Big engine, low spec - where have you gone?
Big engine, low spec - where have you gone?
Author
Discussion

HellDiver

Original Poster:

5,708 posts

198 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Still looking for a new(ish) car, and was just thinking that you used to be able to buy low spec cars with the higher powered engines.

Say, a Mk3 Mondeo LX with the 2.5V6, Mk4 Astra Envoy with the 2.2 petrol, etc? All rare but obtainable in the past.

Now it seems you're stuck with buying the top spec to get a "decent" engine, and all the low spec cars have the hairdrier engines.

I don't care about spec, I just want a reasonably quick engine, good brakes, a seat and steering wheel. I don't need 300kg of pointless electric gubbins weighing the car down.

Does anyone make pauper spec with sleeper engines now?

T16OLE

2,960 posts

207 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
American cars I suppose

Dracoro

8,912 posts

261 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
What car has 300kg worth of electrical gubbins? eek

People want economy. Those that can afford the running costs on bigger engines want the luxuries to make up for it biggrin

For example, I've had 2 Omegas, one base spec (GLS) and currently a top spec (Elite). Both had the same engine and there's pretty much nothing in it between them (negligible weight difference etc.), however the Elite is a much much nicer place to be in.

HellDiver

Original Poster:

5,708 posts

198 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Dracoro said:
What car has 300kg worth of electrical gubbins? eek
Add electric motorised seats, leather, climate control, electric windows all round, sunroof, it soon mounts up. Maybe 300kg was a bit excessive, it was just a figure pulled from the air.

mnkiboy

4,409 posts

182 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Don't Audi still do every trim level available with (almost) every engine?

I'm sure you could get a 3.2 A3 in base spec, but because everyone went for S-Line spec you probably won't find many 2nd hand.

Dracoro

8,912 posts

261 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
HellDiver said:
Dracoro said:
What car has 300kg worth of electrical gubbins? eek
Add electric motorised seats, leather, climate control, electric windows all round, sunroof, it soon mounts up. Maybe 300kg was a bit excessive, it was just a figure pulled from the air.
You mean, just like my Elite has that the GLS didn't?

Of course the GLS was lighter (65kg difference) but in that type of car, I doubt you'll notice that much difference. Besides, in that type of car, the luxuries go a long way towards making it a more pleasurable car to drive.

Edited by Dracoro on Thursday 24th February 13:36

morgrp

4,128 posts

214 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
I think it has a lot to do with british importers speccing up cars to British taste. And giving better deals to a customer buying a car from this stock rather than having a car specially ordered. I have a volvo 850 t5 S which is basically the most powerful engine in the lowest spec of car. Back in those days certainly with Volvo you would buy the engine and the spec of the car separately so you could have a top spec cd model with a 2.0litre 10valve engine or a poverty spec s trim model with a hot 20v t5 engine - shame really as perversely Im actually a fan of the big engine minimal spec cars

b4bby

267 posts

204 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
The only ones that spring to mind would be ex police cars, but i doubt you will get a nearly new one.

SteveS Cup

1,996 posts

176 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Yes Audi.

As said before, you can choose any engine on any spec on the ones I've looked at.

Mustardo

95 posts

174 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Probably as it goes against what will re-sell. I think you're the only person who wants such a thing, no sorry i know you're the only one. A dealer would heavily de-value a big engined car with a low spec. Think about it...

SteveS Cup

1,996 posts

176 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
I must admit, I think most company's are missing a trick only offering top sep / styling on the bigger engined cars.

Audi, you can get a 1.2 A1 in S Line spec. There must be a huge market for this.

I've never heard of anyone wanting a big engined barge without toys!

Sod it, buy an XJR and strip it? Rip out all the lovely leather n wood, stick in some Recaro's and you have a tool.

briSk

14,291 posts

242 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
it's not even 'big cars'.

why do i have to have auto frigging wipers/lights/...?
I have got fingers.

Why do i have to have 'sporty fog lights'?

Why do I have to have 'milanese style couture bodystyling'?

when you useless effing car manufactureres can;t give me heated washer jets, brakes that're sufficient for the car's performance, a spare frigging wheel (let alone one that's the right effing size).

About the only thing i can think of that's kind of getting there is the 335i. and even then you have to have SE spec which no doubt aloows me to illuminate puddles, make one corner of the car cooler than another, change the colour of the lights in the clocks...

hehe

LuS1fer

42,692 posts

261 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
You can still get V8 Mustangs in base spec but think about it - Corvette have offered a humungous engine in a great chassis for many years at a bargain basement price and what is the first thing people always moan about? The interior.

Personally, I prefer a car with a big engine and no mod cons. I don't want i-drive, sat-nav and don't need electric seats. I have found that I DO need a/c with a big engine but can make do without the rest 9albeit electric windows etc seem to be standard on American cars who, unlike Ford UK, are not scabby with the standard spec.

briSk

14,291 posts

242 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
You can still get V8 Mustangs in base spec but think about it - Corvette have offered a humungous engine in a great chassis for many years at a bargain basement price and what is the first thing people always moan about? The interior.
aha but i think what a lot of people (well me anyway) is something that's built well (aka perceived as much as actual fall apartness). so like olde worlde (1980s.90s) german stuff. it's the trinkty tat that bores not fundamental quality.

i mean nowadays you can go into a menu on a daft screen and choose, from 7 different options, how high you want the bootlid to lift when it automatically opens for you (FFS). i want 300bhp and 40mpg and a 10 year easy life. spend the r&d money here please!

boredofmyoldname

22,655 posts

215 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
I have seen a few LX and zetec mondeos with the 2.2 tdci engine, not massive but a reasonable amount of power for a dull looking car.

edo

16,699 posts

281 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Big engine. Low Spec.




HellDiver

Original Poster:

5,708 posts

198 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Mustardo said:
I think you're the only person who wants such a thing, no sorry i know you're the only one.
Really? Funny, there's at least one other in this thread alone that agrees with me.

T16OLE

2,960 posts

207 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Why would you not want a low spec over a high spec?


HellDiver

Original Poster:

5,708 posts

198 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
briSk said:
when you useless effing car manufactureres can;t give me heated washer jets, brakes that're sufficient for the car's performance, a spare frigging wheel (let alone one that's the right effing size).
See Mitsubishi. They sell a tonne-and-a-half Lancer with a 140hp diesel engine, then sell you a factory remap to 170hp, and then have the cheek to fit it with 272mm front discs.

Then they go and release the Lancer Ralliart, 200+hp petrol turbo, still the same stty brakes that melt the second time you use them.

My old astra had bigger REAR discs than the Lancer Ralliart.

michaelfenton

235 posts

178 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
I just got me a second-hand 2006 A4 with a 2.0 turbo engine in it. Awesome car, but it has no s-line kit, tiny 16-inch wheels that barely clear the brakes and useless base-spec seats. It's kinda curious to me because every other one i've seen is either quattro or has the s-line kit! The original buyer obviously had the cash to only opt for one or the other - bigger engine or s-line kit. I know which one i'd go for!