£50,000 Rolls Royce Mini????
Discussion
Are they taking the mick or trying to copy Aston with their 'orrible Cygnet
http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle/AllCars/...
http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle/AllCars/...
Lost soul said:
Caulkhead said:
I don't think manufacturers of expensive motor cars like AM and RR are bringing out these little cars because they want to, it's to reduce their average CO2 output so we shouldn't be too hard on them. . . .
Exactly 
Thought I'd heard this before... in 2009, though I guess this is just the confirmation / start of promotion
http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle/AllCars/...
http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle/AllCars/...
ZOLLAR said:
Lost soul said:
Caulkhead said:
I don't think manufacturers of expensive motor cars like AM and RR are bringing out these little cars because they want to, it's to reduce their average CO2 output so we shouldn't be too hard on them. . . .
Exactly 
Do you want Aston Martin and Rolls Royce to spend their (large bur ultimately finite) R&D budget on sports cars and big luxury cars, or developing a mini platform?
I think it makes complete sense to 'tart up' a standard small car just enough to meet the rules for it being allowed to count as part of their 'range' for 'average CO2' purposes. Then get back the actual job in hand of building exotica.
mrmr96 said:
We've been through all this before with the AM Cygnet.
Do you want Aston Martin and Rolls Royce to spend their (large bur ultimately finite) R&D budget on sports cars and big luxury cars, or developing a mini platform?
I think it makes complete sense to 'tart up' a standard small car just enough to meet the rules for it being allowed to count as part of their 'range' for 'average CO2' purposes. Then get back the actual job in hand of building exotica.
Yes yes yes I know we've been through it before I understand all the reasons, I also realise its far cheaper for them to using an existing model rather than design and build one from ground up.Do you want Aston Martin and Rolls Royce to spend their (large bur ultimately finite) R&D budget on sports cars and big luxury cars, or developing a mini platform?
I think it makes complete sense to 'tart up' a standard small car just enough to meet the rules for it being allowed to count as part of their 'range' for 'average CO2' purposes. Then get back the actual job in hand of building exotica.
What I was trying to say is I would like for them to build one from ground up to see what sort of vehicle they could come up with
.Miocene said:
Thought I'd heard this before... in 2009, though I guess this is just the confirmation / start of promotion
http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle/AllCars/...
It's as old as the hills though. Back when Radford trimmed Aston Martins and Wood & Picket did Rolls-Royces, they also trimmed out Minis too. Owners of such cars included John Lennon, Ringo Starr, Peter Sellers and Twiggy.http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle/AllCars/...
ZOLLAR said:
mrmr96 said:
We've been through all this before with the AM Cygnet.
Do you want Aston Martin and Rolls Royce to spend their (large bur ultimately finite) R&D budget on sports cars and big luxury cars, or developing a mini platform?
I think it makes complete sense to 'tart up' a standard small car just enough to meet the rules for it being allowed to count as part of their 'range' for 'average CO2' purposes. Then get back the actual job in hand of building exotica.
Yes yes yes I know we've been through it before I understand all the reasons, I also realise its far cheaper for them to using an existing model rather than design and build one from ground up.Do you want Aston Martin and Rolls Royce to spend their (large bur ultimately finite) R&D budget on sports cars and big luxury cars, or developing a mini platform?
I think it makes complete sense to 'tart up' a standard small car just enough to meet the rules for it being allowed to count as part of their 'range' for 'average CO2' purposes. Then get back the actual job in hand of building exotica.
What I was trying to say is I would like for them to build one from ground up to see what sort of vehicle they could come up with
.
evenflow said:
Is that a "real" picture of it on the Autocar link? It says it's based on a Cooper S, but has no bonnet scoop. Does this imply that the scoop is not required for cooling and is purely cosmetic?
did you even read the article?"The car’s exterior mixes Cooper S parts — specifically, the front and rear bumpers — with the non-vented bonnet of the Cooper D. The standard colour will be metallic Diamond Black, which was developed, again, by Rolls-Royce Design — but Mini’s own Reef Blue metallic will be offered as an option."
Boba Fret said:
did you even read the article?
"The car’s exterior mixes Cooper S parts — specifically, the front and rear bumpers — with the non-vented bonnet of the Cooper D. The standard colour will be metallic Diamond Black, which was developed, again, by Rolls-Royce Design — but Mini’s own Reef Blue metallic will be offered as an option."
Oooops...skim read it at work! Must do better. C-."The car’s exterior mixes Cooper S parts — specifically, the front and rear bumpers — with the non-vented bonnet of the Cooper D. The standard colour will be metallic Diamond Black, which was developed, again, by Rolls-Royce Design — but Mini’s own Reef Blue metallic will be offered as an option."
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



.