RE: Subaru Shows Sports Car "Architecture Concept"
Wednesday 2nd March 2011
Expect it to use a 2.0-litre boxer motor, non-turbocharged. And there probably won't be an STI version either: Subaru wants to keep that badge for a pure Subaru model line, such as the Impreza.
Subaru Shows Sports Car 'Architecture Concept'
Toyota's FT-86 looks ready, but Subaru's version remains a mystery
While Toyota grabs the headlines with its second-generation of the FT-86 concept, Subaru has, er, a glass model that doesn't really depict what its version of the shared sports coupe project will look like at all...
In fact, apart from the general dimensions of the car, the only real significance of this unveil is the visual proof that Subaru's version of the car will be rear wheel drive - and how the drivetrain layout actually looks.
This is a shame: while Toyota bathes in the generated excitement, Subaru admits that its more meagre budget is being spent on actually engineering the thing. The firm is leading the partnership, and it will be building the different cars for both companies as well.
What we do know is that the Subaru version will be resolutely aimed at the mainstream: the firm (like Toyota) is convinced that there's a market for what it calls an 'affordable' car that's fun to drive.
Expect it to use a 2.0-litre boxer motor, non-turbocharged. And there probably won't be an STI version either: Subaru wants to keep that badge for a pure Subaru model line, such as the Impreza.
Discussion
Am I missing something here, or am I right in saying the article has missed the point? The point of the sports car "architecture" is that it's just that ... the architecture (ie. chassis, engine, suspension).
It's not meant to have a body because it's not a car, it's a platform.
It's not meant to have a body because it's not a car, it's a platform.
Edited by JTeb on Wednesday 2nd March 09:29
JTeb said:
Am I missing something here, or am I right in saying the article has missed the point? The point of the sports car "architecture" is that it's just that ... the architecture (ie. chassis, engine, suspension).
It's not meant to have a body because it's not a car, it's a platform.
The point is, we'd hoped they'd be a bit further along with it by now... It's not meant to have a body because it's not a car, it's a platform.
Edited by JTeb on Wednesday 2nd March 09:29

Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff







(much like Mitsubishi had with the Evo)