Best car with a +9 secs 0-60?
Best car with a +9 secs 0-60?
Author
Discussion

DLovett

Original Poster:

329 posts

192 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
Even though I'm a reasonable young man of 24 years with 2 years NCB, my insurance company will only give me good deals on cars that have a higher 0-60 time than 8.9 seconds.

Peugeot's spring to mind, as they generally test cars fully loaded with petrol and everything.

Car's that I've come up with so far:

Peugeot 205 1.6 GTi
Peugeot 106 1.6 Rallye
Peugeot 406 2.0 Turbo (Chipped to 185BHP)


Should say that MX-5's are out of the question as they are +£5K in Denmark, which is over my budget.

mnkiboy

4,409 posts

195 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
That's a strange requirement from an insurance company.

Erm... Diesel Range Rover? If you can't have performance go for luxury and comfort instead.

skinley

1,681 posts

189 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
I would have thought that all the cars you listed will do 0-60 in less than 8.9 seconds.

T.K

465 posts

207 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
New insurer?

DLovett

Original Poster:

329 posts

192 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
skinley said:
I would have thought that all the cars you listed will do 0-60 in less than 8.9 seconds.
When I say 0-60 I mean 0-62 MPH, as we use the metric system in Denmark(0-100 KM/H).

But yeah, they often do when tested by motoring magazines etc., but Peugeot's figures are high due to the loading as mentioned in my OP.

Thanks for the suggestions so far!

DLovett

Original Poster:

329 posts

192 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
T.K said:
New insurer?
Not sure if you are asking if I am. As stated above, I have 2 years NCB and they won't insure anything with a sub 9 second 0-62 unless I have 3 years of NCB frown

Caulkhead

4,938 posts

186 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
DLovett said:
skinley said:
I would have thought that all the cars you listed will do 0-60 in less than 8.9 seconds.
When I say 0-60 I mean 0-62 MPH, as we use the metric system in Denmark(0-100 KM/H).

But yeah, they often do when tested by motoring magazines etc., but Peugeot's figures are high due to the loading as mentioned in my OP.

Thanks for the suggestions so far!
What source do your insurance company accept as proof of 0-62 time? Any magazine test? Manufacturers figures? Bloke down the pub?

clarkey328is

2,220 posts

203 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
An E36 318is Coupe would fit the criteria pretty well. I'm pretty sure they are actually quicker than the quotes 0-60 time and they handle nicely.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

219 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
DLovett said:
T.K said:
New insurer?
Not sure if you are asking if I am. As stated above, I have 2 years NCB and they won't insure anything with a sub 9 second 0-62 unless I have 3 years of NCB frown
I think they mean you should try another insurer who doesn't have this limit. In the UK such a restriction would be very odd and almost unbelievable.

JonnyFive

29,897 posts

218 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
DLovett said:
Should say that MX-5's are out of the question as they are +£5K in Denmark, which is over my budget.
MX5s are also <8s 0-60mph wink

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

219 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
DLovett said:
When I say 0-60 I mean 0-62 MPH, as we use the metric system in Denmark(0-100 KM/H).

But yeah, they often do when tested by motoring magazines etc., but Peugeot's figures are high due to the loading as mentioned in my OP.

Thanks for the suggestions so far!
How about a classic? Don't know what the regs are in Denmark, but could you buy an older car then mod it? Many older cars will easily be 11sec or slower to 60mph but likely can be made rather fast without a huge amount of effort or cost.

Edited by 300bhp/ton on Thursday 7th April 12:46

Harry Flashman

21,787 posts

271 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
Forget performance and go out and out wafty/off road instead.

I'd have loved pottering around in some luxobarge when I was first driving, borrowing Dad's company cars.

Driving is many things - cruising about in an old Oligarch-mobile is just as much fun as a hot hatch, in its own way.

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

199 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
Second hand, most cars with a VAG PD130 engine have manufacturers' figures in the 9s, but (a) most are actually faster (b) the diesel torque makes them feel faster still (c) they can be remapped to be genuinely nippy.

DLovett

Original Poster:

329 posts

192 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
Caulkhead said:
What source do your insurance company accept as proof of 0-62 time? Any magazine test? Manufacturers figures? Bloke down the pub?
Manufacturers figures!

DLovett

Original Poster:

329 posts

192 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
I think they mean you should try another insurer who doesn't have this limit. In the UK such a restriction would be very odd and almost unbelievable.
Any car with +9 seconds 0-62 was offered for about £500 a year, which is about 40% less than other insurers. I would rather drive something a tad slower for a year and then get something really interesting.

DLovett

Original Poster:

329 posts

192 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
Mr GrimNasty said:
Second hand, most cars with a VAG PD130 engine have manufacturers' figures in the 9s, but (a) most are actually faster (b) the diesel torque makes them feel faster still (c) they can be remapped to be genuinely nippy.
+£7K for a complete shed, which is almost twice my budget frown


DLovett

Original Poster:

329 posts

192 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
clarkey328is said:
An E36 318is Coupe would fit the criteria pretty well. I'm pretty sure they are actually quicker than the quotes 0-60 time and they handle nicely.
Impossible to find in good nick, only a couple for sale at the moment which are completely chavved up. Otherwise a great suggestion, would love something RWD, considered a Sierra 2,0i GLX as I had one before and they were decent on running costs and quite fun in the wet.

Caulkhead

4,938 posts

186 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
Mr GrimNasty said:
they can be remapped to be genuinely nippy.
But then he'll have to inform the insurer he's remapped it. . . . . .

DLovett

Original Poster:

329 posts

192 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
Caulkhead said:
But then he'll have to inform the insurer he's remapped it. . . . . .
Not in Denmark, no.

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

199 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
DLovett said:
Mr GrimNasty said:
Second hand, most cars with a VAG PD130 engine have manufacturers' figures in the 9s, but (a) most are actually faster (b) the diesel torque makes them feel faster still (c) they can be remapped to be genuinely nippy.
+£7K for a complete shed, which is almost twice my budget frown
Sounds like an export opportunity!