RE: 2022 BMW i4 M50 | PH Review
RE: 2022 BMW i4 M50 | PH Review
Saturday 18th December 2021

2022 BMW i4 M50 | PH Review

Can the first electric M car deliver an appropriate level of excitement?



The biggest divide in the world of EVs isn't range, charging speed or the unfeasible lowness of 0-60mph times. Rather it's the one between sensible and extrovert. If you're a large carmaker do you try to make something reassuringly familiar, to lead existing owners gently into the electron-powered future? Or do you do something radically different to showcase your entry into this brave new era, so early-adopting buyers can show off how progressive they are?

Most manufacturers pick a side, but BMW has decided to back both horses. On the shock and awe of the balance sit the iX - which looks a bit like its design came over a fuzzy fax line from the future - to the 'pass the eye bleach' XM. The opposing camp is represented by the iX3 - an electrified X3 which Matt really quite liked - and now the new i4 which, despite its new name, shares pretty much all of its sheetmetal with the existing 4-Series GranCoupe. It's reaching the UK in both rear-driven eDrive40 and all-wheel driven M50 form, as seen here. Making it the first EV to wear an M badge, although one closer in meaning to the one on an M440i than on the M4.

Its numbers are certainly impressive. The M50 uses two motors, the one powering the rear axle rated at up to 308hp and the one up front up to 255hp - although the combined system total (available in the Sport Boost mode) is a slightly lower 537hp, accompanied by up to 586lb ft of torque. The 400V 83.9 kWh battery pack is located beneath the floorpan and gives an official range of 318 miles under WLTP, although obviously less when driven hard. Two other numbers stand out: a 2,290kg DIN kerbweight, which makes the M50 the heaviest M branded car that isn't an SUV, and an official 3.9-second 0-62mph time, which ties with the claimed time for the rear-driven M3 and M4 Competition and is just 0.4-second slower than the xDrive versions.



While impressive in isolation - and even more so when experienced on road - the acceleration figure is an obvious point of difference with the M50's most obvious competitor. While reviews of new EVs from the more traditional side of the motor industry often ignore Tesla, it would be churlish not to acknowledge the clear superiority that the three-year old Model 3 Performance possesses over this brand new rival, on paper at least. The Tesla has a 3.1-second 0-60mph time - independently verified by several test teams - plus a 162mph top speed in contrast to the i4's electronically limited 140mph. The Tesla also has a superior 340-mile WLTP range and, at £59,990, undercuts the M50's base price by a useful £3,835. (With my fully laden i4 carrying another £9,790 of options.) Being slower and more expensive than a segment's runaway bestseller is certainly a brave start.

Let's start with the basics: it is pretty good at being a BMW. I'm still no fan of the company's grille-heavy design direction, but the i4's need to have a standard-sized UK numberplate clamped in its teeth certainly helps to diminish its visual scale. The cabin features a vast central display screen, which runs up to the smaller one for the digital instruments, and BMW has followed the herd in abolishing most switchgear. The screen looks nice and the UI is mostly intuitive, but it shares the common failing of requiring eyes to be taken off the road for even basic interactions (I confidently predict that in a few years a premium carmaker will smugly reinvent the rotary heater control).

Space is good in the front, and the driving position can be set impressively low considering the underfloor battery pack. It's tight and gloomy for adults in the back - as is the GranCoupe - but there's a respectable quantity of luggage space under the rear hatchback (470 litres with seats up, 1,290 with them folded.) Despite being an EV there is no extra stowage under the bonnet, where an engine-like plastic cover sits over control gear and ancillaries.



The driving experience starts off very similar: recognisably BMW, but with a twist. At lower speeds the M50 feels very civilized, pliant suspension dealing well with urban lumps and speed bumps (the rear axle is air-spring, although the front uses steel springs.) BMW is particularly proud of the in-car soundscape created by renowned film scorer Hans Zimmer, which adapts to speed and throttle position with a noise that is somewhere between mechanical and orchestral, and which becomes louder and snarlier in Sport mode. BMW describes this as IconicSounds, although the lack of a natural source makes them seem more IronicSounds, and on my limited straw polling they seem to split opinion down the middle for those who experience them. I'm clearly a Luddite, I turned the system off after ten minutes and immediately liked the car more without it. Sorry, Hans - but The Thin Red Line remains my favourite soundtrack of all time.

The biggest criticism at lower speeds was snappy throttle reactions plus a slight but noticeable hesitation between making an input and feeling a reaction. There was much less of this in Comfort than Sport, but even in its softest modes the accelerator seemed to be trying to pack too much response into the top of its travel - a Taycan feels much more progressive. Like most big output EVs, performance is both massive and apparently effortless, the i4 projecting itself into gaps without the need to wait for gears to shift or weighty engine internals to gather pace. Even a launch control start in the full-fang Sport Boost mode didn't cause any undue drama for the P-Zero tyres, although nor did it match my memory of the almost painful G-forces created by a Model 3 Performance when I did the same thing.

To be honest, at the sort of speeds and loadings that can be experienced on road without filling the mirrors with flashing blue lights, the i4 felt a little inert. Cruising is impressively refined, the cabin's calm only disturbed by slight wind rustle from the M4-alike door mirrors. On the motorway there the sensation of a very slight secondary motion regardless of which setting the adaptive dampers were in, but once onto some of rural Hampshire's more grizzled byways the chassis maintained impressive discipline over anything I could find to throw at it. There's huge grip and crisp, slack-free steering responses - the M50's considerable mass changing direction impressively willingly - but little sense of playfulness or the claimed rear-bias of the power delivery.



Don't worry, though - I found a solution in the Dynamic Traction Control mode. Activating this requires first pressing the stability control button on the centre console, then (counter intuitively) selecting the more permissive setting through the central touchscreen. Doing this illuminates the yellow 'DSC Off' icon on the dashboard, something that is likely to put off most owners from doing it routinely, but it also make the M50 feel much more rear-endy and lively - up to allowing modest amounts of low-speed oversteer - while still intervening if things get too far out of line. Beyond that lies the option of turning the stability fully off, although the combination of electric motor torque characteristics and cold, greasy tarmac meant I left that one for another day.

Slowing down is easy, too. BMW says the M50 can regenerate energy through its motors at rates of up to 195kW, but from a driver's perspective the more impressive feature is its ability to seamlessly blend this with friction braking through an impressively normal feeling pedal. I was less keen on the faff involved in switching between variable levels of regeneration, which has to be done through a touchscreen sub-menu, and there isn't the ability to turn it fully off for those who prefer to coast. I much prefer doing this through steering wheel shifters, a feature the i4 doesn't have. It does have a pair of very obvious screw holes pretty much exactly where fingers expect to find paddles, though.

Five years ago BMW seemed to be well ahead of the chasing pack of established carmakers moving to electrify their ranges. But the funky, radical i3 and i8 struggled to sell in projected volumes, and the company decided to switch from expensive, bespoke EV platforms back to building them on its mainstream architecture. As an electric 4-Series GranCoupe the i4 is very much a product of that thinking. This is a good car, and certainly not one that feels like an insult to the M badge it carries. But, despite the hype, it's definitely not a radical one.


SPECIFICATION | BMW i4 M50

Engine: 400V Lithium-ion battery, 83.9kWh capacity, twin AC synchronous electric motors
Transmission: Single-speed, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 437 (total system, Boost mode)
Torque (lb ft): 586 (total system, Boost mode)
0-62mph: 3.9 secs
Top speed: 140mph (limited)
Weight: 2290kg
Range: 318 miles (WLTP)
Price: £63,825 (£76,600 as tested)









Author
Discussion

drpep

Original Poster:

1,761 posts

198 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
It's a solid effort; much better than the XM monstrosity.

While I'm not sold on the aesthetic for obvious rodent-incisor-derived reasons, the only other standout for an ///M car is the kerb weight. In time as battery density improves, this will hopefully become less of a factor.

Solid effort. 7/10.

Harrypop

2,611 posts

152 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
A direct comparison test between this and the M440i would be an interesting read just to see how they differ and which ultimately is the more desirable package. This may have the power advantage and it's mass lower down but having around an extra 400kg of weight to move around, and more importantly stop, is going to even the playing field some what.

Harrypop

2,611 posts

152 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
Presumably it's got a slightly wider rear track than the car it's based on - unless stick-on arch extensions were considered an aesthetic enhancement?

DeolTheBeast

449 posts

176 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
2290kg...

For a mid segment size car...


DoctorX

8,253 posts

197 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
BMWs used to have such lovely interiors. That screen isn’t attractive or impressive it’s just plain cheap.

Terminator X

20,794 posts

234 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
Sad day for M Division bandit

TX.

DanG355

576 posts

231 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
Is it 537 horsepower or 437? The article says one thing, the stats at the end another. I suspect it is 537?

Feels like this is 2/3 years behind the opposition but probably radical to someone who hasn’t driven or owned a modern electric car.

Nu57jez9639

1,064 posts

68 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
BMW M50 another EV I would definitely like to own just like the Porsche Taycan they actually look nice won't ever be able to afford either the only other I like and looks nice which is definitely more attainable is the Cupra Born can definitely see me owning 1 within next 3 years think all the rest look crap as for the electric M I'll look and admire like all M cars.

Prohibiting

1,921 posts

148 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
I’m left feeling so cold with new cars like this nowadays.

forrestgrump

1,539 posts

221 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
I feel like the advertising of range on these cars needs to be mandated or something to be more accurate. The Model Y with its 370 miles is actually between 185-370. My EQC advertises 260 miles but in similar conditions (winter on the motorway doing 80 like a normal person) to where the Y gets 185, it gets 170. So really the top range number seems meaningless. That aside, I’m all for electric and this seems decent but typically BMW in that it’s pig ugly and I don’t want one. Where’s the larger electric estates please?

anonymous-user

84 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
Those little front side vent things are even worse than the main grill.

Will children of today be pinning up posters of these things on their bedroom wall, and lusting after they in the future? Can you imagine living to such an age when these are “classics”?

Kawasicki

14,398 posts

265 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
Harrypop said:
Presumably it's got a slightly wider rear track than the car it's based on - unless stick-on arch extensions were considered an aesthetic enhancement?
I‘m guessing it has a 5 series rear axle.

GTEYE

2,499 posts

240 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
DoctorX said:
BMWs used to have such lovely interiors. That screen isn’t attractive or impressive it’s just plain cheap.
Have a close look at a Tesla Model 3 and the BMW. The Tesla will redefine cheap looking for you.

Trophy Husband

3,924 posts

137 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
Harrypop said:
Presumably it's got a slightly wider rear track than the car it's based on - unless stick-on arch extensions were considered an aesthetic enhancement?
I‘m guessing it has a 5 series rear axle.
Or they are for aero reasons?

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

264 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
It all sounds a bit average. £70k for an ok car? Fine for someone will low standards but not something I would ever contemplate owning, let alone desiring.

Spiros115

437 posts

80 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
GTEYE said:
DoctorX said:
BMWs used to have such lovely interiors. That screen isn’t attractive or impressive it’s just plain cheap.
Have a close look at a Tesla Model 3 and the BMW. The Tesla will redefine cheap looking for you.
I’ve owned 4 BMWs over the last 10 years and despite having bomb proof build quality the interiors have never been “lovely” and have always traded on ergonomics and materials over style. The new 3 series started to move the dial but this is the layout I think really changes things. It’s futile commenting on an interior unless you sit in it. I will bet these screens feel ultra premium when in the car (as Mercedes a class ones do) as will surrounding materials. Having the press car all black doesn’t help, such a boring trim that won’t show off the best of it.

Kawasicki

14,398 posts

265 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
Trophy Husband said:
Kawasicki said:
Harrypop said:
Presumably it's got a slightly wider rear track than the car it's based on - unless stick-on arch extensions were considered an aesthetic enhancement?
I‘m guessing it has a 5 series rear axle.
Or they are for aero reasons?
No, the arch extensions are used to pass wheel coverage legislation.

Phil Cook

75 posts

86 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
I had a close look at one (but didn’t drive it) at the dealer this week when collecting my new car.
I thought it looked good, good quality fit and finish and nice to sit in unlike a Tesla which, whilst it may be great to drive (I don’t know) looks like it was put together by Stevie Wonder

Maccmike8

1,612 posts

84 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
The brand will make up for its short falls over the Tesla.

Gweeds

7,954 posts

82 months

Saturday 18th December 2021
quotequote all
At what point do brands stop putting daft blue trim bits in because it's an eLEctrIc caR?