Ouch £33K insurance for a corsa ....
Ouch £33K insurance for a corsa ....
Author
Discussion

Kaelic

Original Poster:

2,720 posts

230 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2011
quotequote all

Bit of a mental quote from the AA

but £6K being the cheapest too

http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s...


am kinda dreading my renewal next month lol!

jr123

3,383 posts

193 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2011
quotequote all
Kaelic said:
Bit of a mental quote from the AA

but £6K being the cheapest too

http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s...


am kinda dreading my renewal next month lol!
ASDA quoted me £18,000 on a £900 1.4 Almera

kambites

71,462 posts

250 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2011
quotequote all
I fail to see the problem, really. A 33k quote just means "sod off, we don't want to insure you". Insurance companies have used this method for years.

Jasandjules

72,588 posts

258 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
I fail to see the problem, really. A 33k quote just means "sod off, we don't want to insure you". Insurance companies have used this method for years.
^ This. When I was 18 the insurance company just kept telling me "that'll be 10k" no matter what car I asked them to quote on - I took the hint and went elsewhere....

blambert

107 posts

189 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2011
quotequote all
My 182 is with Flux at £1220.

On confused.com, similar quotes come up and then devolve into the £8-9k area. Its not about risk or cost or anything, just those companies have made a decision to avoid people like me. Same thing with the 30k quote!

Kaelic

Original Poster:

2,720 posts

230 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2011
quotequote all
only had the subject brought to my attention as I nearly ran a granada news crew down while turning into the company car park biggrin

They are out there interviewing the poor lad as we speak!


ZOLLAR

19,920 posts

202 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
I fail to see the problem, really. A 33k quote just means "sod off, we don't want to insure you". Insurance companies have used this method for years.
yes

Scraggles

7,619 posts

253 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2011
quotequote all
suspect some of the chavs and other dim folk might think that they cant get insurance and decide not to bother, the Caravan Using Nomadic Travelling Scumbags never bother to insure as they have no address to send the insurance to

Shaw Tarse

31,887 posts

232 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2011
quotequote all
ZOLLAR said:
kambites said:
I fail to see the problem, really. A 33k quote just means "sod off, we don't want to insure you". Insurance companies have used this method for years.
yes
Why wouldn't they want to insure him?
Age
Type of car
Address

ZOLLAR

19,920 posts

202 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2011
quotequote all
Shaw Tarse said:
ZOLLAR said:
kambites said:
I fail to see the problem, really. A 33k quote just means "sod off, we don't want to insure you". Insurance companies have used this method for years.
yes
Why wouldn't they want to insure him?
Age
Type of car
Address
The AA have a list of insurers which all probably cover most aspect of the market, not all of them are likely to cover under 25's so would quote a high premium just to put him off them.

ZesPak

26,093 posts

225 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2011
quotequote all
Isn't this a never-ending story, based on numbers?

How many have an insurance on their parents?
How many of that have accidents?

Lets put this into numbers:
Take 90 are "piggybacking" their insurance.
10 are "for real"
So the insurance company don't have any number on how many are actually driving the cars they insure.

Then 10 get a serious accident (eg totalling the other car, worth about 25-30k), and claim their insurance (only 1 of them was insured on his own account).

Now, according to the numbers, does that mean that 100% of the sub-twenty year olds have a crash?

So, when you ask for a claim, they just say: you're going to crash into a 30k car, so you better pay it up front?

Hence creating a downward spiral?

That said, I think the AA are no good in this article:
“The quote he received is clearly ridiculous and this should not have happened. For that I apologise."

“Historically, we have always asked our insurers to quote as often as possible so that we can, if necessary, offer appropriate terms for our customers."

That's all very nice, but if that claim was ridiculous and shouldn't have happened, what would be your valid claim? I don't see it mentioned in the article...

poo at Paul's

14,610 posts

204 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2011
quotequote all
I suppose since Charlie Sheen went mental and there is a threat to his show, money may be becoming abit tight?

dave9

579 posts

191 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2011
quotequote all
people always complain like the article in thisismoney where he has just written off his car and he is baulking at the 24k cost to insure his volvo at age 18.

its that much for a reason sadly.

Ian974

3,201 posts

228 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2011
quotequote all
I'm renewing my insurance, I'm fairly sure the most expensive on a comparison site would be ridiculous, stop the press rolleyes

southpaw

5,999 posts

254 months

Tuesday 22nd March 2011
quotequote all
What a non-story - everyone knows this already!