RE: 2022 Caterham Super Seven 2000 | PH Review
RE: 2022 Caterham Super Seven 2000 | PH Review
Monday 10th October 2022

2022 Caterham Super Seven 2000 | PH Review

The retro Caterham gets 2.0-litre power at last - is it Seven heaven?


The rise of the retro Caterham was not going to stop with the demise of the 1.6-litre Ford Sigma engine. The sepia-toned Sevens have simply been too well received, whether in limited edition or series production form, for the fun to stop now. So even with just the two models currently in the range - 660cc three-cyl Suzuki turbo or 2.0-litre Ford Duratec - the Super Seven continues in earnest, now offered as a 600 or 2000 variant. The latter is what we're driving here in all its Bourbon glory, and with it the promise of a new Seven experience: the old-school vibe with modern-day performance. More than twice the horsepower of the 600., in other words. 

Even for those not entirely sold on the styling overhaul - the flared front wings are standard, the colour-matched wheels optional - it’s hard not to smile at a Super 2000. In a world of cars designed to look like powerlifting Transformers, the small-wheeled, narrow-bodied silhouette of a Seven is charming. Most of the details are great, including the badges, Moto-Lita wheel and lovely leather used inside, though a few feel less successful. From where PH sits, the ‘wood’ dash trim really isn’t very nice, and visible spare wheels should be reserved only for 4x4s. You’d rather be seen stranded with a puncture than lugging that around. Suffice it to say those that liked previous efforts (and it seems like there were plenty) will likely be enthused by the 2000; those of us who prefer Sevens with quick-release Momos and Detonator Yellow paint might still be a bit unsure. But the choice is nice to have.  

What’s most certainly different to any other classically styled Seven is the newfound gusto; the 2.0-litre may not gurgle like the throttle-bodied Sigma or parp along in the turbo triple style, but heck is it fast. And an average-sounding Caterham is still brilliant by any standard, too, the 2000 taking on the bark of an old F2 rally car as the tacho approaches its amber region. If the three-cylinder cars encourage using the torque, the grown-up version wants every last rev; the 360 this car is based on makes peak power at 7,300rpm and maximum torque (of just 143lb ft) at 6,100rpm. Perhaps on account of just a few miles, this one didn’t feel quite as feral as 2.0-litre Caterhams can, but it undoubtedly rewards a driver for keeping the gear low and the revs high. Which, with an engine this urgent and a five-speed gearbox this perfect, is a pleasure to oblige. And just as a sports car celebrating the past should be.  

Furthermore, peering out to see those flared fairings over the wheels, grabbing that lovely little wheel and watching the revs climb on a Smiths dial is a very pleasant way to spend a sunny afternoon. Of course, it’s a broadly familiar Seven experience, if just that little bit different. The leather on the seats and the transmission tunnel is really quite nice, which is a turn up for the books. In some cars you’ll contrive a smile or a feeling of fun because the spec or the badge has convinced you it’s a good; in a Super 2000 you’re smiling entirely involuntarily because petrol-based entertainment doesn’t come anymore authentic. 

It isn’t perfect, mind. Where you’re happy to bimble in those lower-powered cars, the intensity of 2.0-litre Caterhams is best served with a more aggressive chassis tune. The 2000, with its road suspension and Avon ZT7 tyres, never quite delivers the bite and precision that makes something like a 360R - with the sports suspension and Avon ZZS rubber - so wholly compelling. This is all relative, of course, because by any other measure the Super 2000 is an utterly engrossing sports car: vivid, alive and so gloriously transparent. To this day nothing can teach understeer, oversteer, wheelspin and brake feel like a Seven, and it remains a glorious experience. But the feeling of a powertrain and chassis slightly at odds with each other does nag at you. 

Now, Caterhams being Caterhams, there would be scope to further optimise a Super 2000, even beyond the official options list. Creating something that looks like an extra from The Prisoner but could keep virtually anything honest on a track day would have a certain unconventional appeal. Problem is that would get jolly expensive; as a base model, the Super 2000 is a substantial £8k more expensive than the 360 with the same power. You could have a good go on the configurator (we do this so you don’t have to), adding the R pack, some nice paint, upgraded seats, better brakes, the Momo quick release, a heater and a windscreen, all for less than the £39,990 a Super 2000 starts at. And that’s quite hard to argue with.  

Which is not to dismiss the idea of a heritage-inspired Seven - not one bit. The success up to this point has already proved their validity. Rather it feels that the more relaxed, leather-lined remit of the genre simply suits less power and ferocity. Additionally, once the £40k threshold has been breached, the innate back-to-basics charm of a Seven becomes harder to reconcile with the asking price. There’s only so much embellishment a fundamentally quite basic package can accept before it looks like a lot of money for not much car.

That sounds harsh when it shouldn’t - your correspondent enjoyed this Seven more than many others cars this year with hundreds more horsepower. But it unequivocally proved that the lovely Super 1600 was the finest exponent of this approach, perfectly balancing accessible performance with the Revival racer vibe. Which makes it all the more galling that they’re no longer on sale. If this is the kind of Seven you want, grabbing a lightly used 1600 feels the best way to do it - skipping the queue in the process. The 2000 is an intriguing concept, but ultimately it feels like engine and chassis are better matched in other Sevens. 


SPECIFICATION | CATERHAM SEVEN SUPER 2000

Engine: 1,999cc 4-cylTransmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drivePower (hp): 183@7,300rpmTorque (lb ft):143@6,100rpm0-60mph: 4.8secTop speed: 130mph Weight: 560kgMPG: N/ACO2: N/APrice: from £39,990 

Author
Discussion

Slowlygettingit

Original Poster:

947 posts

71 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
Never really liked the looks of the seven - so never driven one. And never bought in to the concept.
Never driven a seven so never forgiven it’s funny looks or bought into the concept.

Repeat.


Pflanzgarten

7,695 posts

55 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
Same as in the previous 3 cylinder article, the price of them now shows them up.

I know plenty of people spend plenty more on Morgans.

To get the three cylinder to anything nice in spec you’re approaching £40k and this is going to be heading on to £50k.

Yet the classifieds always have a few Sprints between £25k to £30k with a couple of thousand miles on them-I don’t get it?

Kipsrs

721 posts

79 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
Like the first poster, only difference is, I have driven a Caterham on a timed slalom and hated every second of it, I think it must be a marmite thing. . . You either get em or hate em.

Global Nomad

105 posts

111 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
only time i have been in one is 30 years or so ago when i went on a test drive with my uncle....never forgotten the feeling of infective otherness and the smiles...so still there in the back of my mind as something i'd like to try again

Jon_S_Rally

4,501 posts

118 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
I think these "classic" looking Sevens are a bit of a weird one for me. Obviously it's part of their history and is the "proper" look for them in a way, but I just can't get into it. Give me one with proper cycle wings and carbon fibre bits any day of the week.

cerb4.5lee

45,039 posts

210 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
These have got too expensive for a back to basics sports car for me now. I did really enjoy the drive of the 1.8 K series version that I tried...so I can definitely see the appeal of them. They are certainly a bit marmite from a looks point of view though I reckon.

I'd add a Caterham of some description to my lottery win garage I think.

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
Love the look of these but 40k feels a lot 25K would be way more interesting

Chubbyross

5,008 posts

115 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
I hired a 360R a couple of months ago from Silverstone Caterham. Within minutes I knew I had to have one in my life. Three weeks later I took possession of a 420R. They’re amazing cars. It was like nothing I’d driven before: such a raw driving experience and a great ‘event’ every time I strapped myself in. I can see how they’re a Marmite car but if you haven’t driven one I’d seriously advise hiring one for a day or two and taking it somewhere with great roads.

parabolica

7,018 posts

214 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
LBW2020 said:
Love the look of these but 40k feels a lot 25K would be way more interesting
£40k is competitive given its direct competition. People seem to forget we live in a time where even a bog-standard Fiesta starts at £19k rrp with the top spec reaching £30k with all the options.

Bobby Lee

308 posts

85 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
Kipsrs said:
Like the first poster, only difference is, I have driven a Caterham on a timed slalom and hated every second of it, I think it must be a marmite thing. . . You either get em or hate em.
Did you make a bit of a hash of it? It’s okay, it just takes some practice.

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,778 posts

128 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
I've driven them a few times. I can see why people would buy these as a track car, but too compromised for the road, so don't really understand the wood trim and leather

If I was going to go down the route of looking for a second or third "raw" road car, I think I would go for an Elise instead. A little less raw and a lot more modern.

jackbarclay

55 posts

208 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
Don't you need to design some smaller arches if you're going to fit smaller wheels? Looks a bit silly at the back.

Snubs

1,432 posts

169 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
I've only driven Caterhams on track including one with around 250bhp and it was a feasome, very intense thing to drive even around a circuit. The thought that you can buy roadgoing ones with 310bhp beggars belief...

As for this one, I get the retro wood dash and retro chrome dials, but those big black plastic switches just make it look like a half hearted job to me. I'm sure designing new switchgear is an expensive game to play, but there must have been a better off the shelf option than those, surely?

Bushi

484 posts

223 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
I fancy a self build low power version of these.
Always have, now got the spare £ and the time and space.
Been trying for a while to get a test drive just to see if the reality matches my plans.
Had phone calls, emails, just ignored now... understand there is a wait list, but It's a shame, knocks the experience a little.

MDifficult

2,850 posts

215 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
I sort-of get this car with the little three cylinder... a relaxed reminder of simpler times for people cashing out a bit of their pension to spend a few quid on without the risk of breaking a hip.

But this is big performance, and big money, in a car that still looks horrifically antiquated (rather than retro). While I'm sure that was funny in the Caterham product planning meeting, who exactly is this car actually for?

The huge 'I like to go really fast while looking like a retired doctor who built his car out of MGB offcuts' demographic?

satfinal

2,625 posts

192 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
I understand that it might be totally in-line with modern day price rises and inflation, but maybe through no fault of their own, these cars just aren't that appealing at that price.

smilo996

3,869 posts

200 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
Slowlygettingit said:
Never really liked the looks of the seven - so never driven one. And never bought in to the concept.
Never driven a seven so never forgiven it’s funny looks or bought into the concept.

Repeat.
Drive one and then it will all make sense. Difficult to have more fun on four wheels. Unless you prefer a massive V8 coffee holder in which case theere is nothing to rescue you.

smilo996

3,869 posts

200 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
A Mini Morgan which, when looked at in this way is pretty cheap. But it does seem to get away from the ethos of the 7 and it's evergreen appeal. Expanding the appeal can only be a good thing.
In absolute and pound per smile, there is nothing else that provides more four wheel fun.

Gemaeden

304 posts

145 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
smilo996 said:
...there is nothing else that provides more four wheel fun.
Apart from a hospital bed and a bevy of obliging nurses.

Speedgirl

291 posts

197 months

Monday 10th October 2022
quotequote all
These are wonderful cars, crude, uncomfortable, noisy but wonderful. Quick and feel quicker. But if you fancy one think about what you’re going to do with it. Caterham Racing is more like Dodgeball and a lady a work killed herself doing it, and they are fair weather road cars unless you deffo not a Schneeflocke. I was up an Alp once exploring in a Cayman feeling fairly pleased with myself, when the German Caterham Club turned up, about 20, ripping through the slush, wrapped up warm, with all the camping gear stowed all over the place. That’s how to do it I thought. This nice retro one would be very good for polishing.
hehe