Reccommend me an estate
Reccommend me an estate
Author
Discussion

DBSV8

Original Poster:

5,958 posts

255 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
Time has come to look at replacing the 98 Honda Accord areodeck 2.3 ES, With another Estate

The Honda has been a great workhorse , full leather interior , AC and very generous bootspace ,down side its not very powerfull 160 hp , and not very frugal returning about 23 mpg

Any reccomendations for replacement , will definitely not go French or Volvo route any suggestions.
Ideally with Leather interior , Sat Nav , Automatic ( for wife )

Some I looked at:

2010 Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 5-Door 1956 cc 2.0 JTDM 16v TI

39 mpg , luggage capacity 445/1235





2010 Audi A4 Avant 1798 cc 1.8 T FSI (160 PS) S-Line Avant
30mpg , luggage capacity 490/1430




2009 Bmw 520d M-Sport Touring [Sat Nav + PDC]
42 mpg , luggage capacity 500/1650



2010 Honda Accord 2199 cc Type-S
38mpg, luggage capacity 406/1183





Edited by DBSV8 on Friday 4th March 07:31

smifffymoto

5,131 posts

222 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
I changed from a thirsty Subaru Outback to a very frugal VW Passat Bluemotion(105 hp)
I really wanted another Outback but the exchange rate made them very expensive for what you get.Now I've lived with the Passat for 6 months I feel I made the right decision,It's comfortable,roomy and very frugal.

The only time I will miss the Outback is when the wife drives into a snowbank or off the road and we haven't got 4WD.

fathomfive

10,620 posts

207 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
The new Skoda Superb estate is apparently very good.

lowdrag

13,113 posts

230 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
Everything I read says the Mondeo is a damn good buy, especially second hand, but they seem expensive for the "lower class" image.

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/search/used/cars/merce...


No one's mentioned the C class Merc, and while mine is old (11 years) I've spent £1,500 on it in repairs (aircon compressor and two front springs) over 130,000 excluding the usual consumables. Used ones are fetching as low as £16,000 for the new model with not much mileage. Manuals, if that is what you are looking for, fetch not as much as the autos. According to the Honest John road test, they seem "good for a million miles".

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/search/used/cars/merce...

I'd avoid the Alfa based on their reputation, and whether to go petrol or diesel would depend on the mileage. With the new particulate filters lower mileage drivers are now recommended to buy petrol, and the fuel consumption isn't that much different these days.

ETA - didn't notice the auto requirement at first.

Edited by lowdrag on Friday 4th March 08:12

sicarumba

409 posts

180 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
This one even has somewhere to tie your dog!


WildCards

4,061 posts

234 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
FiL has the new Accord and while it's a lovely car, the boot isn't very big, certainly not compared to the BMW and Audi you've also mentioned.

rob.e

2,862 posts

295 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
Octavia vrs estate?

Mine's doing about 33mpg combined and i drive it pretty hard. It has a 600 litre boot (seats up) which is bigger than an A6. Drives well (mk5 golf GTI chassis) and nice vag standard interior quality.

You can buy new right now with the dealer paying your vat (ie 20% discount straight off before any haggle) or drivethedeal from about 16k.



More info on my car here.

DBSV8

Original Poster:

5,958 posts

255 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
rob.e said:
Octavia vrs estate?

Mine's doing about 33mpg combined and i drive it pretty hard. It has a 600 litre boot (seats up) which is bigger than an A6. Drives well (mk5 golf GTI chassis) and nice vag standard interior quality.

You can buy new right now with the dealer paying your vat (ie 20% discount straight off before any haggle) or drivethedeal from about 16k.



More info on my car here.
thats got a massive boot , but I cant see any options for full leather interior , is this option available ?

y2blade

56,246 posts

232 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
DBSV8 said:
2010 Honda Accord 2199 cc Type-S
38mpg, luggage capacity 406/1183





Edited by DBSV8 on Friday 4th March 07:31
I like that yes I see one most days on my commute..lovely looking car

Mr Roper

13,701 posts

211 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
Have you considered the Alpina D3 Bi Turbo Estate??

Have you?


Have you?

smile


doodles19

2,201 posts

190 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
C class estate is lovely imo.

Shaw Tarse

31,817 posts

220 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
DBSV8 said:
thats got a massive boot , but I cant see any options for full leather interior , is this option available ?
I'd have thought so.

rob.e

2,862 posts

295 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
DBSV8 said:
rob.e said:
Octavia vrs estate?

Mine's doing about 33mpg combined and i drive it pretty hard. It has a 600 litre boot (seats up) which is bigger than an A6. Drives well (mk5 golf GTI chassis) and nice vag standard interior quality.

You can buy new right now with the dealer paying your vat (ie 20% discount straight off before any haggle) or drivethedeal from about 16k.



More info on my car here.
thats got a massive boot , but I cant see any options for full leather interior , is this option available ?
Yep, full black leather is a factory option @ £850 IIRC.

I'm not bothered by leather so I didn't tick that box. It has half leather/alcantara as standard anyway which I prefer.

I looked at all the cars you mentioned above. In my view nothing comes close to the "value for money" you get with the skoda: my priorities in order - price, space, performance, handling, ride and finally image. If you put image as the top of the list you won't buy a skoda, but if you can look beyond the badge the other cars can't touch it.

All IMHO of course.

smile

Bill

56,093 posts

272 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
rob.e said:
Octavia vrs estate?
I'm surprised at what you're saying about the boot size, I'd have thought it would match the A4 rather than A6. Certainly when I looked a few (6 or so IIRC) years ago I considered it a small estate.

And why did you choose the Octavia over the Superb?

jamieboy

5,919 posts

246 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
lowdrag said:
I'd avoid the Alfa based on their reputation
...whereas I wouldn't avoid them, based on owning several for many years, including a 159 Sportwagon. hehe

Downsides of the 159 are that it's not very big inside compared to the outside size, the lip on the estate bit is quite high, and the DPF means the diesels aren't that economical.

No problem with the Skoda image, but I looked at the Octavia vRS (although it may have been previous generation, July '08) and thought the interior was a bit cheap-and-cheerful, even for the price, and the seats weren't great although much better than the non-vRS.

Raize

1,476 posts

196 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
Some sort of BMW.

Efbe

9,251 posts

183 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
jamieboy said:
lowdrag said:
I'd avoid the Alfa based on their reputation
...whereas I wouldn't avoid them, based on owning several for many years, including a 159 Sportwagon. hehe

Downsides of the 159 are that it's not very big inside compared to the outside size, the lip on the estate bit is quite high, and the DPF means the diesels aren't that economical.

No problem with the Skoda image, but I looked at the Octavia vRS (although it may have been previous generation, July '08) and thought the interior was a bit cheap-and-cheerful, even for the price, and the seats weren't great although much better than the non-vRS.
alfas reputation of breaking just means they depreciate faster.

beat the idiots and buy one 3/4 years old. depreciation done, and you're laughing.

By far and away the best looking of all the cars above. A bit different, you won't get lumped into the audi/bmw driver category, and gorgeous inside.

rob.e

2,862 posts

295 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
I just put a DSG Vrs petrol estate into drivethedeal.com and ticked the full leather option and columbus sat nav as per your original post.

OTR its £20,432 which is a saving of £4,472 vs. list.

So, comparing to the alfa above (for example) its only another £600 more but it'd be a new car, 11 plate zero miles. Skoda is faster, bigger boot plus at that price it has nav too which the alfa does not.

If you ditch the nav (£1,600) and get a top of the range tom tom at 250 quid you'd be cheaper than that used alfa.

Alfa does look good though.. smile wins on mpg too but then that's not really fair as its a diesel. The vrs diesel would be comparable though..

Food for thought?

rob.e

2,862 posts

295 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
Bill said:
rob.e said:
Octavia vrs estate?
I'm surprised at what you're saying about the boot size, I'd have thought it would match the A4 rather than A6. Certainly when I looked a few (6 or so IIRC) years ago I considered it a small estate.

And why did you choose the Octavia over the Superb?
Yep, I can fully understand this - when I started looking I was amazed that the a4 boot was less than 500 litres - the others above are not much better either. Given the octavia is golf 5 chassis its pretty clever they've managed to get so much space in the back. For the record, the A6 boot is 565 litres.

Why octavia vs. superb? Simple - you can't buy a "Vrs" spec Superb. Boot isn't massively bigger either (Superb estate 633 litres, Octavia estate 605 litres - figures from comcar) plus the OP is coming from an Accord aerodeck which is more similar in size to the octavia. The superb is great and wins hands down if you need big boot AND massive rear leg room, but given that the OP is looking at A4's and 159's I'm guessing this isn't on his list of requirements?

smile