How short a regular journey is bad for your engine?
How short a regular journey is bad for your engine?
Author
Discussion

bonesX

Original Poster:

902 posts

197 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
My commute is a 4.5 mile rural run, made 4 times a day (lunchbreak nip home).

Are there any negatives associated with this type of engine use?

Mornings the engine sees 3K max rpm. Lunchtime/evening I open her up if I can

Car: '96 Scooby Sti

HellDiver

5,708 posts

199 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
Jeesh, mine's 1.1 miles each way. Yes, I'm THAT lazy.

bonesX

Original Poster:

902 posts

197 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
Yeah, the crank dropped a couple of years ago ;-)

How regular is regular?

nonuts

15,855 posts

246 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
Wow, I hope you do lots of long journeys too, your oil will NEVER be getting warm doing those sorts of journeys = very bad for car!

collateral

7,238 posts

235 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
Getting on it in a turbo might make the oil warm more quickly scratchchin

Wonder if people have had warranty claims rejected due to 'you didn't drive it far enough'. Sounds iffy, although I remember there was something a while ago about VAG DPFs clogging up

nonuts

15,855 posts

246 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
collateral said:
Getting on it in a turbo might make the oil warm more quickly scratchchin
hehe

I can just picture that ending well.

jonstable

2,828 posts

230 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
HellDiver said:
Jeesh, mine's 1.1 miles each way. Yes, I'm THAT lazy.

You're not the only one biggrin I could cycle or walk, but quite frankly have no desire to tackle a big hill after a days work!

Blown2CV

29,948 posts

220 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
Not sure if this applies but it always springs to mind when people talk of the short journeys thing. Short journeys aren't bad for your engine, it is just that longer journeys include a portion where there is less wear on the engine, ASWELL as the portion that is bad for your engine. You won't incur less engine wear by driving an extra few miles. If you only drive your car a few miles each day that is no worse than a guy who drives his car a lot more each day (arguably, it is slightly better). The only guy who needs to be wary is the guy you sell the car to, as unless he checks, he could be a buying a car that for a given mileage has been used for a low number long journeys or lots of short ones, and as such the wear would be a lot worse on the latter.

Now gunning it from cold - that is an entirely different thing, and this is not a short journey thing at all.

RobM77

35,349 posts

251 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
It's obviously a sliding scale. Engine wear is affected by many things, and factored in will be the proportion of your mileage done with sub-optimal temperature oil. Therefore, if you're regularly doing 4.5 mile journeys then a much greater percentage of your engine's life will have been with cold oil than, for example, someone who only ever gets in his car and drives 50 mile trips. Cars are meant for using though, and they generally are pretty tough these days, so I wouldn't worry about it unless it's a highly strung sports car with a tuned engine. Keeping the stress on the engine low is a great way to alleviate the problems, so small throttle openings and low revs is a good idea when you're running cold.

TheEnd

15,370 posts

205 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
collateral said:
Getting on it in a turbo might make the oil warm more quickly scratchchin

Wonder if people have had warranty claims rejected due to 'you didn't drive it far enough'. Sounds iffy, although I remember there was something a while ago about VAG DPFs clogging up
That gets quite a few other manufacturers with DPFs also.
I'm not sure if anyone had to sign a contract to say that they won't drive it around towns in traffic, or explained to them that it has great fuel economy, but every couple of weeks you need to drive it up and down a motorway in 4th gear to fix it.

J-Tuner

2,855 posts

260 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
I've been doing a 4 mile journey each way to the station for years - Not seen any evidence to suggest its harming the engine. Its hard to tell what the oils temp is though. Heater matrix is red hot so its certainly on the way to being fully warmed up. I generally make a point of not revving past 4k for the journey.

Scottish_ninja

370 posts

203 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
Blown2CV said:
Not sure if this applies but it always springs to mind when people talk of the short journeys thing. Short journeys aren't bad for your engine, it is just that longer journeys include a portion where there is less wear on the engine, ASWELL as the portion that is bad for your engine. You won't incur less engine wear by driving an extra few miles. If you only drive your car a few miles each day that is no worse than a guy who drives his car a lot more each day (arguably, it is slightly better). The only guy who needs to be wary is the guy you sell the car to, as unless he checks, he could be a buying a car that for a given mileage has been used for a low number long journeys or lots of short ones, and as such the wear would be a lot worse on the latter.

Now gunning it from cold - that is an entirely different thing, and this is not a short journey thing at all.
Nail on head.

pilchardthecat

7,483 posts

196 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
I utterly shagged a 330d by driving < 2miles to work every day for 18 months (and i used to pop home at lunch time hehe )

(When I bought it i was driving 170 miles a day)

ukzz4iroc

3,423 posts

191 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
Most harm will be done on things like exhaust back boxes as they just fill up with unburnt fuel and rust inside out.

Simbu

1,859 posts

191 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
ukzz4iroc said:
Most harm will be done on things like exhaust back boxes as they just fill up with unburnt fuel and rust inside out.
Shirley you mean water vapour from burnt fuel condensing on a cold exhaust, and the water rusts the exhaust inside out?

hairyben

8,516 posts

200 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
collateral said:
Getting on it in a turbo might make the oil warm more quickly scratchchin

Wonder if people have had warranty claims rejected due to 'you didn't drive it far enough'. Sounds iffy, although I remember there was something a while ago about VAG DPFs clogging up
Well, mercedes can tell from a recoded mileage of 12k in 2 years that the premature battery failure was due to me "not driving it properly". Oh, and they could tell I hadn't carried out the "special battery maintenance" either, which is hardly suprising given they couldn't tell me what it was, or point me to it in the servicing instruction etc....

~
Actually an issue I'm worried about myself now- recently I've been making a number of 1 mile journeys on a cold engine (modern TD)

ukzz4iroc

3,423 posts

191 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
Simbu said:
Shirley you mean water vapour from burnt fuel condensing on a cold exhaust, and the water rusts the exhaust inside out?
Aii that's the one smile In my IROC probably unburnt fuel more so smile

TheEnd

15,370 posts

205 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
ukzz4iroc said:
Simbu said:
Shirley you mean water vapour from burnt fuel condensing on a cold exhaust, and the water rusts the exhaust inside out?
Aii that's the one smile In my IROC probably unburnt fuel more so smile
I remember seeing a lot of town cars (often Rover 214s) that would spit out a good cupful of water at junctions and roundabouts from lots of small journeys.
They must had had litres of water inside the silencer.

RobM77

35,349 posts

251 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
TheEnd said:
I remember seeing a lot of town cars (often Rover 214s) that would spit out a good cupful of water at junctions and roundabouts from lots of small journeys.
They must had had litres of water inside the silencer.
Or possibly an incontinent mouse wink

kambites

69,911 posts

238 months

Monday 7th March 2011
quotequote all
As above. Apart from rusting the exhaust, I'm not convinced that short journeys actually do more damage than long ones, rather the opposite in fact. Obviously they do more damage per mile, but I can't see why a one mile trip is any worse in terms of wear than the first mile of a 100 mile trip.