RE: 2022 Skoda Fabia Monte Carlo | PH Review
RE: 2022 Skoda Fabia Monte Carlo | PH Review
Friday 16th September 2022

2022 Skoda Fabia Monte Carlo | PH Review

Not an obvious choice, but it turns out the Monte Carlo qualifies as that rare thing - a likeable warm hatch


Before you stop reading, stop. By which I mean please carry on. Reading. Yes, I know what you’re thinking: “It’s a Skoda Fabia. Pah!” and “Not even a vRS.” But hold your horses. This is a surprising little car and I have the actual proof: it surprised me. I wasn’t expecting a lot from it either, I’ll admit, but I used the Fabia Monte Carlo to head up north last weekend, to Nottingham, and 300 miles later I am, well, a fan. It’s a cracking little car. That makes it interesting, and interesting cars are what PH is all about, so I’ll continue. I hope you will, too.

I am not getting carried away, either. It’s not a sparkling hot hatch in the mould of a Fiesta ST. Of course it isn't. But if you’re looking for something a little less frenetic – a day-to-day runaround with some welcome zip – it’s very apposite. For a start, 150hp qualifies it for the role. There was a time when 150hp in a car this size would’ve dropped more jaws than an H-bomb, but these days you need another 50hp to join the big (little) boys’ hot hatch club. This isn’t pretending to be in that class, but 0-62mph in 8.0 seconds makes a Fiesta 1.0 Ecoboost 125 ST-Line look like a G-Wiz, and the Monte's 1.5 TSI Evo EA211 engine is so tractable. As long as you're the right side of 1,500rpm it oozes torque and scampers away keenly.

Admittedly, there are two areas where it doesn’t shine. Firstly, it’s not a tonally invigorating engine. Most of the time it just makes some noise. And because that noise is neither fruity nor foul, it comes across as dull until you get up at the last knockings of the rev range. That's when it becomes coarse and scratchy. Not wincingly bad, but not as pleasant as an Ecoboost triple at full chat. Secondly, there’s the gearbox. It’s not a manual, which means I’m about to lose another slice of the audience. Stop. Do keep reading. A six-speed manual is available, but only if you choose the 1.0 TSI. The bigger engine is coupled only to a seven-speed DSG, which is fine at flitting through the gears when cruising, but jerky in stop-start traffic and not convincingly responsive when you kick it down. Plus there aren’t any paddles behind the steering wheel to change gear manually. Even for a warm hatch that seems like a heck of an oversight to me. Silly Skoda.

So far, then, we have decent performance and driveability, but an insipid engine note and gearbox. If my maths is right, that’s nil-nil. But when you start exploring the chassis the win is back on. I imagined this was going to be a lacklustre bundle of understeer and poor body control, most likely twined with an unpleasant, washboard ride. Yet the truth is quite different. They tell me that the suspension is unchanged from other Fabias, yet the last Fabia I drove was soft and squidgy. Here, the springing feels taut but not over-tightened, so the Monte doesn’t roll too much and still breathes with the road. I mean, I’m not talking Huracan Performante levels of damping, here - but whatever trials and tribulations are thrown its way, the Monte's suspension deals with admirably. It means you can attack a road with conviction, safe in the knowledge that it’ll hold a line. It grips well, too, and when you run past the front tyres’ toe hold it’s so nicely balanced that a little lift it trims the line neatly. When you need the brakes, the pedal is stout and measured as well. 

Next up, steering. Oddly, this has too much sensation, by which I mean quite a lot of buzz from the engine rising through the steering column. And because the resonant frequency is between 2,000 and 3,000rpm, which is where the engine sits at 70mph, it’s prevalent. In terms of good vibrations, there are a few, but not enough to say it’s full of feel. What it does get right are weighting and accuracy. There’s an instant connection the moment you move the wheel, and that’s not only helpful when you’re cavorting along country roads. It makes life relaxing on motorways, too, because intuitively you can keep the car centred in a lane. There’s nothing frenzied about its turn-in, either. It’s not attempting to be sporty simply by being quick. It’s just right. I’m not being funny – and this will raise a few eyebrows, no doubt – but I prefer the way this car steers to a Fiesta ST. Sacré bleu, I know, but the ST is too darty, and once it’s turned in to a corner it’s fighting you, trying to return the steering to centre. This Monte isn’t like that. After turning in with precision the steering holds weight naturally.

I’ll tell you another thing that the Monte Carlo does better than the ST or ST-line, for that matter: comfort. It manages to deal with almost all bumps – potholes, sunken manhole covers, craggy Tarmac and speed bumps – in one, or perhaps one-and-a-half, bounces at most. Indeed, the only thing it seems to struggle with is a ridge that tests both ends of the front axle at once. In that moment you get a solid thump. The rest of the time it’s calm; so much calmer than the ever-bouncy ST-Line set-up. So along with its enjoyable B-road dynamics, it’s also enjoyable to sit in for an hour or so on motorways. I include the cabin isolation in that, too. There’s tyre and wind noise, sure, but for a small car on biggish wheels it’s not bad at all.

It's better than ‘not bad’ on the practicality side, too. There’s loads of space in the front two seats and it’s surprisingly accommodating in the rear as well. I’m long-legged, but have legroom behind even a relatively tall driver, along with masses of headroom and space for my feet under the front seats. It’s a fine small car if you’re four-up. It even has a comparatively big and well-designed boot, with a height-adjustable floor and, beneath that, a spare wheel. You don’t see many of those these days. I don’t mean to get too nitty-gritty about this, but it also has decent-sized door bins, trays for odds and sods and a vast glovebox. It's very easy to live with.

 

The driving position is another strong point. The Monte comes with sports front seats that are bolstered properly – not just around your midriff but the shoulders, too – so when you’re blitzing yet another roundabout with tyres chirping, you’re not carrying out an inadvertent sexual assault on your passenger. There’s plenty of adjustment in the steering column, the pedals are placed aptly, and the windscreen pillars are relatively thin, so you can see where you’re going. The Fabia even has buttons. You know, those things that the VW Group seems to have banned from all its other models. These allow you to make simple adjustments quickly and safely, instead pawing away at the dashboard trying to operate touch-sensitive buttons that don’t like being touched. Even the assistance systems aren’t overbearing and easy to turn off – they just don’t stay off when you switch the ignition back on.

And before anyone accuses me of delivering an advertorial, I’ll point out some more flaws for balance. While I appreciate the climate control buttons, Skoda must have let the bloke who buggered up the software for the ID.3, 4 and 5 have a fiddle, because when you change the temperature it blackens the infotainment screen to highlight this new ambient state. Why? It means you can’t see the navigation map for a few seconds and the temperature’s displayed on the climate panel anyway. Then there’s the panel itself. It wobbles with a light press. In fact, there are a few iffy bits of trim dotted about, although in the main the cabin ambience still feels pleasant enough.

The final thing I’d like to mention is the fuel economy. Needless to say, I wasn’t driving the Monte Carlo like Miss Daisy was in the back. I was enjoying myself if the road was twisty and aiming to make progress when it wasn’t. Yet the average economy after 300-odd miles was 48mpg. Take Miss Daisy for a spin and I reckon well over 50 is possible, which is good for the performance on offer, don’t you think? The only sticking point is the price. £23,735 doesn't seem that cheap (the 1.0 TSI manual is £21,000). But I guess these days that’s about right, because it's about what you'll pay for the more pedestrian Fiesta 1.0 125 ST-Line. And since driving the easy-to-live with, quicker, better-riding Monte, that's no longer the nailed-on default it once was. 


Specification | Skoda Fabia Monte Carlo 1.5 TSI DSG

Engine: 1,498cc, four-cylinder, turbocharged
Transmission: 8-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 150 @ 5,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 184
0-62mph: 8.0 seconds
Top speed: 139mph
Weight: 1,267kg (DIN)
MPG: 49.7 (WLTP)
CO2: 129g/km (WLTP)
Price: £23,735 (£27,810 as tested)

 

Author
Discussion

Dombilano

Original Poster:

1,466 posts

86 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
As hot as a cup of tea, left on the shelf for an hour.
I'd rather walk

Firebobby

1,008 posts

70 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
It reads a good ride at least! This will be plenty hot enough for the mid 20's brigade. Insurance should be quite affable, mpg perfectly adequate. We've got used to every hatch having, nay, needing 200bhp. This shows it's not necessary for a little fun driving where the roads allow it.

Dingu

4,893 posts

61 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
Dombilano said:
As hot as a cup of tea, left on the shelf for an hour.
I'd rather walk
Useless for straight line hero’s I agree…

Pica-Pica

16,682 posts

115 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
Could be the wife’s next car, as long as she lets me drive it. It may even be our next car, if we went down to one.

TrotCanterGallopCharge

435 posts

121 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all

Copied from article...

The bigger engine is coupled only to a seven-speed DSG,

Transmission: 8-speed automatic, four-wheel drive

anonymous-user

85 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
27k for a Small Skoda
They have lost their reason for existing..

Pob17

33 posts

64 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
Cheeky number plate.

Mike1990

1,152 posts

162 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
Refreshing to read.

Warm Hatches are everywhere, but they don’t get a mention unfortunately. But yet for our roads they are near enough perfect. Some of the best drives I’ve had have been in little warm hatches.

They are creeping up in price though!

I’m pretty certain you can spend near enough 25k on Corsa GS-Line, 208 GT and the Fiesta ST-Line and co.
Obviously no one pays RRP but still.

VAG are strange when it comes to models and engines. You could get the Ibiza FR with 150bhp, now it’s only available with a 110bhp, they do a Polo GTi, but won’t do a Fabia VRs or even Cupra Ibiza.

anonymous-user

85 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
Like that, quick enough for me and sounds a decent steer.

FA57REN

1,279 posts

86 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
Pistonheads said:
Secondly, there’s the gearbox. It’s not a manual, which means I’m about to lose another slice of the audience. Stop. Do keep reading.
I can begrudgingly see the need for a computer-controlled auto in something with tyre-shredding 600lb/ft, but in a warm hatch? Unless it's to meet emissions targets?

Demelitia

689 posts

87 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
FA57REN said:
Pistonheads said:
Secondly, there’s the gearbox. It’s not a manual, which means I’m about to lose another slice of the audience. Stop. Do keep reading.
I can begrudgingly see the need for a computer-controlled auto in something with tyre-shredding 600lb/ft, but in a warm hatch? Unless it's to meet emissions targets?
Why does it have to be a need based purely on controlling the engines power, or reducing emissions?
Maybe it’s just because the know that no matter what gets said on PH, an automatic gearbox is going to sell cars and make them money. I’m pretty sure that’s their aim.

cerb4.5lee

45,080 posts

211 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
Reading this took me back...because my old 1989 Sierra XR4x4 had 150bhp. The price of it was a bit of a shock, but I guess that is just the sign of the times though.

Nickbrapp

5,277 posts

161 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
My sister had the 1.5 150 tsi in a Ibiza with a manual box

It was really quite quick, really good mid range grunt and a decent steer, not sure if they are still doing that engine and gearbox though

She had a FR trim with a few options and it was 22k new in 2018 after a few discounts from Carwow

martin12345

1,014 posts

120 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
FA57REN said:
Pistonheads said:
Secondly, there’s the gearbox. It’s not a manual, which means I’m about to lose another slice of the audience. Stop. Do keep reading.
I can begrudgingly see the need for a computer-controlled auto in something with tyre-shredding 600lb/ft, but in a warm hatch? Unless it's to meet emissions targets?
It is indeed easier to meet RDE emission regulations with an Auto as it allows you to control where the engine is operated and stop it being operated in some places where the emissions are worse (like deliberately holding a lower gear (and hence using higher RPM and lower throttle opening) with a manual in preparation for an over-take, whereas an auto will upshift and then downshift (after a short hesistation) for the overtake) . The less of the "map" of RPM and throttle you allow to be used, the easier to optimise the map it is as there's less area to work on and also you can force the driver into the cleanest part of the map (especially when engine is cold)

yme402

669 posts

133 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
I am sure it is fine. Boring but fine.
I suppose worthy in the sense it is not yet another VW Group SUV thingy that sends you to sleep. Zzzzzzzzz

Draxindustries1

1,657 posts

54 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
Dombilano said:
As hot as a cup of tea, left on the shelf for an hour.
I'd rather walk


What a daft thing to say. 150hp is plenty enough for the UK's congested roads and would likely suit this little car just fine and would suit 99:% of drivers who don't require ridiculous power outputs.
If though it's the Skoda badge, it's a VAG product, the same as Audi, VW and Seat., its no different...

Rich Boy Spanner

1,891 posts

161 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
Draxindustries1 said:
Dombilano said:
As hot as a cup of tea, left on the shelf for an hour.
I'd rather walk


What a daft thing to say. 150hp is plenty enough for the UK's congested roads and would likely suit this little car just fine and would suit 99:% of drivers who don't require ridiculous power outputs.
If though it's the Skoda badge, it's a VAG product, the same as Audi, VW and Seat., its no different...
I have the 150BHP 1.5TSi in an Octavia and it pulls that along more than just fine on the UK motorway network and roads I drive on so am sure that this Fabia goes very well in the real world. Which is what Skoda are about, real world cars for grown ups.

Maccmike8

1,612 posts

85 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
Nearly £30k laughlaughlaughlaughlaughlaughlaughlaugh

S600BSB

8,537 posts

137 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
Can't see the point of this.

someoneelse

111 posts

213 months

Thursday 15th September 2022
quotequote all
Nice well written review, gives a really decent sense of the car and what it does well/not so well. Can really see the appeal of something like this that lets you do the “slow car fast” thing and wring it out on a B road, but has enough poke to overtake.

My OAP parents have this engine in a Skoda Something (little pretend off roader thing… I want to say Kamiq?) and it scoots along nicely. Good amount of punch for overtaking and cruising but sounds thrashy at almost every possible engine speed.