RE: Jaguar XK European GT Roadster | UK Review
RE: Jaguar XK European GT Roadster | UK Review
Today

Jaguar XK European GT Roadster | UK Review

Don't fancy Jaguar's new Jaguar? Try Thornley Kelham's one...


Given the future of Jaguar looks so different, buyer appetite for its past is unlikely to wane. For so long there was a retro tinge to new Jaguars, perhaps to a fault, and you can be sure that whatever is coming next won't pay the same lip service to nostalgia. Yet there’s undoubtedly a lot of love for the classics; see the reaction to anything Eagle produces, the energy behind the TWR Supercat, and the appreciation enjoyed by the very best XKR and XJRs of late. As Jaguar charges headfirst into the future, so its past looks more lucrative than ever. 

A great time, then, to reimagine the XK120. A car that sometimes feels lost in the annals of Jag sports car history with later C-, D- and E-Types, despite it once being the fastest car in the world - and owned by Hollywood icons like Clark Gable and Humphrey Bogart. Six cylinder up front, rear-wheel drive and a pretty body over the top served Jaguar well (if not permanently) all the way to the F-Type, which gives the XK120 an additional significance. 

Only this isn’t an XK120. This is the latest of Thornley Kelham’s European Collection, a series that’s already spawned a 911-derived European RS and a fixed head XK120 (the European GT Coupe). So this drop-top is the Jaguar XK European GT Roadster, and 25 will be made; only it’s even more than just a Coupe without a roof, the body sufficiently overhauled that only lights and indicators are shared. 

What a body, too. Once more with design overseen by Paul Howse (he of McLaren P1 fame), the Roadster has a bespoke sports car vibe straight from an Italian carrozzeria, voluptuous and curvaceous in a way that makes the regular ‘120 look demure. It’s a fascinating thing to behold, immediately recognisable as an XK with the face and the wings yet also very different thanks to the breadth, sinew and attitude. There’s something lovely, too, about knowing that the panels were hand beaten into their spectacular shape by the craftspeople of TK, that thousands of hours at the English wheel by human beings make each GT Roadster unique. 

Gone is a dainty and delicate postwar classic; in its place you get an almost outlaw-grade speedster. The body is tall in relation to the raked windscreen, the wheels fill out the profile like never before, and the strakes bring drama. It’s an intriguing culture clash of modern cues and classic proportions. The fact that this won’t be to all tastes, and isn’t breathtakingly beautiful from every angle, is to be celebrated; it means the Roadster is memorable, and ensures the XK120 is considered in a new light. Which, for all the efforts lavished on cars like the E-Type, isn’t something that’s happened for later models. The exterior finish puts new cars, even pricey ones, to shame - that’s what 1,100 hours in the paint shop will do. 

Don’t go thinking this is a contemporary experience, however. There’s precious little space to squeeze feet between seat and wing, the wheel has the diameter of a bin lid (and the thickness of a strawberry lace), and the turned aluminium dash is a thing of tactile beauty. Even sitting on exquisite, rich leather and glancing across at dials that actually work, this feels like every inch the classic British sports car. Only the steering wheel is adjustable, the seats are heated, and your phone can charge in the middle. The Roadster’s interior is like one of those perfectly colourised black and white films - maybe the originality has been tampered with, but the experience is too joyful to worry very much. 

It could hardly be easier to drive. The re-engineered straight six is on the button, the clutch is accurate and the shift very satisfying indeed. With a new body that weighs so much less than before and a burly specification for a now all-alloy 3.8 (there’s more than 300lb ft), brisk progress requires very little effort indeed. Peering out over that incredible new bodywork, wind rushing in and surrounded by that interior, it’s very easy to imagine yourself cruising around as one of those caddish film stars.

Or a racer of the era, once that engine’s extended a little further. Thornley Kelham offers the European GT Roadster with either 300hp or 360hp optionally; either way, with less than 1,200kg to shift now, it’s abundantly fast. And utterly divine to listen to: imagine what an M3 CSL would sound like with carburettors, and the result is this XK, greedily snorting all the air it can at any given opportunity. The snarl is raw and raucous, the underlying smoothness of the layout perfectly complemented by the rasping exhaust. It’s an engine of rare joy, even in this rarefied sector of the market.

The chassis overhaul is potentially even more impressive. That glorious new body is seam-welded as part of the build, boosting the strength of the structure; with a totally new suspension setup as well - the rear leaf springs and live axle are ditched, replaced by trailing arms, and with an Intrax/Bilstein double act at each corner - the GT feels imperious. The ride is taut and expertly controlled, the structure feels endlessly resilient, and all that power under the bonnet never, ever feels too much for the underpinnings. So you can go a little bit faster… 

Yet it stops short of feeling like a new car; it’s the classic experience with modern manners. Partly that’s because of the view out and around, but also because the brakes need a fair shove, nothing will help beyond a limited-slip diff if you’re greedy on the throttle, and plenty of road feel comes up through the seat. But the balance is near-perfectly struck, the combination of traditional sports car bonhomie with proper speed, grip and poise pretty beguiling. This is how you dreamed classic cars felt, only to be disappointed by the reality of an untouched old car.

Gripes? Maybe there could be a slightly better sense of connection between steering wheel and front rubber, and maybe the brakes could bite a bit sooner. But you only start nitpicking because what TK has created performs so adroitly against all present-day expectations. This isn’t an old car brought up to snuff; it’s a ground-up recreation that bears a resemblance to an old Jaguar and drives absolutely beautifully. You can keep all the new roofless hypercar speedsters; nothing makes getting down a road such a pleasure as this car.

With so little bodywork, the European GT Roadster is clearly a pretty full-on experience even by the standards of reworked classics. It isn’t going to be a car for long-distance touring, but that only means the limited opportunities will feel even more special. By not sticking to the usual script when it comes to making Jaguars great again, Thornley Kelham has made something unforgettably brilliant. And just wait until you see what they have coming next… 


SPECIFICATION | JAGUAR XK EUROPEAN GT ROADSTER

Engine: 3,868cc, straight six
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive, LSD
Power (hp): 300@6,500rpm (optionally 360)
Torque (lb ft): 280@4,250-4,500rpm (optionally 310)
0-62mph: c. 5 seconds
Top speed: c. 160mph
Weight: 1,180kg
MPG: NA
CO2: NA
Price: from £750,000

Author
Discussion

leglessAlex

Original Poster:

7,381 posts

171 months

Gorgeous. I'd be very happy with this, although I think Eagle's reimagining of the E Type is a little more successful visually.

hammo19

7,798 posts

226 months

Ooooo that’s very pretty. Great colour combo too.

smithyithy

7,918 posts

148 months

Looks very well put-together, my only gripe from the photos, is that the wheels look to sit too far out.. I always associate that with 'kit' car versions like when people use BMW Z3s to make classic replicas, it's the stance that instantly give them away as a rep..

NGK210

5,065 posts

175 months

WTF?
They’ve taken one of the most effortlessly elegant and graceful designs ever, and turned it into a fat arse.
Off with their heads!

Iamnotkloot

1,911 posts

177 months

Yeah, that’s lovely but it’s always the price that bites.

pgn340r

113 posts

237 months

Is it my imagination or has one of the rear brake lights failed?

Murph7355

42,006 posts

286 months

Looks a bit like when a stunner starts to dabble in plastic surgery - you can kind of see the original underneath but the tweaks are a mistake.

Looks more Wiesmann than Jaguar.

Earthdweller

19,568 posts

156 months

Beautiful ... apart from the price

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,765 posts

128 months

I think for £750K I would want something more useable. Demand for pre-60s cars, restomod or restored, is shrinking as the generation that lusted after these cars retires from driving. Wish them well.....

Turbobanana

8,480 posts

231 months

Others' views will vary, but my personal opinion is that I'd never want to spend that much on a new car trying tool like an old one. I just don't understand why you'd buy it, when you could easily have an original XK120 and c£600K change for something else.

That said, the craftsmanship is exquisite and I guess if £3/4M is nothing to you, then why not?

andy43

13,246 posts

284 months

Wondering if chrome bumpers would help its backside a bit.
Still would.

TheMilkyBarKid

881 posts

59 months

Gorgeous, I always preferred the shape of the XK120 to the E-Type if I’m honest. I do prefer them with the rear spats though, just makes them look more elegant to me. I wonder if they’d find a way to spec them back in, in return for the three quarters of a million quid I don’t have!

Clad-Hach

995 posts

18 months

How good would it be to have one of these...just look at it what a thing.

Out for a run in the early morning just enjoying the wind and sound of the engine...lovely.

Wayne95

460 posts

276 months

Nice, but not for any mortal to buy at that price.

if you like XKs, buy an original in good condition for less than £100k now, usually fully restored. Its no less practical than the replica, will probably hold its value now that prices have bottomed out, and you could always at fuel injection and CATS if you want a cleaner engine.


Geertsen

1,965 posts

89 months

The XK120 has long been one of my favourite cars, but I can’t see the point of a replica that costs multiple times what a perfect original would cost. This looks like a replica too; just the little details look a bit ‘parts bin’.

I admire the effort involved though.

thegreenhell

24,151 posts

249 months

That is all kinds of wrong. They've made it look like the sort of replica of a Jaguar that would have been popular in the 90s, with its blingy chrome wire wheels and inappropriate low profile tyres.

edoverheels

623 posts

135 months

I saw their coupe version at FoS which was stunning in the flesh. With this one I suspect that the blusteriness (is that a word?) of the cabin might limit its real world usefulness for touring etc but a lovely thing to blat around in.

CH80

445 posts

27 months

Not sure about the rear design of this thing, and £750k is A LOT when you can get a very sorted XK120 with mild upgrades and dare I say, a better look, for a lot less.

Stu78

290 posts

165 months

750K! give over.

J4CKO

46,946 posts

230 months

Clad-Hach said:
How good would it be to have one of these...just look at it what a thing.

Out for a run in the early morning just enjoying the wind and sound of the engine...lovely.
Ten grand gets you all sorts of nice convertibles that can do that, this is quite nice but 750 grand is like ten times more than an original XK120.