RE: The Auto Show We'd Pay To See

RE: The Auto Show We'd Pay To See

Friday 14th January 2011

The Auto Show We'd Pay To See

Bored by another dismal Detroit, we fire up the PH time machine...



Motown.... once, this was muscle car central, all kinds of over-powered V8s pouring from the smoking factories of Detroit in the '60s and '70s. And of course, you can still buy muscle cars from America's big three, most of them even providing suspension and brakes good enough to handle all that tyre-ripping torque. But if you're looking for fresh muscle cars at this year's Detroit Auto Show, you're in for a bit of a disappointment. True, there is the spectacularly potent Porsche 918 RSR, whose 756bhp should do the job, but this hybrid is a concept, and there's very little to excite those obsessed with laying rubber along a quarter-mile strip of North American pavement.

PH reporter Richard Bremner (Possibly)
PH reporter Richard Bremner (Possibly)
So we fired up the PH time machine, and despatched motoring scribe/bounty-hunter Richard Bremner to boldly scour the space time continuum and bring us back some trophies in the form of fabulous Detroit show debuts from yesteryear.

And here it is. Our fantasy 'all time best of Detroit Auto Show' report, stuffed with the finest American performance car launches to have graced an event that started all the way back in 1907...

Cord 812 - 1937


Voted the most beautiful American car of all time by American Heritage magazine in 1996, the front-wheel-drive, 'coffin-nosed' Cord was almost a pre-war supercar. The 1936 810 attracted more orders than an army unit going into combat, but reliability and production troubles had would-be buyers cancelling and Cord frantic to upgrade the car. The result was the 812, also available with a supercharger, but this wasn't enough to save the car, production stalling in 1937. Power came from a Lycoming 4.8-litre V8, which drove through a three-speed-plus-overdrive gearbox. Equipment included a radio, concealed headlights and variable-speed wipers, all major novelties back then.

*****

Chrysler 300-C - 1957


The 300-C is one of Chrysler's most admired cars, combining flamboyant Virgil Exner Sweptline styling with luxury and real potency. All-new Torsion-Aire suspension, under development since 1951, gave the 300-C excellent stability and considerable cornering power, although we'd probably be appalled by its bend-bashing talents today. But not its performance - in 390bhp Hemi form this was a quick car, knocking off the 0-60mph dash in 8.7sec. The 300-C was known as one of Chrysler's 'letter' cars, 300-C becoming 300-D for the '58 model year and so on. But it's the C that's considered by many to be the most desirable of them all.

*****

Chevrolet Corvette Sting Ray - 1963
Surely the best-looking Corvette ever, the '63 Sting Ray turned America's most famous two-seater into a real sports car with its mix of aggressively sensuous looks, perfect proportions and V8 firepower. The new look brought sophistication too, the separate chassis stiffer, the fibreglass body lighter but stronger, the rear suspension independently suspended and the brakes... well, new drums stopped it a little less slowly. But the most eye-catching feature of the '63 'Vette was the split rear window, a feature hated by chief engineer Zora Duntov but loved by GM design god Bill Mitchell. And gods generally prevail. In fact, it disappeared in '64, making a split-window '63 among the most prized of all Corvettes.

*****



Pontiac GTO - 1964
'RPO 382' wasn't just an option number on the 1964 Pontiac Tempest price list - it was a tick-box that started an American performance car revolution. Marking it cost $295, and saw that a 389cu in V8 would be installed in your 1964 Tempest, though that nameplate was nowhere to be seen, usurped by GTO badges. The GTO also came with stiffened suspension, a four-barrel carb, a hotter cam, a Hurst shifter, redline tyres, a pair of dummy air scoops on the bonnet - and 325bhp, which was enough power to scare its driver stupid. And so began the muscle car era, kicked off by a now-dead Pontiac.

*****


Ford Mustang - 1965
By the time the Mustang made its first appearance at the Detroit show it had already been on sale nine months and found 126,000 buyers. Ford was rushing to boost production for the car that still holds the record as the fastest-selling model of all time - during the 1965 model year, the company sold a staggering 559,451 examples. The Mustang's allure was almost entirely about styling, the original notchback and convertible amounting to little more than an inspired rebodying of the duller-than-dusting Ford Falcon. But performance was part of the appeal too, and if the base six cylinder engine offered no more than 101bhp, the famous K code 289 cu in V8 provided 271bhp. And on Mustang brakes, that was enough to give everyone a thrill.

*****

Chevrolet Camaro Z28 - 1971


The 1970s were a disastrous time for muscle cars and American cars in general. Emission regulations smothered V8s, while Detroit's stylists experimented with looks that seemed to count wheels as after-thoughts to be hidden deep in wheelarches while they figured out how much of the roof should be sheathed with vinyl. So the early second-generation Z28 Camaro was among the last, free-breathing gasps for American performance, its 360bhp V8 good for 0-60mph times of 5.8 ripping seconds. The second-generation Camaro was as handsome as the first, its appeal strong enough to allow a 12-year production run - though by then it felt about as modern as a laundry-room mangle.

*****


1987 Buick Regal Grand National
Lesser Regals, with their padded half-vinyl roofs and fake wire wheel covers it's easy to imagine crashing into shopping trolleys at the mall, piloted by bewildered octogenarians. But the Grand National, built to celebrate Buick's 1981 and '82 Manufacturers' Cup NASCAR wins, was about performance. Or was eventually; the first '82 editions issued a feeble 125bhp from their 4.1-litre V6s, although a few were turbocharged to 175bhp. But by 1986 the GN could be had with 245bhp, and 1987 saw the ultimate version, modified for Buick by our very own McLaren. Though quoted at 276bhp it actually produced more horses, and 360lb ft of torque that was guaranteed to make mess of your rear rubber.

*****

Oldsmobile Aerotech Quad-4 - 1987


This sleek record-breaking concept was really a fully clothed March racing car powered by a 1000bhp version of Oldsmobile's new Quad 4 engine, allowing the Aerotech, which cleared the ground by just 0.5 in, to hit 268mph driven by legendary Indy 500 winner A.J. Foyt, a speed dizzying enough to trigger cardiac arrest in your typical Olds driver. The new engine turned up in the rather less sexy Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme rag-top, though with a not unhelpful 250bhp, aided by a turbocharger. The Aerotech's body was carbon, it weighed just 727kg, and Oldsmobile followed up with another 4.0-litre V8 version in 1992 that set several high-speed endurance records.

*****


Dodge Viper R/T 10 Concept - 1989
By far the most exciting concept at the '89 Detroit show was the Dodge Viper R/T 10, built in part to distract cruel journalists from the full horror of the cars Dodge and Chrysler were actually selling, most of which had the sex appeal of long-johns. Chrysler president Bob Lutz described it as 'our idea of a modern-age Cobra.' It used a 400bhp V10 truck engine, a tubular chassis and composite body panels and, quipped Lutz, came with then-fashionable four-wheel steering - 'but you must steer the rear wheels with your right foot.' Lutz hinted at production, and Vipers were duly delivered to showrooms from 1992, complete with cheapo interiors, canvas roofs that blew off at speed - and masses of V10 grunt.

*****


Cadillac Sixteen - 2003
Long-bonneted and elegant in a way that Cadillacs hadn't been for decades, the 13.6-litre, 1000bhp, Sixteen was a 2003 concept intended to signal Cadillac's return to the automobile world's upper echelons. Sadly we're still waiting for a Cadillac to rival a Rolls-Royce, but the Sixteen at least proved that General Motors had rediscovered the art of designing bold cars of good taste. The huge bonnet housed the V16 implied by its name, it rode on 24-inch wheels and featured fashionable rear-hinged back doors. Pillarless side windows - just the job for a glamorous drive-by shooting - an exquisitely trimmed, hand-finished interior and an engine that looked like it could have been engineered by Bugatti made one of the most impressive American concept cars for years.

*****

Corvette ZR1 - 2009


The best-performing Corvette in almost 60 years of history, the 638bhp C6 ZR1 will get you breathless with its rubber ripping performance, the torque of its supercharged 6.2-litre V8 allowing it to run from idle in sixth gear right out to 205mph. Corvettes have always managed the going quickly bit pretty well - the trouble usually comes in corners. But not in this ZR1, whose finely balanced weight and athletic suspension do a fine job of containing all that torque unless you're a right pedal addict. Those that are will be relieved to hear that its ceramic brakes make this ZR1 a lot hotter at stopping then 'Vettes used to be.

*****

Words and research by Richard Bremner

Author
Discussion

leon9191

Original Poster:

752 posts

208 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
I didnt realise the Viper was that old, shown as a concept in 89!

However i think you might have made a few typos?

"It used a 30bhp V10 truck engine"?

"Vipers were duly delivered to showrooms from 1982"?

robinessex

11,578 posts

196 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
So, 1987, the 727kg Aerotech does 268mph, and years later the Buggati Veyron at +2000kg does 250mph. Progress? And it looks better as well.

Riggers

1,859 posts

193 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
leon9191 said:
I didnt realise the Viper was that old, shown as a concept in 89!

However i think you might have made a few typos?

"It used a 30bhp V10 truck engine"?

"Vipers were duly delivered to showrooms from 1982"?
We think Mr Bremner might have been testing us. The Viper now has a little more power... and was delivered a decade later...

In the meantime... getmecoat

vintageracer01

873 posts

190 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
One has to say: If anyone is the master of flamboyance in car design, then the Americans.

They might be not yard stick for production processes but they are ALWAYS good for some serious "kick-ass design"!

Dare to be different. - I love it.

Edited by vintageracer01 on Friday 14th January 13:12

f111lover

143 posts

208 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
A combination of beauty and beast article, some of those cars are fantastic, others are bloody horrible, obviously in my opinion only. (I hate the Stingray, worst Vett ever built IMO)

James Dean

1,372 posts

180 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
vintageracer01 said:
One has to say: If anyone is the master of flamboyance in car design, then the Americans.

They might be not yard stick for production processes but they are ALWAYS good for some serious "kick-ass design"!

Dare to be different. - I love it.

Edited by vintageracer01 on Friday 14th January 13:12
That's exactly why I love american and italian cars, there's 'drama' about them, in lack of a better word.

JJ78

68 posts

201 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
Mr Bremner has missed the pontiac firbird! Surely that deserves a mention???

Gizmo!

18,150 posts

224 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
Wow - that Aerotech... I had an Airfix one of those in about 1990. Amazing thing smile

qube_TA

8,405 posts

260 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
Always found US performance cars to be more creative to look at, many are awful sure, but they have more of a road presence and are certainly unique. The US car production history is also very interesting. I don't know if it's just because they didn't export many so seeing an American car regardless of what it was, was to me at least always an event.

I certainly miss not having one.






jamespink

1,218 posts

219 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
The Cord had a concentric supercharger mounted horisontally over the V in the block sucking through the carb. I have seen a 100% restoration of a white/red interior car in Buenos Aires that was found wrecked, sans engine. The chap not only did the whole restoration himself but tracked down the original engine that had been fitted to a speedboat in Italy. Makes tidying the scruffy bits on my car like a walk in the park. Amazing cars with great presence!

LongLiveTazio

2,714 posts

212 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
Bit weird that you only have the Cord out of all the amazing pre-war American cars, which were some of the best in the world. The fastback V-16 Cadillacs from the '30s in particular make me go a bit tingly.

Although the fact the 810 is front-wheel-drive is touched upon, its predecessor, the L-29 is significant for being the first American front-wheel-drive car and was even used as the pace-setting car for the Indy 500 of that year.

jayfish

6,795 posts

218 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
f111lover said:
A combination of beauty and beast article, some of those cars are fantastic, others are bloody horrible, obviously in my opinion only. (I hate the Stingray, worst Vett ever built IMO)
Guess that's the beauty of opinion, it's the only one I'd want smile

JohnoVR6

693 posts

227 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
Gizmo! said:
Wow - that Aerotech... I had an Airfix one of those in about 1990. Amazing thing smile
I have a matchbox model of it somewhere...I remember badgering my friend to sell it to me for 50p laugh

I was always amazed by its looks at the time, that and the back opened to show off the engine!

Twoshoe

945 posts

199 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
jayfish said:
f111lover said:
A combination of beauty and beast article, some of those cars are fantastic, others are bloody horrible, obviously in my opinion only. (I hate the Stingray, worst Vett ever built IMO)
Guess that's the beauty of opinion, it's the only one I'd want smile
+1

Oppressed Mass

217 posts

298 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
Surely from 55 -57 there should only be the iconic tri chevys - although I am obviously biased wink

RichardR

2,902 posts

283 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
If you don't want people to accuse your models of being barges, you really shouldn't equip them with sails!



rofl

bobberz

1,832 posts

214 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
One mistake I noticed: the GTO you have pictured is a '65. The '64 cars had horizontal headlights.


bobberz

1,832 posts

214 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
LongLiveTazio said:
Bit weird that you only have the Cord out of all the amazing pre-war American cars, which were some of the best in the world. The fastback V-16 Cadillacs from the '30s in particular make me go a bit tingly.

Although the fact the 810 is front-wheel-drive is touched upon, its predecessor, the L-29 is significant for being the first American front-wheel-drive car and was even used as the pace-setting car for the Indy 500 of that year.
+1

American brands like Packard, Franklin, Cord, and Pierce Arrow all made cars that at least rivaled Rolls-Royce in the 1920s-'30s, while others such as DuPont and Duesenberg make Rollers of the time look like toys!

A shame, there was a time when America had over 100 brands, but now we're down to pretty much only one true, independent American brand (Ford), one owned by the government, one owned by the Italians, and a couple upstarts like Fisker and Tesla.

The great brands not killed by the Depression (only a few), died in the '50s (Studebaker/Packard, Kaiser, Crosley, Nash).

bobberz

1,832 posts

214 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
RichardR said:
If you don't want people to accuse your models of being barges, you really shouldn't equip them with sails!



rofl
It's hilarious how stretched out cars were in American advertising of the time. Being a Mopar fan, I've seen dozens of '57 300-Cs, and they are nowhere near that large in real life! It was a common marketing strategy in America at the time to emphasize a cars' length, as newly wealthy post-war American "suburban white-picket-fence" middle class families wanted the longest cars possible, as length equated to opulence.

LongLiveTazio

2,714 posts

212 months

Friday 14th January 2011
quotequote all
bobberz said:
+1

American brands like Packard, Franklin, Cord, and Pierce Arrow all made cars that at least rivaled Rolls-Royce in the 1920s-'30s, while others such as DuPont and Duesenberg make Rollers of the time look like toys!

A shame, there was a time when America had over 100 brands, but now we're down to pretty much only one true, independent American brand (Ford), one owned by the government, one owned by the Italians, and a couple upstarts like Fisker and Tesla.

The great brands not killed by the Depression (only a few), died in the '50s (Studebaker/Packard, Kaiser, Crosley, Nash).
Absolutely. It's a real shame that representation of US brands in Britan seems confined to people who enjoy wearing bad quality leather jackets with eagles sewn onto the backs. The pre-'50s era of American car building is some of the finest, however, it isn't represented at all over here and I would guess that most people this side of the pond know little about it next to the famous Bugattis, Bentleys, Alfas etc. of the era.

I would kill just to see a Dusenberg SJ up close; I suspect I need to save up for a trip to Pebble Peach!