RE: Kamm 912c | PH Review
RE: Kamm 912c | PH Review
Thursday 13th October 2022

Kamm 912c | PH Review

Newcomer Kamm has its work cut out in a busy Porsche restomod market - can four cylinders distinguish it?


You’d like Miki Kazmer. By profession he’s a film producer, but his true passion has always been for cars, ever since helping out at a local garage as a lad. He used to race a 911, he still does compete with an E30 325i, and he tows the 912c with a Disco 4. He gets it.  

His idea for the 912c is a very simple one. Miki is not from a mechanical or engineering background, so this vision of an ultimate 912 could look like is not one man’s labour of love over many years. Well, it is, but it has involved the expertise of many different people to ensure only the very best bits made the cut. If you’ll excuse the predictable analogy, this is Miki’s four-wheeled blockbuster; the producer doesn’t write, act and direct, instead they recruit the best people in all those jobs to make sure the project is as good as it possibly can be. That’s what the 912c aims to be in four-cylinder Porsche form. It’s exactly the car Miki wanted to create, even down to certain bits - the carbon bodywork and the bespoke cooling, most notably - that the experts said couldn’t be done.  

It’s absolutely stunning up close, too, even as a prototype. We’ve almost become blasé about how pretty these early, narrow-body cars can be, and the Kamm interpretation is a wonderful reminder of just how right it was. Though inspiration was taken from the 911 R and more weight could come out in future (even from the current, incredible 760kg wet), the 912c retains enough of the original details to ensure that you think of it as an old Porsche first - not a carbon bodied ground-up rebuild. Note the original headlights, the chrome, and the quarter windows, for example. It’s all beautifully done. They’re what you clock first, and that perfect silhouette, before the flashes of the carbon for this example, the semi-slick Yokohamas and the harnesses. That feels like how it should be, though of course a car can be built to the customer’s specification. This one, by Miki’s admission, is a little too racy for the moment for regular road use, with plans for a longer fifth gear and softer setup. But you’d never pass up a go in something that looks this right. The number 68, in case you were wondering, is for the 1968 model year, as that’s Miki’s favourite for the 912; it means five dials instead of three, and he prefers the dash. Miki really, really loves the 912.  

Which makes the prospect of experiencing it even more terrifying. Because on top of the jeopardy that comes with driving the prototype of a car set to cost the best part of £300k, there’s the fact this is still a 60s’ Porsche to some extent. The four-cylinder might be lighter than a six, but it’s still out behind, on top of a torsion bar rear end; the wheelbase is very short, the steering is unassisted yet very fast (1.7 turns lock to lock) and the gearbox has a dog-leg first. Also, I don’t really fit in it - and the 912 is left-hand drive. There’s always pressure when driving a car that means so much to someone; multiple that by ten times when they’re watching you pull away.  

Accordingly, the first few minutes are tense. The pedals are heavy, the steering is heavy but very immediate and the set-up is so aggressive that the 912 finds imperfections everywhere. It doesn’t so much demand attention as wrench every bit of awareness from you, all the time. Any notion of this being a dainty and delicate classic is long gone by third gear.  

However, it doesn’t take long to adjust to what’s going on, adapt your style and appreciate just the quality of the work here. In a world where the act of operating a car has been reduced to almost nothing, it’s always a shock when so much effort is required. Especially with legs splayed akimbo. But be in no doubt - the rewards are worth the effort. The Kamm 912c is a physical, demanding, raw thing to drive; never have I been so enamoured by a car having not breached 65mph. As speed is easier to access than ever nowadays and thrills in precious short supply as a result, the joy of something this intense - yet built to a wonderful standard - absolutely skyrockets.  

The engine is a masterpiece. Though derived from the 1.6-litre original, it’s been taken to 2.0-litres by Swiss specialists JPS Aircooled. On paper, 170hp doesn’t look a great deal, but then it’s not moving very much. In fact, there’s so much torque it can actually roll around on very few revs at all. But you’ll want revs, of course, and you get them anyway with ratios this short. Perhaps the best thing to say about the flat-four’s sound and performance is that there was never a point in our time together where anything more was craved. The 912 rasps, snarls and barks like the very best four-pots, delivering power all the way through the rev range. You could sacrifice some torque for a wilder top end, though this feels like a really nice compromise for the moment. And even if you aren’t going fast, the 912 feels it, which is preferable to speed that sneaks up on you.   

The gearbox is dreamy, too, precise and satisfying in an unfamiliar fashion for old Porsches. First to second needs patience, but the second-to-third up-and-down that makes dog-legs so entertaining on a road drive is fantastic. Real effort has been put into ensuring the driver’s relationship to the gearstick is right, that the shift is good and the gearbox itself is tough enough, and it really shows. As a reminder of the pleasure to be derived from engines and gearboxes, you’ll not find much better.  

Even if this was not an on-limit assessment of the 912c, plainly, there is plenty to be encouraged by. It’s light and tiny, which pays endless dividends on British roads, yet it feels like a stiff structure as well. There’s not the feeling of vulnerability that there often is in older cars. Furthermore, because you’re so overwhelmed with feedback, what the 912c is doing is never in any doubt. In this configuration what it’s doing is fidgeting quite a lot, so you’ll certainly not want for something to do - but it’s an absorbing experience, and works best with firm, deliberate inputs.

Again, going against classic car tradition (but very much to the restomod rule book), the 912c feels better the faster and harder it’s driven. The great bits include the brakes and the steering that, if never losing its weight, does become more enjoyable with some speed and readjustment. More broadly, and perhaps predictably, the car is especially brilliant when it all comes together: getting the downshift perfect, judging an apex right, picking up the throttle to feel the diff redouble its efforts and drive you away is as good here as anywhere. Crucially, that initial intimidation becomes total immersion; the more you learn, the more the car makes sense. It must be an absolute blast on a track, and not many old cars give that impression. With a slightly less focused configuration, it promises to be a really sweet road car as well. The balance between performance, size, weight and grip already feels spot on.  

So while it might be a familiar template, bringing together such beautiful details - just look at that pedal box! - with a totally enthralling drive ensures the Kamm 912c isn’t far from the restomod ideal. Additionally, the choice of a four-cylinder engine (and a brilliant one at that) ensures it stands out in what is already a busy little niche of old Porsches made great. Granted, there’s still some fine-tuning to do before it can claim to work flawlessly on UK roads, but it’s beautifully built, stunning to look at and, if nothing else, truly unforgettable to drive. Can’t ask for much more than that. 


SPECIFICATION | KAMM 912C

Engine: 2.0-litre flat-fourTransmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drivePower (hp): 170Torque (lb ft): N/A0-62mph: c. 6 secondsTop speed: N/AWeight: 760kg (with fluids)MPG: N/ACO2: N/APrice: from €325,000 (currently £288,000)

Author
Discussion

Stewedapple

Original Poster:

16 posts

59 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
Much want…

Dale487

1,469 posts

153 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
I saw it at this Sunday’s Bicester Scramble & it’s stunning and pottering around sounded really good.

I’d have one over a Singer (this week, I might change my mind)

TGCOTF-dewey

7,956 posts

85 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
Those harnesses are lethal. Needs a harness bar.

Nice car though.

Jon_S_Rally

4,504 posts

118 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
I'm not going to claim that I would have this over a Singer, but I do feel a huge amount of curiousity about it. It will never happen of course, but it's one of those cars that I just feel that I really need to drive. I'm not even sure if I would like it, but it sounds like it would be raw and visceral and just a generally thrilling experience.

I'm sure the usual suspects will be along shortly to moan about the price, or the fact it's ANOTHER 911 on PH, but I think it more than deserves its place on the site. People complain endlessly about how heavy cars are, and how unengaging they are. This sounds like a total antidote to all of that.

Harrypop

2,611 posts

152 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
I prefer these more dainty, slim bodied cars to the voluptuous, wide bodied versions which a lot of others utilise but I'd be happy with either.

chazwozza

990 posts

216 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
Lovely, nice to see something without 500bhp that weighs too much. Love lightweight chuckable cars with usable levels of power, not that I could ever afford this. Back to my Mx5 I go...!

Chaz

86wasagoodyear

997 posts

126 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
Tremendous. Yes please.

Chunkychucky

6,094 posts

199 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
Some of the 911 'restomods' take the piss, but £300k for a Beetle?! rofl We've peaked.

dinkel

27,836 posts

288 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
A lot of 912s are butchered and transformed into six pot Outlaws.
In standard guise a 912 is so balanced and relaxed. I prefer it to a two litre six.

Speedgirl

291 posts

197 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
I think PH needs to pace itself with these „beetles“. Feast or famine it is. This car is nice especially the colour, and that it’s a 912 underneath. I wonder if there’s any money in doing these things without making them as expensive as possible. Bespoke carbon bits and bobs. Why. Not necessary and doesn’t make it look better.

Dombilano

1,465 posts

85 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
The older I get, the lighter I want a car to be, not sure how many crash regs this would pass though (or as low volume does it circumnavigate it)

Glad it exists, very pretty car

Maccmike8

1,612 posts

84 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
Fabulous.

Jon_S_Rally

4,504 posts

118 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
Dombilano said:
The older I get, the lighter I want a car to be, not sure how many crash regs this would pass though (or as low volume does it circumnavigate it)

Glad it exists, very pretty car
Crash regs aren't really relevant I wouldn't have thought. Firstly, because it's a '60s car, it's a deathtrap anyway (by relative standards at least). Second, it's a modified car, not a brand new car, so volume doesn't really matter. It doesn't sound like they're building brand new cars, just taking old ones and modifying them.

Iamnotkloot

1,917 posts

177 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
The price, no flat-six, and it’s just a ‘beetle’…..
I think it’s superb; it looks like they’ve got the four to sound great. It’s got sensible gear ratios. It weighs a quarter of a modern SUV and looks cool.
It’s a winner.

Chubbyross

5,008 posts

115 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
That’s only 200kg more than a Caterham. It’s a stunning car. And those pedals…oof!

I’d have that over a Singer every time. Much more true to the original.

DodgyGeezer

49,162 posts

220 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
Pistonheads? Seems to be more like Porscheheads - another week another Porsche, it's verging on tiresome. I'll agree that the it seems very well done but is it really anything we've not seen numerous times before and at a similar pricepoint

bluesierra

160 posts

126 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
DodgyGeezer said:
Pistonheads? Seems to be more like Porscheheads - another week another Porsche, it's verging on tiresome. I'll agree that the it seems very well done but is it really anything we've not seen numerous times before and at a similar pricepoint
Another day, another Porsche restomod. PH definitely isn't as bad as some in dribbling over every single unobtanium Porsche fanboy project, and it does just feel like unfortunate timing that this and the Theon were covered so close together. And both this and the Theon feel more interesting than the latest Singer spunkfest.
But really can't the motoring journalism industry as a whole just get a grip. Yes, they're old Porsches. Yes, they're nicely done up. No, you can't afford one; and no, they're not hugely relevant to 99% of your readers.
And hey, if Porsche restomods are all so amazeballs, where's the coverage of the latest and greatest Ruf??

LordHaveMurci

12,338 posts

199 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
DodgyGeezer said:
Pistonheads? Seems to be more like Porscheheads - another week another Porsche, it's verging on tiresome. I'll agree that the it seems very well done but is it really anything we've not seen numerous times before and at a similar pricepoint
As tiresome as these posts?

What other cars are worth resto modding?

Very few are worth enough to spend the money on, people are afraid to touch a Ferrari so that leaves Porsche really.

I’d rather read about these than some goppingly ugly BMW or the newest white goods utility BEV.

Sevenman

764 posts

222 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
DodgyGeezer said:
Pistonheads? Seems to be more like Porscheheads - another week another Porsche, it's verging on tiresome. I'll agree that the it seems very well done but is it really anything we've not seen numerous times before and at a similar pricepoint
It's ok. When TVR start manufacturing huge numbers of cars, including a best-selling electric SUV (it's what we all want!), this can return to being a TVR site smile

esotericar

745 posts

57 months

Thursday 13th October 2022
quotequote all
Maybe I'm totally missing the point, but seems like you'd need to be pathologically contrary to spend £300k on a four-pot 911. With the best will in the world, this exact car but with a flat six surely is going to sound better and go better.

You could argue the weight distribution and balance will be better with the shorter, lighter four banger. But then if you want better / more neutral balance, what the hell are you doing spending £300k on an old Porsche with its engine in completely the 'wrong' place?

The flat-six restomod has obviously been done to death, but can't see how that's a good reason to reject a nicer engine.