£6K to spend - warm/hot hatch
£6K to spend - warm/hot hatch
Author
Discussion

Drive Blind

Original Poster:

5,775 posts

206 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
Is it as straight forward as EP3 type R or EP3 type R?

I test drove and nearly bought a Fabia vRS but I just cant bring myself to buy a diesel.

The scotsman in me wants the Fabia, the boy racer wants the type R.

Is there an obvious alternative that I'm missing?

Clio's are too small - and French. I don't necessarily need a big boot or 4/5 doors. Commute is 50 miles per day, mix of A road and DC. EP3 type R would manage 30mpg when driven economically - I don't really want to go below this. But the roads are all heavily congested during the commute so the type R is wasted?

AAArrrrrrrrrrrrrrghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! help please,

ShiggyBiggs

713 posts

203 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
Id have a look at something like this
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/2250706.htm

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

219 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
So you don't need a boot or the seats, so why the smeg a fwd hatch??? confused

Buy a proper sports car or something instead. hehe

What sort of budget are you looking at? Guessing £6k'ish.


200SX s14, a BMW of some sort. 350z maybe. if mid 20's mog are ok you could even look at V8 muscle cars.

wackojacko

8,581 posts

219 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
EP3's are fantastic cars.

Clio 182 cup or Trophy's are a little more exlcusive.


S2000 (bit of drop top rev tastic fun ?)

George H

14,714 posts

193 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all

nottyash

4,671 posts

224 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
I owned a Fabia VRS from new in 2005, but it needs a remap to be anything like the CTR, and even then it wont handle like one and the dash is pretty cheap looking.
When remapped they do struggle for grip in slippy conditions.
However you will get close to 50MPG with 190BHP with double the torque of a CTR. This means put your foot down at 40 mph in top gear and it will pull away quickly making it more drivable as a CTR requires revving and driving hard to achieve the performance.
Its a personal preference but i have to say a remapped VRS is quite addictive.....but then so is a Honda VTEC.confused


Drive Blind

Original Poster:

5,775 posts

206 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
So you don't need a boot or the seats, so why the smeg a fwd hatch??? confused

What sort of budget are you looking at? Guessing £6k'ish.

if mid 20's mog are ok you could even look at V8 muscle cars.
yup £6K- ish

don't really want anything over 6 years old. Nothing modded, something that out the box is a decent car.

2l petrol is about as juicy as I want to go. 35 mpg doddling along at 60 and probably 20-25 when hooning.

Drive Blind

Original Poster:

5,775 posts

206 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
ShiggyBiggs said:
Id have a look at something like this
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/2250706.htm
no thanks

Drive Blind

Original Poster:

5,775 posts

206 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
nottyash said:
I owned a Fabia VRS from new in 2005, but it needs a remap to be anything like the CTR, and even then it wont handle like one and the dash is pretty cheap looking.
When remapped they do struggle for grip in slippy conditions.
However you will get close to 50MPG with 190BHP with double the torque of a CTR. This means put your foot down at 40 mph in top gear and it will pull away quickly making it more drivable as a CTR requires revving and driving hard to achieve the performance.
Its a personal preference but i have to say a remapped VRS is quite addictive.....but then so is a Honda VTEC.confused
I realise the standard vRS wont be anything near the CTR - but the 50+mpg appeals with still decent performance.

However I would probably need to lower the vRS + fit RARB. CTR is superb right out the box.

Drive Blind

Original Poster:

5,775 posts

206 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
George H said:
sorry, no way

Baryonyx

18,281 posts

188 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
George H said:
Pricey, but these are holding their value well. Low miles, in good nick. Probably a decent buy, and they look like great little cars.

Diesel Fury

455 posts

189 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
Sounds like you've already made your mind up about buying a CTR.

danneth

1,083 posts

216 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
http://pistonheads.com/sales/2778928.htm

these can be found if you look round hard enough

_Leg_

2,827 posts

240 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
2003 Works Mini? Bit older but worth a look? Personally for that money, even as a JCW owner, albeit an 08, I would go for the Clio or a Megane.

EDLT

15,421 posts

235 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
danneth said:
http://pistonheads.com/sales/2778928.htm

these can be found if you look round hard enough
Awesome cars.

I have to agree with 300bhp/ton though, if you don't need a hatchback then there are more interesting cars available for 6k.

Drive Blind

Original Poster:

5,775 posts

206 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
Diesel Fury said:
Sounds like you've already made your mind up about buying a CTR.
I think I have - I was just checking I'm not missing out an obvious alternative

bigcam101

147 posts

201 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
Have you thought about Seat Ibiza 1.8fr same engine as cupra but slightly less powerful and insurance group is only 12 which is not bad for a car with 150bhp.

tyranical

927 posts

219 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
bigcam101 said:
Have you thought about Seat Ibiza 1.8fr same engine as cupra but slightly less powerful and insurance group is only 12 which is not bad for a car with 150bhp.
I've got one and had it remapped at P-torque... my FR 150 is now an FR 215/260lb.ft torque biggrin

Its also faster (in a straight line) than my mates Type R and if driven sensibly 35mpg is easily achieved, I've had 42mpg on a run from Chester to Cornwall.

Handling wise they're not so great, not awful just average handling. A few choice mods will transform the handling though.

Never had any problems with it at all in my 2 years of ownership.

Classic Grad 98

26,518 posts

189 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
Suzuki Swift Sport?

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

219 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
Drive Blind said:
yup £6K- ish

don't really want anything over 6 years old. Nothing modded, something that out the box is a decent car.

2l petrol is about as juicy as I want to go. 35 mpg doddling along at 60 and probably 20-25 when hooning.
The CTR is a fine hatch. Not really me though.

If you fancy something new and chuckable I quite like the look of the Mitsubishi Colt RalliArt. £6.5k will get you an 09 plate. 1.5 turbo and a remap will see 200-210hp and they only weight about 1000kg which appeals to me.

Not sure if in budget but I'd probably also look at R53 MINI Cooper S's.