy from a carelessly eaten pie. 

More realistically however it will be the visible signs of underside corrosion, because very few of the Indian-built (pre-Romanian) ‘Rusters’ from this period have escaped it. The only other Duster featured in SOTW – another 2013 car but this time a 160,000-mile 4x4 diesel priced at £2k last October – had a handful of corrosion advisories on its last MOT from May ’25. That certificate expired last month and the car hasn’t been retested. Draw your own conclusions.  

Thing is, if you get lucky with the September test on our £1,095 petrol Duster you could be all set for at least a year’s worth of very cheap motoring. Just follow Shed’s lead by going through life with low expectations. That way you’ll never be disappointed. Bung a £20 set of seat covers on it, rattlecan your steelies back to their original non-glory and revel in your proletarian stinginess. Either that or save up for the Duster/Jogger cross that PH poster E30KB suggested on the diesel Duster forum. As you can probably imagine it didn’t take the postmistress long to come up with a name for that.


See the original advert

Author
Discussion

tomsugden

Original Poster:

2,456 posts

256 months

Yesterday (06:10)
quotequote all
Cheap and cheerful motoring, I quite like it.

Wren-went

1,056 posts

66 months

Yesterday (06:34)
quotequote all
Ok for a cheap motor , near enough £1100 I could understand someone wanting it even if just to get a year out of it.

If I ever wanted a Duster it would have to be the 1.5 DCI which we have in a 16 plate Clio Dynamic S Mav but the 110 bhp version 5 it's slow enough.

sinisterpenguin

59 posts

47 months

Yesterday (06:34)
quotequote all
Worth £1K of anyone’s money just for the Halfords wheels and at least these are mercifully free of modern “driver assistance” systems.

mart4856

212 posts

52 months

Yesterday (06:34)
quotequote all
A complete and utter turd of a car with no redeeming features or even basic creature comforts. Even if I was given it for free I would feel compelled to get it crushed to remove this abomination from our roads.

Edited by mart4856 on Friday 31st July 12:19

can't remember

1,163 posts

156 months

Yesterday (06:36)
quotequote all
Well it's clearly never been loved, but neither has my washing machine. The rust is an hour with a rattle can job and I think it needs a set of tyres but this is a genuine shed, rather than a decent car on hard times. If you're renovating a house, for example, this will be cheaper to run than a little van and easier to get into the local tip. Crap, but practical, motoring for bugger all and nought pence.

croyde

26,107 posts

258 months

Yesterday (06:52)
quotequote all
I had a Mk2 1.0 3cyl 100bhp Duster bought as an interim car which quickly became my one and only for over 3 years.

Great commuter in London traffic, turned into a little van when needed, trips to the continent, drove all over the UK in it.

Comfortable for long drives and pretty nippy if you liked stirring the gear stick.

Bought new in 2021 for £10,500, sold in 2024 for £9,300.

If I end up buying a do it upper house, I'd seriously consider buying one again for tip and passenger duties.

FrankandLynn

83 posts

21 months

Yesterday (06:55)
quotequote all
About as basic as it’s possible to achieve and reminds me of first cars in the early eighties - decrepit, slow, no frills and showing rust, but run on a shoestring budget. However, despite the misty eyes, the reality was turgid, I’m sure, and we’ve all grown to expect more. I think the culture shock would be overwhelming. Great shed.

yme402

635 posts

130 months

Yesterday (06:56)
quotequote all
For the price of two months PCP for a so-called ‘premium’ SUV, this makes a lot of sense.
I wonder how much less of a cost of living crisis people would be having if they went back to driving cars like this?

Andy83n

605 posts

90 months

Yesterday (07:21)
quotequote all
mart4856 said:
A complete and utter turd of a car with no redeeming features or even basic creature comforts. Even if I was given it for free I would feel compelled to to get it crushed to remove this abomination from our roads.
We'll put you down as a 'maybe'

fantheman80

2,519 posts

77 months

Yesterday (07:24)
quotequote all
Some doggers will snap that up in no time surely

GreatScott2016

2,448 posts

116 months

Yesterday (07:29)
quotequote all
yme402 said:
For the price of two months PCP for a so-called premium SUV, this makes a lot of sense.
I wonder how much less of a cost of living crisis people would be having if they went back to driving cars like this?
I like your thinking sir smile

GianiCakes

672 posts

101 months

Yesterday (07:31)
quotequote all
Station car for a quarter of the price of a season ticket, what’s not to like?

MC Bodge

28,801 posts

203 months

Yesterday (07:35)
quotequote all
With a bit of cleaning, tidying up, and using a few spray cans from Halfords over a weekend, this could be a bargain utility car.

Great shed.

Ps. I wonder if Renault hatchback springs/dampers could be used to lower it a bit?

Edited by MC Bodge on Friday 31st July 07:40

Andy86GT

1,037 posts

93 months

Yesterday (07:35)
quotequote all
yme402 said:
For the price of two months PCP for a so-called premium SUV, this makes a lot of sense.
I wonder how much less of a cost of living crisis people would be having if they went back to driving cars like this?
There's someone on another thread with a seized 3 year old Defender on 35k miles. This Duster has only been serviced every 35k, sobering.

MC Bodge

28,801 posts

203 months

Yesterday (07:38)
quotequote all
Andy86GT said:
There's someone on another thread with a seized 3 year old Defender on 35k miles. This Duster has only been serviced every 35k, sobering.
?

Cambs_Stuart

3,517 posts

112 months

Yesterday (07:45)
quotequote all
can't remember said:
Well it's clearly never been loved, but neither has my washing machine. The rust is an hour with a rattle can job and I think it needs a set of tyres but this is a genuine shed, rather than a decent car on hard times. If you're renovating a house, for example, this will be cheaper to run than a little van and easier to get into the local tip. Crap, but practical, motoring for bugger all and nought pence.
I've just bought a new washing machine and I bet it'll be less fun than this car. It's not fast, nice to drive, refined, well built or good looking, but it'll be a great first car for someone. Assuming the rust isn't too bad underneath it'll last a few more years.

POIDH

3,509 posts

93 months

Yesterday (07:49)
quotequote all
Cracking cheap shed. One of my colleagues runs one of similar era and miles. She's had it from new and it's basically a dog kennel on wheels that gets her to work and back from edge of the Highlands, no matter the weather. It creaks a bit. It feels cheap. But damn, it works, has never broken, costs bugger all to run and is there every day...

(This one feels like it might be a miss due to the lack of service history. Someone has really ignored this thing, feels like that may come back to bite. Surely other Dacia's are available that someone has serviced...)

MC Bodge

28,801 posts

203 months

Yesterday (07:52)
quotequote all
Maybe it has been serviced DIY, but not showing as a "service"?

If it runs ok, with no rattles, it is quite possibly fine.

georgeyboy12345

4,562 posts

63 months

Yesterday (07:58)
quotequote all
Grim. It’d be borderline acceptable if it had a years MOT on it, but it will definitely fail next month then need a load of expensive welding doing.

It’s be alright as a car for taking the dog out for walks in, I suppose

drgoatboy

2,026 posts

235 months

Yesterday (07:59)
quotequote all
I hired one of these in very similar spec on holiday a few years back (thankfully with Aircon).
I'd been meaning to try one for years as I actually quite like the whole ethos and think they look kinda cool.
I was so disappointed, we only had it for a day and it was much too long.

Still if you can drag it through another MOT that looks like decent value all the same. (But I'm out)