Audi RS2 - How special?
Audi RS2 - How special?
Author
Discussion

Pommygranite

Original Poster:

14,470 posts

246 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Just pondering the classifieds and see that RS2's are still phenomenally expensive but i presume a depreciation free motoring 'experience'.

Question is, do the justify the price and aura they seem to carry - 14k for a 15 yr old Audi is a lot but i understand the engineering background.

Also could you live with one on a daily basis and what sort of MPG/running costs are involved?

Zad

13,008 posts

266 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Ask our esteemed mod and PH admin person Garlick biggrin

Maybe you have to be a certain age to remember when they first appeared. Utterly, utterly bonkers. An estate car with basically the mechanicals from a racing Quattro, and then fettled by Porsche. Of course as it was pre -RS4, RS6 and Volvo T5R, there was just nothing to compare it to.

Pommygranite

Original Poster:

14,470 posts

246 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Zad said:
Ask our esteemed mod and PH admin person Garlick biggrin

Maybe you have to be a certain age to remember when they first appeared. Utterly, utterly bonkers. An estate car with basically the mechanicals from a racing Quattro, and then fettled by Porsche. Of course as it was pre -RS4, RS6 and Volvo T5R, there was just nothing to compare it to.
I remember reading the original Autocar report and infamous front cover 'quicker than a F1 to 60'. They seemed to be blown away by the speed but wasnt sure if the rest of it was that great.

Matt UK

18,084 posts

230 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Having never driven one, my question would be, how does the performance stack in the here and now?

Gad-Westy

16,585 posts

243 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Pommygranite said:
Zad said:
Ask our esteemed mod and PH admin person Garlick biggrin

Maybe you have to be a certain age to remember when they first appeared. Utterly, utterly bonkers. An estate car with basically the mechanicals from a racing Quattro, and then fettled by Porsche. Of course as it was pre -RS4, RS6 and Volvo T5R, there was just nothing to compare it to.
I remember reading the original Autocar report and infamous front cover 'quicker than a F1 to 60'. They seemed to be blown away by the speed but wasnt sure if the rest of it was that great.
It was quicker to 30 than a mclaren F1 largely thanks to excellent traction. 1.1secs I seem to remember.

jeremyc

28,153 posts

314 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
I've lived with one for over seven years now and can't think of anything to replace it with. smile

Performance and practicality in one package - it very much holds it's own with today's performance cars (think 0-60 in 4.8s, 165mph) but don't buy one if you're looking for economy. hehe

Remember also that it is a 15 year old car and hence some parts will perish/corrode, but generally they offer bullet-proof engineering.

I'd say they were a pretty good bet for depreciation-free motoring - a very limited edition, iconic, modern classic. biggrincloud9

Here's what PH thought of mine when I took them out for a spin: clicky


Dominicc01

530 posts

197 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
I've often looked them up in the classifieds. Fantastic cars. But now they're even more expensive than the original RS4, which was quicker off the line to 60, I'd have to question it.

GravelBen

16,502 posts

260 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Zad said:
Maybe you have to be a certain age to remember when they first appeared. Utterly, utterly bonkers. An estate car with basically the mechanicals from a racing Quattro, and then fettled by Porsche. Of course as it was pre -RS4, RS6 and Volvo T5R, there was just nothing to compare it to.
Well Subaru had been selling these with 220bhp, AWD and rally-bred handling since 1989 so there was something to compare it to... but the performance of the RS2 was really in another league.



Excuse the non-standard nature of the car, its the first half-decent photo I found.

Edited by GravelBen on Wednesday 16th June 09:41

Coxy914

691 posts

236 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
We had one for 4 years, sold it on here last year. It was my wifes daily for 3 years.

Performance wise, blisteringly quick... Ours was a German import and had been tuned by Oettinger and was just shy of 400 bhp.
It was a case of foot on pedal...lag....lag....lag.....whhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh! Bye bye M3/M5/ etc etc etc...

Running costs are what you'd expect from a 15 y/old Audi/Porsche.
There are specialists out there who can help and not ridiculous prices but take in to account that when you ask for Porsche parts (such as brakes etc), the prices are even higher than Audi's already high prices!

As for MPG, on a good run (motorway) she'd get 28mpg, but town driving, or the daily commute to work, my wife was lucky to see anything above 18mpg and given the cost of super, then it does become rather a large weekly household expense.



On the plus side, I would say they are pretty much depreciation proof.
We sold our for less than a grand less than we bought her for, and we got her off a dealer! Not bad for 4 1/2 years of car ownership!
Even less given as I sold the other set of wheels for £500 separately afterwards!

You can also get them on a Classic Car policy so insurance is cheap.

And, it will always have cult status amongst Audi fans as being the first RS model Audi (production one at least before some people go on about a pre production RS coupe)

Shropshiremike

24,475 posts

233 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Gad-Westy said:
It was quicker to 30 than a mclaren F1 largely thanks to excellent traction. 1.1secs I seem to remember.
It gets quicker as the years go by! smile

Think it was 1.5 seconds.

Undoubtedly quick to 60 for a car of that era - but it needed another 8.3 seconds to go from 60 to 100

VEA

4,792 posts

231 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
I'd have one! Always thought they were good looking things!

belleair302

7,012 posts

237 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
I ran an RS2 for two years and found the car to tick so many boxes as a day to day car. Fast, secure, unique, roomy, with all of the toys. Not silly money to restore, great brakes, serious road presence and beautifully built.

They are rare, when did you last see one being driven and many owners like Jeremy C keep them forever.

I also ran a Subaru Legacy GT-B Twin Turbo....not in the same league regarding build quality, nor stopping power. However the four wheel drive system was better, it was more roomy and as reliable just somewhet lacking soul.

plenty

5,036 posts

216 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
I haven't driven one, but my guess is that like other iconic models made famous by the motoring press, the RS2's residual values are primarily a function of its desirability among people who lusted after it as youngsters when it was new, and now are in a position to afford it.

Personally my money would go on an a £5k S2 Avant with a few choice mods, but I expect most buyers looking for an RS2 will specifically want the RS2 badge.

Futse

183 posts

215 months

Friday 20th May 2011
quotequote all
Nice time to breathe some life in the RS2. Well, in this topic anyway...

What about mileages? How many miles can they do before serious trouble/costs?