Running in new engines.
Running in new engines.
Author
Discussion

doodles19

Original Poster:

2,201 posts

202 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
Do you or don't you?

I've herd so many differing opinions over the years, some that don't bother and rev it straight out the box whereas I've met others who treat it with cotton wool for the first 1000 miles.

Was just hoping for some clarification on the matter!

Matt UK

18,084 posts

229 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
Depends if it is my car or not

doodles19

Original Poster:

2,201 posts

202 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
Ok so it would be my car, not a rental/other that I wouldn't really care if it went pop later in life.

Prince Jefri

1,971 posts

198 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
Do I? Yes

Do I think I have to for the good of the engine? No

I do it because I'm told to - for the sake of the warranty. I guess if I rev the nuts off it with 30 miles on the clock it will be recorded and warranty work in the future might be difficult (that said if it's a 1000 - 2000 mile run in period it will always be covered in 2 days anyway. When I got my Range Rover delivery date I booked it in for it's first service 2 days later)

Cyder

7,186 posts

249 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
The irony with it is that within seconds of the engine being started for the first time on the production line it is driven onto a rolling road and thrashed hard during the tests. hehe

If Mr and Mrs Smith with their brand new Honda Jazz knew this they'd probably have a seizure!

TommyBuoy

1,298 posts

196 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
Some engines do require running in, in as much as they use a different oil for the first 1000 or so miles (E36 M3 Evo springs to mind).

I guess if you had to go back and have the run in service it would make sense to not thrash it to being with?

HellDiver

5,708 posts

211 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
Drive it as you intend to for it's life. Change the oil early.

Rentals and cop cars always go better, because they've been driven hard from day one.

Personally I think "running in" a diesel engine by taking it easy is dangerous, you risk polishing the bores.

Dracoro

9,026 posts

274 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
If it's a new car, it's not just the engine that's being run in. It's gearbox, driveshafts, differentials, brakes, suspension etc.

It's certainly not going to do any harm taking it easy for 500/1000 miles, so why take the risk (however small).

As for bench testing, are ALL engines run in like this and are they under load etc.? Replacement engines too? reconditioned engines? rebuilt ones? and so on...

doodles19

Original Poster:

2,201 posts

202 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
Cheers for the replies guys, I'll ask the dealers what the manufacturers line is on running it in, see what they have to say about it.


Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

275 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
HellDiver said:
Rentals and cop cars always go better, because they've been driven hard from day one.
PH Myth alert!!

GAjon

4,083 posts

242 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
Varying speed & revs is more beneficial. Driving the fist few hundred at a constant albeit slow is more harmful.

wildcat45

8,159 posts

218 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
Its about not being daft with it.

My MX5 now has 600 miles on it. Now I am beginning to explore the revs a bit, no red lining 'till about 1000 miles.

Where my place is in Scotland, It often requires a bit of beans to get it up an incline and onto a fast A road. I hate running the cars at high revs when cold but sometimes if the traffic is heavy I have to.

Been lucky so far with the MX5 no high revs from cold yet.




waterwonder

1,002 posts

205 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
Having run in a good 20+ cars back when i was working in stealerships i would say it doesn't really make that much difference.

A lot of cars, rentals, courtesy cars etc etc are thrashed from day 1. I wouldn't say on average they have any more problems than a car that's cared for.

However my own (un-scientific) observation was that particularly on diesels taking it easy for the first couple of thousand seemed to give marginally better MPG (from the trip comp). I tried this back to back on a few identical cars. I.e thrash one, then the next one run it in.

As others have mentioned if you like to wrap your cars in cotton wool i suggest you never vist a factory or shipping docks. The speed at which brand new cars moved around and loaded and unloaded will upset you greatly.

My own personal cars i have always run in, not because i firmly beleive it offers any benefit, it just feels the right thing to do.

inman999

34,954 posts

202 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
Dracoro said:
If it's a new car, it's not just the engine that's being run in. It's gearbox, driveshafts, differentials, brakes, suspension etc.

It's certainly not going to do any harm taking it easy for 500/1000 miles, so why take the risk (however small).

As for bench testing, are ALL engines run in like this and are they under load etc.? Replacement engines too? reconditioned engines? rebuilt ones? and so on...
Unless you run it in so lightly the rings glaze increasing blowby and permanently reducing the power/efficiency. Of the engines I've rebuilt I've always run them in hard and they've felt healthy with the oil staying golden. None have gone bang, touch wood.

E21_Ross

36,729 posts

241 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
Yes. though i think it depends on the engines. my dads E92 M3 needed running in. it used different oil until it's run-in service before 1200miles.

HellDiver

5,708 posts

211 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
PH Myth alert!!
Or not. I've driven plenty of both, and I can tell you for a fact it's not a myth.

Dracoro

9,026 posts

274 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
HellDiver said:
Ozzie Osmond said:
PH Myth alert!!
Or not. I've driven plenty of both, and I can tell you for a fact it's not a myth.
Interesting, what is the sample size that you are basing this "fact" on?

EDLT

15,421 posts

235 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
Cyder said:
The irony with it is that within seconds of the engine being started for the first time on the production line it is driven onto a rolling road and thrashed hard during the tests. hehe

If Mr and Mrs Smith with their brand new Honda Jazz knew this they'd probably have a seizure!
They are then caned in a much less scientific manner by several people between the factory and the dealership, followed by a final hammering during the PDI check.

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
EDLT said:
Cyder said:
The irony with it is that within seconds of the engine being started for the first time on the production line it is driven onto a rolling road and thrashed hard during the tests. hehe

If Mr and Mrs Smith with their brand new Honda Jazz knew this they'd probably have a seizure!
They are then caned in a much less scientific manner by several people between the factory and the dealership, followed by a final hammering during the PDI check.
None of which counts so long as you take it easy for the first X miles when you pick it up.

rolleyes

NHK244V

3,358 posts

201 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
HellDiver said:
Drive it as you intend to for it's life. Change the oil early.

Rentals and cop cars always go better, because they've been driven hard from day one.

Personally I think "running in" a diesel engine by taking it easy is dangerous, you risk polishing the bores.
That's down to modern ECUs learning your driving technique, many a car comes to me with the complaint it's slow compaired to a mates so i wipe the ECU's KAM, gibe it a thrash and 9 times out of ten it improves throttle response and power delivery.