Tripping a speed cam from a standstill

Tripping a speed cam from a standstill

Author
Discussion

TazR6

Original Poster:

1,186 posts

252 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
Are there any cars around that could accelerate quick enough from a standing start in front of a Gatso, to be able to trigger it and get a NIP?
If so, what limit could it break? 30? 40?

Vipers

32,975 posts

230 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
Formula 1 perhaps? Just guessing.




smile

Colin 1985

1,921 posts

172 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
What's the distance available?

Petrolhead_Rich

4,659 posts

194 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
Vipers said:
Formula 1 perhaps? Just guessing.




smile
According to Top Gear Tests a "Reasonably Priced Car" (Lacetti) is faster than an F1 car off the line! Anyone remember the tests they did (in the Birmingham NEC IIRC)

Vipers

32,975 posts

230 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
Petrolhead_Rich said:
Vipers said:
Formula 1 perhaps? Just guessing.




smile
According to Top Gear Tests a "Reasonably Priced Car" (Lacetti) is faster than an F1 car off the line! Anyone remember the tests they did (in the Birmingham NEC IIRC)
Daewoo or Chevy (lacetti that is)?




smile

Marty Funkhouser

5,427 posts

183 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
Petrolhead_Rich said:
Vipers said:
Formula 1 perhaps? Just guessing.




smile
According to Top Gear Tests a "Reasonably Priced Car" (Lacetti) is faster than an F1 car off the line! Anyone remember the tests they did (in the Birmingham NEC IIRC)
That was on a very slick surface indoors, presumably a public road would be much coarser, still dont think there would be enough grip though. Think it was in the Exel centre london too.

TangoAlpha

1,175 posts

256 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
A Gatso failed to trigger at 145mph / 233kph (Top Gear).

If a Gatso triggers, one could assume there are speed marking for verification (this may not be true, the upper limit for verification may be lower than 145mph).

A Gatso camera fires with a 0.5 second interval (?).

A car travelling at 233kph travels around 64m per second, thus travels 32m in the time between flashes. One could then assume that the road markings do not stretch further than 32m beyond the point at which the radar detection starts (which is presumably only a short distance from the Gatso).

This would give the maximum length of road markings to be around 32m plus a couple of metres to allow for the angle of the radar detector.

Also note that you need to be travelling at the illegal speed 0.5 seconds before reaching the end of the road markings so that the two photographs occur within the road markings.

Anyone good at maths?

Life Saab Itch

37,068 posts

190 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
But the question was "can you get one to trip from a standstill?"

F1 cars are st at standing starts. They are not optimised for them.

I have seen a Subaru Impreza get one flash from a scamera from a standing start. I imagine this is because he ran out of markings before the second flash would have gone out.

Yes it can be done in a fast road car.

Petrolhead_Rich

4,659 posts

194 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
Vipers said:
Petrolhead_Rich said:
Vipers said:
Formula 1 perhaps? Just guessing.




smile
According to Top Gear Tests a "Reasonably Priced Car" (Lacetti) is faster than an F1 car off the line! Anyone remember the tests they did (in the Birmingham NEC IIRC)
Daewoo or Chevy (lacetti that is)?




smile
Think it was the Lacetti, but as I thought it was the NEC and as has been mentioned it was the Excel Center, I could be wrong.

It defiantly happened though and the normal car won!

Vipers

32,975 posts

230 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
Petrolhead_Rich said:
Vipers said:
Petrolhead_Rich said:
Vipers said:
Formula 1 perhaps? Just guessing.




smile
According to Top Gear Tests a "Reasonably Priced Car" (Lacetti) is faster than an F1 car off the line! Anyone remember the tests they did (in the Birmingham NEC IIRC)
Daewoo or Chevy (lacetti that is)?




smile
Think it was the Lacetti, but as I thought it was the NEC and as has been mentioned it was the Excel Center, I could be wrong.

It defiantly happened though and the normal car won!
You read the my post too quick...... was asking if it was the Daewoo, or Chevy Lacetti, both do one, guess it would be the Chevy though, maybe the 1.8 sport 0-60 9.8 seconds.




smile

Mars

8,803 posts

216 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
RedVictor. Stands a chance of being able to beat the max speed a Gatos can register within the target distance. smile

anonymous-user

56 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
er, surely, it depends on how far away you start?? Assuming the camera measures your speed "just" before you cross the first line, then if you are not speeding at this point,further accel in the zone between the "verification" lines makes no difference. Pretty fast "normal" cars can accel just about 1g for a short distance, which means over 30 would take 1.4sec and take 9.2m. So to be in any hope of tripping even a "30mph" camera, you'd have to start at least 2 car lengths away from the line!

anonymous-user

56 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
er, surely, it depends on how far away you start?? Assuming the camera measures your speed "just" before you cross the first line, then if you are not speeding at this point,further accel in the zone between the "verification" lines makes no difference. Pretty fast "normal" cars can accel just about 1g for a short distance, which means over 30 would take 1.4sec and take 9.2m. So to be in any hope of tripping even a "30mph" camera, you'd have to start at least 2 car lengths away from the line!
For a more normal car, mean accel will be closer to 0.5g (in 1st gear) and the camera will probably require 35mph to actually trigger (in a 30mph limit) this needs 3.2s of accel from rest, taking 25m distance

alfa daley

880 posts

236 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
I'm fairly sure something powerful and 4 wheel drive could get to 30+ within the white lines if starting with its nose parallel to the camera. You're talking 0-30 in 1.5ish for say a carrera 4S or impreza.

feef

5,206 posts

185 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
I'm not going to do the differential calculations to get an exact value, as I can't be arsed, so I'm assuming the gatso trips at 35mph and that if you reach 37mph by the end of the 32m. I'm also assuming uniform acceleration. Round up 37mph to 17m/s

Some basic calculations, using

a = ( Vf - Vi ) / t

and

d = (( Vf + Vi ) × t )/2

t= 2d/(vf-vi)

a= (17-0)/t

:. a= 4.5 m/s/s

So to reach 37mph from a standing start in 32m would require the acceleration of 4.5m/s/s.

That equates to a 0-100kph time of:
a=(vf-vi)/t
t=(vf-vi)/a
time = (17)/4.5 = 3.7

So theoretically, a car with a 0-60 time of 3.7s could trigger a Gatso in a built up area.

Feel free to tear my schoolboy physics to shreds smile


alfa daley

880 posts

236 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
Found vbox timing slip info for my car, gives it a 0-60ft time of 1.9s and speed at that point of 37.8mph. 60ft is 18 metres so think it's definitely possible with a good launch.

anonymous-user

56 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
But, the "speed sensing" is either inductive loop or radar, either of which operate in the zone BEFORE the camera, and must be tripped to start the 2 photo recording process. if you haven't tripped it as you cross the first line, then you can go as fast as you like towards the second line

feef

5,206 posts

185 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
But, the "speed sensing" is either inductive loop or radar, either of which operate in the zone BEFORE the camera, and must be tripped to start the 2 photo recording process. if you haven't tripped it as you cross the first line, then you can go as fast as you like towards the second line
One way to find out is to find a front facing camera and someone with a motorcycle wink

john2443

6,361 posts

213 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
Petrolhead_Rich said:
Vipers said:
Petrolhead_Rich said:
Vipers said:
Formula 1 perhaps? Just guessing.




smile
According to Top Gear Tests a "Reasonably Priced Car" (Lacetti) is faster than an F1 car off the line! Anyone remember the tests they did (in the Birmingham NEC IIRC)
Daewoo or Chevy (lacetti that is)?




smile
Think it was the Lacetti, but as I thought it was the NEC and as has been mentioned it was the Excel Center, I could be wrong.

It defiantly happened though and the normal car won!
Chevy in the Excel centre. I think the F1 car won by reaching about 80, but the Chevy got to about 70, as said above, 'cos there was very little grip so they had to be very gentle with the F1.

They said afterwards if they hadn't bothered with the F1 car they'd have held the world indoor speed record with a Chevy!

Edited - my memory had a Skoda in it, but found the vid and it was the Chevy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uG9Afp6fy0

Edited by john2443 on Monday 10th January 17:54

TTwiggy

11,574 posts

206 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
I actually think you want something very light with good traction. 0-30 being more important than 0-60.

I reckon a honda powered Elise could do it.