Secs sells
Author
Discussion

isee

Original Poster:

3,713 posts

212 months

Tuesday 29th March 2011
quotequote all
Seen a billboard or two with something that looked like a chinese knockoff of the smart roadster.

The first thing that came into my mind is that the slogan and the body are promising something that they can't deliver.

so two questions:

1. what was it?
2. what is the 0-60 times ont he top engine?

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 29th March 2011
quotequote all
isee said:
Seen a billboard or two with something that looked like a chinese knockoff of the smart roadster.

The first thing that came into my mind is that the slogan and the body are promising something that they can't deliver.

so two questions:

1. what was it?
2. what is the 0-60 times ont he top engine?
Its the Renault wind, and the 'secs' reference is about the roof speed wink not 0-60.

isee

Original Poster:

3,713 posts

212 months

Tuesday 29th March 2011
quotequote all
PSBuckshot said:
Its the Renault wind, and the 'secs' reference is about the roof speed wink not 0-60.
Oh, my apologies, I never had a convertible in my life so didn't realise that the speed of "conversion" is a major factor when choosing one.

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 29th March 2011
quotequote all
isee said:
Oh, my apologise, I never had a convertible in my life so didn't realise that the speed of "conversion" is a major factor when choosing one.
It's not just they have no other good points to sell the car hehe

Kiltox

14,863 posts

187 months

Tuesday 29th March 2011
quotequote all
Is it wrong that I kinda want one of these? (once they've suffered the legendary Renault depreciation of course) getmecoat

isee

Original Poster:

3,713 posts

212 months

Tuesday 29th March 2011
quotequote all
Kiltox said:
Is it wrong that I kinda want one of these? (once they've suffered the legendary Renault depreciation of course) getmecoat
Yes, very. seek professional help before it's too late!

4Q

1,277 posts

216 months

Tuesday 29th March 2011
quotequote all
PSBuckshot said:
Its the Renault wind, and the 'secs' reference is about the roof speed wink not 0-60.
...although they're probably the same! wink

Kiltox

14,863 posts

187 months

Tuesday 29th March 2011
quotequote all
doogz said:
I dunno, if they give it the Twingo 1600, and it doesn't loose all rigidity by having the roof taken off, it might be kinda fun.
Comes with either the Twingo 1600 or the 1.2 TCE also from the Twingo/Clio

jsg612

571 posts

197 months

Tuesday 29th March 2011
quotequote all
Have driven both engines and they're great little cars. Based on the Twingo RenaultSport so has heafty brakes and a stiff chassis. Very girly looking though and not sure I'd buy one. Excellent car for posing around the city in for a girl.

The secs sells bit refers to the roof, which really does open/close in just 12 seconds (not that I timed it you understand!).

sjg

7,676 posts

294 months

Tuesday 29th March 2011
quotequote all
9.2s 0-60 for the 1.6 133bhp version. It's a previous-gen Clio underneath, bit of a shame they couldn't put the Renaultsport 182 engine in there.

Kiltox

14,863 posts

187 months

Tuesday 29th March 2011
quotequote all
jsg612 said:
Have driven both engines and they're great little cars. Based on the Twingo RenaultSport so has heafty brakes and a stiff chassis. Very girly looking though and not sure I'd buy one. Excellent car for posing around the city in for a girl.

The secs sells bit refers to the roof, which really does open/close in just 12 seconds (not that I timed it you understand!).
Still want one getmecoat

Although you can probably guess from looking at my profile I don't care what image my car has biglaugh

Crow555

1,037 posts

223 months

Tuesday 29th March 2011
quotequote all
I really don't see why anyone would consider these when for the same money you could get a 1.8 MX5. I know the MX5 isn't everyone's cuppa but if you're in the market for a convertible, it's a better bet than this thing.

Kiltox

14,863 posts

187 months

Tuesday 29th March 2011
quotequote all
Crow555 said:
I really don't see why anyone would consider these when for the same money you could get a 1.8 MX5. I know the MX5 isn't everyone's cuppa but if you're in the market for a convertible, it's a better bet than this thing.
I imagine these are a lower insurance group though.

I'd only consider one at 4-5 years old when it's worth 20p, not new.

sjg

7,676 posts

294 months

Tuesday 29th March 2011
quotequote all
Crow555 said:
I really don't see why anyone would consider these when for the same money you could get a 1.8 MX5. I know the MX5 isn't everyone's cuppa but if you're in the market for a convertible, it's a better bet than this thing.
Assuming you want a folding hard-top, you're looking at a smidge under £20k for the base 1.8 MX-5 RC, which is slower than the 1.6 Wind that costs under £16k. As well as costing less to tax, the Wind is more economical and cheaper to insure too.

Yeah, I don't see why anyone would consider one either....

SteveS Cup

1,996 posts

189 months

Tuesday 29th March 2011
quotequote all
I have no idea why everyone bangs on about the new MX5's... they're stupid money!!

I really like the Wind... I've been trying to get my mrs to look at them but she's not having any of it... if it's anything like an RS Twingo to drive it seems a great little car... Most women would like to pose in one and if they're fun to drive and I could forgive the image of it when I drove it.