Poll:
Total Members Polled: 148
Discussion
dibbers006 said:
kambites said:
Why are Mazda in with Honda?
If I have grossly mis-generalised a 'Build Quality' group could you elaborate why you feel so.Edited by kambites on Wednesday 19th January 11:47
Wheres the Alfa option 
FWIW I chose, Volvo, Ford/Vauxhall and Honda & co.
My parents have always had Vauxhalls, they run them into the ground, and generally we see well over 100k miles before the big bills start coming in. I have had a few fords, and they have generally been very reliable and cheep to fix.
I have never owned a Volvo but I believe from owners that they are very reliable workhorses and take a lot of abuse, seeing high mileages before the big bills start coming again. They also have a nice solid feel to them, and have lovely interiors.
Meh. Its all personal opinion at the end of the day though.
FWIW I chose, Volvo, Ford/Vauxhall and Honda & co.
My parents have always had Vauxhalls, they run them into the ground, and generally we see well over 100k miles before the big bills start coming in. I have had a few fords, and they have generally been very reliable and cheep to fix.
I have never owned a Volvo but I believe from owners that they are very reliable workhorses and take a lot of abuse, seeing high mileages before the big bills start coming again. They also have a nice solid feel to them, and have lovely interiors.
Meh. Its all personal opinion at the end of the day though.
I voted Honda/Nissan/Mazda.
Every time I get in one of their taxis I am amazed at the ride/rattlefreeness compared to the intergalactic mileage.
Anything VAG simply can't compare, plus I've just had yet another oil pump go on a VW 2.0TDi PoS at work. Bloody things.
PS I think Toyota should be grouped with Honda/Nissan/Mazda.
Every time I get in one of their taxis I am amazed at the ride/rattlefreeness compared to the intergalactic mileage.
Anything VAG simply can't compare, plus I've just had yet another oil pump go on a VW 2.0TDi PoS at work. Bloody things.
PS I think Toyota should be grouped with Honda/Nissan/Mazda.
dibbers006 said:
RicksAlfas said:
PS I think Toyota should be grouped with Honda/Nissan/Mazda
I'm not sure if I can edit and retain the votes?Why would you suggest a notable difference between Honda/Nissan/Mazda and Subaru/Mitsubishi?
I didn't know if you were keeping Subaru and Mitsubishi seperate as they were more sporting/leftfield.
I think you could have just put all the Japanese in together really.
Where's the Fiat/Lancia/Alfa option?
Utterly misleading poll and therefore pointless.
My VW had the best interior. Yet it was the least reliable car I've ever owned.
My Subaru had the worst interior. Yet it was bullet proof mechanically.
Ask a more specific question: Which car has the best interior? Which car has the most reliable mechanics? Totally different.
My VW had the best interior. Yet it was the least reliable car I've ever owned.
My Subaru had the worst interior. Yet it was bullet proof mechanically.
Ask a more specific question: Which car has the best interior? Which car has the most reliable mechanics? Totally different.
kambites said:
dibbers006 said:
kambites said:
Why are Mazda in with Honda?
If I have grossly mis-generalised a 'Build Quality' group could you elaborate why you feel so.Edited by kambites on Wednesday 19th January 11:47
te too (although that's more to do with their dealers than the car)
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff