Does anyone believe these performance stats?
Does anyone believe these performance stats?
Author
Discussion

Streetrod

Original Poster:

6,483 posts

235 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
Pulled this off another site, I am having troble with the numbers quoted, what do you folks think?


[quote]Here is the first exclusive look at the 3rd production Hennesey VENOM GT, built for a client of Hennesey's in Europe. For all the latest VENOM GT details check the dedicated web page here VenomGT.com | The Official Website of the Hennessey Venom GT
[B]
A quick review of the Venom's stats:[/B]

[LIST]
[*]0 – 60 mph 2.5 sec.
[*] 1/4 Mile 9.9 sec. @ 162 mph
[*]0 – 200 mph 15.9 sec. (Bugatti Veyron = 24.2 sec.)
[*]Top Speed 267 mph
[/LIST]
















[/quote]

HowMuchLonger

3,041 posts

222 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
More power, less weight, so why not.

This is ignoring the usual Hennessey is a con artist/ the engine will blow up thought proccess

kambites

71,474 posts

250 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
As above, from what I've read it might do it once but I wouldn't expect any kind of reliability.

eldar

25,274 posts

225 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
0-160 in 9.9secs is seriously quick.

I'm not convinced that all the figures are right, at least with road legal tyres.

V8mate

45,899 posts

218 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
HowMuchLonger said:
More power, less weight, so why not.
What? 267mph?

garrykiller

5,670 posts

187 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
eek

hairykrishna

14,495 posts

232 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
On slicks maybe. 267 seems ambitious too - where are they going to do that?

MarkRSi

5,782 posts

247 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
probably some random value plucked from thin air said:
Top Speed 267 mph
Okay, go for it smile

mkopc

1,998 posts

231 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
267mph in a stretched Exige. I suspect that is highly optimistic.

Pints

18,451 posts

223 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
On paper? Possibly.
In reality? Not a chance.

mikearwas

1,118 posts

188 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
eldar said:
0-160 in 9.9secs is seriously quick.

I'm not convinced that all the figures are right, at least with road legal tyres.
That is stupid performance, utterly mad and utterly wonderful. Will wait to see it done before believing it though.

kambites

71,474 posts

250 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
mkopc said:
267mph in a stretched Exige. I suspect that is highly optimistic.
I don't think the chassis is particular relevant to top speed. The Exige/Elise shape actually generates mildly negative lift and speed, so stability shouldn't be too much of an issue with a few tweeks and the frontal area is small enough to make the speed plausible if the engine really generates that much power. To me the acceleration figures seem more optimistic than the top speed.

tim2100

6,288 posts

286 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
1200bhp

1220 Kg.

No Price.

nicky.mattsson

2,639 posts

229 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
mkopc said:
267mph in a stretched Exige. I suspect that is highly optimistic.
I knew it looked familiar, excuse me for being an idiot/being a bit behind the times but is it based on an Exige in anyway or is it a shameless copy? paperbag



kambites

71,474 posts

250 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
nicky.mattsson said:
I knew it looked familiar, excuse me for being an idiot/being a bit behind the times but is it based on an Exige in anyway or is it a shameless copy? paperbag
I believe it's a modified version of the Elise/Exige tub.

Jimmyarm

1,962 posts

207 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all

This is RWD right ?

How on earth do you get 1200bhp down to get a 2.5s 0-60 in a lightweight rwd car ?

Sounds like simulation figures ?

tim2100

6,288 posts

286 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
nicky.mattsson said:
I knew it looked familiar, excuse me for being an idiot/being a bit behind the times but is it based on an Exige in anyway or is it a shameless copy? paperbag
I believe it's a modified version of the Elise/Exige tub.
Hennessey Website said:
Note: The Hennessey Venom GT design is based on the Lotus Elise / Exige. The Venom GT is created from a base Lotus Elise / Exige and utilizes components including but not limited to the roof, doors, side glass, windscreen, dash, cockpit, floorpan, HVAC system, wiper and head lamps. Hennessey Performance and the Venom GT are not associated with Lotus Cars.

nicky.mattsson

2,639 posts

229 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
Cheers, from a very lazy internetist thumbup

kambites

71,474 posts

250 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
tim2100 said:
kambites said:
nicky.mattsson said:
I knew it looked familiar, excuse me for being an idiot/being a bit behind the times but is it based on an Exige in anyway or is it a shameless copy? paperbag
I believe it's a modified version of the Elise/Exige tub.
Hennessey Website said:
Note: The Hennessey Venom GT design is based on the Lotus Elise / Exige. The Venom GT is created from a base Lotus Elise / Exige and utilizes components including but not limited to the roof, doors, side glass, windscreen, dash, cockpit, floorpan, HVAC system, wiper and head lamps. Hennessey Performance and the Venom GT are not associated with Lotus Cars.
eek If that roof is really an Exige one and there is nothing structural above the sills, I really don't like to think how that will handle. That chassis wasn't built to take that weight or that power.

Diabolik

1,222 posts

190 months

Thursday 10th March 2011
quotequote all
Disregarding those not so believable specs, I reckon that looks awesome!